Osezua's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Osezua's Profile › Osezua's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 10 pages)
By Ali Abare Abubakar - Special to The Washington Times - - Sunday, November 8, 2015http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/8/muhammadu-buhari-nigerian-president-too-slow-to-de/ |
The violence was carried out by both parties. APC killed PDP also killed. It wasnt a one party affair. |
The violence was carried out by both parties. APC killed PDP also killed. It wasnt a one party affair. |
The Media Consultant to Mrs. Diezani Alison-Madueke, Mr. Clem Aguiyi, has commended the Senate for televising live the screening of ministerial nominees as the truth about Diezani Alison-Madueke’s legacy as Petroleum Minister, is beginning to emerge despite the conspiracy to diminish her sterling accomplishments on the altar of politics.http://sunnewsonline.com/new/diezani-vindicated-as-kachikwu-upholds-her-policies-clem-aguiyi/ |
The highest is 66 while Sokoto is 15 and 7 for boys and girls respectively.Wow! See the rest after the cut.. http://www.lindaikejisblog.com/2015/10/check-out-wide-margin-between-sokoto.html |
The obvious feud between President Muhammadu Buhari and President of the Senate, Dr. Bukola Saraki is beginning to take a dangerous and unsavory turn, writes THISDAY Politics Desk Perhaps, it has become a matter of public knowledge that the current ordeal of the President of the Senate, Dr. Abubakar Bukola Saraki, isn't just political, but one conceived, interpreted and being executed by the soldier-turned democrat, President Muhammadu Buhari. Looking back, it is the belief of many that what has now turned out a mess of power play and indiscreet political leadership would have long been nipped in the bud if Buhari had been honest from inception by openly locating and situating his interest within the equation other than feigning to be above the fray with indistinct body language whilst on the background sowing the seed of the embarrassment that has become the newspeak on the political space. Evidently, the media trial of Saraki by the Code of Conduct Tribunal is beginning to look like some desperate attempt to undermine, intimidate, suppress, overwhelm, incapacitate, ridicule and denigrate the person of the Senate President. This is why the plot is generally seen in many quarters as being designed at the highest level of government and the ruling party, the All Progressives Congress (APC). The plotters, it is believed, include people in the presidency, some party leaders, a few aggrieved senators and two governors from the North-west, who believe if Saraki does go down, the development could enhance their chances of replacing Buhari in 2019. Given the intrigues, the latest development, it does appear, is to make a final push to remove Saraki as Senate President in the next couple of weeks before the end of the month so that when Buhari is finally submitting his list of prospective ministers, it would be to a stooge-Senate President. That is why the masterminds are believed to be making desperate moves with its attendant mistakes certain to crash their case. The scenario above seems plausible because it also explains the reason the masterminds cannot wait to comply with the provisions of the law, procedure and processes of the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act. Section 24 of the Act says any charge to be preferred against any person under this Act can only be handled by the Attorney General or whoever he has authorised to do so. But the last time the nation had an AG was in May 2015. It is therefore suspect why they can't wait to get an AG in place before proceeding with this? The answer is obvious. To appoint an AG, he has to appear before Saraki and others for confirmation. So, it stands to reason that the plan is to get Saraki off their way before appointing an AG, ministers and other nominees. To further compound the poorly conceived onslaught against Saraki, the current management of the Code of Conduct, is believed to have clearly ignored its own legally laid down procedure. For instance, Section 3 (d) requires the Bureau to offer the public officer the opportunity to either deny or admit to the non-compliance or breach as contained in the complaint. It is only in the event of a denial of the complaint that the matter can be forwarded to the Tribunal. Here: "Receive complaints about non-compliance with or breach of this Act and where the Bureau considers it necessary to do so, refer such complaints to the Code of Conduct Tribunal established by Section 20 of this Act. Provided that where the person concerned make a written admission of such breach or non-compliance, no reference to the Tribunal shall be necessary." This provision was ignored as Saraki was said to have first known about the alleged charges through two online news portals, which published the charges less than 24 hours after they were filed. The person being accused was served more than 24 hours after it had been published on the sites. That the plot was flawed was also evident in the fact that all the witnesses produced at the CCT were Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) officials. Isn’t it right to conclude therefore that the EFCC might have helped the CCB to verify the assets or are the two agencies working together on this “project”? That some stories for the gods! What is however clear in this mumbled up plot is the fact that the CCT chairman, Mr. Danladi Yakubu Umar is allegedly under investigation and even being tried by the EFCC. Again, isn’t it clear that they might have rushed to take the trial to a man inclined to “play balls”? The EFCC angle is equally instructive. Ibrahim Lamorde, the EFCC chairman, is believed to have a score to settle with Saraki because of his on-going trial in the Senate over allegations of embezzling N2trillion, being proceeds of sale of forfeited assets and recovered funds as filed in a petition by one Dr. George Uboh. What this means is that the EFCC is the one surreptitiously handling the case in the CCT and is working with a man believed to be under their manipulation as an accused in another case they are handling. From all indications, the EFCC might have tried severally to intimidate Saraki but unsuccessfully. It is no surprise therefore that most of the issues raised in the CCT charges had been raised by EFCC during both the already decided and the on-going court cases in which the commission is not making any progress. But they seem to be exploring all means possible, just so that anyone clicks. There is yet another procedural error in the current trial. After every declaration, EFCC usually carries out verification of assets to ascertain the veracity of claims. This usually involves face to face interview and presentation of documents. The question is: how come that they are now faulting Saraki's 2003 declaration in 2015? After the declaration in 2003, he had declared in 2007, 2011 and 2015. Just two weeks ago, the commission was said to have written to acknowledge the receipt of the 2015 declaration, raising another question of whether or not they had notified him of the inconsistencies they are now challenging? More than anything else, the claims appear conscripted than real because the concerned authorities have failed to do diligent investigation but rushed to action, thinking Saraki could be brought in even under very vague circumstances. Ponder this: in the first charge, they alleged anticipatory declaration in 2003 on a property said to have been owned by Saraki and occupied by his staff since 2001, that is, the 15A and 15B McDonald Road, Ikoyi. The one that the federal government sold to him later which they allegedly mistook for the 15A and B is identified as a property on Plot 17A and 17B. And since the plots are beside each other, it is taken that they mistook one for the other. Then on Plot 17A and B, they charged him for owning a property of N497.2m, which they said was beyond his means. But the argument being put forwarded is that with Saraki's antecedent, how can less than N500m be beyond his means? That is debatable. But first, reflect on the contradictions – a man who owned two plots and others cannot and should not afford two other plots in the same vicinity? In another charge, they said he claimed to earn money on a house under construction. Here, they feigned not to know about buying property off-line or paying rent to a landlord, whose house is still under construction if interested in the property and its location and does not want others to beat you to it. This is simple logic of trade practices, which is well known even in law. Continue Reading on: http://www.thisdaylive.com/ |
Muhammadu Buhari talks a good game, but he’s already resurrecting the transactional, ethnic politics of his predecessors. The dust has finally begun to settle. For Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari, it was pixie dust, which enveloped and elevated him, along with the entire country, into an epic global spotlight that is only now starting to recede. The March 2015 presidential election marked the first time in Nigeria’s history that the ruling party stepped aside for the opposition, a story that graced the front pages and airwaves of major media outlets the world over. Buhari’s victory was framed as a new dawn for Africa’s wealthiest and most populous nation — a nation whose failure to curb widespread corruption and insecurity has been consistently blamed on the absence of strong leadership. Continue reading on link below http://hsrd.yahoo.com/_ylt=A2KLth_P2vpVcPsA4PWbvZx4;_ylu=X3oDMTNzZDRidnBmBGJwb3MDMQRjY29kZQNnYQRjcG9zAzMEY3QDMQRnAzczM2YxYzRmLWJiNzktM2RjNy1hZWY4LTVkZWJmM2FlMDFhZARpbnRsA3VzBGl0YwMwBHBrZ3QDNARwb3MDMQRzZWMDdGQtc3RybQRzbGsDdGl0bGUEdGVzdAM5MDE-/RV=1/RE=1443712975/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RO=2/RU=aHR0cDovL2ZvcmVpZ25wb2xpY3kuY29tLzIwMTUvMDkvMTUvbmV3LW5pZ2VyaWFuLXByZXNpZGVudC1zYW1lLW9sZC1wcm9ibGVtcy1idWhhcmkv/RS=%5EADAeixUk2HqnlnyjSh7QQn4q8fZFZ4- |
[b][/b]A mild drama played out at the Ota High court premises in Ogun state on Tuesday, September 15, as a mysterious snake forced a judge to release 7 detained journalists. According to Vanguard report, a judge attached to the state High Court 1, Ota, Ogun state, Justice N. I. Agbelu had ordered the journalists to be arrested and detained for allegedly filming the court premises without his consent. The detained journalists, Daud Olatunji(Vanguard), Samuel Awoyinfa(The Punch), Ernest Nwokolo(The Nation), Abiodun Taiwo(Daily Times) , Sulaiman Fasasi(Nigerian Pilot ), Wale Adelaja(TVC) and Johnson Akinpelu(Alaroye) had arrived the court at about 11:44a.m. to cover two proceedings involving victims of Pakoto demolition and killing in Oke – Ore community. A police orderly had identified them as men of the press and left them alone. Not long after, a woman, said to be the assistant court registrar accosted them, asking to see a letter of authorisation from the Chief Judge or a senior judiciary officer permitting them to enter the court premises. See link below. https://www.naij.com/552279-drama-mysterious-snake-appears-court-forces-judge-release-7-detained-journalists.html |
Last night reports surfaced that the presidency has reportedly been under pressure to relocate the Villa Chapel, because it is said to be too close to President Muhammadu Buhari’s bedroom and kitchen. See link below for more on the story.. https://www.naij.com/551845-read-presidency-planning-relocate-villa-chapel.html[b][/b] |
Where does INEC come in in all this matter. If inec who conducts the election says there was elections, how can the military's claim of no election invalidate the INEC's claim. ![]() |
Inec that conducted elections says there was election but the military says no election. why has more when it comes to election matters? ![]() |
Home News Business Tech Politics Sports Entertainment Style Viewpoint Editorial Forum Jobs Columns PROPERTY You are here : Home » News » How America, West frustrated Jonathan’s anti-Boko Haram war How America, West frustrated Jonathan’s anti-Boko Haram war on September 06, 2015 / in News, Trending 5:47 am / Comments Tweet By Emma Ujah, Abuja Bureau Chief As President Muhammadu Buhari inquires into the Boko Haram war expenditures under the last administration, it has emerged that Nigeria’s traditional allies in the West deliberately frustrated former President Goodluck Jonathan’s efforts towards ending terrorists’ activities in the country. US President Barack Obama (R) shakes hands with President Goodluck Jonathan of Nigeria before their bilateral meeting in New York on September 23, 2013 on the sideline of the United Nations General Assembly. AFP US President Barack Obama (R) shakes hands with President Goodluck Jonathan of Nigeria before their bilateral meeting in New York on September 23, 2013 on the sideline of the United Nations General Assembly. AFP A security source disclosed in Abuja that Nigeria, under the leadership of Jonathan, wrote 25 letters to the United States of America and other Western nations, seeking to acquire state of the art weapons to deal decisively with the terrorists. However, they all turned down the requests, the source said. “What was most painful was the fact that Nigeria was not begging to be given those weapons as gifts. We were ready to pay for them but they turned their backs on us when we needed them most. “The same people who made all the promises about assisting us to bring an end to the Boko Haram attacks and bring back the abducted Chibok girls did everything they could to frustrate our efforts”, he added. According to him, the scandal that broke out over the botched South African arms deals was the culmination of the worst that a frustrated sovereign nation could face. Two attempts by foreign contractors engaged by the nation’s highest security authorities to buy arms from South Africa and Israel were stopped and over $24 million of Nigeria’s hard earned foreign exchange seized by South African authorities in two separate instances in that country. It was learnt that though the funds were eventually released to Nigeria, the harm had been done and the purpose stopped mid-stream. Sunday Vanguard learnt that when it became very clear that the nation’s long-standing traditional allies were not prepared to assist, Nigeria had to turn to Eastern Europe and Asia for weapons. “A conclusion was reached that the nation would suffer more devastation should she continue to beg those we regarded as our friends when things were going on well with us. It was at that point that the nation had to look elsewhere, especially towards the East and Asia”, the source said. Nigeria’s Ambassador to the US who died in Washington, last week, Prof Adebowale Adefuye, captured the mood of the then government and most Nigerians when he addressed the American Council on Foreign Relations, in November last year. “The US government has up till today refused to grant Nigeria’s request to purchase lethal equipment that would have brought down the terrorists within a short time,’’ “We find it difficult to understand how and why, in spite of the US presence in Nigeria with their sophisticated military technology, Boko Haram should be expanding and becoming more deadly. “There is no use giving us the type of support that enables us to deliver light jabs to the terrorists when what we need to give them is the killer punch. A friend in need is a friend indeed. The true test of friendship is in times of adversity,” he said. America’s only excuse for refusing to sell the much-needed weapons to Nigeria was that Nigerian troops were reportedly not adhering to the fundamental human rights of the terrorists, in the prosecution of the Boko Haram war. The security source who spoke with Vanguard said the alternative arms sources in Eastern Europe and Asia did not only receive Nigeria with open hands, “we also got other forms of ‘technical assistance’ as those who provided some of the equipment also entered into agreement with us to have some of their military personnel join our troops for the purposes of ensuring optimal performance of all the equipments. “We didn’t want a situation where we would get to the war theatre and have any of the equipment breakdown without the expertise to promptly fix it”. The source said that Some of the expatriates seen among the troops were with them to provide such requisite technical assistance. According to him, the successes recorded from the last months of Dr. Jonathan in office and the current onslaught against the terrorist were due mainly to the arrival of various equipments from countries other than Western nations that call themselves Nigeria’s traditional allies. He observed that President Buhari’s panel would discover at the end of its sitting that it was not possible for the Jonathan administration to have reduced Boko Haram to the level it left it without having to bend backwards on several fronts to secure the right weapons and technical expertise. http://www.vanguardngr.com/2015/09/how-america-west-frustrated-jonathans-anti-boko-haram-war/[b][/b] |
[b][/b] President Muhammadu Buhari sure means well for Nigeria. He is disposed to tackling corruption. But let’s not make mistakes. He can’t fight and totally win any war against corruption. All he can ever achieve, in my opinion, is to substantially curb the menace. To eliminate it will be a very tall order because we live in a human society where there are different shades of want and need. No country in the world has been able to eliminate corruption. From my readings, corruption is not a phenomenon that can be eradicated, like you eradicate polio. However, given Buhari’s disposition, and strict disposition to the adherence of the rules, he may achieve a significant percentage reduction. But before he does that, he must address the moral burden he now lives with. That is one huge issue that will continually blight every effort he makes at prosecuting anyone for corrupt enrichment or embezzlement of public funds. Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a moral burden on Buhari. He is also a dent on whatever image Buhari professes to the public, and the world, as far as corruption war is involved. There is no denying the fact that Tinubu was one of the main facilitators of the Buhari presidency. He joined other key political actors to provide the platform and worked out the model with which Buhari achieved his dream of leading Nigeria as a democratically elected president. It will be, therefore, uncharitable to ever think of the Buhari presidency without tying it to Tinubu and his ability to mobilise resources for the feat. Tinubu delivered his media organs, The Nation, TV Continental, Radio Continental to the Buhari campaign, churning out persuasive messages and propaganda in the pursuit of the vision to enthrone the APC candidate into power. Yes, the former Lagos governor deployed other resources, financial and otherwise, to galvanise delegates support to deliver Buhari and the APC presidential primary election in Lagos. But despite all these, Tinubu is Buhari’s biggest moral baggage. So many putrid things swirl around the former Lagos State governor that no leader who is committed to tackling corruption can gloss over. And that is why voices asking the President to commence the cleaning of Nigeria’s Augean stable from his party have refused to be drowned. Tinubu is unquestionably one of the richest Lagosians nay Nigerians as at today. The stupendous wealth certainly can’t be located in the matrix of hard work. It is a product of shady deals, which shames his pretentious progressive credentials. These are some of his upscale business concerns, which he allegedly acquired after leaving office as governor using fronts, which he has found extremely difficult to explain its financial base: Oriental Hotel, Falomo Shopping Complex, First Nation Airline, Lekki Concession Company, Apapa Amusement Park, Maiyegun Land Project, The Nation, Renaissance Hotel, Ikeja, Tejuoso Market (Joint ownership), Ikeja Shopping Mall, TV Continental. He allegedly converted Lagos Polytechnic land for TVC, owns NNPC office building in Lagos, Radio Continental, School of Nursing building in Lagos. He’s involved as tax collector of Lagos State (Alpha Beta). His blind supporters believe that it is asinine to call attention to this abnormality. But the truth is that no serious nation can sweep such things under the carpet. The shibboleth of the current administration is fight against corruption. Tinubu is askew to that vision. An individual that owns 80 per cent of Lagos simply because he had the opportunity to govern the state cannot be a face of war on corruption, which the APC government represents. If the country is to hop into a new era of accountability, Tinubu, certainly, cannot be part of it. His socio-political life is strewn with dirts. Not too long ago, an online news magazine, Daily Beast.com, based in the US ran a story of Tinubu’s involvement in drug cartel in Chicago. Even though the truth or otherwise of the allegation cannot be ascertained, the man himself has not publicly denied it. In the same measure, the recurring issue of Tinubu’s parental background and state of origin have remained suffused in controversy. This is totally at variance with the personality of the president, whose social life is not in doubt. The lifestyle of the former Lagos State governor is largely the reason several Yoruba give cold shoulder to a suggestion that he should wear the armband of the leader of the ethnic group. Some reasons are always cited for rejecting him. First is his controversial academic claims and secondly, his large appetite for filthy wealth. These traits are opposed to the accommodating and incorruptible lifestyle of Pa Obafemi Awolowo. The latter sacrificed all for the Yoruba. He was unblemished in every sense of the word. And that informed his choice as the leader of the race. In contemporary time, Pa Abraham Adesanya lived for the people. He was neither greedy nor overbearing. His simple lifestyle and commitment to the cause of the Yoruba made people of the race to adopt him as their leader. For now, the person who shares these ennobling values and characteristics is former governor of Ogun State, Chief Segun Osoba. On account of his principled disposition to issues as well as his refusal to succumb to questionable political deals he was elbowed out of APC, a party he helped to build. All these things cannot be brushed aside by the Presidency. Nigerians are keenly watching on the template the administration intends to use to battle corruption. But Buhari has a leeway. He can redeem both his image and that of his deputy and in the process give credence to the anti-corruption fight if he borrows a leaf from Russia under Vladimir Putin. Like Buhari, Putin, a former KGB chief, was helped into office by some individuals considered to be most corrupt in the Russian society. Putin also was aware that his quest for office was being backed and financed by the best wheeler-dealers of the Russian society. They threw their money for his election in exchange for protection. These were corrupt business and oil magnets, who had abused whatever needed to be abused in the Russian society to become rich. These guys included Mikhail Borisovich Khodorkovsky of Yukos Oil. As at 2004, Khodorkovsky was Russia’s richest man and was worth $15 billion. Along with Roman Abramovich, he was named Russia’s Person of the Year in 2003. They all put considerable resources into financing Putin’s election. Despite their enormous contribution to ushering him to office, Putin refused to live with a moral burden as far as the campaign to stem corruption in his country was concerned. At a time in history, Nigeria was equated with Russia on the corruption index. But Putin has been able to pull Russia out of the infamous club. How did he do it? He first went after those who funded his election with illegally acquired wealth. For this reason, Khodorkovsky, who was first given the option to leave the country but refused, found himself before the law and was found guilty of tax evasion. He bagged a five-year prison term for tax evasion. While in prison, his business partner was prosecuted and found guilty of money laundering and embezzlement. For Khodorkosvky’s involvement, his jail time was extended. Further probe of Yukos Oil led to the eventual collapse of the company. With that, Putin sounded a note of seriousness in his anti-corruption battle in Russia. Putin’s action held a lot of promise for Russia. Having openly prosecuted and punished Khodorkovsky, one of his main election financiers, Putin off-loaded the moral burden that would have blighted his anti-corruption fight. This is the leaf Buhari must borrow if he is to clad his anti-corruption war in seriousness devoid of any witch-hunt. Why probing Tinubu is important is that it will free Buhari to go after others. Otherwise, it will be ridiculous if Buhari seeks to prosecute perceived corrupt persons while shielding those immediately around him. If Buhari pretends not to have any evidence against Tinubu, he should reach out to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) or even re-visit the documentary, Lion of Bourdillon. That short film holds a lot of leads into Tinubu’s corrupt empire from which he funded his political enterprise. Tinubu’s Chicago certificate scandal, which actually laid the foundation for his corruption of the public space, needs to be revisited. The reason is this: we have no reason to have allowed such odious show to have enveloped our sense of patronage. If Buhari is able to revisit that issue, like he is revisiting NITEL, then, we may begin to put things in proper perspective. Besides reviewing leads exposed in the Lion of Bourdillon, it is also incumbent on Buhari to cause a re-opening of the Code of Conduct case against Tinubu. If former President, Goodluck Jonathan, did not go further with the matter, on account of not possessing the guts to do so, or on account of a deal that freed Tinubu and made him betray Nuhu Ribadu in the 2011 presidential election, a Buhari who has professed the guts to look into our national past, ought to re-open the matter and make sure that justice is served to both the accused and the accuser. I recall that a prominent politician, in several published interviews, had raised allegations of conversion of public property to personal use, including the alleged stealing of a polytechnic, which was converted to house Tinubu’s media company in Lagos. Those allegations are yet to be answered or denied. I also think that allegations by several other Nigerians against Tinubu should be investigated. It thus says a lot about the convincing work that Buhari ought to do to give his anti-corruption fight a serious and altruistic face. Not investigating any of those issues would dent Buhari’s charge against corruption. I know that it will be argued that those alleged property belong to Lagos State. Yes, they do, but they also belong to the public and the public deserves justice in this regard, knowing that the incumbent governor of the state will not investigate, as doing so may consume him. Former Governor Babatunde Fashola is still paying a price for refusing to grant some self-serving requests of his godfather. He is close enough to Buhari, or perceived to be so. Therefore, he can shed more light. In all, Buhari has a golden opportunity to prove to the world that his anti-corruption fight is not targeted at some individuals he may have disagreed with in the past. The starting point should be Tinubu. If Putin could do it in Russia, nothing stops Buhari from doing it in Nigeria. That is the only one way that Buhari’s action in removing crude-swap partners of the Jonathan era, and replacing them with oil companies linked to Tinubu, like Oando, would be seen as an action taken in national interest. It is the only way Nigerians can cast their trust on the corruption war. • Dr. Rahman is university don and a public affairs commentator. https://www.naij.com/539380-war-corruption-buhari-beware-tinubu.html |
Results Of Northern Domination In Nigeria - Kayode Editor’s note: Prominent Nigerians continue criticizing President Muhammadu Buhari over his appointments as most of them are seen as lopsided. Femi Fani-Kayode, the Nigerian politician, also joins the critics. In his article ‘Nigerian president or king of the north?’ he speaks about the importance of the federal character in the president’s appointments. Northern domination in the affairs of Nigeria In 1957, Sir Ahmadu Bello, the Saurdana of Sokoto and the Premier of the North, said the following: “We the people of the north will continue our stated intention to conquer the south and to dip the koran in the Atlantic ocean after the British leave our shores.” Three years later, on 12 th October 1960, he went a step further by saying the following words to the Parrot Newspaper: “The new nation called Nigeria should be an estate of our great grandfather Uthman Dan Fodio. We must ruthlessly prevent a change of power. We must use the minorities in the North as willing tools and the South as a conquered territory and never allow them to rule over us and never allow them to have control over their future”. That same year he said: “I will allow Sir Tafawa Balewa to go and become Prime Minister and lead the unbelievers of the south whilst I will stay in the north and lead the faithful”. Not to be outdone, in January 1947 on the floor of the Northern House of Assembly, Sir Tafawa Balewa, a man that was to become the first Prime Minister of Nigeria 13 years later, said the following words: “We do not want our Southern neighbours to interfere in our development. We have never associated ourselves with the activities of these people. We do not know them, we do not recognise them, and we share no responsibility in their actions. We shall demand our rights when the time is ripe. If the British quit Nigeria now at this stage, the Northern people would continue their uninterrupted conquest to the sea”. READ ALSO: Buhari Is A Healer Not A Divider – APC The passion for the total domination of the Nigerian state by the north has not in any way diminished over the years. As a matter of fact it appears to have become even more pronounced and, for some, it has become an obsession. Consider the following. On 2nd October 2014, one Aliyu Gwarzo said the following to Point Blank news: ”When I say that the Presidency must come to the north next year I am referring to the Hausa-Fulani core north and not any northern christian or minority tribe. The Christians in the north are nothing and the minorities know that when we are talking about leadership in the north and in Nigeria, Allah has given it to us, the Hausa-Fulani. They owe us everything. This is because we gave them Islam through the great Jihad waged by Sheik Usman Dan Fodio. We liberated all these places and all these people by imposing islam on them by force. It was either the Koran or the sword and most of them chose the Koran. In return for the good works of our forefathers Allah, through the British, gave us Nigeria to rule and to do with as we please. “Since 1960 we have been doing that and we intend to continue. No Goodluck or anyone else will stop us from taking back our power next year. We will kill, maim, destroy and turn this country into Africa’s biggest war zone and refugee camp if they try it. Many say we are behind Boko Haram. My answer is what do you expect? We do not have economic power or intellectual power. All we have is political power and they want to take even that from us. If they don’t want an ISIS in Nigeria then they must give us back the Presidency and our political power. Their soldiers are killing our warriors and our people every day but mark this: even if it takes one hundred years we will have our revenge. Every Fulani man that they kill is a debt that will be repaid even if it takes 100 years. The Fulani have very long memories”. READ ALSO: President Of The Northern Nigeria: Fayose Accuses Buhari The quest for northern domination in the affairs of our country is as old as the hills. It led to a brutal civil war between 1967 and 1970 in which millions were killed. It led to pogrom after pogrom and slaughter after slaughter in the north. It led to a series of military coups and counter coups. In 1991 it led to a coup by Major Gideon Orkar which, if it had been successful, would have resulted in the excision of the core northern states from our country. It led to the annulement of Chief MKO Abiola’s presidential election of June 12th 1993 which almost resulted in a second civil war. It led to the brutal suppression of the south by General Sani Abacha and the murder, torture, incarceration and exile of many southern leaders. It led to stiff opposition to the government of president Olusegun Obasanjo in the north which came in the guise ”political sharia”. And finally it led to it’s most barbaric and hideous expression in the relentless opposition to the regime of President Goodluck Jonathan which came in the form of Boko Haram. With President Buhari those lusting for total northern domination have finally had their way Judging from recent events, with President Buhari now in power it appears that those that have been lusting for total northern domination for the last 55 years have finally had their way. The inability to think deeply or profoundly is a curse. The inability to read widely and learn from others is a pitiful and costly affliction. If there were ever a time for profound thinking and deep and sober reflection when it comes to the affairs of our nation it is now. I say this because only three months after President Buhari has been sworn into office the power configuration, vis a vis north and south, has resulted in the following mess. There is no gainsaying that this is unacceptable. Some of us warned that this would happen but we were insulted and lampooned for doing so. These appointments are not only lopsided but they are also a manifestation of the fact that in just three months southern Nigeria has finally been relegated to being little more than an occupied region and a vassal state. The people of the south appear to have been placed in servitude and bondage. Our chains may be invisible but they are very much there. Is Buhari the President of Nigeria or is he the King of the north? The question must be asked: is Buhari the President of Nigeria or is he the King of the north? Some have argued that the federal character formula has no place in our affairs anymore and that merit ought to be the only criteria for government appointments. Permit me to quote a young man from twitter who responded to that absurd logic rather well by saying ”if federal character isn’t important, why is the Vice President also not from Daura? Educated people should not speak like illiterates’’. Others have said that we should wait for the ministerial list and that after that things would balance out. Again this is absurd logic and those that spout such convoluted thrash appear to have forgotten the fact that the president is compelled by law and the constitution to appoint a minister from every state of the federation, including each of the southern states. READ ALSO: Buhari Under Fire Over Recent Appointments Whether he is president of Nigeria or king of the north Buhari would do well to retrace his steps. The consequences of not doing so for both his government and the unity of our country will be grave and costly. The south cannot be subjugated and treated with contempt and the people of the south will never be slaves. Fairness and equity in the distribution of national resources and key government appointments are a fundamental pre-requisite for peace, security and national unity in our country. It has served our collective interest well for many years. Those that seek to upset the applecart and jettison it today are not considering the inevitable and monumental consequences of their actions. Power may have returned to the north but the people of the south must be treated with respect, sensitivity, dignity, fairness and decency. Those that refuse to accept this counsel and that insist on charting a different course do so at their own peril. Read the rest at Kayode’s Facebook page. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent the editorial policy of Naij.com. Oluwafemi Fani-Kayode is a Nigerian politician, essayist, poet and lawyer. Fani-Kayode was the special assistant to ex-president Olusegun Obasanjo from July 2003 until June 2006, the minister of culture and tourism from 22 June to 7 November 2006, and the minister of aviation from 7 November 2006 to 29 May 2007. During the last presidential poll he was the director of media and publicity of Goodluck Jonathan presidential campaign organization. Culled from: naij.com |
See what Femi Fani Kayode thinks of all the political appointments in Nigeria so far This is what Femi Fani Kayode thinks of all the political appointments in Nigeria so far. He shared this on his Facebook wall this morning. See below... 1. President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria - north. 2.Senate President- north. 3. Speaker of the House of Representatives- north. 4. Chief Justice of the Federation- north. 5. President of the Court of Appeal- north. Continue to see the full post 6. Chief Justice of the Federal High Court- north. 7. Secretary to the Federal Government- north. 8. Chief of Staff to the President- north. 9. Chief of Army Staff- north. 10. Chief of Air Staff- north. 11. Comptroller General of Customs- north. 12. Director-General of State Security Services (SSS)- north. 13. National Security Advisor- north. 14. Director General NIMASA- north. 15. Chairperson of the Independant Electoral Commission (INEC)- north. 16. Comptroller-General Immigration- north. 17. Accountant-General of the Federation - north. 18. Commander of Civil Defence Corps- north. 19. Chief Security Officer to the President- north. 20. ADC to the President- north. 21. Principal Secretary to the President- north. 22. Senior Special Assistant to the President on media- north. 23. Chairman of the EFCC- north. 24. Head of Service- north. 25. MD of Nigerian Ports Authority- north. 26.DG of Nigerian Broadcasting Commission (NBC)- north. 27. Chairman NDLEA- north. NIGERIANS WANTED ''CHANGE'' AND NOW WE HAVE GOT IT. NO-ONE SHOULD COMPLAIN BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT OUR PEOPLE WANTED. THOSE OF US THAT WARNED THE COUNTRY THAT THIS WOULD HAPPEN WERE INSULTED AND LAMPOONED. NOW WE HAVE TO LIVE WITH THE CONSEQUENCES OF OUR CHOICE FOR THE NEXT FOUR YEARS. WELCOME TO THE NEW NIGERIA. WELCOME TO ''CHANGE''. http://lindaikeji..com/2015/08/see-what-femi-fani-kayode-thinks-of-all.html |
National Identification Number Mandatory from September 1, 2015 - NIMC The issuing authority for National Identity, the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC) has put 1st September, 2015 as commencement date in which all transactions involving the identification of individuals must be done with the National Identification Number (NIN). The Commission is therefore calling on all Nigerians to avail themselves the opportunity of enrolment into the National Identity Database and be issued a National Identification Number (NIN), which is the single version of truth and the foundation identity. NIMC had in recent Newspaper advertorials between 27th April– 4th May, 2015, stated that the use of NIN shall become mandatory as from September 1, 2015, for all transactions offered by applicable government institutions. These transactions, pursuant to section 27 (1) and (2) of the NIMC Act, 2007 include: application for, and issuance of an International Passport; opening of individual and/or group bank accounts, all consumer credits; purchase of insurance policies; the purchase, transfer and registration of land by any individual; National Health Insurance Scheme, such transactions that have social security implications, registration of voters, payment of taxes, and pensions, etc. Consequently, “Any government agency/institution ,bank, insurance company and all other institutions offering services and/or involved in transactions requiring the identity of an individual must first demand for the NIN. Any individual, institutions/body who fails to comply with the above has committed an offence punishable under section 28 of the NIMC Act.” The General Manager, Inspectorate, Regulatory & Compliance Services, Mrs. Hadiza Dagabana said. Nigerians are urged to appreciate the full import of the NIMC mandate, and understand that the three decades old problem of identity management in Nigeria has been fixed since 2012 by the provision by NIMC of a Unique Identification Infrastructure for Nigeria and the subsequent launch of the National e-ID Card scheme in 2014. “Clearly, most people are unable to appreciate the shift in paradigm from ‘Card Issuance’, their familiar turf, to ‘Identity Management’, the current global trend, which explains the reason why they insist on getting the physical card even after they have been enrolled and issued their NIN. NIMC is focused on establishing ‘Foundation Identity’ (who you are) as the issuing authority for Nigeria, all other institutions, including the Banks and INEC are focused on ‘Functional Identity’ (whether you are eligible for a specific service). Functional Identities established pursuant to various organisations’ databases such as the Bank Verification Number (BVN), the Taxpayer Identification Number, etc., are not substitute for the NIN. Therefore, citizens must ensure that they are enrolled into the National Identity Database (NIDB) by 1st September, 2015, the effective date of commencement of the mandatory use of NIN” said the General Manager,Information Technology/Identity Database, Mr. Chuks Onyepunuka. For emphasis, the NIN was deployed in 2012 and is still running to date. There are close to 404 Enrolment Centres nationwide, and cards are currently been issued in the state offices across the Nation and the FCT and will be hastened as soon as the Commission scales up on its facilities and infrastructure. Signed, Abdulhamid Umar General Manager, Corporate Communications http://www.nimc.gov.ng/?q=national-identification-number-mandatory-september-1-2015-nimc |
There you have it. ![]()
|
How about this? ![]()
|
True talk. The defections are purely to position for federal appointments. Politicians be deceiving since ...1999. ![]() |
Congratulatins. But the show of wealth?.......VANITY UP ON VANITY ALL IS VANITY. ![]() |
I think the stress or fear of ruling a country as big and complicated as Nigeria is dawning on APC and by etension Buhari... After contesting from 2003 to 2015 (twelve solid years) I think he (Buhari) should by now be conversant with the challenges besetting Nigeria and how to solve them. If you are demanding for useful tips now then what was the whole essence of campaigning. if during the campaigns you said the present govt was a failure it means you have better ways of getting things done. I think APC should talk less and plan more. |
Ghe ghe.. Our General dey fear? Na wa ooo. |
Change will surely come...... to LAGOS. |
please does unilag offer PGD in Civil Engineering? If yes, do they also accept HND (upper credit) for PGD? |
please I need info. from the house. I want find out if University of Ibadan offers PGD in Civil Engineering. Your response would be appreciated. Thanks. |
Hello all, please I want someone to explain to me how I can become a member of the Nigerian society of Engineers. I Studied Building Technology HND (upper credit). 4yrs experience. I am planning to do a PGD in Civil Engineering. reply will be appreciated. |
please I need information on University of Ibadan PGD 2012/2013 sale of forms |
Please I need information on FUTA 2011\2012 PGD Admission list. Thanks |
I was able to get through to the application form but the problem is that I was only able to fill in my personal data and acedemic record. Other pages refused to open and there was no confirmation. Please does this mean I will be disqualified? I am so worried. |
Hello guys, mine is HND Building Technology.(upper Credit) |
Hello Guys I am new here. I think you are doing a great job. Thanks for the post. |