₦airaland Forum

lexy2014:
[s]What makes u think am a Muslim? How did u come that conclusion? Since u haven't run out of things to say, kindly explain how u know that am a Muslim. Also take note of d last statement in my last comment.

If I quote u again, what will happen? Now that I have quoted u, what are u going to do about it? If u are sane, how come u have lost ur patience and ur sense of decorum for a simple discussion that u have no stake in?

Pls attend to d following:[/s]

philip0906:
You have run out of points and can't make any sensibsle posit.

For your own good, do not quote me again as you've become incoherent. Go and bow down to your allah.

America is doing a wonderful job, only sane people and humans, appreciate that.

philip0906:
I will have to conclude that you're foolish!

So when I say no one cares if terrorists die, does that imply that America still wouldn't do help by cleaning tgem out? If you had brains you would have understood that the lives of terrorists are worthless and the world will not be on a stand still if hordes of terrorists are wiped out. America can conveniently foot the defence budget, so you have no point.

Talking about Israel been in the middle east, Israel is doing just fine and can take care of itself. They have a great economy, they have the strongest military in there able to defend the nation, there is no chaos in Israel.

On the other hand, there is turmoil, chaos, gnashing of teeth, all sorts of terrorist organisations...From Iran to Iraq, to Lebanon, to Pakistan, to Syria, Palestine...these are the countries that are suffering from the demons they created in the name of worshipping your foolish allah.

So gedifork!!

Angelfrost:
Guy, na on top 2k you carry your full identity sara for Nairaland... Na wa o!

lexy2014:
U are really contradicting urself in ur desperation to prove a point that can't be proved.

According to u: "No one cares if they are terrorists". But in several of your posts including this one, u have alluded to d fact that d US is on a mission to wipe out d terrorists. So how can "No one cares if they are terrorists" and at d same d US committing billions of dollars to fight these terrorists?

If u say am a terrorist because u think I support Iran, would u also say that d US is a terrorist because it was an ally of iran b4 1979? Would u also call d US terrorists for supporting d Mujahedeen in d Afghan war against d USSR between 1979 and 1989? The US supported d mujahedeen with millions of dollars in cash and weapons. So pls tell me how I supported Iran.

According to u:

"So for all the world cares, the middle east can boil and blow up all the children of allah, na them know."

How is it possible for "all the world" not to care if d middle east boils? Is Israel not in d middle east? Is Saudi Arabia, UAE and Qatar not in d middle east? Are u saying "all d world" doesn't care about these countries?

ArticleBeast:
Hate or the truth? These days we are so scared of the truth that will tag it hate just like our politicians. I wish you fit come tell Mama Justina wey dangote trailer kill her daughter. Na me go join them beat you like thief

Azmanaty:
He is about unleashing more trucks to Kill Nigerians.

Nonsense and Buhari

Ibrahimmrfish:
[s]What on earth are you even arguing about.I am talking about countries in possession of nuclear war-head,you started talking about missiles. When i mentioned the striking capability of a submarine you start talking about USA and Isreal beating Pakistan. It's obvious you are kid.India is rated ahead of Britain and France,India have 3 wars with Pakistan and yet Pakistan is still standing and you are here talking About Isreal that can not defeat common Hezbollah. This will be the last time i will respond to you, cause you are talking base on emotion not facts and i don't waist my time on children[/s].

Ibrahimmrfish:
We are not talking about missiles, we are talking about nuclear war-head.And you don't need a long range missiles to strike a distant position,that's was why they countries like Pakistan and Is real both have submarine,all they need to do is to move close enough for the submarine to lunch a guided missile at the target.

Ibrahimmrfish:
[s]Since your brain can not take big grammar. I decided to restrict it to you level.But in future, when your mind in wide enough, try using some magical thing call Google,it reduce the level of ignorance. As for level of hate,that one is totally up to you.[/s]

Ibrahimmrfish:
b:[data-article_id="70950455"] [data-hide_artId="70950455"] {display:none;}213FAA8CPinterestC49106BEReddit74BC852EFlipboardarticle_titlearticle_synarticle_seoPakistan has tactical nuclear bombs as small as 125-250-grams: MinisterRasheed, a known motormouth, said that the LoC with India andP

Empiree:
[s]as if you care so much about civilians?. Civilians have been killed in the middle East and around the world but you modafikas muted because it was not in your interest. Now bcus of your hatred for one side you suddenly care about civilians.

Anofia[/s]

Ibrahimmrfish:
[s]Google is your friend, you can use it for other things not just nairaland and porn[/s].

Ibrahimmrfish:
OK,now see.So a Muslim nation can not have a nuclear weapon.Sorry to bust your bubble,i am sure your ignorant @ss don't know that Pakistan which is also Muslim country have about 200 and still increasing it.Extremist ignorant donkey.No one should have nuclear weapon, but if some have it,then every one should also have.

lexy2014:
Am sure u can prove that am a terrorist. I would also like u to prove how I have become a problem to d US. I would really love if u could do that.

In trying to "make d world a safer place", d US has inadvertently created all these entities that u call terrorists. How is that making d world a safer place? Or can u prove that these entities u refer to as terrorists didn't emerge as a result of US global interventionists politics?

lexy2014:
[s]How is acknowledging that iran made an error an indictment? If u make an error is that an indictment? Has d US not killed its own troops and ally troops by what it called "friendly fire"? Is that an indictment on the "US military and the more reason they wouldn't allow them to access nuclear weapons"? U really getting desperate.

I thought u justified d US shooting down a passenger plane in 1988 as a result of non advanced technology and sophistication. Y can that "advanced technology and military sophistication" prevent civilian deaths? How can u justify killing 60 civilians because of one man in d name keeping d world safe? By killing 60 civilians, it shows that d US hasn't made d world safer. It shows that d safety of many civilians can't be guaranteed by d US.

If d US is your US, then u should be an American citizen which I very much doubt that u are. When u look at d emergence of d Islamic govt in Iran, d Taliban, Osama and ISIS, u will see that d US is only suffering for [/s]its intervention in places where it shouldn't have. All these entities are products of US global politics

Ibrahimmrfish:
[s]The whole reason for the existence of Hezbollah is to liberate Southern Lebanon from Israeli occupation. As for Osama and Isis you can thank your god,the USA for their creation. Hezbollah is also a political party in Lebanon and have a huge support from the Christian population of Lebanon, the Christian party in Lebanon is also a partner and there are Christians in their fighters[/s].

As for nuclear weapons, who are USA to dictate the countries to have nuclear weapons? So is OK for USA to have 4000 nuclear war-head but not OK for Iran to have 1.If i call you a slave now,you will angry.

lexy2014:
Good. So if d lives of terrorists aren't sacrosanct, that means d lives of innocent noncombatants are sacrosanct irrespective of whether they find themselves in "terrorist territory" or not. So d onus is on d US to protect d lives of these innocent lives in its so called quest to make d world a safer place. If it kills innocent civilians, then it hasn't made d world safer. It has made more dangerous for innocent people to live in.

Like I noted and even as d US noted, Iran made an error. How is that annihilation? Can u provide any evidence of Iran "annihilating" its citizens? Or has d meaning of word "annihilate" changed?

Iran isn't my Iran same way d US isn't your US. Whether or not it is biting more than it can chew, isn't part of d discussion as noted earlier.

lexy2014:
Which human life isn't sacrosanct? If u say it is valid for America to take d lives of non combatants, then y d hoopla when u accuse Iran of doing d same? Apart from this incident which was internationally acknowledged to be an error, how did Iran kill its citizens in droves?

lexy2014:
If it was Iran that shot down a passenger plane 32years ago, u wouldn't wish it of as an inconsequential event. D important thing is that innocent lives were lost and someone was responsible and in this instance, its d US. D problem with ur argument is that when d US kills innocent lives, it is justified but when Iran does it even in error, it is terrorism.

Even ur excuse that d reason 4d 1988 incident was because their technology wasn't advanced, further contradicts ur claims. because with d "Technology and military sophistication that has advanced", d US is still killing innocent souls just like it has been doing in Afghanistan.

Human life is sacrosanct and u can't justify d killing of innocent souls because d US did it. Y did their "advanced technology and military sophistication" not prevent d death of d 60lives? Are d 60 souls unimportant because they were killed by d US? If it was Iran that killed those people in error, would u say it was justified?

lexy2014:
Y shouldn't I mention 1988? Did I use your mouth to mention it? If it was Iran that shot down a plane in 1988, would u prefer to sweep it under d carpet citing advancement in military technology? With all d US military sophistication and technology, y couldn't it kill d Taliban commander without killing an extra 60 innocent lives?

Like I said, am not debating whether d US is stronger than Iran militarily. U are itching for that debate and am not interested in it. D topic is about human lives not about who is stronger or about who is weaker

lexy2014:
I am not here arguing for or against who is more powerful or who is less powerful.
If Iran couldn't different between a passenger plane and a military plane, what was d US thinking when it shot down a passenger plane in 1988? Same "crime". I honestly don't see what u are contesting.

Its funny how u guys try to justify d killing of innocent lives when d US is responsible but call it terrorism when its Iran. Its hypocrisy and double speak at its best. Human life is sacrosanct irrespective of who is involved.

For claims that Iran fired "aimlessly", be informed that 13 of the missiles it fired hit d military bases housing US troops. D reason no casualties were recorded was because d US took precautionary measures to limit d risk from their end.

lexy2014:
In 1988, d US shot down an Iranian passenger plane killing everyone on board.

Just this week, d US killed more than 60innocent lives in Afghanistan because it wanted to kill one Taliban commander. This is just one of d many instances were d US has killed hundreds of people in Afghanistan, Pakistan and iraq. Based on this and with what u said, how is d US better that Iran?

lexy2014:
D key word there is "unintentional" and even d Trump that u are hailing said it was an error. By d way, d US has also killed several innocent lives in Iraq and Afghanistan which it calls "collateral damage". Recently 60 innocent souls in Afghanistan were killed when US launched a drone strike at a Taliban commamder

Empiree:
[s]what's the big deal here?. Same happened when mini war started btw Russia and Ukraine and Western powers backed Ukraine. In the process, Ukraine passenger aircraft was hit by missile accidentally and Russia eventually claimed responsibility. It was accident and families were compensated.

This just happened 3 to 5yrs ago. It is not a yardstick to start blaming Ayatollah, Iran or whatever. All they need to do is compensate the families. Remember there were more Iranians in the flight as well. So NL "war analysts" shouldn't start using this avenue to support attacks on Iran.

Mistakes happen[/s]

victorian:
Na you sabi with write up.


Anyways I know what happens in marriages from the very rich to the poor. Especially when a very rich guy from a high class family marries from a free spirited girl from a low class family.

Trust me I know the end result.

[s]'m from a royal home and I have mixed with both the high and low. It's just too clear to see and understand if uv mixed with both class of families[/s]

victorian:
[s]I'm not surprised.
I was expecting it anyways

I'm surprised they lasted this long!

.when a carefree woman is overly controlled in an aristocrat marriage, just to please everyone in the marriage especially the parents of the man. Just give her some few years, all hell will let loose if the parents of the guy, do not wear off their hold in the son's marriage.

Red flag I saw : She cut off her dada, that one alone ehn? It's finished in that marriage. Even though she agreed to cut it off. One huge part of her died already on that spot but the husband will not know the damage he has done to her inner being, just to please family and make her look the ideal wife in the eyes of the public.

Then making her a full time housewife? When she's a busy bee? So someonelse will not snatch her from him? I laugh in Chinese!

So tell me, Was she not snatched in the end? She couldn't even wait to be divorced properly before dating another guy, whom I believe will be a free spirited guy.

Guys what you fear most in marriage and try everything possible to make sure it doesnt happen, will eventually happen. It's life. Don't allow your fears over take the running of your once loving and smooth relationship before u guys get married.

All I see here is a free spirited woman who has set herself free from bondage called marriage. She thought she will be free like when she was single. She didn't know she will tied to all sorts of rules and regulations by the family. What a shock for her!

She's not going back to that family again she's gone for good.

Everything is not all about money.[/s]

dljbd1:
[s]My dear, you are the exact kind of girl I was in search of for a while. Sincerely speaking, I've had my own share of Instagram queens and slay mamas and I can categorically tell you that your ex eh...lemme just not talk.

Well, one man's sugar is another man's poison. If the reasons he gave were the actual reasons then he aren't your man girl!

If not that I have a woman just like you right now I swear I wouldn't have minded getting your contact and dating you this instance. Before I met my girl I was in search for like 2yrs. Una type scarce for this generation and I'm usually grateful when I meet one.

A lot of my female friends are like you and have great relationships... My closest female friend is married, just like you.

Don't beat yourself up dear... You are perfect the way you are!
[/s]
Drop your number sha... We could link up for linking up sake (before all these NL dudes start having wild thoughts)

See you soon.

victorian:
She try.

I wish both of you best of luck.

I can't be in such type of relationship. My man has to spend more, even though I assist by the side. Thats how our relationship flows.

lomprico:
yahoo boi! he is fattening you for the kill.