₦airaland Forum

kudinkarfe:
Which one come be your own. A typical Nigerian, he's not happy with these guys demanding their share of national cake but he is not saying anything when politicians are sharing yam

Virginnn:
If at this stage you don't realise it's Obaseki Vs Oshiomhole, then I strongly recommend that you be included in the upcoming medical examination.

smirn:
shut up your smelling mouth. Phillip should be ashamed of himself. What he will reap in future will be far more than these insultd to Oshomole. Shame to him , so you realized he is your father, your blinded eyes are beginning to open. You see how ungrateful you are Philip? Oshomole is now your Campaign focal point. You and your governor Obaseki has failed woefully. Look at all your useless campaign posters filtering airport road that was constructed by Oshomole, tell me one road you constructed and commissioned in Edo state for four years? It's obvious you have nothing good to campaign with but you should be assured that something worst than these insult to a man who brought development to Edo state will befall you soonest.

WoundedLamb:
All of you on this thread are hypocrites!

When gay people are humiliated and subjected to all sorts of terrible things in Nigeria due to your sadistic and archaic laws, you all support it. You forget that they are consenting adults who have the right to use theirs bodies anyway they want. But here you are calling out another country for humiliating heterosexual fornicators just because you all are in fornicators yourselves! You're all suddenly human right activists!

Shameless hypocrites!

Akhirastriver:
The same way bible frowns at fornication yet pastors do it

Confirmedzombie:
Osho is not contesting, whether PIO wins or not life goes on with him, he has made his money. Those badhing him here, how much have you made in life.

Osho doesn't know if any of you exists. So continue

ThatFairGuy1:
What has he become please?

Akhirastriver:
Were they beaten by Muslim ?werey

lexy2014:
From d story, it wasn't necessarily religious reasons that d couple was flogged

Supermugu:
.... Go read the Article again ! Na her country people ( Ghana community Leaders ) flogged her for tarnishing dem image not Saudi people ! It has nothing to do with religion

MNDY:
So you disgrace and assault a Saudi-Arabian in his own country because he slept with a girl from your country tarnishing the image of your country?

Shey the Ghana community in Saudi-Arabia and its leaders there soppose get level for anoda pesin land reach dat ni?

hisgrace090:
Go and thank God you did not ask this question in a Muslim dominated area.

uunwanaobong3:
CAS VERDICT

This is an official summary of CAS verdict on mancity...........this goes to show how foolish a Case UEFA and the Hate 8 clubs presented to CAS

Honestly, I am so embarrassed reading this....... UEFA should be investigated.sorry u couldn't go thru d back door...yea arsenal will slug it out with Sevilla next season in d Europa..UEFA is not as dull as nigerians..no evidence cuz the sourse UEFA got evidence from was a scam..courts dont use scam sourse as evidence pls learn to live with it .city has come to stay and dominate eya




https://www.manchestereveningnews.co

Man City vs Uefa court case details revealed by CAS

Manchester City DID provide to the Court of Arbitration for Sport the full content of the leaked emails which formed the basis of Uefa’s two-year ban.
And the independent court agreed with the Blues that nothing in them was proof that they had disguised owner investment as sponsorship money.
That was at the nub of the CAS decision to overturn Uefa’s two-year ban, which means City will be free to play in the Champions League next year.
CAS finally revealed the written reasons for their decision today, and said that three of Uefa’s allegations had been “time-barred” - that is, Uefa broke their own rules which state that any charges for breaches of financial fair play rule cannot stretch back further than five years.
But two more Uefa allegations were thrown out by CAS as lacking sufficient proof after City mounted a solid defence.

They pointed out that they were hacked by Rui Pinto, currently in jail facing criminal charges in Portugal, and said that “the Portuguese court has stated that Mr Pinto is not a whistleblower but is an extortionist, and that the stolen documents should not be used against the victims of his hacks.”
That was thrown out by Uefa, who said even if hacked, the emails were in the public interest.
But Uefa failed to show that the emails, once put into context, proved any wrongdoing.
The adjudicatory committee which initially found City guilty in February put great emphasis on mention in emails of “alternative sources” for most of the sponsorship fees in 2010. But that inadmissible as it referred to payments from a year BEFORE the break-even requirement.

The mistaken identification of Sheikh Mansour in one of the emails was central to City's defence
The leaked emails also made mention of “His Highness” which was assumed to mean City owner Sheikh Mansour.
But City’s team said that this in fact referred to Sheikh Tahnoon, chairman of the Abu Dhabi Tourist Authority – the CAS panel said there was no reason to believe that was untrue.
It was also claimed by City that the adjudicatory committee “wrongly assumed that the criminally obtained documents are genuine”, when they said it was obvious that at least some of the documents have been “edited to achieve a particular presentation”.
They also made the claim, accepted by CAS, that some of the financial “arrangements” discussed in the email had never come to fruition.
City said the leaked emails were “confusing snapshots, taken out of context, of matters that simply did not happen in the way that has been portrayed.”
The panel agreed that the CFCB adjudicatory committee had failed to reach the standard of proof required, and that the fairness of the market values of the sponsorship agreements was never questioned.
The Blues’ legal team said “MCFC has cooperated, in the face of a shifting and still uparticularised case involving allegations of fraud and conspiracy.”
They had said the leaked emails should not be admissible, but still answered the allegations based on them, and eventually agreed to release the original emails – there were six of them and one attachment used, out of around 5.5million hacked emails.
City also claimed that the CFCB had “systematically breached its duties of confidentiality and impartiality” during the process and that “ultimately MCFC has been investigated and prosecuted through a process that lacked impartiality and has, moreover, harmed MCFC.”
The CAS found that “leaked email number four is in fact a combination of two separate emails” which gives a “somewhat distorted impression”, and they based their decision on the originals, rather than the hacked versions published by Der Spiegel.
City and Uefa disputed when the five-year time bar should begin, and the panel adjudged any breaches before May 15, 2014 were inadmissible, which ruled out alleged breaches in 2012 and 2013.
But allegations dating to 2013-14 and 2015-16 were admissible – but the panel found insufficient evidence to find City guilty.
“The majority of the panel finds that the leaked emails by themselves are not sufficient evidence to support a finding that MCFC provided incorrect information to UEFA by disguising equity funding as sponsorship contributions”, they said.

City produced witnesses including board member Simon Pearce, also close to the Abu Dhabi Royal Family.
He replied “absolutely, categorically not” when asked if he had arranged payments to be made to Etihad to help fulfil sponsorship obligations.
The panel noted that none of the emails involved Etihad.
Uefa had claimed that the fact there were two separate payments of £59.5million and £8m made from Etihad was proof that one of them had been channelled through the airline from the funds of Sheikh Mansour’s Abu Dhabi United Group.
But City said the two payments came from two different budgets – central funds and marketing. Uefa said the £59.5 came from ADUG and the £8m from Etihad.
The panel found that the accounts also do not contradict City’s case, and that Uefa had singularly failed to provide any real proof that the Blues had breached FFP rules.
“Neither hypothesis is established and then it boils down to the burden of proof,” they said. “Given that UEFA carries the burden of proof and because the majority of the panel finds that it did not succeed in satisfying such burden, UEFA’s allegations must be dismissed.
They added: “There is no doubt that Etihad fully complied with its payment obligations towards MCFC and that MCFC rendered the contractually agreed services to Etihad in return.”
The award said the sponsorship agreements were “fair value” and there was no evidence City had tried to cover up any alleged violations or that they had actually gone through with some of the arrangements discussed in emails
They concluded that “UEFA’s theory on disguised equity funding remains unsubstantiated” adding the “theoretical possibility that this may have happened can certainly not be excluded but that is not the standard to be applied.”
City were eventually found guilty of failing to cooperate with the investigation by the semi-independent Club Financial Control Body.
City’s legal team had, CAS award, refused to cooperate because the evidence on which Uefa were proceeding was based entirely on hacked emails.
It said they “decided not to answer any questions on the authenticity of the criminally obtained documents or to produce any of the documents requested, suggesting that the request had not been made in good faith by the Chief Investigator.”
Uefa insisted they were relevant saying “Indeed they are at the core of this case.”
The panel found City should have cooperated with the investigation, and fined the Blues 10million euros.

engrrichie92:
funny

because I am the only person in this world that earns over 300K and hates his Job

focus7:
Is she the only seller in the world, the fish she's selling is it the one we eat or the one men only eat?

Anyway Hushpuppy claimed he's into real estate.

KwaraRat:
Federal and State civil servants will be mandated to take Bill Gates vaccine and ID2020 tag or risk termination.

Just watch and see.

Seun360:
E go be you like Telemundo.