Oluboh's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Oluboh's Profile › Oluboh's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 14 pages)
Kogi Central Women (FAWWASS) Celebrate Alhaji Yahaya Bello's Acceptance to Aspire for Senate 2027 Kogi Central Women under the aegis of FAWWASS have expressed profound joy and appreciation following the decision of former Governor Alhaji Yahaya Bello,CON. to accept their heartfelt call to aspire for the Kogi Central Senatorial seat in the 2027 general elections under the All Progressives Congress (APC), Insha’Allah. The women described his acceptance as a moment of renewed hope and confidence for the people of Kogi Central, noting that Alhaji Yahaya Adoza Bello has truly paid his dues through impactful leadership, visionary governance, and unwavering commitment to the development of Kogi State. They emphasized that this is the time to reciprocate his sacrifices, dedication, and service with overwhelming love, loyalty, and support. The FAWWASS President, Hajia Barikisu Ohunene Mohammed Ahovi Yusuf, praised him as a transformational leader who touched countless lives, empowered youths and women, strengthened security, and laid a solid foundation for sustainable development across the state. According to the group, his legacy continues to speak for itself, making him a worthy and trusted choice for higher legislative responsibility. The women also expressed deep appreciation for his role in the emergence of the current Governor, Ahmed Usman Ododo, describing him as a worthy successor who is steadily consolidating on the achievements of his predecessor with a strong commitment to inclusiveness, continuity, and people-oriented governance. Speaking on behalf of the group, the FAWWASS Vice President, Hajia Zuleihat Asuku, commended the Accountant-General of Kogi State and Founder of FAWWASS, Chief Dr. Habibat Oyiza Tijjani Onumoko, for her exemplary leadership, dedication to service, community development, and unwavering support for women empowerment and grassroots mobilization. She described her as a pillar of strength and a shining example of excellence whose impact continues to inspire women across Kogi State. The women offered heartfelt prayers for Alhaji Yahaya Adoza Bello, Governor Ahmed Usman Ododo, and Chief Dr. Habibat Oyiza Tijjani Onumoko. They prayed that Almighty Allah grants them good health, long life, wisdom, and continued success in their leadership journeys. They further prayed for divine protection over them and their families, and that their efforts toward the development of Kogi State and Nigeria at large will continue to yield positive and lasting impact.
|
Another user responded who fought for the release of the boy posted this as well https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1AkEb3MRyE/?mibextid=wwXIfr
|
How Sen. Natasha Akpoti Arrested 22 year Old Boy and Supervised His Inhumane Treatment - Facebook User A Facebook user has publicly criticised Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, accusing her of hypocrisy following her recent condemnation of an arrest involving one Hussein Ataba. In a lengthy post circulating online, the user stated, “You probably thought people had forgotten the same thing you did to Amoto. You allegedly tricked him out of his house in Lokoja with a fake message, then moved straight to Abuja where you were waiting with your boys. You also supervised how he was treated. You had him kneeling on the floor like a common criminal and even joined in questioning him”. He continued, “Imagine asking a 22-year-old boy at the time to confess where guns were hidden in Government House, while threatening to use Niger Delta powers to make him disappear. Do you remember what you told his father?”. “His only luck was that some people went looking for him and refused to give up. He was also smart enough to alert his close friends before your armed men on mufti whisked him away. Even then, he was kept in the abattoir for two full weeks under terrible and inhuman conditions. In the end, he came out free, and you still don’t know how it happened. At some point, he went four straight days without food or water.” “Now you suddenly know the law and want people to see you as some kind of heroine, defending an obviously foolish person like Hussein Ataba. Not everyone here is blind or foolish. Some of us know the game, especially with Mr. Commonsense and others like him. Sadly, it is always the poor and helpless people on the streets that are used as pawns”. The Facebook user questioned the senator’s current stance on human rights and due process, arguing that her criticism of recent arrests contradicts the actions she is being accused of in the past. The post concluded by expressing concern over what it described as a pattern where vulnerable individuals are used as pawns in political struggles. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18bbXwfijD/?mibextid=wwXIfr
|
Meta Rejects Senator Natasha’s Requests: Facebook and Prof Duru Counter Natasha’s Attempt to Silence Critics In a period where public narratives are increasingly shaped by social media, the fight for truth often collides with attempts at suppression. The ongoing legal confrontation between Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and Dr. Sandra C. Duru (popularly known as Prof. Mgbeke) has now evolved into a national conversation on accountability, free speech, and the dangers of manipulating gender narratives for personal advantage. Prof. Mgbeke has consistently maintained that her publications were made to educate the public about the risks of false allegations, misinformation, and media manipulation. According to her, the discomfort expressed by Senator Akpoti has little to do with the words written and everything to do with the facts revealed. The senator’s lawsuit, filed not only against Prof. Mgbeke but also against Meta Platforms Inc., operators of Facebook, seeks to compel the removal of posts she describes as defamatory. However, Meta’s official counter affidavit has shifted the momentum dramatically. In its response, Meta clarified that Facebook does not remove content simply because an individual is displeased with it; removal only occurs when posts violate the platform’s established community standards. Meta urged the court to dismiss the application, arguing that the senator’s request lacks legal merit. For Prof. Mgbeke, this development reinforces a larger principle: the right to fair response and open expression. She insists that her publications are justified and rooted in factual context, especially considering past accusations she believes were weaponized against her. She also points out inconsistencies in the senator’s sworn statements, noting that certain denials contradict publicly known events. As court proceedings continue in the FCT High Court, Gwagwalada Judicial Division (Suit No: FCT/HC/GWD/CV/229/2025), the matter has grown beyond a personal dispute. It now represents a broader struggle against intimidation, misinformation, and the strategic use of gender narratives to silence dissenting voices. For many observers, this is not just a legal battle, it's a national moment of reflection on truth, integrity, and the responsibility that comes with public office. Prof. Mgbeke maintains one position firmly: attempts to bully her into silence will not stand. The conversation, she says, must continue, not for drama, but for education, transparency, and the protection of others who may one day face similar tactics. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/16iKtXa8nf/?mibextid=wwXIfr
|
This message is for everyone who claims to love Ned Nwoko and Regina Daniels. If you truly support them, please understand that you are not helping them by fueling this fight online. You are not defending them. You are damaging the only remaining window for peace and reconciliation. Whether that reconciliation happens now, later, or never, their beautiful children must always be respected. Those children are blessings from their union and deserve peace, not chaos. If you love Regina, respect Ned. If you love Ned, respect Regina. This is not the time for insults, sides, or blame. The right thing to do now is to encourage calm, speak privately to the parties involved, and support healing, not hostility. To our mothers watching, I plead with you. Please speak to Regina’s mother. This is the moment to act like a wife, a mother, a caring grandmother, and a mother in-law with real wisdom and maturity. The only true victim in this public drama is Regina’s father, who is being humiliated as if he has never been a present or honorable man. No woman should fail at being a good wife and still extend that failure into motherhood, motherh in-law, and now grandmother roles. Enough is enough. As for Sammy, I will keep my words minimal. But if I were his mother or older sister, I would simply ask Ned to step aside and allow me to take care of that youthful arrogance and misguided confidence with a little bit of sweet - bitter- lovely corrective measures. Trust me. Everyone must calm down. Please, STOP!!! Ned Nwoko is a gentleman. Regina is still a young woman who deserves our unconditional love, support, and protection. Both of them are hurting. Both are overwhelmed. Both are emotionally unprepared for the street-drama, embarrassment and noise surrounding their private challenges now turned into a reality show by social media users. So as for me, I will not take anything said or done by either Ned or Regina to heart right now. I know pain when I see it, and pain speaks loudly. Sometimes it speaks too loudly. Let us allow them space. Let us allow them dignity. Let us allow healing to take its natural course. Love them both enough to protect their peace, not destroy their future. ❤️💛❤️ Prof. Sandra C Duru https://www.facebook.com/share/1KGLSVnDCc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
|
THE TRUTH MUST STAND A Chronic Liar Cannot Rewrite Justice. Accountability Is Not Witchhunting. Enough of the Manipulations. I heard that Natasha Akpoti publicly claimed that the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria said the criminal cases against her hold no substance and are merely political witchhunting. Let us be clear once again on this. The President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is a brilliant and responsible leader. He will NEVER rubbish the same institution he represents. He will NEVER undermine the security and justice systems of this nation. How can anyone describe those serious criminal cases, backed with evidence of audacity and impunity, as mere political games to witchhunt a woman who openly engaged in such unlawful actions? I doubt very strongly that PBAT would ever say such a thing. We all have legitimate access to the President and other national leaders. It is obvious that Natasha Akpoti, the master of fabrication, is lying again. She is desperately obsessed with creating false narratives, just as she did a few days ago when she spewed nonsense on her platform insulting the Senate President and other senators. She paraded a mischievous letter of information, not an invitation, to her so called recycled constituency empowerment and imaginary two years anniversary celebration. She conveniently forgot that she lied about everything and has not even completed two years in the Senate. Tell me, how many of her colleagues did you see there? Did you see the Senate President present? The Senate President simply performed his official duty by reading a letter addressed to the Senate as an institution. It was never personal. It was never a reconciliation move. It was nothing more than procedural duty. No wonder CP Akin Fakorede ( the head of the IGP Monitoring Unit) and his allies were desperately attempting to remove me from these cases, but they failed woefully. If anyone tries to politicize this case or attempts to twist the arm of the Senate President to bury it, they cannot twist the arm of a non politician like me who has already petitioned the police with even deeper and more devastating evidence. PBAT WILL NEVER MAKE SUCH A JOKE OF NIGERIA! Because if Nigeria allows this nonsense, then it means anyone can wake up tomorrow and publicly weaponize the media and gender against the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. They could call him a murderer, claim that his wife carries a stolen or harvested heart of a child, or accuse him of raping a minor or committing any other horrific allegation without a single evidence or proof. And we condemn Trump for his utterances and actions while enabling a system that entertains reckless falsehood and behavior in our own nation? The Attorney General of the Federation already affirmed that Natasha Akpoti has cases to answer. That is the truth. Justice must not become a political toy. Nigeria must choose integrity over noise making and irresponsible behavior. The institution must stand. The truth must stand. And the law must speak. https://mgbeke.media/the-truth-must-stand/ Prof. Sandra C. Duru One of the Principal Witnesses and Petitioners in the Ongoing Criminal Investigations and Prosecution of Natasha Akpoti
|
Natasha Akpoti is always clever by half. Austin Okai, thank you for that exclusive interview. The truth is finally unfolding, naturally and publicly, for the whole world to see. Even though we have already submitted the authentic and verified forensic examination report and analysis of all Natasha’s voice notes and videos obtained by me and my private investigators, Okai Austin’s revelations have made one thing even clearer. Natasha hires and fires her own whistleblowers like disposable tools, using them as pawns in her endless game of deception. This woman thrives on chaos, plotting evil, funding smear campaigns, and manipulating weak minds daily to destroy others. She is a disgrace and a gender weaponization agent! Now the question remains, who exactly was she plotting against this time? Prof. Mgbeke https://www.facebook.com/share/v/17RDjfByeN/
|
Diplomacy Is Not Reconciliation: Akpabio’s Courtesy, Natasha’s Drama, and the Media’s Spin My dear truth ambassadors, follwers of Prof. Mgbeke and TruthShield, as seasoned experts in leadership, strategic communications, public administration, human behavior, social policy, human rights advocacy, and media management, we understand the subtle power of influence, perception, and diplomacy. It is precisely because a distinguished, intelligent, and principled leader like Senator Godswill Akpabio, a seasoned politician, accomplished lawyer, and true statesman, understands the strength of humility and the art of strategic leadership that he chose to act with unyielding grace. This is a man who has served Nigeria with distinction as a Commissioner, two-term Governor of Akwa Ibom State, Minister, and now the Senate President. His record speaks volumes. He has delivered progressive, transformative, and development-driven leadership with tangible results in his constituency and across the nation, all without unnecessary drama or self-promotion. So when a senator known for her theatrics, the self-styled Senate parrot, Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan, decided to turn a simple letter of invitation into a stage performance, Senator Akpabio did what a true leader does. He obliged her request to read it, not because it was extraordinary or newsworthy, but because courtesy and diplomacy demanded it. Yet, in typical fashion, the media rushed to twist the story into another misleading headline: “Natasha ‘Reconciles’ With Akpabio, Invites Senate President For Project Commissioning In Kogi.” Reconciled with whom, and over what? What exactly is the big deal about reading a colleague’s letter of invitation? If Senator Akpabio had declined, the same people would have cried foul and accused him of hating women. Now that he graciously obliged, they are calling it reconciliation. The hypocrisy is astonishing. But beyond the theatrics and headlines, the real question remains. What has the Attorney General of the Federation said about madam Natasha’s ongoing criminal trials in court? That conversation is far more important than staged public relations moments or sensational narratives. Stay tuned, because my next post will shed more light on the truth. The Senate, the people of Nigeria, the Senate President, his family, and truth ambassadors across the world are standing firm. Justice must prevail, and Natasha must provide evidence for every single allegation she has made. Now, take a moment to read her blatant insult to the entire Senate, Nigerians, and to the Senate President, the very leader she claims to be inviting to witness her so-called responsibility to her people. “When you walk in truth, you do not need to perform for attention or explain your authenticity. The light of truth always exposes the darkness of deceit.” – Prof. Sandra C. Duru Prof. Mgbeke https://www.facebook.com/share/16MHXomJ75/
|
PRESS STATEMENT By Prof. Mgbeke Voice of Reason. Voice of Truth. Voice for Justice. As the newly promoted Deputy Inspectors-General (DIGs) and Assistant Inspectors-General (AIGs) of Police are being decorated today, October 28th, 2025, one question continues to echo across the nation’s conscience: When will Nigeria have another Indigenous Inspector-General of Police (IGP)? With the new promotions now in effect, the conversation about leadership transition within the Nigeria Police Force becomes more urgent than ever. The nation can no longer ignore the question of merit, balance, and equitable representation in its security architecture. Why the Southeast Deserves It on Merit It is time to ask why the Southeast, after the tenures of Mike Okiro and Onovo, has not produced another Inspector-General of Police. Among the current crop of officers, one name stands tall above politics and prejudice, DIG Frank Mbah. Here is a man whose credentials speak volumes. A seasoned police officer, respected Nigerian citizen, distinguished lawyer, PR and security expert, and a polished gentleman of exceptional intellect and integrity. He remains uniquely brilliant, scandal-free, physically fit, and eloquent, qualities the Nigeria Police urgently needs at this critical stage of reform and image restoration. With at least four more years of active service ahead, DIG Frank Mbah is not only competent but also forward-looking. His professional record and communication prowess have set him apart as one of the finest spokespersons in the history of the Nigeria Police Force, perhaps only rivaled in Queen’s English by Marvel Akpoyibo! This Is A Call for Merit, Not Manipulation Nigerians home and abroad have long awaited the announcement of DIG Frank Mbah as the next Inspector-General of Police. This long awaited appointment should not be about ethnicity or emotion but pure merit, service record, and leadership quality. As calls persist for the removal, retirement, or probe of the current IGP, Kayode Egbetokun, there is growing concern that political interference might lead to the premature retirement of highly competent officers, the very men capable of fixing the rot within the Force. Such an outcome would not only be unjust but also detrimental to national security and institutional reform. Recent Inspectors-General of Police 1. Kayode Egbetokun — June 19, 2023 – Present (Ogun State) 2. Usman Alkali Baba — April 6, 2021 – June 19, 2023 (Yobe State) 3. Mohammed Adamu — January 2019 – April 6, 2021 (Nasarawa State) 4. Ibrahim Kpotun Idris — March 2016 – January 15, 2019 (Niger State) 5. Solomon Arase — April 21, 2015 – March 21, 2016 (Edo State) The time for balance, justice, and merit-based leadership in the Nigeria Police Force is now. The nation needs reformers, not conformists; visionaries, not placeholders. And in that equation, DIG Frank Mbah stands as a symbol of competence, credibility, and hope for a new era of policing in Nigeria. Many may wonder, “Are you not in good terms with the government or the system?” Of course I am, and that is precisely why I must speak the truth. True loyalty to one’s nation is not blind praise or silent complicity; it is the courage to tell the government the truth, respectfully, factually, and without bias, prejudice, or sentiment. It is standing firm not as an ethnic or political bigot, but as a voice of conscience committed to helping power see clearly, act justly, and make a lasting difference for the people. Prof. Sandra C. Duru Media Scientist | Security Consultant | Advocate for Institutional Integrity | Public Relations Expert | Professor of Public Policy & Strategic Communication https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19eyPM3SAe/?mibextid=wwXIfr
|
Unmasking the Rot: How Deep Corruption, Conspiracy, And Abuse Of Power Are Being Protected Within The System Many of you may not understand why I flew in with a few of my private investigators and detectives to help unravel an ongoing sensitive investigation that has almost certainly resulted in a big issue between me and some powerful leaders in the government, as well as a few top security officials who think they can shut me up or emotionally manipulate me into backing off this investigation or, rather, security concerns that might further expose too much incompetence, corruption, conspiracy, and other matters that could bring shame upon their country and offices. You all remember the petition we wrote to the IGP and to the Police Service Commission a few weeks ago? Yes, a portion of that petition was attended to by the IGP after persistent pressure and the presentation of strong evidence. But now, the IGP wants to intimidate me into submission and let go of Compol Akin Fakorede, who he must investigate. Could it be that he is the IGP’s “dirty officer”? Why is he shielding him from being investigated and prosecuted? I want to reassure the IGP that even he is not above the law if found guilty or wanting. As long as I remain within the ambit of the law, no fraternity, intimidation, and not even ethnic bias or favoritism, will ever stop me from demanding justice. I truly love and respect everyone, but not at the detriment of my own principles, rights, values, and beliefs. I have zero tolerance for intimidation, harassment, and injustice. Though my lawyers got a green light a few days ago that our very serious petitions, which were previously stepped on by the so-called criminal in police uniform, have finally been approved and assigned to the highest and best intelligence security department to handle, I asked all my lawyers to hold on until my strategic return with my experts in criminal investigation. I will officially request that all the criminal investigations and all our cases be consolidated into one single case before we proceed. My amazing truth ambassadors, we all can join hands with President Bola Tinubu to change Nigeria and make it work again, but we must do that strategically, intentionally, brilliantly, intelligently, fearlessly, and with REAL facts, evidence, and wisdom. And again, we must be within the ambit of the law. That is exactly what I silently did to DG SON Akanya, DG DSS A.Z. Gadzama, and former IGPs Hafiz Ringim, Ogbonna Onovo, and Tafa Balogun. We are most likely to have IGP Kayode Egbetokun join this list of Professor Sandra Duru’s ‘whitelisted or blacklisted’ police officers in the history of the Nigeria Police Force. I do not make noise, and I am not afraid of death because no man born of a woman, nor any mere mortal or demon, can eliminate me. I am a born spiritualist, and I know when I will be returning home to my Creator. It is not yet time. Now, look at the young man in white in this picture with Natasha Akpoti. He is Hamza Lamisi, the legislative aide and personal assistant to Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan. He operates a verified Facebook account through which he publicly published derogatory and defamatory remarks against me, while also making grave allegations that he expressly attributed to Commissioner of Police Akin Fakorede of the IGP Monitoring Unit. His statements further implicated the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) and the President of the Senate, thereby raising serious questions about the misuse of official authority, possible conspiracy, and unlawful coordination of defamatory propaganda under the guise of law enforcement communication. These are not mere social media utterances; they constitute prima facie evidence of witness tampering, witness bullying, emotional blackmail, harassment, intimidation, criminal defamation, misrepresentation of authority, and abuse of office. The content of the publication reveals a calculated attempt to obstruct justice, influence ongoing investigations, and manipulate public perception through deceit and misuse of official capacity. This material therefore possesses substantive evidentiary value and stands as a critical piece of proof that must be subjected to an independent, transparent, and comprehensive investigation in line with the provisions of law. Every issue and individual mentioned in the petition must be diligently examined to ensure that no abuse of power, conspiracy, or coordinated criminal conduct goes unpunished. Prof. Sandra C. Duru, BSc, MSc, PhD, FICA, DFCIHRM, ANipr, FSM, Dr.PPA, Dr.BAM, DFIPMA, DFAISM. Professor of Public Policy and Strategic Communication🇺🇸✍️🇳🇬 https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EqrrwajhU/?mibextid=wwXIfr
|
Prof. Duru Honored as Doctoral Fellow by AISM and IPMA for Excellence, Leadership, and Global Impact In a distinguished ceremony celebrating leadership and professional excellence, Prof. Sandra Duru was officially inducted as a Doctoral Fellow at the Africa Institute of Strategic Managers (AISM) and the Institute of Professional Managers and Administrators of Nigeria (IPMA). Both reputable institutions are proudly affiliated with the Chartered Institute of Professional Managers and Administrators, USA, reflecting international recognition of competence, integrity, and impact. The honorary fellowship acknowledges Prof. Mgbeke’s exceptional contributions to leadership development, strategic management, education, and global advancement. Over the years, Prof. Mgbeke has been an inspiration in promoting ethical leadership, professional excellence, and innovative administrative practices across sectors. Speaking after the induction, Prof. Duru expressed heartfelt gratitude, dedicating the achievement to God and describing the recognition as a divine reward for years of diligence, consistency, and service to humanity. “To God be the glory,” she said, emphasizing her commitment to continue driving positive change and contributing to Africa’s strategic and developmental growth. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19tTsrw1W3/
|
Breaking News! Court refused Natasha's application seeking to restrain Prof. Sandra Duru from posting or commenting about her pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice. Prof. Mgbeke https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17Gffi2sv1/?mibextid=wwXIfr
|
happiness32:I told you all to watch and see, I told you Natasha is a known liar. She did same with Reno and Bello The best predictor of future event is past event |
THE NATASHA’S SHADOWS WILL SOON BE REVEALED The Natasha’s shadows hidden behind the curtains of Nduka Obaigbena’s (the owner of Arise Television) unprofessional and quack broadcasting station will soon be revealed, and you will be so shocked that the entire orchestrated attack on the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, is too deep, politically motivated, and heavily sponsored!
|
EFCC Vs Yahaya Bello: No banking regulation breached in fund withdrawals- EFCC witness A High Court in the Federal Capital Territory, was on Wednesday, told that no banking regulation was breached in the withdrawals of funds by the government house administration under former governor Yahaya Bello of Kogi State. A witness of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Mrs Williams Abimbola said that her bank, United Bank for Africa, UBA, acted within the ambit of the law during withdrawals by one of the defendants in the money laundering charges. The banker who was cross examined by A. M Aliu, counsel to Abdulsalami Hudu specifically told the court that non of the withdrawals was above N10 million being the maximum allowed by law for withdrawals. When the matter was called for continuation of hearing, the witness, a Compliance Officer with UBA, admitted that she had given similar evidence before the Federal High Court in FHC/ABJ/CR/98/2024 between the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Yahaya Adoza Bello. The witness, however, admitted not being the relationship or account manager of the Kogi Government House account and that the account was domiciled in Lokoja but noted that transactions were in line with stipulated guidelines. The witness, who had testified that she worked at the Area 3, Abuja branch of UBA at a previous Federal High Court hearing on March 6, 2025, told the court that she could work at any branch. “I reported to 18, Adetokunbo Ademola Wuse 2, Abuja, this morning,” she said. On cross-examination, Yahaya Bello’s Counsel, Joseph Daudu, SAN, asked the witness that, as a Compliance Officer, does her duty involve protecting the integrity of the bank from legal penalty, reputational damage and financial losses? “Yes,” she responded. She had, while testifying, confirmed multiple transactions by Abdulsalam Hudu in the sum of N10 million each between 31st July and 6th August, 2019. But she told the court that she was not in a position to know why the withdrawals were made. When asked if no banker demands to know the purpose for which a customer makes a withdrawal, she explained that when making transfer, the bank asks for the purpose of transaction and relationship on high volume transactions. But she added that the bank does not make such enquiries in the case of cash withdrawal, noting that the banker was not an internal auditor of the customer. She also mentioned transfers, in tranches, by one Bello Abdullateef, on July 5, 2019, but noted, on cross-examination, that her bank did not breach any regulations in allowing the withdrawals or transfers. ”There was no withdrawal that went beyond N10 million in all the transactions presented before the court,” Williams said, while responding to the Defendant’s Counsel. She claimed to have been with her bank for 19 years and that she understood the duties of a cashier, which included paying cash and receiving cash. She also admitted that a customer could withdraw his money as much as he liked in as much as the mandate was correct. The witness had earlier listed the authorised signatories on the Kogi Government House account, as at 2004, to include Christopher Enefola, Permanent Secretary; Onekutu Daniel, Chief Accountant; Hudu Abdulsalami, Accountant. She mentioned a letter dated, September 2008, with three signatures – Elder P.S Ocheni, Abbas Ibrahim Abubakar, Chief Accountant; and Abdulsalami Hudu, Senior Accountant. During cross-examination by the Counsel to the 3rd defendant, A.M. Aliyu, the witness was presented with a bank statement (Page 3 of F1, May 27, 2019), where the withdrawals were made. She admitted that the narration on the credit entry was the Governor’s security fund, and noted a credit entry of N100 million, in two tranches of N50 million each. “Can you, on oath, tell this court that those funds were not used for security purposes after withdrawal?” the counsel asked. “My Lord, I am not privy to the details of the transaction and cannot categorically answer that question,” the witness responded. Earlier, during cross-examination by Daudu, SAN, the witness had admitted that she had not met or had any business to do with the 2nd defendant, Umar Oricha. She also said she had not met the first defendant, former Governor Yahaya Bello, before. Counsel to the 1st Defendant, Joseph Daudu, SAN, had ealier informed the court about an application before it, challenging jurisdiction. He prayed the court to take their application so as not to waste precious time on witnesses. “I urge your lordship to give us a date. Let’s deal with the issue of jurisdiction,” he submitted. Prosecution’s counsel, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, however, argued that the application was not ripe for hearing and that the motion should wait until November 12, another date for hearing. The EFCC also called its 4th subpoenaed witness, Jesutoni Akoni, a Compliance Officer with Ecobank, who confirmed that he had a 13-page document before him. Counsel to the 2nd defendant, AM Aliyu, however, objected to the admissibility of the document tendered, saying it did not comply with the provisions of the Evidence Act. The Court then discovered that the document tendered by the prosecution was actually addressed to Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court. The prosecution admitted this and withdrew the cover letter. The witness admitted, on cross-examination, that the name of Hudu Abdulsalam did not feature as signatory to the account. She also said that he did not know the three signatories to the account. Justice Maryann Anenih thereafter adjourned further hearing till October 9, 2025. https://dailypost.ng/2025/10/08/efcc-vs-yahaya-bello-no-banking-regulation-breached-in-fund-withdrawals-efcc-witness/
|
“If Condoms Are Given Free, Sanitary Pads Should Also Be Free for Women” – Governor Uba Sani as He Launches Pad the Girl Child Initiative A Historic First in Kaduna State and Northern Nigeria For the first time in the history of Kaduna State and Northern Nigeria, the Kaduna State Government has launched the “Pad the Girl Initiative”, a groundbreaking program designed to promote health, dignity, and empowerment among young women. Under the visionary, people-oriented, and compassionate leadership of His Excellency, Senator Dr. Uba Sani, CON, Governor of Kaduna State, this initiative reflects a bold, inclusive, and modern approach to governance. Governor Uba Sani has once again demonstrated that true leadership listens, cares, and takes decisive steps to uplift the most vulnerable, especially young girls. The initiative, which commenced on 20th September 2025 at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, will provide free sanitary pads and menstrual health education to over 40,000 female students across tertiary institutions in Kaduna State. Why It Matters Menstrual health remains one of the least discussed yet most pressing challenges for girls in Nigeria. Many young women are forced to miss classes or even drop out of school due to lack of access to sanitary pads. By making pads freely available, Governor Uba Sani is not just meeting a health need, but breaking barriers to education, restoring dignity, and advancing gender equality. This initiative is a practical demonstration of the Governor’s belief that if condoms can be distributed free in the interest of public health, sanitary pads must also be free in the interest of women’s health and dignity. Broader Commitment to Girl-Child Empowerment Beyond menstrual health, Governor Uba Sani has consistently prioritized programs that empower the girl child. His administration has expanded scholarships for female students in STEM fields, strengthened laws against gender-based violence, promoted digital skills training for young women, and supported vocational programs that give girls sustainable livelihoods. Each of these efforts reflects a comprehensive vision for women’s empowerment, one that combines education, safety, and opportunity. Directed and coordinated by Dr. Abuh Raymond and Sumayyah Muhammad Sani, Coordinators of the Kaduna State Government “Pad the Girl” Initiative and UBA Ambassadors Network, the program stands as a historic step toward a future where no girl in Kaduna State is denied education or dignity because of her gender. This landmark intervention is more than a welfare program, it is a declaration that women’s health and dignity matter. Governor Uba Sani’s leadership is rewriting the narrative for Kaduna State and Northern Nigeria, ensuring equity and empowerment for the next generation. Kudos to His Excellency, Senator Uba Sani, for his unwavering commitment to the welfare of Kaduna’s young women and girls. His leadership is truly making a difference.
|
Happy Independence Day Nigerians! “Super Sandra, Hero Of The Moment, Nigeria Is Standing Up For You! You Are The Most Discussed Topic In All Of Nigerian Homes.” - CP Akin Fakorede, Head Of IGP Monitoring Unit. I waited to celebrate my own Independence Day on my ancestral soil with the Nigerian police most stupid and unintelligent criminal in police uniform, CP Akin FAKOREDE, who is working tirelessly with Natasha and her nonentities and one most useless man who by coincidence shares the same last name with me. As a media scientist, I have unmasked their latest trick, their media weaponization, and their propaganda against me to make me look like what they are portraying in the media “fake professor” “blackmailer who was paid to lie against Natasha” whereas FAKOREDE Akin knows the truth and has even praised me for my high level of intelligence and integrity. They think they can tag me crazy, lunatic, troublesome, and purposeless, a person who has no direction on this case and as if I am fighting everyone. But they have failed woefully because I have established intelligence and cases with exceptional evidence that no one among them can escape. Tell me, what kind of police officer investigates high profile cases of this sort, while disgracing his office, his IGP, and his rank like COMPOL Akin FAKOREDE? What is his relationship with Natasha, Sandra, and Hamza Lamisi? Anyway, happy Independence to Nigerians who have endured the likes of pathological liars and manipulators like Akin FAKOREDE and Natasha. But let it be known, this is the end of the era of false accusations without evidence. No more media manipulation. No more gender weaponization in Nigeria. I am their terror and their nightmare. Akin FAKOREDE, stop waking me up with childish and petty things. Take them to your likeminded low level of intelligence fellow who is on the same level of stupidity, Natasha. I am a forensic mind and I am on a clear mission to bring people like you to book. FAKOREDE Akin woke me up this morning with a link to an uncensored blog post sponsored by him and also wrote me his usual harassing message. Let’s read his praises and his derogatory remarks, too. He is truly mentally unstable! Now, tell me, who do you think Akin Fakorede is working with or for? Who is Hamza Lamisi? Who do you think has that phone number that threatened my like? Who is sponsoring the new propaganda campaign against me to distract us from asking for the evidence? Why are they sponsoring attacks on my credibility, integrity, and character? What do i have in my possession that they are worried about? Do you think Akin FAKOREDE deserves to remain in the Nigerian Police Force? Prof. Sandra C Duru
|
More images and chats between Prof Sandra Duru ans CP Fakorede exposed
|
Prof. Duru Petitions IGP, Calls for Investigation of Commissioner Fakorede Over Alleged Misconduct The crisis surrounding the high-profile case between the Federal Government of Nigeria and Senator Natasha Akpoti has deepened, as Prof. Sandra Duru, widely known as Prof. Mgbeke, has petitioned the Inspector General of Police, accusing a senior officer of corruption, intimidation and obstruction of justice.https://thenigerianpost.com.ng/prof-duru-petitions-igp-calls-for-investigation-of-commissioner-fakorede-over-alleged-misconduct/
|
*Attempt to Discredit Prof Sandra Duru: Nigerians Question CP Akin Fakorede’s Political Cover Ups, SARS Controversies Amid Sen. Natasha Akpoti’s Alleged Role* The coordinated attacks on Prof. Sandra C. Duru, popularly known as Prof. Mgbeke, are beginning to unravel as Nigerians take a closer look at the man her critics are trying so hard to protect, Commissioner of Police Akin Victor Fakorede. More Nigerians online are beginning to see through what looks like a coordinated campaign by Commissioner of Police Akin Victor Fakorede and Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan to discredit Sandra C. Duru (Prof. Mgbeke). What began as a Facebook livestream exposing political corruption has now grown into a nationwide debate, not about Sandra Duru’s credibility, but about why Nigeria’s political and security elite are desperate to silence her. In recent weeks, social media has been awash with attempts to ridicule Duru’s revelations and paint her as “delusional.” But Nigerians on X (Twitter) and Facebook are asking a different question: If CP Fakorede truly has nothing to hide, why the orchestrated smear campaign against one woman’s voice? Some newfound supporters of CP Fakorede paint him as a “forensic genius” and incorruptible officer. Yet, this narrative ignores troubling reports over the years linking his name to controversial operations, abuse of office, and politically-tainted policing. Public memory is not so short as to forget that during his time in Rivers State SARS, his unit was repeatedly accused of extrajudicial killings, harassment of civilians, and partisan interference in elections. When civil society groups, human rights lawyers, and even the National Human Rights Commission raised alarms, the cases were buried under bureaucracy. To now call him “spotless” is to erase history with the stroke of a pen. *Silencing a Whistleblower* Prof. Sandra Duru’s outspokenness has clearly unsettled powerful circles. Instead of engaging with her allegations, detractors have opted for the oldest trick in the book: smear the messenger. Label her “attention-seeker,” “delusional,” “blackmailer,” and hope Nigerians stop asking the real questions. But what exactly has she said? That there are powerful interests who manipulate narratives, launder reputations, and suppress dissent through intimidation. For daring to speak, she is now the target of coordinated attacks by bloggers and faceless groups suddenly rushing to defend CP Fakorede. Is this coincidence? or is it a strategy to protect certain individuals from scrutiny? Sandra Duru insists her only crime was petitioning authorities about political blackmail, only for CP Akin Victor Fakorede to hijack the matter. Instead of pursuing the suspects she named, Fakorede allegedly released them and turned the case against her, while his allies echoed Natasha Akpoti’s media surrogates in branding her “fake professor,” “delusional,” and “criminal.” She accuses Fakorede of harassment, intimidation, and bias, abusing his office to protect Natasha’s interests. Nigerians argue this is not policing but persecution, raising fears that Nigeria’s security institutions are once again being weaponised against whistleblowers rather than serving justice. *Natasha Akpoti’s Shadow Role* In recent months, Natasha Akpoti has positioned herself as a crusader against corruption, claiming to have been sexually harassed by Senate President Godswill Akpabio. But Sandra Duru shocked Nigerians when she alleged that Akpoti privately tried to recruit her into a blackmail scheme against Akpabio, allegedly offering her huge sums of money. Instead of addressing these allegations head-on, Natasha has responded with blanket denials and counterattacks, calling Duru’s evidence “manipulated.” Yet Nigerians are asking: if Sandra Duru has nothing, why does Natasha sound rattled? Why the rush to dismiss her instead of agreeing to an independent forensic review of the call logs and recordings? Even more suspicious is the sudden media blitz in which Natasha’s allies and CP Fakorede’s defenders appear to be working from the same script, where Natasha’s media aides and personal assistant are on social media hailing CP Fakorede and attempting to mislead gullible followers by tarnishing Sandra Duru, dismiss her as irrelevant, and hope Nigerians forget the evidence. *Where Is the Evidence Against Her?* The anti-Duru publications thunder about “lack of evidence” but produce none themselves to absolve Fakorede. If she has no facts, why the obsession with silencing her? Why not allow an open investigation, with her evidence and his record both placed before the public? Truth does not fear light. But coordinated propaganda and name-calling are signs of panic, not confidence. Nigeria’s problem is not whether one woman “wants attention.” The problem is that our policing institutions remain opaque, shielded from accountability, and too often used as political weapons. If CP Fakorede is as clean as advertised, he should welcome a transparent probe into his past operations, finances, and affiliations, especially given the weight of accusations that have followed him across postings. Instead, what Nigerians are seeing is a public relations blitz to polish his image while vilifying his critics. Whatever one thinks of her style, Prof. Sandra C. Duru has shown a courage rare in today’s dispensation. She has taken on entrenched figures, exposed inconsistencies, and refused to be cowed by cyber-bullying or media intimidation. To dismiss her as “irrelevant” is to miss the point: she is raising uncomfortable questions that powerful men would rather bury. History shows that whistleblowers are often ridiculed before they are vindicated. The attempt to paint CP Akin Fakorede as untouchable and Sandra Duru as delusional is a lazy narrative that insults Nigerians’ intelligence. Nigerians must treat the glowing tributes to CP Fakorede for what they are: public relations stunts designed to drown out uncomfortable truths. The bigger question remains: Why are those in power so afraid of what Sandra Duru has to say?
|
*Birthday: Message of FGYB to Sen. Ohere* My brother and loyal ally, Felicitation on your 59th birthday! Happy 59th birthday, my dear Senator Abubakar Ohere - a steadfast leader and a shining example of dedication to public service. I am honoured to extend warmest wishes to you and your family on this day. Your tireless efforts to uplift and empower communities have left an indelible mark on countless lives - and your sacrifice, wisdom and commitment to our nation, and to the cause of our New Direction political family have been inspiring. I recall with great fondness your remarkable contributions in my administration, where you served with distinction in multiple capacities. As Special Adviser on Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, you brought your expertise to bear in strengthening local governance and advancing community development. Your subsequent appointment as Honourable Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs further showcased your capabilities and dedication. Later, as our Commissioner for Works and Housing, you oversaw critical infrastructure projects that transformed the development and commercial landscape of Kogi State. In all, your commitment to excellence earned you widespread respect and recognition, and it was no surprise, therefore, when you transited to the National Assembly - where you were equally impressive as the Distinguished Senator represent Kogi Central. Beyond your professional achievements, I cherish the personal relationship we have built over the years on the foundations of mutual respect, trust, and a shared passion for a better Nigeria. Abu, you are more than a colleague to me - you are a brother, friend, confidant, and a true partner in progress. Your integrity, humility, and kindness are always appreciated. On this special milestone today, I pray the Almighty God to continue blessing you with good health and wisdom, as well as higher heights in life and service. I wish you relentless joy, love, and purpose. Happy birthday, my man. God bless you richly. YAHAYA BELLO, CON!
|
after4:If convicted, read well before making statements |
Revisiting Senator Natasha’s Eligibility: Sections 66(1)(c), 68(1)(b), and 68(2) of the Constitution The legal and constitutional implications of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s recent conviction for defamation and other pending legal matters raise important questions about her continued eligibility to occupy a seat in the Nigerian Senate. While Section 66(1)(c) lays the foundation for disqualification, Sections 68(1)(b) and 68(2) outline the procedure and powers through which the Senate can enforce or give effect to such disqualification. Relevant Constitutional Provisions Section 66(1)(c) – Ground for Disqualification “No person shall be qualified for election to the Senate or the House of Representatives if: (c) he has been convicted and sentenced for an offence involving dishonesty or fraud, or any other offence punishable by imprisonment of more than one year... unless he has been granted a pardon.” This provision establishes that conviction and sentencing for an offence involving dishonesty, fraud, or other serious crimes disqualifies a person from election or continued membership of the National Assembly. Section 68(1)(b) – Vacancy Arising from Disqualification “A member of the Senate or of the House of Representatives shall vacate his seat in the House of which he is a member if: (b) any other circumstances arise that, if he were not a member of the Senate or the House of Representatives, would cause him to be disqualified for election as a member...” This means that if a serving senator becomes disqualified under Section 66 after being elected (e.g., via a criminal conviction), their seat becomes vacant by operation of law. Section 68(2) – Senate’s Power to Determine Vacancy “The President of the Senate or, as the case may be, the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall give effect to the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, so however that he is satisfied that the provisions of that subsection have become applicable in respect of any member.” This vests the Senate President with the authority to declare the seat vacant—but only if satisfied that the constitutional conditions for disqualification have indeed occurred. This often requires: final conviction by a competent court; Evidence that the sentence exceeds one year and the offence involves dishonesty, fraud, or other moral failings; No presidential or gubernatorial pardon has been granted. Implications for Senator Natasha 1. Defamation Conviction: If the defamation case leads to a conviction and is criminal in nature, and results in a sentence exceeding one year, and if it is shown to involve dishonesty or intent to deceive, then Section 66(1)(c) could apply. The Senate President, under Section 68(2), may then be called upon to declare the seat vacant. 2. Contempt and Other Charges: If any pending case leads to a criminal conviction and sentencing, and the nature of the offence fits Section 66(1)(c), disqualification follows. The triggering of Section 68(1)(b) makes her continued tenure in the Senate unconstitutional. 3. Appeal Process: If the conviction is under appeal, the disqualification may not take full effect yet, as courts generally allow for exhaustion of appellate rights before enforcing disqualification. However, if the Senate President is satisfied that the conviction has reached finality or is enforceable (e.g., no stay of execution), he can act under Section 68(2). Conclusion: Legal Pathway to Disqualification The combination of Sections 66(1)(c), 68(1)(b), and 68(2) presents a clear constitutional mechanism for disqualifying a sitting senator once the grounds are met. In Senator Natasha’s case: If her defamation case leads to a conviction or any other legal outcome meets the threshold of Section 66(1)(c), And if no pardon is issued or appeal fails, The Senate President has constitutional authority under Section 68(2) to declare her seat vacant. Until then, the presumption of innocence and the right to appeal protect her tenure—but the constitutional risks remain real and could be decisive if the legal outcomes firm up. |
Suspended Sen. Natasha Akpoti in Court Over Defamation Charges—Yet to File Any Sexual Harassment Petition Against Akpabio Suspended Senator representing Kogi Central, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, was again spotted at the Federal High Court in Abuja on June 30, 2025, for the continuation of proceedings in the cybercrime suit filed against her by the Federal Government. While the embattled senator maintains a posture of defiance in court, critics continue to highlight a glaring omission in her legal activity — she has yet to formally file any petition or complaint regarding her widely publicized sexual harassment allegation against Senate President Godswill Akpabio. Despite sparking a nationwide uproar earlier this year by hinting at alleged sexual misconduct by the Senate President, Natasha has provided no evidence, no police complaint, no legal filing, and no follow-through, only a series of local and international media tours, one of which she shed tears, what some netizens may have described as an emotional game. Her silence on that front, while she faces serious criminal charges, is raising fresh questions about her credibility and motives. “This is no longer oversight; it looks deliberate. She accused Akpabio but hasn't taken legal steps.” – @LegalWatchNG “She weaponized a serious issue to score political points. That’s dangerous and disgraceful.” – @NaijaTruth On June 30, Natasha stood before Justice Mohammed Umar, where she is facing six counts of cybercrime under Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025, filed by the Director of Public Prosecution, Mohammed Abubakar. The charges allege that she deliberately made false and damaging statements against Senate President Akpabio and former Governor Yahaya Bello of Kogi State. She pleaded not guilty, and the trial is expected to commence on September 22, 2025. She was granted bail on self-recognition, though legal analysts say the weight of the allegations could have significant implications for her political future. Many observers now view Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s courtroom appearances as the fallout from a pattern of recklessness — one that involves making baseless public accusations, mobilizing media sympathy, but failing to act within the bounds of the law. In a country where genuine victims of harassment struggle to be heard, critics say Natasha’s conduct not only undermines her integrity but also trivializes real struggles by weaponizing sensitive issues for political effect. As the September trial date approaches, the public remains focused — not just on the court’s verdict, but on whether Senator Natasha will ever formally back her many allegations with evidence. For now, that silence is louder than any press release. https://punchng.com/alleged-cybercrime-trial-begins-september-as-court-grants-natasha-bail/?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwLQjMBjbGNrAtCMumV4dG4DYWVtAjExAAEeOvVS6ZaTvQp9_DONJIKpFkJIpQSyJqAumIGBy3H54r2MC8-pAsSiuXAxnDM_aem_1O1Bg76K7wGcbz3tKE9bkw
|
Dr. Sandra Duru Fires Back at Senator Natasha Akpoti, Demands Legal Showdown Dr. Sandra C. Duru, a renowned media and public policy advocate, has issued an uncompromising statement, warning the embattled Kogi Central senator, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, that the era of “emotional manipulation and social media drama” is over. This comes in response to what Dr. Duru describes as “a deliberate campaign of falsehood and public deceit” orchestrated by Akpoti-Uduaghan to tarnish reputations and derail the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu by targeting Senate President Godswill Akpabio. In a public post shared on Wednesday 18th June, Dr. Duru stated: “Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, not even a million sponsored bloggers, nor your Tunde Ednuts, Adeola Fayehuns, Sowore and his Sahara Reporters, your gossip consortiums like Gistlover, nor the confused journalists moonlighting as activists on Arise Tv can intimidate me or drown out the truth.” The public statement is not the strongest yet from Dr. Duru, who has become a central figure in the counter-narrative to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s escalating accusations involving allegations of sexual harassment, corruption, and organized abuse of office. Dr. Duru alleged that Natasha’s campaign is part of a wider, well-funded effort to discredit key figures in the current administration—starting with Akpabio, with the ultimate aim of destabilizing President Tinubu’s government. She challenged Natasha to take her “drama” to the courtroom and face the full legal consequences of her claims, stating pointedly: “You alleged. Now you must prove… The courtroom is not an Instagram live session. The law does not run on gossip or sentiment. Justice is not served through hashtags.” Beyond the legal challenge, Dr. Duru painted Natasha’s behavior as manipulative, and part of a dangerous pattern of gender weaponization and media manipulation that threatens the integrity of public discourse. In a follow-up note, she referenced threats allegedly made against her life, suggesting that forces opposed to her mission are desperate to silence her. Now, with Dr. Duru openly throwing down the gauntlet, the pressure is mounting for the Senator to move from media circuits to legal corridors. It remains to be seen how Akpoti-Uduaghan will respond. But what is clear is that Dr. Sandra Duru is not backing down. If anything, she has escalated the stakes and reframed the confrontation—not just as a personal battle, but as a moral and national reckoning. As Dr. Duru herself put it: “You have bitten more than you can chew—legally, morally, and intellectually. Enough is enough.” This is no longer just a clash of political narratives. It is a direct confrontation over truth, reputation, and the future of justice in the age of hashtags and headlines. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1JTohozXzg/
|
It started with a simple request for clarity. On a bright Monday morning, scrolling through Facebook, I came across a stylish selfie posted by Senator Natasha H. Akpoti. She looked composed, fashionable, and confident—captioned with declarations of resilience amidst controversy. She wrote, " Some women are lost in fire, some women are BUILT from it… Michelle K. For the love of country 🇳🇬 and people… I remain unbent, unbroken and unapologetic for standing by my truth". But in the midst of her defiant poise, there were unanswered allegations she had made against prominent figures—Senator Godswill Akpabio, Governor Yahaya Bello, and Reno Omokri. Allegations that, if true, could shake political foundations. So, as a concerned citizen, I dropped a comment: "Show evidence, you say you remain unbent." A calm, fair question—right? But within minutes, the digital wind shifted. A verified commenter joked beneath my post, “E mean say the evidence bend na,” triggering laughter from onlookers. The thread was growing, attention mounting. Then—suddenly—I was blocked.
|
"Even the Devil will run for its life": Senator Natasha Akpoti's Brother Describes Her in Leaked Chats* The controversies surrounding suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan seems not to be ending anytime soon, as a newly leaked and confirmed chats reveals very damning statements from a member of her own family. Leaked private chats have surfaced showing her own brother, Akpoti Okehi, making damning remarks about her character. The development comes amid an intensifying public dispute between Akpoti and social advocate Dr. Sandra Duru. The leaked conversations, posted by Dr. Duru on her verified Facebook page, show Okehi describing his sister in unflattering terms, stating that “even the devil will run for its life”. The messages suggest a level of internal family disapproval that may cast doubt on Senator Akpoti’s narrative in the public domain. Dr. Duru claims Okehi reached out to her privately on May 13, 2025, and even encouraged her to reveal more facts about his sister. In the messages, when Duru suggested the senator might need prayers or psychological support, Okehi reportedly dismissed the idea and hinted that the worst is yet to come. “It’s clear now that this is not just about politics or misunderstanding,” Duru wrote. “When a person’s own sibling describes them in such terms and encourages transparency, it speaks volumes. Duru has described a consistent pattern of dishonesty and deflection within the Akpoti family. She referenced past incidents where the senator allegedly misrepresented events, including claims brought to international platforms such as the United Nations and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), involving allegations of sexual harassment, assasination plots, gender-based violence, and even organ harvesting. Duru maintains that many of these claims were fabricated and designed to manipulate public sympathy. “Rather than resolving issues with a simple apology, she [Akpoti] turned it into a global media circus,” Duru wrote. “And now, her brother’s own words have confirmed what many feared—that this is a pattern, not an accident.” Okehi, after the chats were made public, reportedly claimed his account had been hacked, but Duru dismissed the claim as “kindergarten-level damage control,” citing digital footprints and metadata as evidence of authenticity. When verified, the phone number released by Duru as given by Okehi, showed it was actually Natasha’s own brother. The post concludes with a call for accountability and an insistence that public figures must not hide behind media theatrics or false narratives to escape scrutiny. As of the time of this report, Senator Natasha Akpoti has not issued an official response to the leaked chats or her brother’s comments. However, the incident is already stirring renewed debate about the senator’s credibility and the deeper dynamics within the Akpoti family. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1S5d3XNXeD/
|
“Diarrhea of Stories— Medical Doctor Challenges Adeola Fayehun to Address Damning Audio Evidence Linked to Natasha Akpoti[size=8pt][/size]” In the ongoing controversy surrounding Senator Natasha Akpoti, Adeola Fayehun, and Dr. Sandra Duru (Prof. Mgbeke), a Nigerian medical doctor, DS Omeiza, has stepped forward with a candid and unfiltered response—urging all parties, especially Adeola, to stop the distractions and face the core issue: the unaddressed audio recordings linked to organ harvesting claims and Senate disruption. In a statement that has since gained traction, the doctor admitted to initially ignoring Adeola’s recent recordings—until curiosity got the better of him. “I managed to watch till 15 minutes before I zoomed off,” he wrote, “I had thought she provided a mountain of undeniable evidence against Prof. Mgbeke. I never knew it is just another diarrhea display of cho cho cho without any substances.” According to him, what Adeola is doing is nothing more than character assassination—“focusing on the personality of Prof. Mgbeke while shutting her eyes to the evidence she has provided.” Of all the numerous stories and claims being circulated, he singles out only one item as materially significant: the now-viral audio recordings. The recordings allegedly capture a conversation in which Natasha admits to sending representatives to disrupt Senate proceedings, along with her voice being linked to organ harvesting claims. The doctor emphasized, “If you watched the Senate hearing on that day, you’ll not have a hard time believing they never went there for smooth proceedings.” He challenged those dismissing the audio as fake or AI-generated, insisting that such claims must be backed by real evidence. “If you say the audio is fabricated, then show us how and when it was fabricated. Don’t just say it—we are done with stories.” Calling for focus and sincerity, the doctor distanced himself from the gossip-style narrative that’s dominating online discourse. “I don’t have time to listen to how Prof. Mgbeke had sex 7 times a day or drinks water through her anus. That’s highly irrelevant to me.” His position, consistent from the start, reflects a broader public sentiment: allegations must be proven, no matter who is making them. Whether it was Prof. Mgbeke accusing Akpabio, or Natasha accusing others, the demand remains the same—show us the evidence. In a time when misinformation and sensationalism dominate public discourse, his message serves as a sobering reminder: credibility must be built on facts, not feelings. |
Suspended Sen. Natasha Akpoti Appears in Court Over Contempt Charges—Yet to File Sexual Harassment Petition Against Akpabiohttps://www.vanguardngr.com/2025/05/sen-natasha-arrives-court-as-judge-hears-akpabios-contempt-claims/amp/
|
Umoren family denies organ harvesting allegations against Akpabiohttps://punchng.com/umoren-family-denies-organ-harvesting-allegations-against-akpabio/?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwKOaIRjbGNrAo5oFmV4dG4DYWVtAjExAAEe4e3FUzevdyvz6PpU1K_iFp6tx7iLFDN0p_XdPPUaXtT9gp0noiTvpE7D4as_aem__YkO-65u_fkzt_kUnNlOCw
|
Senator Natasha’s Defender, Ogbonnaya Seen Eulogising Sandra Duru, Nigerians Demand Evidence of Allegations from Natasha Akpoti Tension continues to rise in the controversy involving Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan as Nigerians express growing frustration over what they describe as media distractions and poorly planned damage control. In a surprising twist, Mrs. Francess Ogbonnaya, who was recently hailed by Natasha Akpoti on facebook page for her “courage in speaking up,” has been seen in an earlier video eulogising Sandra Duru—the very woman Natasha accuses of leading a smear campaign against her. Ogbonnaya called Sandra Duru infallible and a believer and supporter of truth in the viral video below: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mud27g9Xsuo?si=W5x0DvayCkrPYI7i This contradiction has sparked outrage online, with many Nigerians accusing Senator Natasha of desperation and media manipulation. Rather than offering solid proof to counter the serious allegations of sexual harassment, staged setups, and potential cover-ups, Natasha is being criticized for relying on what some call “cheap journalism” and emotional social media posts. The resurfaced video of Ogbonnaya’s praise for Duru has only added fuel to the fire, raising questions about the credibility of her testimony and the senator’s public narrative. Adding to the skepticism is the involvement of journalist Adeola Fayehun, who recently hosted Ogbonnaya on a Facebook Live session aimed at defending Natasha. Sandra Duru has accused Fayehun of being a hired media hand for Natasha, pointing to previous videos and social media activity that reveal a longstanding bias. Fayehun has often shown public support for Natasha, even dancing on social media during her campaigns and elections. In the live session hosted between Adeola and Fayehun, the two allegedly hired journalists by Natasha can be seen having a fight on air when asked if they were ready for police investigations on their claims, video below: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAhv9AKT4SE?si=92v7EPNoVw761N1r This perceived partiality has led many to question the neutrality of the platform used to push Natasha’s counter-narrative. As the back-and-forth continues, Nigerians are demanding substance over sentiment. The public is calling for hard evidence, not staged interviews or emotional outbursts. Without clear facts and legal clarity, the matter risks spiraling further into media theatrics and public fatigue. |