₦airaland Forum

bykebyke:
The Abraham that counted the stars abi another one?

I no get your question, come again.

I don't know why this syfy go de bring shitty "women are powerful" shows every now and den. First it was wynonna Earp then this one, why ruin an original character and name her vanessa helsing (so called relative of Abraham), then proceed to call it an original series? WTF!!

iheanyi40:
is the app on playstore ?

just download mobdro from www.mobdro.com, you go see mutv plus sky sports soccer channels and other soccer channels. Na through mobdro I watch the match for Mutv.

Leyqute:
Abegii...

When last did Utd score 5 goals in a match - friendly or unfriendly?

You don forget midtjylland wey we win 5 - 1 for europa league?



I de see new faces for here, una welcome o.

Wonderful 2nd half of football, far better than the crappy first half, good to see the players fighting for the first eleven, totally dominated galatasary.

For those who are confused by the topic, simply put, was pepper rubbed on your eyes as punishment when you were a kid?


I was, and the experience was horrible, it resulted to eventual sleep.

Tunasco:
BANSHEE

but they no cancel banshee, they producers decided to end it.

kryptonian1987:
this is how we know a dying man-child when he's nothing relevant to say again. he'll become arrogant, pompous and very aggressive towards others (like what Parrot is doing now)!

SIGNING OFF, BRO....

This is exactly what I mean When someone feels inferior in an argument he claims that he's been insulted. Now I officially know your level in the halls of intellectual discourse. I made the mistake of replying you, I apologize to myself for thinking that I was dealing with a bright mind, I never knew that it was with a crybaby who even sucks at that. Next time, find people who relate to your level more, those ones that will be shouting upandan with little or no substance to back up their statements.


This will be my last response to you. Good night!

Oh and remember that advice I gave you, education is fundamental.

Go to this thread and ask your questions.



www.nairaland.com/1549406/what-movie-watching-now/283

kryptonian1987:
don't mind that parrotibaba jor... nothing him no abt comics and cbm...
he's among those people who became fans of cbm after seeing the Avengers. perhaps they don't know that every success marvel enjoys today wouldn't had been there if wasn't for DC!

DC having success since time immemorial, while her junior brother (Marvel), started few yes back....probably 8yrs ago.

Abeg spare me this malarkey that you spewing upandan. You think say you dey my level for where comics matter dey?. A nescient dude like you should stop disgracing the inhabitants of this thread. Right now in the cinematic world, DC can't even measure up to the waistline of Marvel so what is it that you yarning?. I don tell you before and I'm repeating myself again, go and educate yourself online before engaging anyone in a conversation you have no idea of. Good luck!.

TonySpike:
I saw this statistics this morning and I was so surprised, BVS: Dawn of Justice on DVD and Blu-ray is selling like hot cake!!! This was the same "shitty CBM" that was so proclaimed by the almighty parrotibaba. It is either that parrotibaba and his ilks are biased critics or people around the world are wasting their hard-earned cash to buy BVS on Blu-ray for $16 (5700 Naira)...lol.

isn't this as a result of the so called ultimate edition that was released by WB? Na because say me and you download our own for net? Do you think that the original bvs dvd will sell as much?

solomonbrown64:
.....Aint this superman dude the guy in teen wolf, or I am not seeing well..

Yeah, Tyler Hoecklin

kryptonian1987:
[s] if really u want to know more about ur universe, I will be of help to help you out. all you are good at is smart and good writing, but no grasp about the comics world.
hope you know what Stan Lee said abt Thor as regards to MCU, right?
if you need to know more about box office, then I recommend you try and read articles written by Mark Hughesfilm or Scot Mendelsen from Forbes. they will convincingly broaden ur understand so u don't raise some ineffective point. like the man of steel vs Iron man 3 dvd and blu-ray total gross.[/s]

Absolute thrash coming from someone that have no idea about cbms.


You can continue disgracing yourself, I'm done arguing with you. When you beef up your knowledge about comics and cbms, come back let's talk.

TonySpike:
My friend, there was no witness on ground except superman and Lois. By default, superman was more in a precarious position. Everybody heard the sonic boom, everyone knew superman was there and even Lois had no idea of what happened to the idea. Superman was there, so it had to be him since there were no other witnesses!

Lois knew what happened, she heard gunshots, she has a bullet to attest to her testimony, why didn't they put her on a stand since she clearly was the only eye witness on ground? The bullet enough will show that supes had nothing to do with the village massacre so why castigate supes when they didn't even know what happened? Why not let lois testify? "I have proof that John didn't kill James" and "I assumed that John killed James" are not the same thing. Lois had enough proof to vindicate supes, why didn't they put her on the stand? Because it's a plot hole. EOD!

[quote author=kryptonian1987post=47976913][/quote]I swear it's like trying to teach a sheep how to dance. I said that it took marvel 3 movies to get pass the billion dollar mark, I never said that iron man 3 was part of the 3 I mentioned. You see where your comprehension abilities is found wanting. This is what I said in response to you claiming that it took 5 mcu movies to make a billion dollars...


"Just for the records, it took just three mcu movies to reach the billion dollar mark. If I state that your knowledge about all things marvel is limited you will start crying wolf."


Shey you can see the full stop before this...


"Iron man 3 generated over a billion dollars in the box office alone, how many DC movies so far reached that mark in the dceu?"


Now the above point was made to thrash your point since so far none of the two DC movies have made it to $900m.

Since I have to also spoon feed you info, here are the first 3 movies in the mcu and their earnings.

1) ironman 1 - - $585m
2) the incredible Hulk - - $263m
3) ironman 2 - - $623m

Now get your calculator and add, 5 + 2 + 6, what's your answer? Shey na over 1 billion dollars? Good!. School dismissed!!.

Again the graphics of Civil War is top notch whether you want to accept it or not!.

The alarming rate at which you are sinking currently is shocking! what's next? Will you start talking about the haircut of Robert Downey Jr?

Good night!

TonySpike:
Hahaha, it seems you're double-standard in judging people. You told someone to go and rewatch CACW, meanwhile you need to actually rewatch BVS to grasp the understanding of the movie. Let me describe why Superman was doubted in the Nairomi incident.
1. The Nairomi scenario was a CIA operation.
2. The CIA cover of Jimmy Olsen was used to locate the exact location of the rebels, by using Lois Lane as a bait.
3. The CIA had a 'eye in the sky' I.e. a drone to undertake aerial surveillance. The CIA also has some elite forces on the ground who were far away from the rebel camp.
4. Lex Luthor's men were apparently giving tactical support to the rebels and Lex was aware of CIA presence. This was how Jimmy Olsen's cover was blown.
5. Once Jimmy Olsen was shot, Lois Lane was taken into custody by the rebels.
6. Almost around this same period, Lex's men got their cue to start shooting the villagers. Guess what their cue was? Superman's re-entry sonic boom which was loud enough.
7. While Lex's men were doing the killing, the CIA noticed that their inside asset, Jimmy Olsen, had been shoot. Their drone was still far away from the rebels position.
8. The CIA ground operatives requested to rescue Lois Lane but were denied access. The drone missile was activated to target the rebel camp. At this stage, KGBeast and other Lex's men had finished their killings of villages.
9. Logically, Lois was the only ground witness but she was kept indoors and all she could hear was yelling and shootings. She didn't physically see anyone. Also, the drone couldn't scan the area because it was far from the camp.
10. Once the drone fired its missile, Superman flew in and destroyed both the drone and missile. Now, Superman took out the only 'eye in the sky' which coincidentally was the only CIA witness.
11. By the time the Lois was rescued, everyone thought that it was Superman that killed the villagers. There was no other witness to corroborate what happened on the ground!
12. Superman therefore lost his integrity by taking out the drone and this was why he was doubted. He was viewed as the judge, jury and executioner!

You should know that by taking out the drone, Superman took law into his own hands and was further implicated in the killings of the villagers. Was this too hard to understand??

I don't need you to describe the movie for me as I saw it myself, twice, the original cut and the ultimate cut. Now, if the cia had no eye witness or no tangible proof that supes killed the villagers then why castigate him? Does that make sense to you? Abi no be bullet them take kill the villagers? Or are you now insinuating that the rebels borrowed supes guns to kill the villagers?. How can you accuse someone of doing something that bad when there's no single proof to prove it?.


Modified.


And they just totally forgot about lois lane that was at the site of damage, she was supposed to be put on the stand to testify to the cause and it would have even much better since she had a bullet to testify with. Who's the judge, jury and executioner now?.

kryptonian1987:
all you post here just show you can't buttress ur point without throwing insult and That's the problem with most people. why insulting when making your point? this shows you no nothing about comics or cbm.
what makes u think I didn't see CW in Cinema.... so must I conform to ur point before you would be able to think the otherwise?
I asked every simple question, and all the answers u could came up with, were insults (lol!)?
what makes you think marvel is doing far better than DC...
DC have released two movies; MOS and BvS. for the record, it took Marvel, at least a whole 5 movies before they could crossed $667m in box office which DC did with their first shared universe movie.
DC's first 2 movies, MOS + BvS = $1.549b
Marvel's first 2 movies: iron man + incredible Hulk = $848.6m so tell me, how are they can't be compared? the excuse people like you keep bringing is: "DC characters are more known so they are supposed to do big in box office", in order just to make no relevant point.
don't worry, in time, people like you will start seeing things more clearer.
Talking about CGI graphics, I don't think any company in the world (presently!) can match the height and standard "Weta Digital company" heading by Letteri is now. kindly do more research, or if you choosed not to do then find out from your fellow marvelites. even your marvel boss, Kevin Feige has attested to it.
what about their dvd and blu-ray combo pack...MOS still did far better than almost all Marvel's dvd and blu-ray combo pack except for the Avengers. so what are you talking!!!
I bet you didn't even know all these! all you know are: RT and what mainstream fans (kids) say...

I don't know how what I said suddenly became an insult, I simply stated the obvious and whether it hurts you or not is none of my concern.


Just for the records, it took just three mcu movies to reach the billion dollar mark. If I state that your knowledge about all things marvel is limited you will start crying wolf. Iron man 3 generated over a billion dollars in the box office alone, how many DC movies so far reached that mark in the dceu? Your answer will be that they just released two movies. Again MoS never made more than ironman 3 in dvd/Bluray pack so cross check your facts.


You were the one that brought up the ps4 graphics reference in relation to civil war and it simply showed that you didn't see the movie in any clear format. I'm not interested in who handled the graphics in bvs, I never made any points towards that area of discourse.

kryptonian1987:
Bros please stop making me to laugh!!!
do you even know Lex or Batman at all?
Batman is always having issue when it comes to trust, except for few, and you want him to trust a god-like being! I think you do not know Batman, even for a second. to cap it all, this Batman is a rip-off of Frank Millers' batman returns which perhaps is darker and gritty .
for Lex Luthor, nothing comes first before him.... that's his obsession. he can trade anything he has just to bring down superman.
I think Lex plan is far more articulated than Zemo's own... Lex didn't rely on luck to shine on him like Zemo did. Remember, they are both humans, and extraordinary humans.

Actually Lex failed in his plan to get batman to kill supes, he too was relying on luck plus the numerous cash at his disposal. Zemo was just a sokovian soldier with virtually nothing, who almost pulled off his plan in spectacular fashion. Now before another argument starts, I'm in no way comparing zemo to Alexander.

Batman having no trust of anybody has nothing to do with the unwarranted hate towards supes. Like say na supes killed his parents and Robin. Like I pointed out before, bvs succeeded in totally forgetting about how supes stopped zod's invasion, almost like it didn't happen at all or it was wiped out of the memories of the whole world.

kryptonian1987:
Did you listen to yourself? "after that deadly mistake "?...lol! can you compare it to the one caused by Ultron? or the one caused by Loki and his minions (which still, there's no military presence to arrest their mistakes)?.

very your point, you re making it looked like Zemo didn't want the avengers to die-yet he's busy impersonating/framing bucky to kill "innocent people ( Wakanda president among many). supposing his plan works, what do you think will happen to the avengers.... so you think there won't be casualties (deaths)?

Tony wasn't doing all his best to make bucky sign the accord. he was only doing his best to assemble his friends (core members) to sign the accord. he sees bucky as someone that can't be trusted despite the tribulations and traumas bucky was going through.
I don't think you know much about comics, because you just proof that to me... I bet that you became a comics fan or cbm fan not quite long, that's why you're praising civil war this way.
even the CGI scenes in CW were so so similar to ps4 game and you are here rating it that high, haba my guy!!!
I don't think any reasonable movie (not to even talk of universe filled movies) would take that long for govt to interfere when her world is being threatened by external force frequently.

I think I am a good judge of any movie I watched, not someone else will do that for me

with an open mind, look at all MCU movies and tell me if all are better than BvS or MOS?
your answer will clarify your person to me more

All these stuff you just posted are pure undiluted thrash

Scarlet witch made a deadly mistake on foreign soil that involved the deaths of 11 Wakandans plus a lot of Nigerians, how is that not a deadly mistake? Must it be ultr0n sized before it's a deadly mistake? Did you even listen to yourself when typing this garbage?


I can see that you lack basic comprehension ability, did you not read where I stated that he wanted to pit the avengers against each other? Did the avengers not fight themselves?. Did he not apologize to T'challa for the death of his father since the bombing was the casualties of his schemes? He wanted revenge for the death of his family and he knew that he couldn't get it by fighting the avengers one on one since he doesn't have the capacity to, rather he decided to turn them against each other. What's so hard to understand here?


First of, Tony Stark has no relationship with bucky Barnes, no one does except cap so why will he want bucky to sign the accords? Is bucky an avenger? He wanted to bring bucky in because bucky was accused of bombing the conference building in Vienna and cap was helping him get away with it. Why should he trust someone that was caught on tape as the perpetrator of the Vienna bombing and also worked for hydra?.


I don't know what brought ps4 to this argument and I can tell that you never saw this movie in the cinema, you probably saw it online in its TC version since you brazenly compared it to ps4 graphics. When the dvd version comes out, go and re watch it instead disgracing yourself in public.

I have been watching superhero cartoons and reading comics since I was a kid. I can certainly tell you that captain America civil war is one of the greatest cbms in the world. Take it or leave it!.


What makes you think that the government didn't intervene since Tony Stark first came out as ironman? Why don't you go and re watch the ironman series? What do you think S.H.I.E.L.D is? Is it not a government sanctioned body that oversees the actions of the avengers? I can see that your knowledge about marvel cinematic movies and TV shows are severely limited.

I don't need to list the various mcu movies that absolutely shiits on bvs and mos. You can educate yourself on that. There's not even a competition between marvel and DC in the cinematic world now as marvel is clearly on top.


I strongly suggest that you go back and watch all mcu movies till date without bias and sentiments because you seriously need to before engaging in an argument with me.

Minemrys:
black widow na follow follow she dy do. She no support am. She go that accord jux cos na her job, even cap went to berlin. BW na expensive chick she dy go where m0ney dy. She no get plan. :-D

We don't need to over flog this matter, she could easily have joined cap in carter's burial but she didn't, she instead went to the accords. She was in support of the accords, if you no wan accept that then it's really not my concern.

TonySpike:
Let me tell you, BVS mirrors the very world and times we currently exist in. The action of Superman stopping Zod's invasion cannot be hailed by everyone because some people lost their important friends and families. Infact, the victory over Zod came at a cost to the people of Metropolis. Wallace Keefe, for example lost his limb and Bruce Wayne lost part of his investment and some of his staff; at least the movie made us see this. Imagine having a powerful person like Superman in our midst, how will the world respond to his existence? The problem is that people like you fail to understand how Superman is being portrayed. Take the powerful US military for example, they carry out precision airstrikes in many places around the globe trying to defeat terrorism. As usual, there will always be collateral in their airstrikes, and people whose lives and families were affected will always find a way to despise the US. This is exactly the scenario Superman found himself after MOS, some people liked him, some people feared him and some outrightly hated him. The movie was trying to draw parallels as it exists in our current world, yet, people like you fail to see that. This is what the scene of "God among Men" was trying to explain and I'm sure you failed to see it from that angle.

And what were the people expecting supes to do when he was fighting zod? Avoid the buildings and go to Mars? Like he had any choice in the matter. Instead of trying to castigate the only dude that stepped up the plate to actually defend them, they should be thankful that they are alive and going about their businesses. Supes could have just kicked a cold bottle of beer and relaxed while zod takes over the world and then the same people will come up and accuse him of negligence. The US military is fighting wars with terrorists so that the people back home will not have to suffer from terror incidents like 9/11 and the majority are in support of that. We all know that wars bring casualties and it's inevitable but it's necessary. Don't you think that if the US for example decides to let this jihadists have it their way that the same people complaining about casualties will still come back and accuse the US for doing nothing. Now I'm not saying that he deserves ultimate praise and respect, all I'm saying is that from what we saw in bvs, he had more negative reactions from people, in fact overwhelming negative reactions from people than positive which is wrong. All of a sudden people forgot what he did and are looking for all sorts of excuses to make him look bad. If he was that bad, why will the whole world go into mourning when he died? What's the difference between what he did here and what he did in man of Steel? So if he wakes up tomorrow the same 1diots that mourned him will suddenly forget about doomsday and focus on scorning him again?. My main problem with this centers on why the events of man of Steel were easily forgotten, almost like it didn't happen.

Minemrys:
see how the mcu makes people think. In a real world, an alien shows and starts doing tinz, how do u expect us to believe him right away?? Then the u.s says this alien has d0ne a bad tin, bring evidence and you tell me no one would believe?

Oga had it been that this happened in man of Steel, it would have made perfect sense but not after he risked his life to fight for earth against zod. They believed him when he was snapping zod's neck but starts doubting him when he goes to nairomi to save an American journalist. So when he eventually resurrects in justice League and goes to Japan to eat sushi the world will start doubting and calling for his head again. Does that in any way make sense to you?

kryptonian1987:
civil war was just another Marvel movie that is meant to appeal to mainstream moviegoers, didnt mean it was great. Winter Soldier still remain the topnotch in MCU to beat.
Baron Zemo wasn't even close to a good villian, not of even talking of great one. a villian that is ultimate plan is far beyond his control for it to hatch...
why using the red book on WS in that building when he won't get to murder any of the avengers, especially tony stark or Natasha. Rather he red it to him just to cause a minor and far lesser threat there.
ask yourself this question: what if iron man decided not to fight WS? accepting fully well that that wasn't bucky, but a brainwashed WS?
why is even Crossbones in civil war... because I didn't see any correlation between him and zemo...! Ok maybe because of action, action and action.
bro, the truth is:.... Civil war is too over hyped! despite the mixed and lacklustre reception BvS got, it's still a hot topic till date even if it is no longer playing in cinemas (while civil was is still). Ohhh.. and also, it's presently generating a cultic-like status as we speak, while civil war will definitely go the same way just like most Marvel movies, except Winter Soldier.
pardon my writing, cuz am writing through a mini browse app

Civil War is one of the greatest cbms currently on the big screen whether you want to accept it or not. It deserves every bit of success and praise that it's currently getting.

Baron zemo clearly stated that he has no intention of killing the avengers simply because he can't, rather than trying to fight them one on one, he instead chose to pit them against each other. He said this when he wanted to end his life before T'challa stopped him. In that German intelligence building, what he simply did was to further prove to Stark that bucky Barnes is dangerous and capable of actually bombing the conference building which clearly worked. Baron zemo is one of a kind manipulative, scheming, devious villain.


Again why will Stark choose not to fight a guy that was running away from the supposed havoc that he wrecked in Vienna? Is bucky his cousin or friend? Are they even related in anyway? And to top it all off, he found out that bucky was responsible for his parents death. Before the final fight, Stark was doing all he could to at least get bucky a fair trial but after the Germany incident, he decided to use firepower.


Crossbones was in Nigeria doing an illegal business and apparently the avengers got wind of the operation and pursued him there. Have you forgotten that crossbones is hydra and that the avengers are still tracking the remaining hydra agents around the world. The aftermath of the mission was the important part, scarlet witch made a deadly mistake that resulted in deaths and hence pushed up the sokovia accords.


Civil War deserved all the hype that it got because it delivered where bvs failed woefully. BvS will forever be remembered as that shitty cbm that was released twice take it or leave it!.

Minemrys:
cap 3 wasn't a civil war. It was a t0ny vs stark stand off. The s0kovia AC was a subplot, how? To introduce black panther. Only 3 that ai robot, stark, and his friend in the avengers supported it. Black widow was just doing her job. She neva said yes or no.
In fact there was no formal agreement between the avengers for it to be a civil war.

black widow was in support of the accords, if not what was she doing in Vienna? Vacation? Heck she even promised T'challa to help him bring in bucky Barnes before eventually betraying him as pursued both cap and bucky towards the aircraft. She did that because she finally heard what cap had to do, that's to stop zemo from resurrecting the other winter soldiers which clearly wasn't zemo's intention.

God why am I describing this movie for you? Why don't you go and watch it yourself.

Minemrys:
ah marvel fans sure can use their imaginati0ns. Okay so without the UC how could u have underst0od why superman was to blame for the nair0mi incident? And how does the nair0mian lady's hearing make sense to you?

This is ridiculously ludicrous Shey he left metropolis to go and rescue lois lane in far away nairomi and there were casualties plus the obvious Lex luthor set up. What has this got to do with imaginations? DC fans and their ridiculous thinking. The nairomi woman was clearly making things up like how her parents died caught up in supes supposedly cross fire when in fact nobody mentioned that supes was only present in the desert which was the abode of the nairomian terrorist. Why will supes suddenly go to Africa and start causing havoc when he goes to Mexico to rescue a girl from a fire outbreak?

One of the problems I had with bvs was that the whole world including Lex and Bruce Affleck forgot that barely 2 years back, supes singlehandedly stopped zod's earth invasion, something that should have removed the doubts and envy from people.

Minemrys:
cleverly manipulate the destructi0n of the avengers? How on earth did zem0 get hold of classified hydra top secret? The winter soldier? And why n0t release it and activities of the winter soldier(s) to the media/world? First to cause fricti0n am0ng the avengers themselves on why bucky should live or roam freely than the plot device that was the lagos explosi0n? In this case zem0 could've made the public questi0n the avengers (that is the side that wants to help cap free bucky solely) by framing them and forcing the u.n to sancti0n all heroes. It would've being m0re intense and less c0medic (what the hell, its civil war n0t c0medy war). So zem0 didn't cleverly manipulate the avengers, he manipulated t0ny and steve cos at the end of the day even the avengers weren't sure why they were fighting (cough black widow, panther, hawkeye <the guy even left his wife and kid at h0me to go to jail for a guy he's n0t cl0se to and@ spiderboy left his h0mew0rk he would submit in class the next day after a rich guy 4 no reas0n, scarlet witch<s0me0ne i expected to undastand why TWS must be arrested>. God civil war was a g0od c0medy film to n0t be taken serious.

Civil War doesn't necessarily mean a country vs country scenario, rather in this situation it's the division of the avengers following the sokovia accords. This is the definition of War in the dictionary. "A state of armed conflict between different countries or different groups within a country. ".

Black panther was fighting cap because he's protecting the guy that he(T'challa) thought was responsible for the bomb blast that killed his father. He was in support of the accords. So was black widow, who helped cap when she later found out about zemo. Hawkeye is also an avenger is he not? Spiderman has been doing his assignments and fighting crime long before he met Stark and Stark clearly upgraded his suit so he had a reason to follow Stark and moreover, he was supposed to be on the sidelines but got caught up in the fight that resulted in him been eventually sent home by Stark.

Baron zemo was the reason for the eventual fracture of the relationship between the avengers when he impersonated bucky while blowing up that conference building. This resulted to the fight in the airport as Stark wanted to bring bucky in.

Minemrys:
now. Without u having watched the director's cut, how did u kn0w lex set supes up? How was it expectd to make sense to you? Supes flew down, shot those terrorists with guns and bam, he flies away. Up up and away. Tada! Why did it pain the U. S govt so bad that they'll set a hearing in washington cos supes did what a U. S soldier could?

So supes now use guns? When the same ninja that was in nairomi delivers the kryptonite to lex wasn't that enough reason to believe that he works for lex? Or when lois found out that the bullet that was stuck in her journalist pad wasn't military grade but from lex's private firm, and even met with secretary Swanwick who confirmed it, wasn't it enough reason to know that lex set him up?

kryptonian1987:
when something confirm the asked and answered, it simply means it's improved and virtually cleared most the things people are complaining about.
to me, the truth is that....we've been so much spoon-feed on information how CBM should be done, that we hardly think with our heads. that's one of our major problem today concerning movies.
BvS it's a movie that you need also to pay proper attention to their gestures and facial expressions for you to be able to anticipate or understand (not trying to say BvS was too smart. no!) where actually they driving to.
the way see BvS and CW is this:.... BvS: UE > CA: CW > BvS: TC.
that's my honest judgement, because I look at how momentum s are gradually built, how subplot to subplot converge to form main plot, how intensity the story is ( characters philosophies and ideas), how coherently the story is being shaped. which to my best of knowledge, BvS: UE did a far better job than CA: CW. CW
CW was just all about fight, fight and fight, without proper reasons to it.
like the airport fight scenes and the last act, when Iron man was trying to murdered Winter soldier, knowing fully well that WS was himself when he killed his parents. Iron man being a light-hearted hero, for at least 8yrs, shouldn't have retaliated that ways. mind you, I used "lighthearted hero" there...

it didn't improve the original cut, we all knew that supes was set up in nairomi by lex. We knew that he wasn't responsible for the bomb blast in the Senate building so what exactly did the ultimate cut do to improve the original cut?

Whether you accept it or not cbm are not body language movies. There's nothing fantastic about the facial expressions or body languages in bvs except that the script writers didn't know how to delegate proper dialogues across the cast. Only Bruce Affleck had a proper dialogue in the movie. So please don't defend poor script writing as being smart.

Of course a DC fan will rate bvs over civil war even though he knows that it isn't true, I never expect a hardcore DC fan to do otherwise.

Civil War wasn't all about fights without reason. The movie was political and tested the strength of friendships. The world wants to keep the avengers under control and while one part of the avengers agrees to, the other doesn't. This causes division between the avengers plus the devious machinations of zemo, the behind the scenes villain that cleverly manipulated the destruction of the friendships and relationships between the avengers. Civil War was cleverly and artistically crafted and thoroughly deserves the success that has come it's way.

theoneJabulani:
After watching the ultimate version, u still didn't see anything good in bvs? The jury really is out on DC

Yes I didn't, this ultimate version is supposed to be the director's cut which is prevalent in movies that are cut down for cinema consumption. This is what you get when you eventually buy the dvd pack with the addition of behind the scenes, gag reels, etc. So it didn't dramatically improve bvs in anyway. It just confirmed the already asked and answered questions in the original cinema cut.

Una don start again one would think that after the shitbaggery of bvs that yous for don shut up by now. You can scream from today till next year on how fantastic bvs is but it doesn't change the fact which is that it was a bland plot holes ridden movie that needed to be released for a second time in other to be lessen the damage. I watched the ultimate edition and it still didn't make the movie any good except you are counting extended fight scenes and the nairomi woman as improvement. DC fans nowadays are pessimistic about the success of their franchise on TV and do you blame them? A movie that spent 2 years and more than 200m dollars marketing itself comes out and becomes the joke of the year BvS in the future will be used as a reference to bad cbm. It will be remembered as the movie that was released twice because it was utter shiit. There's no need comparing civil war to bvs because the movie speaks for itself, nobody needs to try and convince you about how good the movie is, the movie is on most people's list of greatest ever cbms.


As for suicide squad, I have already stated my interest in the movie mainly because of the jackasses in the movie and not the story because if you look at the storyline, it's not good enough. I sincerely hope that this movie gives DC fans something good to talk about this year because it will be a great shame if this movie follows the part of bvs.