₦airaland Forum

Tinkuzia:
Am also faced same but took treatment and became safe.

docjosh:
it is normal as it happens to evryone sooo no p.all body parts dat are in two's are only homogenous replicate

Legbo6:
B4 anybody condemn one book or d oda, dt s Qur'an or Bible, try nd knw much 2 back up ur stands, i noticed from Bible JESUS declared abt coming of someone, good Christians will nt dispute massage of MUHAMMAD, cos even in Qur'an D same MUHAMMAD talked abt birth of JESUS CHRIST, if any Christian disagreed wt d massage of MUHAMMAD, then brother tell us d who JESUS speaks abt his coming, if d person yet 2 come or wat? B4 u speaks bad abt someone try knw d person inside out.
i stayed very closed 2 Muslims nd they cn nvr talked bad abt Christianity bt we d Christians xpecialy those i call CHURCH gowers jucking mouth saying bad abt MUSLIMS, 2 bad

urahara:
I bother about the bible because bible believers exist and i am surrounded by them.

ItuExchange:
In the past, and in recent times, Christians have been slain by religious fanatics.

Many Christians have been praying and worshipping the Lord for many years, but remain in their problems, mostly financial.

Last year, a faithful elderly Christian, who’s served the Lord for many years lost his daughter in a fatal motor accident as she was returning from a night vigil, not from a club or party.

There are other Christians who suffer one heartache or another in various ways. While many church leaders are preaching a problem-free Christian life nowadays, we know that the reality is different.

But why do Christians suffer?

Neteller here: www..com.ng

omadaa:
Linda Ikeji dey fear ....why Don Jazzy no go report Olamide. She is stretching the matter more than necessary and I think she should just let sleeping dogs lie. We all know it is an empty threat....if wizkid actually goes on to do that we all know what effect it would have on his image and career. So Linda Ikeji should just face her mansion and blog and stop interfering in the private lives of others....Abi how did d news of his eviction help ease fuel crises

cloudgoddess:
Wow, did you even read anything I replied in the other thread? I refuted over half of these points in my response to you yet you still post this. Did you attempt to comprehend what I typed there or did i just waste my time?

And the site title is "Eternal Perspective Ministries", go figure. Interesting how the only websites writing these confused displays of ignorance are always Christian websites. Never actual science websites like NASA, National Academy of Sciences, Harvard, Cambridge Biology Department, etc. This is like a Muslim sending you a web page called "Praise Allah" explaining why Jesus wasn't the son of God. It's a clearly biased, religiously motivated source with no credibility in the science world.

Can you bring an actual, reputable science website with actual research studies pointing out actual flaws in the actual premises of evolution? Not lazy creationist propaganda pages written by religious zealots who are just as uninformed as you are of what evolution is in the first place?

Buharism:
The quran is dating back to the period of religious unrest around the world, when warefare was part of every religion but unfortunately other religions edited their religious books to reflect that their was no more need for warfare, bt islam is lacking behind due to their inability to change their own to reflect the current state of religious peace in the world.
.
Do u knw that nobody can adhere completely to rules and laws of their religion? The laws were accumulated ovèrtime and are hard to follow due to western civilization now, it is nw left for people to choose those they think are needed in the society.

cloudgoddess:
What study are you referring to? Post the link.

Given the fundamental misunderstandings you displayed in your prior post, I can't help but be doubtful that you correctly understood the premise of the study or what it was out to achieve. Evolutionary "leaps" are not proposed to occur in a single generation, and abnormal development is an expected result of radiation-induced mutations - the theory doesn't claim otherwise.

Visitor700:
To believe and obey Allah and His messenger.

[size=15]"Believe in Allah and His Messenger, the unlettered Prophet who believes in Allah and His words. Follow him, perhaps you will be guided."
(Qur'an 7:157)[/size]

Buharism:
Hahaha.
The jizya only exist in an islamic state. but you will agree with me that not all islam followers spread hate speech against christians, some even attend christian schools, and associate well with christians,
.
1 billion peaceful muslems cant be judged by the actions of around 100 million violent ones who only follow the violent part of their law.

Annunaki:
Thankfully those 1 billion peaceful muslims are not following the true teachings of islam and they are considered as fakes by their more devoted counterparts. A religion is evaluated by the teachings and examples of it's founder as documented in their holy books. Unfortunately in islam, they have extremely very poor examples and teachings.

cloudgoddess:
Well for one, there are a lot of false misconceptions about evolution in your post. And because your questions are based off of those misconceptions, they don't actually make much sense. I'll go one by one.

for example, why did evolution come to a stop with man. after several centuries, why didnt we keep evolving and evolving to more superior organisms.
Evolution has not come to a stop, nor will it until all life dies out. Every population of every species on earth is still evolving - it's an ongoing process involving tiny changes in the genetic material of populations generation after generation, which leads to large changes over large expanses of time (as in, millions of years for certain species - certainly not hundreds).

"Superior" is a meaningless term when comparing species with different biological niches. Evolution acts on organisms based on their environments, so the evolutionary fitness of organisms can only be measured in the context of their specific environment. If you placed a human being in a lion's den or a killer whale territory, you will quickly see that we are NOT superior to those creatures, just different. They have exactly the necessary features to survive in the environments they are presently home to, therefore they have achieved just as much evolutionary success as we have.

after several years of chimpanzees existing, why hasn't any one of them or any other animal for that matter, evolved to a human or a more complex entity respectively.
Again, this comment is based off the false assumption that humans are somehow the apex of evolution. We are not. Many animals have all sorts of features that humans lack - stronger sense of hearing, sight, and smell. Quicker reflexes, faster speed, specialized limbs & digestive systems.
Our pre-frontal cortex, the part of our brains that allows us to do all of the complex human behaviors that make us so "special", is really the only part of us that distinguishes us so much from other animals. Harm that area and people can quickly revert to very primal ways of behavior - no different than our closest living evolutionary relatives (chimpanzees & bonobos), or our less neurologically developed Homo ancestors (like Homo erectus, Homo habilis, etc).

this evolution you speak of has remained as a theory since the 1800's when it was proposed till date of which we have had enormous leaps in science and technology since then.
This statement stems from a misunderstanding of the meaning of the word theory in the context of science, versus the layman's meaning. In science, a theory is a thoroughly supported description of a body of facts - not a guess about what might have happened. An article from the National Acadamies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine sums it up nicely. Feel free to only read the bolded.


it stands to reason that with our technological prowess, after all that time, this scientist should be able to replicate what their theory states in the lab or in nature in order to remove all doubt.
And they have. Populations of E.coli bacteria and Drosophila flies have been observed to evolve new alleles in their DNA & thus new phenotypic traits after several generations of testing. Drosophila specifically were evolved to the point of genetic isolation - the marker that determines when a population has undergone speciation.

I don't expect you to have seen this research though, because it is likely (especially given your other misunderstandings, which very basic reading on evolutionary science would have eliminated) that you have only ever sought out [apparently false] information to reinforce your biases against evolution, rather than learn about the mountains of evidence that support it - or even the basic premises of the theory itself.

its good u have knowledge about evolution and DNA similarities, but it would also enlighten you more to study and see how almost impossible it is for those light differences between species (that have look-alike DNAs) to transform and bridge the gap of those dissimilarities for e.g chimpanzee to man.
Another misconception - Chimpanzees did not evolve into man. Man and chimpanzee share a common ancestor, which gave rise to multiple species over time - think of a cluster of tree branches with the same root, but different endings.

And the obvious dissimilarities between chimps & man are mostly caused by changes in regulatory genes. Chimp DNA has genes turning certain features 'on', which for us are turned 'off', and vise versa. Chimps & humans share over 98% of their DNA, nucleotide by nucleotide (that is very far from a "light similarity" ) and the differences we do see in our genomes are precisely those that would be expected after 5 million years of genetic divergence & isolation.

the evolution theory assumes that life appeared spontaneously and began to transform itself slowly. thats absurd and requires a lot of faith to believe dear
Evolution assumes nothing about the origin of life, actually. Another example of your comments being based on false premises.

ABIOGENESIS exclusively describes how the first primitive forms of life first arose on earth. Evolution EXCLUSIVELY describes the process by which life diversified into the millions of species we see today. They simply aren't the same study.

sonofthunder:
tis a controversial topic

olasesi:
I don't know. And the specific number of the laws isn't a popular subject as are the laws. And if it's based only on the Qur'an, then their numbers are far less than the christian laws. Perhaps in the forty's, or even less.

olasesi:
That you keep up with his rules and regulations.

sonofthunder:
has the op been answered?

cloudgoddess:
Every species currently on earth is a product of the evolutionary processes that have been acting on it for many, many years. The process is ongoing, it will never stop until all life on earth dies out. It is happening right now for every species each generation.

It would be impossible to directly observe significant changes in allele frequencies in most non-microbial species (lions, elephants, dogs) because their generation times are way too long - major evolutionary changes typically take hundreds to thousands of generations, before any person could observe that, they would be dead long since.

However evolution is directly observed with fruit flies (usually drosophila melanogaster) and bacteria (usually e. coli) in biology labs across the world; since those species have short generation times (20 minutes for e.coli, 7 days for drosophila) and their DNA is easy to sequence (simplier organisms = less DNA). The organisms are allowed to reproduce for many, many generations, then their DNA is examined for the expected changes.

cloudgoddess:
I'm curious about how people who reject evolution would explain the more specific observations in nature that seem to support an evolutionary model. For example:

1. Why are the DNA sequences between species like, say, the chimpanzee and the human, or the bird and the dinosaur, so similar, if those organisms are not related? Wouldn't you expect to see completely random and dissimilar DNA sequences between all species if they shared no genetic relationship?

2. Why are simpler life forms consistently found in lower rock layers than their theorized present-day evolutionary descendents? Shouldn't we find all life forms mixed in all rock layers, if new species did not arise over time?

3. Why do human fetuses grow a layer of fur during development, which sheds later on before birth? And why does this fur grow at the same point in development as Chimpanzee fetuses do? If there were no relationship between us, wouldn't we expect human fetuses to lack such a thing?

4. In the same vein, why do the fetuses of all members of the Chordata phylum all look so similar?

5. Why are there organisms like flesh-eating bacteria, and parasitic, eye-burrowing worms that hurt humans? If such harmful and disease-causing organisms did not arise out of evolutionary adaptation, then why would they be created?

I am genuinely curious about how one would explain these phenomena in a non-evolutionary framework.

philfearon:
When u pronounce "gods" or "Gods",do you put capital or small letter ""?

Buharism:
peacefulness and sacrifice are what Allah requires.

olasesi:
Submission to the Will of God

Heyleluh:
It is due to funny bone effect.

The "funny bone" got its nickname because of that funny feeling you get after you hit it. But your funny bone isn't actually a bone at all. Running down the inside part of your elbow is a nerve called the ulnar nerve. The ulnar nerve lets your brain know about feelings in your fourth and fifth fingers.