₦airaland Forum

There are more beautiful and more booticlicious black woman in the USA yet for some stupid reason, successful black men seem to go for fake white ladies or asians.

That is simply the effect of brainwashing. . .

sweetpie23:
must African men are dumb and they don't know what they want.

Please subtract me from the list, cus i certainly know what i want . . . and i don't compromise. A natural lady is one of my first criteria. Cus my own idea about life is that is she is vain, we simply cannot get along . . . irrespective of whether or not she is miss solar system.

michelin89:
How come only men have been brainwashed by the so called Europeans, since the VAST MAJORITY of African women prefer dark skinned men, except rare exceptions?

Actually dark skinned men is the western idea . . . . tell me please . . . do you think tall dark and handsome came from within african culture or main stream media

[quote author=oyinda. link=topic=331471.msg4664744#msg4664744 date=1254667634]drrionelli,
you don't get the point do you  
we all have freedom of choice yes. duh  the point isn't about changing the freedom of choice. the point is about influencing how you make that choice.

you are making a height comparison. well on average men prefer women shorter than them. but also, on average, men have different heights so logically, one man's idea of shorter will be different from the next guy's.
your idea of tall for example will be different from your friend who is taller or shorter than you.
a tall guy will tend to be with a taller girl etc. with skin tone on the other hand, idea of light skin and dark skin ISN'T relative or differ from man to man.
the definition of light skin or dark skin isn't arbitrary as a matter of fact, there is a general consensus on what qualifies as light skin (rita dominic, beyonce etc) or dark skin (genevieve, jackie appiah etc).
and most men from pitch black to average black tend to prefer (what is generally classified as) light skin. not what is light skin relative to their own shade.


if you compared this to height (like you're trying to do), people will call it a fetish. it is not normal for a 5'10 guy to "prefer" a 6'5 girl. but it is very normal for a pitch black guy to prefer beyonce's shade. that is the norm and that is what the OP is referring to.

this type of overwhelming "preference" for light skin isn't natural, even though you are indeed free to choose what you want.

of course you won't base a relationship on your preference. but you will tend to pick your partner based on those preferences. that's why many african women bleach. and of course they will be bright and glowing for the first few years after they start bleaching and will attract many men. the ugly effects show up only a little bit later.

but this isn't just for african men though. they have the same problems in india. all their bollywood stars are fairer and most of their women consume lightening/bleaching products.
coincidence that most of africa and india are former european colonies.  

so the point is about influencing your preference. maybe if there is a different idea of what is considered beautiful, this unnatural preference will disappear.[/quote]@oyinda

it is not a coincidence . . . it is part of the effects of brainwashing, hence my own personal intention to make sure i have detoxicated a lot of the brainwashing from my system before i even start thinking of marriage.

Cus the truth is that its difficult for parents to teach a child what they themselves do not know or believe.

Its unfortunate, however being bombarded with imagery on television is part of the reason for the fair skinned preference of most black people.

iice:
[color=#9900ff]Eating and scaring people [/color]

someone is about to start putting on the [b]pound[/b]s . . . hope no be [b]pound[/b]ed yam u chop

@whitelexi

Okay i hear, just thought i should offer a friendly and necessary advise.

@amaka

I am not saying you are flirting, I am just pleading with you to consider that in case you want to flirt with whitelexi. You sometimes sound more matured than you look, hence it can be deceiving to those that do not know. And thus might get them in trouble.


@whitelexi

I am not saying you are flirting with amaka, i am just saying that you should be careful.

whitelexi:
Amaks, I got back from work to find another 6 on friday, yesterday i had a couple, and today i woke up and found one waiting there. . .  so i wont say its stopped

Okay no wahala . . .

na wa o whitelexi,

1. Even me i know that you are bad guy, hence am a little bit confused as to how you are still able to get so many hits on your YIM. I hope there is no one on nairaland amongst them hitting you up. Considering that you have been thoroughly exposed on nairaland.

2. Hence i really do not understand why ladies are still coming after you.

3. Be careful abeg cus AIDS is real.

4. Finally, whitelexi i would suggest that you try and make up with all those that you have offended on nairaland. its not good to be at war or loggerheads with people on nairaland. I personally make sure i make amends with people on nairaland even wen i know that they are at fault.
It does not matter whether you are at fault or not, just try and make amends. I am not saying that you should be in a relationship with anybody, i am just saying trying and at least let them know the relationship is not possible and that you just want to make sure you are not enemies.

Whitelexi abeg be careful o . . . amaka is too young o . . .

Amaka i am not saying it cus i dislike you, actually i do not, instead u have to understand that you are putting guys in nairaland in trouble wen u flirt with them, cus in reality they can't know how young u are. And you know that the law does not care about ignorance.

So i would advise you to save the guys from trouble by letting anyone who is trying to flirt with you to know your age upfront before you flirt with them.

Whitelexi . . . do you have a sister in leeds or something.

sjeezy8:
It can change by private industrial and manufacturing companies by Africans not foreign investors.  We are too dependent
on foreign goods.

The west and arabs and even china would never want that to happen.

Thus the only way forward is to have a national leader willing to sacrifise his or her life to make it happen.

I can guarantee you that the west or china or arabs or others would do their best to sabotage it and make sure it does not work.

China got to where it is today partly because of the dictatorial effect of communism that allowed them to kick out the west and stop their agents from infiltrating china.

Most African leaders are merely western pawns hence nothing of concrete in terms of development would ever happen, whether we like it or not . . . Africa would not move forward until we adopt the initial chinese policy of consuming only what we produce . . . so as to restrict the flow of cash to within the african continent.

I knew it was over wen she said the two things were fake . . .  . . . oops girl, i don't do fake  , infact i don't mind if they are size A so long as they are not fake. . .

ezeagu:
You replied with the outcomes of the problem, not the root of the problem itself, so who's fault do you think all that you listed is?

Nope read my response again . . .what is given is not the outcome . . .

Definition of an outcome is the symptom of an action done by someonee or something (root cause of the action):

Thus in response to your question:

Outcome:

1.Corupption
2. Waste of resources
3. Underdevelopment.



Root Causes:

1. That is how Africa has been designed to function by the west .i.e you cannot plant corn and expect to harvest yam.
2. CIA has always being installing puppet leaders in africa (according to their design) so that african resources can be plundered.
3. Africa had independence but was never independent.
4. Most African leaders that have tried to change the design and control of Africa by the West have either being killed or villified as criminals (which some are) and their countries slammed with illegal sanctions e.g. Zimbabwe

noetic15:
and what is the finding of your "research" ?

I did not do any research.

RNKJV
------------------------------------------
Genesis 10:2 The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.

Genesis 10:3 And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.

Genesis 10:4 And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim.

Genesis 10:5 By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.


1. Notice that only descendants of Japheth are referred to as Gentiles.
2. Notice the Ashkenaz people . . . ashkenazi jews et al . . . . . 

Problem

What about the Children of Ham . . . what happened to them and how are they described in the bible.

Wrong do research again . . . . . . i was also suprised wen i found out.

Can someone please provide a straight forward answer to this question . . .


Yes it is a trick question, so please consider it properly before answering.

Kunbee:
The conception of Jesus Christ

Wrong . . . go back and do your research and come back to answer the question . . .better still go and ask any catholic truthful enough to tell you the truth about what it really means. . .  .

Hint: It has to do about giving birth but not about the Messiah.

Ignorance being displayed here is astounding . . . I would suggest that people try to understand the proper use of english.

No sea creature was taken into the ark.

Hence there was no need for Noah to take a whale into the ark . . .

kolaxy:
Common sense alone would dictate that Noah was not required to do so, since such creatures already were accustomed to living in water.

God therefore limited “all flesh” by specifying three categories: (1) birds; (or fowl); (2) cattle; and (3) creeping things.

God’s command to Noah in Genesis 6:19-20 was that “a male and female of all kinds of animals that could not live in the waters [were] to be brought into the ark”

Furthermore, Genesis 7:21-22 records: “All flesh died that moved upon the earth, both birds, and cattle, and[b] beasts[/b], and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: all in whose nostrils was the breath of the spirit of life, of all that was on the dry land, died”

See clearly that it was only animals living on the land that were taking into the ark . . .

Can someone please go back to the bible and quote for me where Noah was directed to save Sea Creatures . . .


Yes you hate the bible.
Yes you hate the idea that things were created and not that you evolved from a monkey.
At least try and do it with dignity and truth and not with falsehood.

Can someone please explain to me . . .

ezeagu:
Who's fault do you think that is?

here is ur answer

No2Atheism:
1. even nigeria does not know how much oil is being exported talkless of less developed african countries.
2. CIA has always being installing puppet leaders in africa so that african resources can be plundered.
3. Africa had independence but was never independent.
4. Corruption is prevalent in Africa because the West benefits from money stolen from Africa and banked in the West.

What people do not realise is that even if African leaders are corrupt, if the amount of African money stolen and banked in the West is instead kept in African banks, there would be more development in Africa.

Hence from technical point of view, corruption is part of the problem and so is capital flight.

Arab countries are also corrupt, however the difference is that there is not much capital flight over there.