Ojikeebere12's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ojikeebere12's Profile › Ojikeebere12's Posts
A former state Publicity Secretary of the Edo State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Godwin Erhahon has warned the state governor, Godwin Obaseki, and his deputy, Philip Shaibu, to be wary of the fate of the candidate of the Action Alliance (AA) political party in Imo State, Uche Nwosu, in a recent Supreme Court judgment. He said Obaseki is surrounded by swindlers who are urging him and his deputy to continue to pursue their gubernatorial ambition on the ‘wonky, expired and empty platform of the PDP.’ Erhahon, a former Chairman of the Edo State Council of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), in a statement in Benin City, said the Supreme Court judgment in the case involving Nwosu, who participated in the party primary election of two different political parties in Imo, ought to have made Obaseki have a rethink because of the illegality of the action. ‘The apex court crafted the judgment so explicitly as if it was meant for the duo of the governor and his deputy to understand what fate awaits them in the state,’ Erhahon stated. ‘The Supreme court nullified Uche Nwosu nomination in AA on the account that he had contested for nomination under APC. ‘As if to explain itself further to the outgoing Governor, the Supreme Court elaborated on how the relevant law nullifies the PDP candidacy for their understanding when it elaborated thus: ‘The spirit of the law forbids anyone to contest for nomination under two or more parties in the same election or even start the process of being nominated by procuring the nomination form. How does Governor Obaseki hope to escape the last clause?, Erhahon queried. According to him, ‘the clause has rendered the expired PDP governorship ticket a counterfeit. Obaseki procured APC nomination form, filled and returned same and to crown it up, attended APC screening which he failed. By the clause under reference, the Supreme Court seems to have told Obaseki to stop wasting his time and resources. ‘So also does it sound a warning to Obaseki’s supporters that they are about burying themselves along with a dead body because they are blinded by temporary pecuniary sentiment. ‘Whoever is being deceived by his neighbour may survive but whoever deceives himself is on a suicide mission. Let’s watch and see where desperation, cantankerousness and sadism are leading Governor Obaseki to. Like the Benin elders would say “hasty wrestling and fatal fall go together”,’ Erhahon said. https://www.sunnewsonline.com/edo-guber-uche-nwosus-supreme-court-fate-awaits-obaseki-erhahon-warns/ |
*President’s proposals endorsed without room for debatehttps://thenationonlineng.net/apc-nwc-how-buhari-ambushed-nec-members/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
|
What is playing out in APC should worry every true Nigerian but instead some people are celebrating the temporary loss of power by a few without minding the long-run implications. For instance, should it not worry us the way our politicians have pocketed the Nigerian courts and Judiciary? From the CJN, Appeal Court President to the Chief Judge of Federal High Court? Whereby you can get any judgment you want depending on the interest at play. Only last week the new Appeal Court president that was just confirmed sat in the night to give a judgment suspending the APC chairman Adams Oshiomole as if that was condition for his confirmation. There is no point talking about our Security forces or the various court orders flying left, right and centre. If Nigerians are not concerned then we have a big problem in our hands because those who are celebrating at the moment may later cry and weep when they remember this day. For the opposition who are rejoicing at the top of their roofs, I laugh at them because they don't know what they are doing. The raw power being displayed by these people today will never allow them to smell power in 2023 because the people playing this script are not ready to relinquish power anytime soon. Recall this was how the opposition celebrated the killing of the card reader in 2016 when the Supreme Court failed to recognize it by giving it a legal backing in their judgment in Rivers, Akwa Ibom and Abia state governorship election petition. Today the same opposition is crying foul because they are now the worst hit since the same card reader has not been signed into law and I don't think it will ever be signed given disposition of the political actors who are playing this script today. |
Having scaled the screening of the Peoples’ Democratic Party, PDP, to contest for the party’s governorship ticket on June 25, Governor Godwin Obaseki of Edo State has fresh hurdles to scale in the party. The first is winning the party’s ticket, the second is getting majority of the PDP family in Edo to buy into his quest of running with his deputy, Philip Shaibu, while the third is to calm frayed nerves of some Edo PDP stakeholders who are bitter that Obaseki is pushing them aside and out of reckoning. Obaseki and Shaibu resigned from the All Progressives Congress, APC, after the governor was disqualified from the party’s governorship primary. He defected to the PDP on Friday and was granted waiver by the National Working Committee, NWC, to contest PDP’s primary after screening him on Saturday. However, reading meanings into Obaseki’s speech while defecting on Friday that he is now the leader of the PDP, some stakeholders said the comment was not discreet and has cast the governor as a dictator. This came as PDP governors and Obaseki Mandate Forum assured Obaseki, Shaibu and their supporters who joined the party on Friday, of accommodation and level playing field. The Governor Aminu Waziri Tambuwal-led PDP Governors’ Forum also wished Obaseki God’s blessings and guidance as he subjects himself to the forthcoming primary of the party. The PDP Governors Forum, in a statement by its Director-General, Hon. C.I.D. Maduabum, described Obaseki’s entry into PDP as a homecoming to a democratic platform that accommodates all Nigerians desirous of good governance, accountability and deepening of democratic tenets. “We welcome you to the PDP Governors’ Forum under the leadership of His Excellency, Rt. Hon Aminu Waziri Tambuwal, CFR and all other PDP Governors in the Forum. Your entry into the PDP family is a homecoming to a democratic platform that accommodates all Nigerians desirous of good governance, accountability and deepening of democratic tenets. “The PDP Governors welcome you to use the PDP as a vehicle to enthrone rapid economic, social and infrastructural development of Edo State. As you subject yourself to the forthcoming primaries of the party, we wish you success and God’s blessings and guidance. “The Forum extends the solidarity and support of your colleagues to you and all of your teeming followers into the party and assures you all of accommodation and level playing field,” the statement read In the same vein, the Obaseki Mandate Forum congratulated Obaseki and Shaibu for taking a bold step of quitting APC for the PDP. National chairman of the forum, Chief Nathaniel Momoh, said the group considered Obaseki’s defection as one “that was long in coming, following the poor handling of his aspiration by the Adams Oshiomhole-led APC. “We believe this is a positive step in the right direction and a clarion call on members of the forum to double our efforts to ensure his victory at the poll.” Disquiet over Obaseki’s defection However, some entrenched forces in Edo appear bitter over how Governor Obaseki was accepted into the party. Obaseki was received by Edo PDP Chairman, Dr Tony Aziegbemi, in a carnival-like atmosphere in Benin last Friday. Some members are claiming they were not carried along and have expressed reservations over how the defection happened, especially the governor’s remarks. After receiving the PDP membership form, Obaseki said: “I know that upon taking up membership of this party, I automatically become the leader of the party in the state. That is the constitution; I read it thoroughly last night (Thursday). “I want to assure all of you that I am prepared to provide leadership. I am prepared to provide a leadership that will lead this party to victory and I am prepared to provide a leadership that will not only put PDP in office in Edo State but as the ruling party in Edo State.”“One of the aggrieved stakeholders picked holes in the comment.““What he said was very revealing and disturbing. Who joins a party and automatically becomes the leader? Even if that is what will be, Obaseki should have been more discreet. It shows he is coming to the party to displace those who have worked for years to build the structure. “He is going to plant his people everywhere, thereby suffocating those who have toiled for the party even in opposition,” he lamented.“Another stakeholder added: “It is just about him and his ambition. It is not about the party structure. He simply wants to use our platform to fulfil his ambition and move on. This is a great danger that will boomerang for the party.” Fearing that the development might hurt existing cohesion in the PDP, which under the leadership of immediate past chairman, Dan Orbih, won four of the nine House of Representatives slots at the last National Assembly elections, two of the three senatorial seats and did well in the 2016 governorship poll, despite facing a ruling party with federal machinery, a stakeholder said it was not yet late to make amends. “So, to give Obaseki the impression he is coming to help us is false because if not for federal power, PDP routed APC in 2016. Rather, he is the one that needs us. The notion that he is a big fish is just nothing but guesswork,” he said. Indeed, PDP leaders and Obaseki are expected to ensure that the rough edges are smoothed as the growing disquiet may affect the party’s chances at the poll if long-standing members feel sidelined and unappreciated. Many of them, sources said, may not work for the PDP in the September 19 governorship poll. One of the party members said: “Our party feels we will just win by fielding Obaseki as a sitting governor but it is not true. Look, APC knew why they rejected him. He hasn’t sorted out his qualifications issue. Supposing he even manages to win, do you think the APC won’t cash in on that to file suits against him? Where will that leave us as party members and stakeholders?” No stepping down for Obaseki — Imasuangbon Indeed, one of the three PDP aspirants who will contest the party’s ticket with Obaseki, Mr. Kenneth Imasuangbon, weekend, agreed with the views of the aggrieved stakeholders and vowed not to step down for Obaseki Imasuangbon, who lost the 2016 APC ticket to Obaseki, told Vanguard on phone: “I cannot step down for Obaseki, he should be the one to step down for me. I am not going to step down for anybody. We have concluded congress before Obaseki came. “The action by those calling for a step down must be condemned by all; it is wicked and undemocratic. The military can’t do this; we don’t have democracy in Nigeria, what we have is autocracy. There is no morality in all this. He (Obaseki) can’t push my dream of 16 years away. Thank God for the position of Benin monarch, Oba Ewuare II, who said he needs peace to prevail and that there should be no godfatherism. “It is not about pressure but about doing the right thing in line with the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, due process and the Electoral Act. According to him: “It is disappointing and a big shame in Edo state and the entire nation and it portends danger for the country and the party. Nigerians should rise up against what is happening, we are not in the jungle, it is no do or die affair but about the process. It is totally unacceptable. https://www.vanguardngr.com/2020/06/obaseki-faces-fresh-hurdles-in-pdp-as-imasuangbon-vows-not-to-step-down/ |
BENIN monarch Omo N’Oba Nedo Uku Akpolokpolo Oba Ewuare II on Thursday stated his position on political developments in Edo State. He is opposed to imposition (consensus candidate) and god-fatherism, a statement from Benin Palace said. The statement, signed by Frank Irabor, Secretary to the Benin Traditional Council, said there was no truth in social media speculations that the royal father had prevailed on some governorship aspirants to step down for one of the aspirants in the upcoming shadow poll of a certain political party. The rescheduled primary of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) will hold on June 23, a day after that of the All Progressives Congress (APC). The statement said the monarch’s prayer had always been that “God and our ancestors should give us a governor that will accord respect to traditional institution, develop this state and, provide food on the table for the masses.” The statement warned against dragging the royal father into politics, insisted that the palace is werry of imposition of candidates. It reads: “HRM has said times without number that the palace of the Oba of Benin does not get involved in partisan politics… “The Omo N’¹Oba strongly advises that in order to eschew recurrent socio-political conflict that seems to constantly ravish the state, making Edo people a laughing stock to the rest of the country on how politicians manage the affairs of Edo people, our Edo political actors must eradicate the twin evil of political vices of godfatherism and consensus candidacy. The two practices seem antithetical to the very fundamental basis of democracy. “Let everybody take note that the palace is very weary of imposition of candidates, when only certain individuals want, but majority of the people do not want. ‘Ghana must go’ politics should end in the state. Politicians should stop cashing in on the poor masses and exploiting them for their votes. “We believe all qualified aspirants in any elective office should be given a level-playing field, for democracy to develop to the next level in Nigeria. Political actors should mature up and learn not to wash their dirty linen in public.” The Oba of Benin also admonished politicians, as they are preparing for their governorship primary elections, to exercise the highest standards of maturity and sportsmanship, stressing that the desire to bring about the best for the people of Edo State should not be compromised or sacrificed on the altar of intolerance, rumour mongering and fake news. The monarch reminded rumour mongers that there is an ancestral curse on anyone who attempt to tarnish the image of the Oba of Benin and the ancient throne of Benin Kingdom, which would normally be for their selfish ends.” https://thenationonlineng.net/my-position-on-edo-politics-by-oba-of-benin/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
|
Osagie Ize-Iyamu, governorship candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2016 Edo election, is set to emerge candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) for the September 19 poll. Ize-Iyamu, who lost to Godwin Obaseki, governor of Edo, four years ago, is believed to have the backing of Adams Oshiomhole, suspended national chairman of the ruling party. TheCable understands that Osaro Obazee, who contested a state assembly seat in 2019, and Pius Odubu, a former deputy governor of the state, have stepped down and endorsed Ize-Iyamu. Before endorsing Ize-Iyamu, they were the remaining two aspirants in the race for the party’s governorship ticket. Six aspirants had indicated interest in the June 22 governorship primary but only three were cleared. Obaseki, Chris Ogiemwonyi, a former minister, and Matthew Iduoriyekemwen, two-term majority leader at the Edo assembly, were screened out of the gubernatorial race. After his disqualification, Obaseki had resigned his membership of APC and held strategic meetings with Uche Secondus, national chairman of the PDP, and some governors of the opposition party. He is expected to defect to the PDP any time soon. If that happens, Obaseki will end up swapping places with his old opponent: he as the PDP candidate and Ize-Iyamu as the APC candidate. On Thursday, APC inaugurated the Edo election and appeal panels to conduct the party primary election which is now considered a walk over for Ize-Iyamu. Abiola Ajimobi, acting national chairman, represented by Hillard Eta, national vice chairman, south-south, directed the committees to ensure the success of the the party’s flag bearer. The seven-man election panel is headed by Hope Uzodinma, governor of Imo and Ajibola Bashiru, senate spokesman, is the secretary. https://www.thecable.ng/coast-clear-for-ize-iyamu-as-two-apc-aspirants-step-down |
A last-minute meeting summoned to discuss the fate of Governor Godwin Obaseki of Edo State has failed to save the embattled chief executive as the National Working Committee (NWC) of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) on Monday said that it would go ahead with June 22, 2020 governorship primary election.https://www.dailytrust.com.ng/we-wont-lose-if-obaseki-leaves-oshiomhole.html
|
Governor of Abia State, Okezie Ikpeazu, has been moved to Abuja, Nigeria’s capital, for intensive care after testing positive for Coronavirus earlier this week. According to insider sources, the governor is being treated at his home in Abuja with a sizable number of medical personnel on the ground to ensure he gets the best care possible. Apart from medical staff on the ground to attend to him, it was gathered that the Abia State governor also arrived Abuja with a retinue of aides and security personnel, some of whom are believed to have tested positive for the virus as well. SaharaReporters gathered that Ikpeazu has kidney failure and has been undergoing dialysis, thereby further complicating his situation and threatening his chances of making a full recovery from COVID-19. Before now, there were attempts to fly the Abia governor abroad for treatment but following the ban on international flights in many countries around the world and his positive status of the virus, that idea was frustrated and the decision to move him to Abuja was reached. In March, Ikpeazu was reported to have been trapped in the United States following the travel restriction put in place to contain the spread of the virus but the Abia Government dismissed the report as false. Recall that on March 22, 2020, Governor Ikpeazu said that the state will not record any Coronavirus case because it was the only state mentioned in the Holy Bible. He said, “Abia is the only state that is mentioned in the Bible. We have a promise from God that none of these diseases will touch God’s people. And I hold on to God’s promise. “We saw Ebola, it did not get to us. We saw monkeypox, it didn’t get to us. Even this one (COVID-19) will also pass us by.” As a result of his current situation, Governor Ikpeazu has since directed Ude Chukwu, his deputy, to act in his capacity until he recovers. Abia State so far has 83 cases of Coronavirus while seven persons have recovered from the pandemic. http://saharareporters.com/2020/06/09/exclusive-abia-governor%E2%80%99s-coronavirus-treatment-complicated-kidney-failure |
crispus09:Ok |
crispus09:Hahahahaha.... Meaning? |
Mr. Yonov Frederick Agah's is a Nigerian from North central |
According to Nairalander [orshiayoh]: The withdrawal of Mr. Agah's nomination is in my opinion, a wrong decision influenced by local politics. Mr. Agah who joined the WTO since 2005 as Nigeria's Permanent Representative and later appointed a Deputy Director-General is an insider, and can be trusted and supported by colleagues to reform the WTO. His nomination received overwhelming support within the WTO and the General Council, a body he chaired while serving as Nigeria's Ambassador. May Nigeria not suffer the consequences of this political decision. https://www.nairaland.com/5904097/president-buhari-nominates-okonjo-iweala-world/7 Do you agree?
|
Modphase:You don see am nah |
ojikeebere12: |
*All payments made in cash *Gave N5.760b to Abia lawmakers, N7.2b to informants *Made payments to traditional rulers, others A former Governor of Abia State, Senator Theodore Orji has furnished the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) with details of how he spent his N38.8billion security votes during his eight years in office. Orji who was in charge of the state between 2007 and 2015 is being investigated by the anti-graft commission for corruption. He said he collected N38.8billion as security votes during the period and not N48billion as alleged by the EFCC. Orji who is currently representing Abia Central Senatorial District in the National Assembly said he shared much of the N38billion with members of the state House of Assembly, his security informants and traditional rulers. He claimed to have also given part of the money to military units,the police,the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) and security agencies as what he called statutory allocations. In a tell-it-all statement to his interrogators, the former governor said he gave successive members of the State House of Assembly N5. 760billion, at N60million per month, in the eight years. He also claimed to have paid N75million monthly to security informants in 15 of the 17 local government areas of the state within the same period. The yet-to-be identified informants allegedly pocketed a total of N7.200billion between 2007 and 2015. Some of the security agencies, according to him, received N2million per month. However, he told the interrogators that he does not have a comprehensive list of all the beneficiaries of the largesse because the Government House staff who used to disburse the cash is no more. He gave the man’s name simply as Felix. Orji said he did not ask for the list from Felix at the expiration of his tenure as governor. He only issued directives to Felix on how to share the security votes. He also said he never collected cash either from the Director of Finance or the Cashier in Government House. The EFCC insists that Orji collected N48billion in eight years. It has retrieved five huge bags of documents from the relevant desks in Abia State on the ex-governor’s financial transactions. Based on Orji’s confessions, the EFCC is expected to arraign him in court soon being in what a source described as “a straightforward case.” The Nation gathered that the former governor made the revelations during a session on oath in the presence of his lawyer, who he referred to as Edmund. It was the first time Orji would open up after many years of trying to make him respond to allegations against him. Orji said he received N370million monthly as security votes in 2007 and N410million monthly from 2008 to 2015. He said that from his assumption of office up to his exit the funds were distributed in cash. “There were also statutory funds to the security agencies,” he was quoted as saying. He said the first Speaker in 2007 and the last Speaker in his second term confirmed the receipt of N60million monthly from his security votes. He said the Majority Leader also attested to the receipt of the monthly cash although he claimed he did not know “ how they shared the money.” He could not explain what the monthly cash to the lawmakers was meant for or remember the exact amount he was giving the traditional rulers monthly. Orji admitted that all disbursements by the late Felix were based on his directives. Usually, according to him, the funds were brought by the Director of Finance (DF)in batches. The DF would then inform the ex-governor on how much had come and would then be kept in the accounts. Orji would, in turn, issue directive to the late Felix on what to disburse and to whom. He was quoted as saying “Felix comes to show me how disbursement is made. After disbursement, Felix keeps the list for safety. As I was leaving the Government House, I didn’t ask him for the list.” He claimed that he never personally collected any cash from the votes whether from the Director of Finance or Government House cashier. The funds were channelled through Felix “on my directives,” he said. The EFCC is still working on the charges against Orji. But a reliable source told The Nation that investigation had “reached an appreciable stage for trial.” Continuing, the source said: “We have been on this case since March 2017. Our operatives were painstaking in cracking this case. “We will arraign ex-governor in court any time from now because the charges are ready. The only challenge is COVID-19 but we won’t allow it to affect the arraignment. “In the face of the law, he is presumed innocent until proven guilty by the court. The onus is on him to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he did not commit the financial recklessness.” The source said the use of security votes was the first leg of the ongoing probe of Senator Theodore Orji. The former governor has been under investigation since November 22, 2018 following a petition from a group, Fight Corruption: Save Nigeria Group In the March 17, 2017 petition, the group alleged that Orji received and diverted various sums of monies that accrued to Abia State while in office. The breakdown of the amounts allegedly received by him are as follows: N383 billion revenue from federation accounts N55 billion Excess Crude Revenue N2.3 billion Sure – P N1.8 billion Ecological funds N10.5 billion loan from First Bank of Nigeria through the Ministry of Chieftaincy and Local Government Affairs. N4 billion Loan from Diamond Bank N12 billion Paris Club refund *N2 billion Agricultural loan for farmers *N55 billion ASOPADEC. https://thenationonlineng.net/how-i-blew-n38-8b-security-votes-in-eight-years-by-ex-governor-orji/ https://thenationonlineng.net/how-i-blew-n38-8b-security-votes-in-eight-years-by-ex-governor-orji/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
|
Facts have emerged over how the plot to oust the National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, was foiled yesterday by some governors of the party sympathetic to his cause.https://www.newtelegraphng.com/how-pro-oshiomhole-govs-saved-apc-national-chair
|
The embattled All Progressives Congress, APC, national chairman, Adams Oshiomhole, is expected to preside over the National Working Committee meeting scheduled to hold Tuesday, 17 March, 20202. The development follows the stay of the execution order of the appellate court regarding the lower court-ordered suspension of Comrade Adams Oshiomhole as National Chairman of the party. National Publicity Secretary of the party, Mallam Lanre Issa-Onilu in a statement on Monday said: “all members of the NWC are expected to attend as important matters concerning the party will be considered and deliberated at the meeting”. “Recall that a Court of Appeal on Monday stayed the execution order of a High Court restraining the APC National Chairman, Comrade Adams Oshiomhole from further acting in that capacity,” he added. https://www.vanguardngr.com/2020/03/oshiomhole-to-chair-apcs-nwc-meeting-on-tuesday/ |
A member of the seven Justices of the Supreme Court which heard the application filed by the sacked Governor of Imo State, Emeka Ihedioha, seeking to review the judgement that ousted him, Justice Centus China Nweze, yesterday, held that the verdict of the apex court on Ihedioha’s removal was a nullity. Justice Nweze, who delivered the only dissenting judgement, held that the said judgement was given in bad faith and consequently nullified the declaration of Senator Hope Uzodinma as governor on account of wrong declaration. He further held that Uzodinma mischievously misled the court into unjust conclusion with the unverified votes credited to himself in the disputed 388 polling units. This was just as six other Justices on the panel led by the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Tanko Muhammad, dismissed Ihedioha’s application for lacking in merit. Reading his dissenting judgement, Justice Nweze held: “In my intimate reading of the January 14 judgement, the meat and substance of Ihedioha’s matter were lost to time frame. This court once set aside its own earlier judgement and, therefore, cannot use time frame to extinguish the right of any person. “This court has powers to overrule itself and can revisit any decision not in accordance with justice.” According to Justice Nweze, “The decision of the Supreme Court in the instant matter will continue to haunt our electoral jurisprudence for a long time to come. Without evidence of meeting other constitutional provisions, the court misled itself into declaring Uzodinma as governor. “This court has a duty of redeeming its image, it is against this background that the finality of the court cannot extinguish the right of any person. “I am of the view that this application should succeed. I hereby make an order setting aside the decision of this court made on January 14 and that the certificate of return issued to the appellant be returned to INEC. “I also make an order restoring the respondents as winner of the March 9, 2019 governorship election.” The majority judgement, however, refused to set aside its judgement that removed Ihedioha and replaced him with Uzodinma. The court held that it lacked powers to sit on appeal in its own judgement delivered on merit and in accordance with dictates of the law and justice. The court held that the request by Ihedioha asking it to set aside its judgement of January 14 this year on grounds of nullity is an invitation on the apex court to sit on appeal over its own judgement, which the court cannot do. In the majority ruling delivered by Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, the court held that granting the request of the applicants would open the flood gate by parties to all kinds of litigations. The apex court, in the majority ruling, insisted that by the provision of section 235 of the 1999 Constitution, its decision on any judgement based on merit is final and shall not be reviewed once delivered under any guise, except for clerical errors. The court also stated that by Order 8 Rule 16, the general law is that it has no power to alter any judgement and that such judgement once delivered on merit shall remain forever. Justice Ariwoola said: “Certainly, this court has no inherent power to grant what is being sought; it is beyond the powers of this court. There are no constitutional provisions for this court to review its own judgement. “To say the least, this court has no competence and indeed lacked power to sit on appeal in its own decision. Finality of the Supreme Court is entrenched in the constitution and inherent power can only be invoked where there is law to do so. “This court cannot under any guise alter any judgement under any inherent power, as doing so would bring the court into disrepute and ridicule. “The application is liable to dismissal and is hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction and competence. The court, however, held that parties in this case should bear their cost. Other Justices who aligned with the majority judgement are the CJN, Justice Muhammad, Justices Sylvester Ngwuta, Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, Amina Augie and Mary Uwani Abba-Aji. INEC had declared Ihedioha as winner of the March 9, 2019 governorship election on the ground that he won majority of lawful votes cast at the governorship poll. The Imo State Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal and the Court of Appeal in their concurrent decisions in the appeal filed by Senator Uzodinma, upheld Ihedioha’s election and dismissed Uzodinma’s petition on grounds that he did not prove his allegations against the election of Ihedioha. The apex court, however, disagreed with the decisions of the Appeal Court on the grounds that they erred in law when they excluded votes from 388 polling units from the total scores at the poll. According to the apex court in the judgement delivered by Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun on January 14, when the excluded votes totalling over 200,000 were added, Uzodinma and not Ihedioha actually won majority of the lawful votes cast in the March 9 governorship election in Imo State. The apex court consequently declared Uzodinma Governor of Imo State and ordered INEC to withdraw the earlier certificate of return issued to Ihedioha and issue a fresh one to Uzodinma. The court accordingly ordered that Uzodinma, the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) which came fourth in the election be sworn in as Governor of Imo State. Miffed by the decision, Ihedioha approached the apex court with a request to reverse his sack early this year on the grounds of nullity. In arguing his application, Ihedioha’s counsel, Kanu Agabi (SAN), told the court that they are praying the court to change its mind because of certain inherent errors in the judgement that removed his client from office. He claimed that the apex court did not consider the judgement of the Court of Appeal which struck out Uzodinma’s appeal for being incompetent, adding that as at the time the apex court gave its judgement, the decision was still subsisting. In pointing to another error he said was contained in the judgement, Agabi wondered where the issue of 388 polling units came about when in actual fact, Uzodinma had tendered results of 366 polling units which he claimed was excluded from the total figure of votes cast at the election. He said “the judgement gave them credit in 22 polling units from nowhere”, adding that, “contrary to all precedent, the number of votes cast at the election exceeded the number of accreditation by 129,000.” He also argued that the judgement did not show that the APC had the necessary constitutional spread to be declared winner of the election. Agabi, therefore, urged the court to set aside its judgement sacking Ihedioha and restore the verdict of the Court of Appeal. He submitted that by section 6 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has all powers, including powers to correct its errors. Responding, counsel to Uzodinma and the APC, Damian Dodo (SAN), urged the court to dismiss the application for being incompetent and lacking in merit. Dodo said they are opposing the application because the court lacked the jurisdiction to entertain it in the first place. Dodo said: “Whether the application is characterized as an application for review or classified as an application to set aside or so ever dressed or clothed, this court has consistently and rightly so held that it lacked powers to sit on appeal over its own judgement and this is what it is." On the judgement of the Court of Appeal which dismissed their case, Dodo submitted that the judgement of the Supreme Court which set aside the judgement of the appellate court has completely taken care of all issues raised at the lower court. He subsequently asked the Supreme Court to dismiss the application for lacking merit. Highlight of yesterday’s event was when after the ruling of Justice Nweze, people in the court, including counsel, burst into spontaneous clapping and the CJN threatened to sentence anyone caught clapping to “continuous clapping”. https://www.newtelegraphng.com/justice-nweze-carpets-cjn-5-scourt-justices-over-verdict |
The lead Counsel of the erstwhile governor of Imo state Emeka Ihedioha, Kanu Agabi SAN has withdrawn his participation in the Supreme Court Verdict Review. https://newsmirrorng.com/breaking-ihediohas-lead-counsel-withdraws/ |
Chai..... Whoever wrote this piece deserves an award and a bottle of Cold Beer. |
Nobel laureate, Prof. Wole Soyinka, has faulted a report by a newspaper of his purported selection to serve on a monitoring team for the forthcoming Supreme Court review of the case between Imo State governor, Hope Uzodinma of the All Progressives Congress and Emeka Ihedioha of the Peoples Democratic Party.https://punchng.com/uzodinma-vs-ihedioha-im-not-part-of-supreme-court-review-team-soyinka/
|
Olanikpekun where are you? |
meum:Hahahaha.... Just wondering? Could she be avenging for his brother Ihedioha? |
Justice Mary Peter Odili is from Mbaise in Imo state. The same town with Emeka Ihedioha that was recently sacked by the Supreme Court. While Ihedioha is from Aboh Mbaise, Mary is from Ezinihite Mbaise. Her husband Peter is in the same party with Ihedioha a PDP chieftain and a former Governor of Rivers State. Wondering..... Any connection with her ruling in Bayelsa case? |
kahal29:Very Apt |
This one na Appeal and should read..... Ihedioha Appeals Supreme Court judgement |
…Says no proof votes ascribed to Uzodinma met mandatory spread Sacked former governor of Imo State, Emeka Ihedioha, has urged the Supreme Court to speedily hear the application he filed for a review of the judgment that ousted him from office and declared Hope Uzodinma of All Progressives Congress, APC, as the validly elected governor of the state. Ihedioha, in the application he filed through his team of lawyers led by a former Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Chief Kanu Agabi, SAN, maintained that the judgment the apex court delivered against him on January 14, amounted to a nullity. Enumerating reasons why his sack should be reversed, Ihedioha who contested on the platform of Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, argued that the Supreme Court lacked the jurisdiction to declare Uzodinma governor in the absence of any proof that votes ascribed to him met the mandatory geographical spread. In his brief of argument, Ihedioha, contended: “This honourable court did not have the jurisdiction to declare the 1st appellant/respondent as elected in the absence of any proof that the votes ascribed to him met the mandatory geographical spread stipulated in section 179 (2) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended). “This honourable court did not have the jurisdiction to declare that the 1st appellant/respondent met the constitutional geographical spread without providing in its judgment the reason(s) for that conclusion”. He argued that the apex court panel, which was headed by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, Justice Tanko Muhammad, had no jurisdiction to hand victory to Uzodinma “in an election petition, which was based on two inconsistent and mutually exclusive grounds.” . He drew attention of the apex court to the fact that one of the grounds of the petition Uzodinma lodged against the outcome of the Imo State governorship election, was that he (Ihedioha) was not duly elected by majority of lawful votes cast at the election, “the implication of which is that the majority of votes cast at the election were valid.” He said the second ground was that the election was invalid for non-compliance with the Electoral Act, “the implication of which is that the election be annulled.” Besides, Ihedioha argued that the CJN-led panel failed to consider a subsisting judgment of the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal that dismissed Uzodinma’s petition. “At the Tribunal the 2nd Applicant (as 2nd Respondent) applied to have the petition struck out on the ground that it was incompetent having regard to the fact that the 1st Petitioner who came fourth did not join the 2nd and 3rd runners up in the Petition. “The application was heard and dismissed by the Tribunal whereupon the 2nd Applicant appealed to the Court of Appeal by way of Cross Appeal to which the 1st and 2nd Respondents replied. “The cross appeal was heard and allowed by the Court below. In the words of Adah JCA, who delivered the lead judgment in the cross appeal: “The preliminary objection of the 1st Cross Respondent (sic) at the lower court is allowed and I hold that the appropriate order of the trial tribunal would have been to have petition no EPT/GOV/IM/08/2019 struck out for being incompetent. I therefore order the petition struck out. No cost is awarded.” “The 1st and 2nd Respondents appealed against the above order of the Court below in ground 18 of their Notice of Appeal but only to the extent of showing that the 1st Appellant was the 1st Cross Respondent at the Court of Appeal. “The order of the Court of Appeal striking out the Petition for being incompetent raises a jurisdictional issue which this Honourable Court ought to have resolved first before delving into the merits of the Appeal. “In its judgment, this court neither considered nor resolved this jurisdictional issue. “The failure of the Supreme Court to consider and pronounce on this issue amounts to a failure of jurisdiction and completely erodes the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to consider the appeal on the merits. “Your Lordships neither set aside the decision of the Court of Appeal striking out the Petition for being incompetent nor made any pronouncement on it. In the absence of any pronouncement by the Supreme Court on this issue, the judgment of the Court of Appeal striking out the Petition for being incompetent remains valid and subsisting. “In the absence of any specific order of the Supreme Court setting aside the order of the Court of Appeal striking out the petition, the Supreme Court had no jurisdiction to countenance the Appellants’ appeal”, Ihedioha added. More so, he argued that his sack was a nullity inview of section 140(2) of the Electoral Act (as amended), noting that Uzodinma divested the Supreme Court of the relevant jurisdiction to declare him winner since he had in his petition, branded and stigmatised the entire governorship election that held in Imo State on March 9, 2019, as invalid. “The appellants/respondents fraudulently misled this court into holding that a total of 213,495 votes were unlawfully excluded from the votes scored by the 1st Appellant/Respondent in the gubernatorial election of 9th March 2019 in Imo State. “The 1st Appellant/Respondent admitted under cross-examination that he was the person (and not the 3rd Respondent [INEC] or any of its officials) who computed the result that gave him the 213,495 votes alleged to have been excluded from his total votes in the election. “The fraudulent nature of the additional votes was demonstrated by the fact that the total votes cast as shown in the 1st Appellant/ Respondent’s computation was more than the total number of voters accredited for the election and in some polling units more than the total number of registered voters. “The fraud was also demonstrated by the fact that the result computed by the 1st Appellant/Respondent showed only the votes of the 1st Applicant and the 1st Appellant/Respondent without specifying the votes scored by the other 68 candidates who participated in the election. “The fraud was further demonstrated by Exhibits 63RD1 to 63RD19 (INEC Forms EC40G) which show that there were no valid elections in the 388 polling units where the additional 213,495 votes claimed by the 1st Appellant/Respondent were allegedly generated. “By Exhibit A1 (Form EC8D) the total number of voters accredited for the Governorship Election held on 9th March 2019 in Imo State was 823,743,while the total valid votes cast was 731,485. “With the inclusion of 213,695 votes for the 1st Appellant/ Respondent and 1,903 to the votes of the 1st Applicant, as ordered by this court, the total number of votes cast at the election now stands at 953,083 (i.e. 731,485 + 213,695 + 1,903) making the total number of votes cast at the election to be far in excess of the total number of voters accredited for the election, 129,340.” “It is unlawful for the total number of votes cast in an election to exceed the number of accredited voters and that illegality rendered the judgment sought to be set aside null and void. “The Appellants/Respondents pleaded in paragraph 39 of their petition that a supplementary election should be conducted in the 388 polling units where the additional votes that created the illegality were alleged to have been cast and that pleading was binding on the Appellants/Respondents and the court. “The 1st Appellant/Respondent alleged that votes from 388 polling units were unlawfully excluded or cancelled and urged the court to include in the computation of the election results the votes from those polling units. At the same time the 1st Appellant/Respondent prayed that fresh elections be conducted in the said polling units thus rendering the petition speculative. “The Appellants/Respondents failed to plead the votes scored by all the parties in the 388 affected polling units. Only the votes allegedly scored by the 1st Appellant/Respondent and the 1st Applicant were pleaded – an omission which rendered the petition incompetent. “This Honourable Court was consequently misled into making a vague order directing the inclusion of votes from the 388 polling units without stating or specifying the particular number of votes to be included from those polling units for all the parties. “Without computing the votes for all the parties from the 388 polling units this honourable court was misled into making a declaration that the 1st Appellant/Respondent was the winner of the gubernatorial election in Imo State – an election that the Appellants/Respondents had themselves branded or stigmatized as invalid on account of non-compliance”, Ihedioha added. https://www.vanguardngr.com/2020/02/imo-reverse-your-verdict-ihedioha-tells-s-court |
Chai The members who defected are: 1) Nwangele LGA: Chyna IWUANYANWU PDP - APC 2) Ideato North LGA. Innocent Egwim AA - APC 3) Okigwe LGA: Chidem EMELUMBA PDP - APC 4) Nkwerre LGA : Obinna Okwara AA - APC 5) Onuimo LGA : Paul Emeziem APGA - APC 6) Orsu LGA : Ekene Nnodumele - APGA - APC 7) Ideato South LGA: Duru Johnson is AA - APC Isu LGA: SN Obiefule AA - APC9) Ohaji-Egbema LGA: Herculus Okoro PDP - APC Recall that the Deputy Speaker resigned his position immediately after the Speaker Hon. Chiji Collins defected from the Peoples Democratic Party to the All Progressive Congress |
Documents made available to AFNews revealed that within the short span of former governor Emeka Iheidoha of Imo State, he allegedly approved the sum of N3.5M to be used to clear Avutu poultry grass. Gov. Emeka Ihedioha Further investigation reveals that clearing of the said premises usually cost between N300, 000 to N500,000. More information coming.. https://afnews.ng/amp/how-ihedioha-used-n3-5m-to-cut-grass/?fbclid=IwAR3asTKqa4hZ-wakw1oJvQniOwIIuYmmhRNzuThuBFw4yKkyamlGYtZjdEk
|
Accreditation is done at polling unit levels. Once election is cancelled in a polling unit, nothing is recorded from that polling unit during collation. Thus, when election results are cancelled, they usually don't form part of the accredited voters. Though some people have often argued against this practice because they believe that it is intentionally done to prevent a rerun. So looking at the Imo state case, the number of accredited voters will increase with the judgement. If these numbers now credited to Uzodinma was captured as invalid or cancelled votes, there would have been rerun because it's much more than the margin of victory between Ihedioha & Nwosu However assuming without conceding that the figures did not tally, Ihedioha unfortunately did not seek for the cancelation of those figures due to over voting. Mind you the court is not a father Christmas. It only gives u what u ask for and cannot help you to prosecute your case. Hope was given what he sought for in d mist of the evidences surrounding his prayers! The court is not a calculator of votes it only grants prayers based on EVIDENCES before it. |
Another issue is about the Accreditation figures of the Supreme Court not tallying with that of INEC figures |
According to Punch.... In upholding Uzodinma’s appeal on Tuesday, the Supreme Court agreed with him that the votes polled in 388 out of the 3,523 polling units were excluded in the final results declared by the Independent National Electoral Commission in the states, on March 11, 2019. Justice Kekere-Ekun ruled that with the addition of the excluded votes to the earlier declared final results, Uzodinma polled the highest lawful votes with the required spread of votes in the state. She set aside the judgments of both the Imo State Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal and the Court of Appeal which had both affirmed Ihedioha’s election. She stated, “The lower court misunderstood the case of the appellants,” she ruled, adding that “the case was not a case of exclusion from the election but exclusion of votes from final results.” She explained that the lower courts were wrong to have rejected the results of the 388 polling units on the grounds that they were not tendered before the tribunal by the proper person. The results were said to have been tendered by the 54th petitioners’ witness. “P54, a police officer who tendered the results was subpoenaed to produce the results. Having been subpoenaed to produce the results, it was wrong for the lower courts to hold that P54 was not the proper person to tender the results,” Justice Kekere-Ekun ruled. Ihedioha had argued that the Supreme Court had earlier in its judgment delivered on December 20, 2019 declared that Uche Nwosu was the candidate of both the APC and the Action Alliance and on the basis of that declared the nomination of Nwosu for the March 2019 election as null and void. His lawyers argued that the apex court’s judgment implied that Uzodinma was not the APC’s candidate in the election. But addressing this argument in the Tuesday’s judgment, Justice Kekere-Ekun held that the issue of nomination was a pre-election issue that could not be raised in a post-election litigation. As the consequence of the findings, she ordered, “The judgment of the lower court which declared the first appellant as the winner with the majority of lawful votes is hereby set aside. “It is hereby declared that votes due to the appellants – Hope Uzodinma and the All Progressives Congress – were wrongfully excluded. “It is ordered that the votes unlawfully excluded should be added. “The first respondent (Ihedioha) was not duly elected by the majority of lawful votes and his return as the winner of the election is hereby declared null and void. “The first appellant (Uzodinma) polled the majority of the Imo State governorship election held on March 9, 2019 and got the required spread across the state. “The first appellant is the winner of the governorship election held on March 9, 2019 in Imo State.” https://punchng.com/pdp-fumes-as-supreme-court-sacks-ihedioha-declares-uzodinma-winner/ .... According to Daily Trust Newspaper.... In the lead judgment read by Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, the apex court held that Uzodinma proved the allegation of exclusion of results in 388 polling units of the state where he scored 213, 695 votes. Justice Kekere-Ekun ruled that the Court of Appeal was wrong to have ruled that the PW54, subpoenaed police, who produced the documents of the results, was not the proper person to tender same as he was not at the polling units where the results came from. The apex court upheld the argument of counsel to Uzodinma, Damian Dodo (SAN) that the issue is whether their results were unlawfully excluded from the results, and not whether elections held in the polling units. “The majority judgment of the lower court affirming the judgement of the governorship election tribunal is hereby set aside. It is hereby declared votes due to the appellants- that is Senator Hope Uzodinma and the All Progressives Congress from 388 polling units were wrongly excluded from scores ascribed to the appellants,” she said. https://www.dailytrust.com.ng/s-court-sacks-ihedioha-declares-uzodinma-governor.html
|

Isu LGA: SN Obiefule AA - APC