₦airaland Forum

We all remember when we were children and we would be sexually attracted to a particular classmate. Instead of being honest about our feelings we would hide and repress them by pretending we hated that person.

Likewise, the afrocentric is the 1# self-hater in the black community. Just like a child who ignores his real feelings the Afro-centric covers up his self hate and jealousy of whites by pretending to be proud of his blackness. This facade, however, falls apart under scrutiny. When you analyze the numerous contradictions in the so called "pride" of this self hating insecure loser you find that there is no one more ashamed to be black than those who pretend to be the proudest.

First off, the so called "proud" Afrocentric claims everyone to be black; in his eyes all mixed race people are black, the Arab is black, the Hispanic is black etc etc. He claims to be descended from the Moors, sometimes the Egyptians, sometimes the Hebrews... some even claim to be Greeks. This is the opposite of pride, pride is based on exclusivity, people are proud of their Ferrari because its rare to have such a car, but unlike real pride the Afrocentric's false pride is more akin to a desire to belong, to include as many people as "black" as possible so he wont feel so alone and isolated.

The second evidence of latent afrocentric self-hate can be found when he says "race is a social construct". How can one be proud of his race when he wants to pretend it doesn't exist? These same Afro-centrics often claim "all races come from black, we were the first race". How is it pride to want other races to have evolved from you? The Afro-centric is not even intelligent enough to understand that when he says this he is making the most potent argument for his inferiority.

newsflash: things tend to improve when they evolve.

The hallmark of Afro-centric self hate is the inability to look inward. The Afrocentric blames every problem in his race on external factors and can never hold his people accountable. Tell me, who hates himself more than a man who cannot even look in the mirror?

kingston277:
All this talk and yet the IQ of the UK in the 1900s was 80. In Egypt and Greece it was likely lower.

Enough of this IQ nonsense, lets focus on returning Africa back to stability:
https://www.recoveredhistories.org/images/africa-01.jpg

Its funny that there are no photographs of these great African civilizations, or even writing. You would think that if they were so smart they would have at least been literate, but no. If these civilizations were so great Europeans would not have been able to just take over them and enslave the people like cattle.


The Europeans clearly never reached this part of africa, where is there great civilization?

kingston277:
So can you expalin how we went from this
https://i1050.photobucket.com/albums/s417/KingMichael777/precolonialghana50_zps00ed3513.png

To This
https://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/4/15/1271352224681/WELCOME-TO-LAGOS-001.jpg

Around the time the whiteman took over? Did the blackman just magically forget how to be civilized as soon as white people took over the top spots of his society?

Why don't you tell me? because that is certainly what it seems like. How could blacks have created a civilization when blacks cant even run a functional society with vast oil wealth.

bump

osystein:
And read about the poor white problem in South Africa and the reason why apartheid was established in the first place. It really wasn't about blacks being inferior, but due to many whites living in extreme poverty and blacks getting educated and doing better than many white people. The fact that many white people lived below black people was seen as a threat to the prevailing white supremist view of the time.

The American Carnegie corporation investigated the poor white problem in South Africa and recommended that apartheid be put in place to give whites an upper hand and keep negroes permanently poor and uneducated, hence apartheid and the bantu education act.


Carnegie Commission of Investigation on the Poor White Question in South Africa


"The Poor White Problem in South Africa: Report of the Carnegie Commission" (1932) was a study of poverty among white South Africans that made recommendations about segregation that some have argued would later serve as a blueprint for Apartheid.

[1] The report was funded and published by the Carnegie Corporation.



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_Commission_of_Investigation_on_the_Poor_White_Question_in_South_Africa

Did whites cause the black AIDS rate to get so high in America, if so how?

osystein:
Is there anyone who doesn't know about the inequality in SA?

Clearly the legacy of apartheid. You'll have no problem stating that the country is the most developed in Africa thanks to apartheid, but you'll deny that the high HIV rate compared to other countries in Africa is due to the Apartheid history.

You should read about the migrant labour system (which was reserved for blacks) and how it destroyed black families in South Africa and the neighbouring countries. It's not just coincident that the regions where mine workers were sourced in south africa and neighbouring countries are the most devastated by HIV.

Does apartheid explain the AIDS prevalence rate in the Caribbean? Whenever there is a prevalence of blacks there is more AIDS.

hmmm, did white South Africans cause this too? if not who are you going to scape-goat next.

Waltaw:
Men you think that we care about the opinion of an ignorant person like you.. men we don't. believe me.
You ain't shit to us.
We might care about what Dangote think of us..

What I (or anybody) thinks doesn't matter. What matters is getting Africa out of poverty.