₦airaland Forum

L

T

I

N

Nomski0: Its official! Borussia Dortmund is officially the most foolish club in the Bundesliga! How dare they? How dare they sell Lewandowski after selling Gotze? What the hell?
Selling their number 9 and 10 in less than 6months?

Let them just sell Royce so that we'll be sure that they'll never smell Champions league.

BTW I HATE BAYERN MUNICH

Lol. . . Calm down missy. They didn't sell Lewy, they simply played hardball and let his contract run out, hence he's a free agent.

Bayern and their useless league are still a pile of shït though.

ritchboy: Inbreeding, lobotomies, inc[color=#000000]e[/color]st, violent deaths, sodomy bla bla bla, your lines are predictable and redundant.

But these are the unfortunate circumstances through which you were birthed and the vices that hold sway in your cursed lineage. I am drumming these into your psyche so you can be aware of the squalor you were born into, perhaps the ugly the trend can be bucked in your generation.

No need to publicize the hallmarks of your family, just tell us the "European football sanctuaries" Mourinho's Porto "desecrated".

That you still think Porto, FC Porto won the CL in 2004 because of "luck of the draw" shows how recalcitrant a cöck you are.

Coogar, Roma ain't top of jack! They trail Juve by 5 points!

ritchboy: Just admit you had no idea what you were talking about and we can call it a day

You'd have to admit you were concieved through inbreeding first then I can offer you the olive branch of euthanasia rather than a certain violent death.

ritchboy: Cop-out of what? A tortuous debate with a half-witted internet gangsta who thinks Mourinho "desecrated European football sanctuaries en route to lifting the CL with Porto."?

Stop reaching you pansy!

Actually, Porto streamrolled the Asec Mimosas, Ashanti Kotokos, Amazulus, Eyimbas and other African teams of this world enroute to lifting the UEFA CL.

Stick to bïtching negrito.

ritchboy: I just remembered Nitlad is a world renowned halfwit. Apologies to all for quoting him and making you waste time replying.

Great cop-out. . . You may now go and die miserably like you were destined to.

Can't do screenshots now, so peruse this. . .

www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/inter-milan/transfers-alle/verein_46.html

Also, apart from Inter's limited finances, they had to sell to be able to afford those budget buys.

Infact, in 2009/2010 when they spent in excess £80m they made close to £100m themselves in sales. In other words, Inter didn't have shingbain to spend, they sold and sold and sold including their best player -Zlatan- before they could raise the coins they spent.

Can the same be said of Chelsea and Madrid? When last was any of these two's tranfer dealings been in the green?

Just putting things in perspective. . .

dayokanu: Compare it to other clubs. How many clubs in Europe would spend 130m over 2 seasons and still call it a budget job?

We are talking about Mourinho, and his spendings at his various clubs. And it has been laid bare that he has achieved more at clubs where he has had less to spend.

GustavoFring: Comparing what he spent at inter to what he could 'afford' is a fraudulent exercise as I don't believe you are privy to the limits established by the board at Inter or any of the other clubs.

In any case, a better comparison would be Jose's net spend at Inter compared to other Serie A clubs at the time...

The Serie A was Inter's to lose before and during Mourinho's tenure. They won 5 in a row!

The priority was Europe, which then leads us back to how much Chelsea had to spend before we eventually captured the 'Holy Grail' and how much Madrid have spent in pursuit of the elusive La Decima.

You will agree with me that whatever he spent at Inter na coins beside wetin these two spent.

I reiterate, he didn't spend much to become immortal at Inter and Porto.

GustavoFring: 135 mill over 2 years is a budget job?

I fear your extravagance...

Yes it is in comparison to the relentless spending he could afford at Chelsea and Madrid.

nateevs: Inter Milan's spending, £53m in 08/09 and £82m in 09/10 says you are wrong.

This is a miserly % of what he had to spend at Chelsea. So I insist, he didn't have the cash to splash, neither did he "throw money at the problem".

Is it not an irony that JM's greater successes have come on budget jobs?

And where's the team he built only 3/4 years ago?

Mourinho's assignment at Inter was never to build a team to last a millenium, but to bring instant success, especially in Europe. This he did in spectacular fashion. Testament to this is the length of his contract in relation to the average age of the team then. He practically conquered Europe with a team of geriatrics, bargain buys and cast-aways like Eto'o and Sneijder. That is genius.

Plus like Ritchie said, check out the fixtures Porto en route the final.

Bitchboy is an idiöt, please don't reference him. . .

You can say that only with the benefit of hindsight. . . They were never the team to beat. Abi which of Porto's games were they favourites to win prior? Was it not after they had conquered all that gods were made out of their personnel - players and coach?

If to say na dem be Milan then ni, then you can talk about their 'easy fixtures', but they were Porto, freaking FC Porto! Their outlook prior to every game then is the same as it is now - unfancied. They conquered against the odds!

ritchboy: Nonsense... Which grounds were desecrated? Porto's UCL win is a classic example of "luck of the draw", United were the only decent side they faced and they needed help from the officials to progress.

You are a fool. . . You call Porto winning the CL in the 2004 "luck of the draw" and Manure was the only decent side they faced?? Clearly, you are trolling. . .

Inter spent shitloads of money when JM was there...

So spending £135m in two years is shitloads compared to the hundreds of millions he had to spend at Chelsea or the limitless coffers at Madrid? You are out of your depth.

drollster: Then prove it.

Go and die!

Creamish: Iv got proof

How are you?

luxanne: Who are you?

luxanne: Never mentioned you

She's my cousin

luxanne: Really? He lied

I don't lie!

[quote author=ms_pee]Where is nitlad? [/quote]As you undrëss. . .

[quote author=ms_pee]Where is nitlad? [/quote]Peeping at you. . .

[quote author=ms_pee]Where is nitlad? [/quote]In your closet.

Creamish: Was wit me

'course I was.

luxanne: Stood me up

luxanne: How dare you?

Wetin I do?

luxanne: Mad @ Nitlad

Love you to. . .

Well, same here. . .

You miss me?

nateevs: Everyone refers to the Chelsea of yore but never remember to mention that along with that success came over £600m worth of non stop spending. JM will not achieve that without the spending.

Without spending huge
amounts, you will never win
anything.

Mourinho is not the culprit for Italy's bankruptcy, yet he took Inter to the highest peak possible in football. He didn't have hundreds of millions to spend before he desecrated European football sanctuaries en route to lifting the CL with Porto.

All the "JM gats spend plentiful to succeed" yarnings nor get footing cos Mourinho's greatest success came at Inter where greenbacks nor dey nyanfu nyanfu.

Goldenboy007: Ooooooh,its a polygamous marriage? sorry i withdraw my advice....No comment.

Your differences are irreconcilable, file for divorce!