₦airaland Forum

beckNcall:
This has boxed trump in a corner, it now looks like the show of force turns out to be show of guts no sense

Lol, let's see how it plays out. Trump can't be silly to attack North Korea. NK isn't Syria.

South Korea and Japan would ensure it doesn't even happen is Trump decides to go haywire.

yanabasee:
NK threatened war first.....that was more of inciting an attack on US according to CNN...

And its been confirmed that the failure is due to Trumps handling on the issue...

Lol.. ohh CNN


How can failure of a launch be correlated with Trump handling anything?

seunny4lif:
Like how ?
They lunch it and it fail
That's called science
You test a object first before put it in counting with your hardware
USA can't attack a country that own a Nuclear warhead
Even CNN confirm it, that attacking NK will shake the world cos of thier nuclear
I wish Gadaffi owns one like Iran

Don't mind the Libyans that fell for USA propaganda. Perhaps, Gadaffi would have liberated Africa.

yanabasee:
How?...

NK threatened to launch the attack first.... and trump in his response said that NK will be taken care of.... and surprisingly, it was taken care of...

North Korea never said they will attack first. They only said if Trump is ready for war so be it. Also, Trump never took care of anything. The missile fail launch was first detected by SK and I think it's more of a strategy from NK.

beckNcall:
the missile launch failed, bomb blew up on launch. Providence at work

By making it fail, it was no threat to anyone. If the USA attacks, they would be attacking a country without UN approval. The North Koreans seem to understand how to play the game.... Lol

yanabasee:
Why would NK's Missile failed to launch?....

Like I said earlier....NK cannot single-handiedy fight America.... Even Russia takes extreme precautions when dealing with US...


Many thumpzup for pence...

No, it has proven they called the bluff of the USA. By making it fail, it was no threat to anyone. If the USA attacks, they would be attacking a country without UN approval. The North Koreans seem to understand how to play the game.... Lol

You can wonder whether or not CIA is really America anymore. It's a relic from the second world war when they called it OSS. A nasty part of the deep state.

Tugee:
If he was a 'fool' like you said he wouldn't have been sitting on billions in dollars and you sitting in front of your laptop talking about him.

The only mistake I think he made was turning down facebook's offer of $5bn because you see, Mark Zuckerberg understood what you don't when it comes to global app marketing, and Mark discovered that Snapchat's marketing game (temporarily for the rich ONLY) was tight. Unfortunately for Snapchat, now they have Facebook as a competitor who have already embarked on a massive campaign to bring them down with Facebook, Instagram and Whatapp 'Stories' doing almost the same thing as Snapchat. Also for your information, Facebook had already commenced a massive online media campaign aimed at discrediting Snapchat which includes the source of this TOPIC under discussion.

So my friend before you call any one a 'Fool' and 'Unwise' check yourself and confirm your status.

You are right and buttressing your comments further, snap is a mess on Android. Instagram stories are much more better and cleaner than Snaps.

Snapchat was also offered a fully featured and functional Snapchat client for Windows for free. Snap seem to have some form of vendetta for Windows. He also took down 6snap (a 3rd party app) that worked better than official versions on Android and iOS. He is such a douchebag

My own baby scores 10/10 which tops all these overrated ladies.

USA is yet to learn from the Korean war. Trump is very stupid if he thinks North Korea will attack Japan or South Korea if North Korea gets attacked. North Korea will attack USA in USA


Less than 100 days and all Trump wants is war and war. What kinda man is that?

linearity:
I do not know why you engage in these school yard arguments.

We all know that USA manufacture and use weapons including bombs for strategy reasons. The US MOAB was a strategic response for the Islamic fighters in Afghanistan and they have used it.

The US has demonstrated over and over again that, they will deploy and willing to deploy their bombs, we saw that in Japan...Russia on the other hand manufactures these bombs for tactical reasons against the US, just to show off that...'ha look, we can build a bigger bomb'. If the US think that, a bigger bomb than Russian's FOAB will give them a better strategic advantage, they would have done. After all, US have the technology to do that, and their defense budget is 10x that of Russia.

At some point, the the size and magnitude of a big building begins to loss it's value and just like with anything, there is a point of diminishing return. The US is the only country that have used Nuclear weapon in battle and they are the only country that have used large non-nuclear weapons in battles as well. With all these noise about Russian and their FOAB and their superiority, how many times have they deployed these weapons battle or tested in real battle situations? Russia is observed with US and would try everything to portray that, they are superior to the US, while US just go ahead and do what they want to do.

Lastly, I doubt if there will be any war between US and Russia, but lets suppose that is likely, you will agree with me that FAOM and MOAB will not be the weapons that will decide who weapons.

You are getting somethings wrong. USA can do anything and nobody will blink an eye cos they are the "world police" . The UN (US) can't even do jack.

On the other side, Russia can't cos they aren't the "world police" but if USA is so strong and always have a reason to attack a nation, why can't just just strike Russia?

Russia isn't obsessed with USA. They are simply building their military in case of any attack from any country especially USA cos they often front.

China is doing exactly the same thing. Most countries are just scared. The would should be happy there are certain countires like Russia, China, Iran and North Korea.

The reason USA spends 10x funds more than Russia is because of military bases they have all around the world. Isreal builds whatever they want without questions, why can't North Korea or Iran do the same thing?

Suddenly suddenly, black is now an interior color within blacks hence the high rate of skin bleaching..

Africa is further going backwards and Nigeria/Nigerians particularly.

northvietnam:
Try JESUS

Try JESUS..


and thank me later

You mean the white guy that couldn't save his own soul while he died on the cross like a chicken with two other thieves??

gadgetsngs:
I can see ur problem is byond here,nice day

I've got none, perhaps you are the one that ve got it loads.

I agree with Mynd

gadgetsngs:
and the other 2 persons?

Did you read their comments?

gadgetsngs:
Didnt want to reply u anymore,but why do u assume everyone got problem with comprehension? ,its a bad attitude and u need to rid urself of it

How does your earlier comment correlate with Mine? You simply wrote what made me write that.

MizMyColi:
No mind Ollah2
Even Itel sells more than Tecno.

So tell me how Huawei even comes close.
Next thing now, he will say Xiaomi beat Tecno in terms of sales.

Ollah2 has sworn never to see anything good in Tecno. Anywhere he sees good news about Tecno, he activates his Kill joy mode.

Don't be like Ollah2.

Do you guys have comprehension problems?

Hassan080196:
To you, tecno is now better than Huawei abi?

Comprehension shouldn't be a problem

gadgetsngs:
What are u saying? do u even follow d mobile market? Who knows Huawei in Nigeria? am suprised at this ,even itel ,and innjoo combined
would sell more than Huawei

Do you understand English at all?

TPAND:
This survey is fallacious. Samsung suffered a major set back in 2016 after the galaxy note battery explosion. Nigerians are quick to recycle junks from deluded bloggers

Quit writing junks. What major set back did Samsung encounter? They are currently the number one OEM surpassing Apple in the most recent survey. You are here writing junks

Mynd44:
Y'all still buying Tecno? Smh

Yes bro. The best phone to come outta China.

So tecno sold more phones than Huawei. Nigerians are truly blind.

I'm happy to see this deal eventually go through. Now, Milan can be Milan again.

Forza Milan

bikerboy1:
The rich can only get richer.

Even Efe can't still explain how his life changed all of a sudden

I won't stop calling until my call is picked

You always call at the wrong time.

Until Nigerians begin stoning politicians. This BS won't stop

ReubenE:
You made a nice submission until you almost derailed. Perhaps you are not very clear with the Federal Presidential system. I mean no offense

The Executive Arm of Government, and by extension, the President is the embodiment of a nation's sovereignty.
He is the symbol and rallying point of all State affairs both internally and externally.

Nigerians are not wrong for putting the blame on him because that is how the system works.
It is now left to him to navigate through the hurdles that lie ahead to make Nigeria a great nation, that includes liasing with the other Arms of Government to complete the cycle using democratic means.

My brother, democracy does not accommodate blames. Democracy demands results that will translate to better life for the people, but so far, our President has not been able to give us the results we need.

Organising all the Organs of Government to work towards one goal is what will make him a good President.
Passing that job to the citizens will show him as incompetent, unfit for the position he occupies.
We will continue to yap, cry, blame until our voices are heard....

I didn't derail bro. Like you rightly said, in a democracy era all arms works together. Executive, Legislature and Judiciary, the latter is the worst. He the Executive has made some moves on corruption(you can call it witch hunting), but the Judiciary have failed at every case handled by them. What else should be done?

henry007:
Gotta teach you about tech and still teach you about sarcasm?

Still cancelled!

Perhaps you should teach yourself first

Brigance:
Exactly my point, I cant deal with a device I can't comfortably handle one-handedly.

Reason why I'm not even giving a second look at s8. I think Samsung ble*eped up mighty with size, the base model at 5.8.

I understand you bro. Lol, the S8 isn't as big as you are making it look. Like I told you earlier, look beyond the screen size but screen to body ratio. The 5.8 S8 actually looks like 5.5 but the S8+ which is 6.2 looks like 5.8


Screen to body ratio matters

henry007:
S4 is indeed the most gorgeous device ever, as in totally brilliant with fingerprint technology and shiny aluminium and glass finish, not to mention lollipop OS ready. Just so sad that it's out of the stores and the used version is priced ridiculously low like the used iPhone 4s which is way way way below it's standard. Gee i wonder why that is?

Pls this thread and the discussion is cancelled.

By your logic, iPhone 7 is 2016 best phone since its the most expensive ? Right?

You have been to all stores to confirm S4 isnt sold brand new anymore. You just write nonsense upandan. I guess the Android world is making you feel fly hence the gibberish you've spewing all day long.

A brand new S4 will find the update to Lollipop when unboxed if it's an old stock while the more recent one will be lollipop ready

Brigance:
Screen size for me doesn't go beyond 5.2"

Anything beyond that is like straddling a baby.

You know, pixel ratio is densier on smaller screen, so better display output.

Look beyond the screen size but screen to body ratio. iPhone 6 plus, 6s plus, 7 plus have 5.5 inches but monstrous in sizes.

henry007:
I don't need to do an online test, i've been obsessed with mobile tech for years. I see why you appreciate the S4(nostalgia from that time it was bad ass) but buying it in 2017 is just 100% sufferheadness.

You cannot even begin to imagine how many things have changed since the time when people said it was cool. If you want levels or class or functionality, S4 has none of that to offer in 2017. S4 is in the class of iPhone 4s, e no even reach iPhone 5 tbh.

Talking about the Camon CX, the design is just like the iphone which iphone itself is still using, it's beautiful.
The camera is top notch.

Samsung s6 that costs 3-4 times the S4 just got the Nougat update which people are now advising others not to update yet meanwhile Camon CX chips with it. NOTE: there would be no OS after Nougat til much later in the year.

S4 and Camon CX are only mates when it comes to ram and that's Tecno's oversight. However the system uses up less than even the phantom 6 with 3GB ram as seen below.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8f4TVr5NMM?a

Lastly, the information above is mainly for people that can actually afford the Camon CX.

As usual, long tales of BS. What are the 2017 technologies that are out that which S4 has none of? Iphone 4s is in the same class with S4, only a tech defunct person would say that.

If CX has same design as the Iphone(iphone 6 upwards I guess) then it's ugly.

Only you knows about S4 shouldn't be updated to Lollipop and only you also knows that S6 shouldn't be updated to Nougat. You must know a whole lots of things. Did you expect S6 to "chip" with Nougat 2 years ago?

Despite S4 been offficially on Lollipop. There are loads of features which Google just added to Android but as been available on Touchwiz for a long time.


You leveled S4 and CX on RAM simply because they have same amount of RAM but iphone 4s is on same level with S4 despite having inferior specs. You must be very brilliant


You have only been obsessed with blackberry technology for years.
Welcome to the Android world

funmyade:
A product of same series debutting a year after automatically means it is better than the previous. Technology is evolving and so changes are made. I still maintain, if S4 is that good, S5, not to talk of S8, wouldnt have been made.

I end just like @Omoade1890 said "don't you think there have been lots of evolution after 2014?? s4 was super in it's own time but you should understand that a lot has changed since 2014 and s4 cannot rule/stand where cx stand"

thank you sir, Mr Lecturer

You are confusing yourselves. Are the phones in question by same OEM talk more of same series? Yes, tech has improved over the years but that doesn't mean the newest phone is better than a few years version.

None of you guys have been able to prove that CX is better than S4. All you have been screaming all day long is technological advancements yet no substantial evidence to back it up