ronald4lif:


Hahaha, you don't mean it?

Im serious, i dont understand why men get married. Marriage is just something for women to do when they get old.

A smart guy knows that old age is the time to enjoy your money.

Rofl without marriage or without sex?

I would not get married for 1,000,000,000 dollars

It is the rule of natural selection that less evolved and inferior species are outperformed by the better ones and quickly go extinct. Scientists are beginning to argue that the AIDS epidemic is a form of natural selection that will eliminate the black race by 2075. The reasoning argues that no attempt should be made to slow the spread of AIDS because it is inevitable and beneficial because it kills individuals who are not intelligent and responsible to survive the modern world.

The miracle of statistics is that you don't need to sample every single member of the population to gain useful and true information about the population. If we are trying to gain an understanding of black people's lack of sexual control we don't need to look any further than the samples provided by AIDS data.

The first 2 images are of South Africa. As you can see the prevalence of Aids correlates with the number of black people in the area. Some will say that AID's correlates with poverty, and it does, but the data shows that it also correlates with blacks. Upon further analysis we see that the correlation with poverty is caused chiefly because black genetics correlate with poverty as well.

When you look at the Caribbean you see that the countries with the most blacks also have the most AIDS. When you look at the United States you see that AIDS prevalence is also concentrated in the black population. However, when you look at other poor groups you do not see an abnormally high AIDS rate. For example in Mongolia (4k GDP per capita) the AIDS rate is non-existent. The same thing is seen in other non black 3rd world countries like; Yemen, Oman, Burma etc. The fact that AIDS doesn't correlate with poverty in areas with no blacks disproves any argument that there is correlation with AIDS and poverty independent of blacks.

In statistics the constant variable is the variable that controls the outcome. The constant variable resulting in an abnormally high AIDS prevalence in an area is the presence of black people in that area. So it can be inferred that the high AIDS infection rate among blacks is due to black behavior.

The last image shows black migrants crossing barbed wire to get into Europe, many are infected with AIDS. Such images will become more common and we move closer and closer to the 2075 deadline for the extinction of the black race. Eugenics is the only way to solve this issue.

In addition to this, even if the smartest people ran the government, who would be the engineers, the doctors and the professors?

You see the engineer shortages they are having in South Africa? Most of the students are majoring in sociology...because they are simply not smart enough to do engineering. This is what happens when the average of the population is too low. Putting intellectuals in government will help, but when the average people are not smart the economy will not go anywhere.

Stillfire:


I agree and do understand the urgency you predicate.
As I said it is only from a sentimental side point am I averse to it. I do not have any rational conclusion to tell you why we shouldn't get rid of negative genes which I will be the first to say manifests. But only on an emotional thought am I averse to it. The negative consequence of eugenics is that it is in conflict with human rights...the right to reproduce. My line of work is in clinical research, and being protective of vulnerable subjects in the society is what we are enforced to do, it is not far-fetched to say that has shaped my sensibilities. But I do understand where you are coming from. What we need are geniuses to get in the corridors of power. Unfortunately Africa's rich elite, its leaders- traditionally or politically are not made up of intellectuals. I know the metrics you use to determine who should be sterilized depends on IQ, but have a thought about how this will turn out to be a thing between the rich versus the poor, whereby the rich increases rate of reproduction (because they have the resources at their disposal) and poor reduce their rate of reproduction. Now that doesn't seem bad but, one thing we need to consider is that increasing the breeding of this rich elite will not translate to an increase in positive genes because our rich elite is not comprised of the Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerbergs but thieving politicians, business men or old money with ties to the slavery era with no innovative idea or scientific inventions to their name. I think a better question of how we can help Africa get its bearing is how can we take power from these traditional or political institutions and give it to intellectuals? Or what do you think?

You bring up some good points, I agree with most of what you said but want to bring up another perspective.

It would be better if the intellectuals led the country, the problem is that just because a person is high IQ doesn't mean they will make a good politician. Politics requires a different skill-set than academics like science or mathematics. A politicians is more akin to a pastor than an intellectual. He must be charismatic and personable but smart enough to read the pulse of the people and manipulate to get his way. To this end a politician must be smart but not too smart or the common people will not be able to relate to him. The general consensus is that politicians typically fall 1-2 standard deviations higher than the average IQ of the population. (15 -30 points) People like Bill Gates and Zuckerberg score 3-4 standard deviations higher, making them way too different from the population to be leaders.

IQ tends to have an inverse correlation with charisma, and people without charisma are not successful in politics.

So in America, where the average is 100, the politicians typically score from 115 to 130. The average IQ of U.S presidents is 128 which supports this claim, as this score is almost exactly 2 standard deviations from the average. The same trend is found in every nation and has been going on for a long time. Even the average Nazi IQ was around 2 standard deviations from the average, you can see the scores here: http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/meetthedefendants.html

On the other-hand, the best scientists in these countries typically will score in 150's 160s and even 180s in IQ.

Now when we apply this theory to Africa the full magnitude of the problem becomes evident. The average IQ of Nigeria is from 67-84, I think it is around 75. The average for the continent of Africa is 70. The average African leader will scores 1 to 2 standard deviations higher than average, giving him an average score of 85-100. This is good for a factory worker or a truck driver, but for the leader of an entire economy and controller of millions of dollars/lives this level of intelligence is a disaster. Modern economies are far too complex to be handled by someone with an IQ of 85-100 while hes competing with leaders scoring at 130 +.

When you realize what IQ represents you begin to understand what the real problem with the African leadership is. They are not evil, they are not more selfish and nepotistic than any other people ( look at how American leaders waste the peoples money bombing Iraq for Halliburton) they are just dumber. While American leaders know how to loot and still bring development, Nigerian leaders can only loot but are not smart enough to do anything else.

So in the fundamental way I agree with you, the current elites of Africa are very dumb. The problem is that this low IQ is inevitable when the average is so low. It is my opinion that the only way to have good intelligent leaders is to increase the intelligence of the entire population because leaders invariably fall 15-30 points higher than the average.

Some IQ bellcurves for reference. You see just how rare it is to find people who score above 105 in a population averaging 75? ... 105 is the average for China.

makahlj2:


If this is true, then it is perhaps too late already to take measures, anyway. Your artificial geniuses won't help, either. They will be lured to the western countries, to further advance the white race. Remember, societal relations are a very slowly-reacting system; you might need centuries to change them. Unless you go the path of Hitler or Mao Zedong to speed up things. But going totalitarian has its own perils.

Totalitarianism is the first step, we just need a leader with a high enough IQ to make it work.

Autocracies work when the leadership is intelligent and has a sound economic plan. Look at China

chukxie:
Indonesia! Hmmmm! If you've ever been to Jakarta you'd know sex, booze and drugs are rife there. Those that sanctioned the public caning of that girl should hide their heads in shame for being a bunch of hypocrites. They should take the wips to Jakarta. Indonesian girls in Hong Kong and Macao shag like there's no tomorrow. I wonder how many of them would be subjected to such a public humiliation when they return to Indonesia.

True. There are indonesian girls all over porn sites

madgoat:
Wow... So people are archaic in reasoning. Imagine flogging an adult.

indonesia is 100X better than nigeria.

maybe if nigerians caned more the AIDS rate would reduce

Its becomming serious. They are exposing female teachers having sex with male students almost every week in the united states.

I interacted with 3 such women in high school, one in middle school so i know its an epidemic. The ones they are exposing are only the tip of the iceberg.

MorrowCaligari:



okay, i'll stop the ben carson thing if you just tell me what you mean by fulani domination and why you put hausas at the bottom otherwise its a just conclusion to say youre doing so out of spite.

ROFL I couldn't care less what your conclusion is, do i know you?

look it up

MorrowCaligari:


what evidence makes you think hausas are at the bottom of the pyramid?

what do you mean by fulani domination?

please elaborate.

Ben Carson

I'm not wasting my time with you. Ask someone else

- ben carson.

makahlj2:
Hausa, without doubt. They ruled Nigeria, rule and will rule it.

Remember the Fulani rule the Hausa and rule Nigeria.

MorrowCaligari:
Friggin Ben Carson! First of all what do you mean by hausas domination by fulani?




You still haven't answered my question, is IQ a reliable measure of one's intelligence?


Pleep


You definitely have something against hausas.

I'm not like you people. I can view the world objectively instead of stumbling through a maze of bias and emotion like you guys do. Just because I put the Hausas on the bottom doesn't mean i have "something against" them. It simply means that according to the evidence available to me they appear to be the least intelligent.

I know objectivity is like rocket science to you guys and such a thing is impossible for you to understand.

Anyway, Ben Carson was said to have scored the highest SAT score of any high-school student graduating from Detroit in decades. Whether or not true this is true, its obvious that he had outstanding academic achievement as he graduated from Yale and went on to become a successful Neuro-surgeon.

Why did you just write "friggin Ben Carson" at the beginning of your post? Stop being a smart-ass and make your point clearly. Do you think he is dumb?

makahlj2:
Now read carefully, you fool. English language is an eclectic, grabbag mess that has evolved over centuries to borrow words from other languages, and that's the explanation why it's so "rich and complete". Every other language, including Yoruba, could do this trick. Did you notice that most of the words in your citation that are difficult to translate into Yoruba, for example, are not of English origin either, but have Latin roots?

That passage can be translated into any major European language without difficulty, in fact it was originally written in German. This is the depth of complexity found in languages that developed with a writing system. Reinventing this level of depth in less developed languages is like trying to reinvent the wheel.

I know the monkey will find some way to keep arguing but this is the last ill say to you on this issue.

davidante27:
[s]Go preach unity to your igbo people .They are not united and do not love each other . Also tell them to stop multiplying like rabbits . Overpopulation is detrimental to a well functioning society. Akwa cross is slightly larger or same size as Igbo land ,yet has a more sustainable population.
[/s]
I don't mind the entire African being one country and have English as Lingua franca. What I dislike is arrogant and primitive behavior . I can only accept English as the lingua franca, not any african language over another . insinuating otherwise is a disrespect to the other tribe's heritage .
Asking the akwa cross to embrace igbo language is akin to asking Germany to abolish their language and embrace Kosovo language .What a travesty.

This is actually a reasonable point. It would be better if English was the Lingua Franca. At the very least though, Annang Ibibio and Efik should be conflated into one. Biafra or no Biafra.

makahlj2:
Stop trolling. You cannot assume that other people in this forum are unintelligent. You hold some very extreme views and if anyone disagrees, you throw insults, not unlike an ape which throws sh$t at whom it dislikes.

Listen you brain-dead buffoon. If you disagree with me and present a reasonable and intelligent response I will give you respect.

You guys are not capable of this, as thus you are not worthy to be talked to as anything other than the trash you are. Get used to it or GTFO of my thread.

10$ for the first low-IQ African moronn to translate this passage into his native language:


"But the difference of space is essentially a determinate, qualitative difference. As such it is (a) first, the negation of space itself because this is immediate and undifferentiated self-externality, the point. (b) The negation as negation, however, is itself spatial, and the relation of the point to space is the line, the first otherness of the point. (c) The truth of the otherness is, however, the negation of the negation. The line, therefore, passes over into the plane, which on the one hand is a determinacy opposed to line and point, and thus is plane in general, but on the other hand is the suspended negation of space, and thus the re-establishment of spatial totality, which, however, now contains the negative moment within itself an enclosing surface, which splits off an individual, whole space."

StarFlux:
Very true o.

If you look at Phyno's song "Connect" - it's actually a great example of what we're discussing.

He says:"dem say i no go go far, dey say am be local".

Now, what does local mean? It's a stereotypical (and often very true) description of the common man in Nigeria. Frowned upon due to poor command of the English language and usage of his/hers mother tongue.
If you don't speak English, you're not a civilized being. This is also why some parents ban their children from speaking their native languages.
Discrediting and down-talking our native languages for the sake of English pains me.

There are plenty of small languages in Europe capable of chemistry, mathematics, physics. There is nothing those languages can't do that English can. The exact same thing can be said about every single language on earth. English is neither grammatically complex or unique in any way. It's actually a pretty butchered language. The only thing it got going, is a huge body of loanwords. Some use that as a reason for it being superior, but in fact, a human can only remember so-and-so many words. A large portion of these words are barely used and more or less useless.

There is no good reason why someone hasn't sat down and said "ok, we need to create and improve the scientific capability of our languages - let's create some new ones". As I've said many times: morphology in our native languages makes it so easy to coin words to create new meanings. English has borrowed for the opposite reason - it's incapable of making new words. A staggering huge percentage of English is pure French/Latin. English borrowed for historical reasons, but also out of outmost necessesity and desperation (note: reason, historical, necessity, desparation - all of foregin origin).

At least to me, English carries very little emotion and expressiveness. It's a stone cold language, and thank goodness it's not my mother tongue. I lose your point of view entirely when you say "the most complexity and nuance". Abeg, u don leave your room? If you really want to use complexity as an arguement and as an "objective" measurement (which it is not), then there are far better candidates than English.

To pessimists saying you can't succeed with our languages - look at Phyno sef, look at Olamide, Wizkid, Flavour. They all succeeded because of their native tongues and they know it very well.

But as my signature says, were, were nikan njele. If you let the termite fester for too long, eventually it will take everything with it. Besides, if history has taught is anything, it's that world languages change rapidly. I see no reason why the next one couldn't be Yoruba, Igbo or Edo.
Je'ka jo.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynCkE3kYI10

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS5zBrEZg-A

European languages are useful for science because they developed with a writing system.

English was selected (above French and German) as the language of science because it is simply better at expressing certain concepts than other languages. It is also not encumbered by useless rules like word gender (Masculin/Feminin) or different endings found French or the excessively complex grammar of German.

There is no Yoruba way to express the oscillation of a sequence of real numbers. There is no way to describe the ossification of cartilage tissue in underwater invertebrates or to properly explain the amalgamated calcification of mollusk shells. These are things that developed over countless years of work and research in the English language. Trying to translate all of this into an African language is like trying to reinvent the wheel.

The fact that you will argue against such a self evident truth displays the abject and insurmountable stupidity of the average black brain.

And I laughed out loud when you said that English vocabulary is useless and no one can learn it all. That is exactly what a low IQ person would say. I didn't need a dictionary to give the above examples, but i know you will need a dictionary to understand them. English is a language that gives the intelligent a way to express themselves as fully as possible. It sounds cold and dry to you because you are retarded. The complexity of English lies in the amount of nuance that can be conveyed in every idea. Instead of saying cold you could have said; frigid, Icy, frosty, chilly, stiff or dead. All providing a slightly different nuance/meaning to the idea you are trying to convey.

What a colossal fail this argument was, you low IQ people make me sick. Now lets watch the monkey resort to an even more feeble and brain-dead argument against the indisputable truth.

davidante27:
You written a long novel without saying anything . Igbos are linguistic neigbors and should agitate for their autonomy, the akwa cross are linguistic neigbors and should agitate for their own . the akwa cross lingua franca is Efik language and everyone agrees with that fact. the financial and commercial district with seaport and skyscrapers will be Oron area. The entertainment and recreational district will be iebeno/eket area. The administrative district will be around Uyo area.
what do igbos have?

I'm not going to argue with you about this. I already understand that you are not intelligent enough to grasp my point of view.

The "novel" I wrote was not an attempt to convince you of anything. It was for my own benefit and for any other such enlightened person who may read this thread.

makahlj2:
I don't think he is white. He is most probably a self-hating Uncle Tom, ashamed of the dark color of his azz.

I'm not ashamed of myself, or of the black race per say. I'm just ashamed of you low-functioning blacks. Ashamed may be the wrong word even...

I don't see myself as the same as you guys, so even if I did hate you it doesn't mean i hate myself.

makahlj2:
By the way, why should we stop talking about whites? Whites certainly have accomplishments, Only a fool would disregard these and would not learn from others' successes and failures. Asians learned from whites and that's how they developed their countries.

If you were analyzing the accomplishments of whites it would be productive, that is what the Asians did.

What monkeys like you do, however, is analyze the failures of whites and use them as a scapegoat/deflection for black dysfunction.

davidante27:
Now you've just proven how dumb you really are . I know that you are igbo. I now get it .I guess that's why the igbo people are hated everywhere because of such inferior reasoning .
what makes you think that igbo has anything more than anyone else ? You should be ashamed that you were sold as cheap slaves .
Igbo people are historical slaves and are some of the most barbaric and backward people . Igbo land has no viable natural resources at all . Igbo soil is infertile. Igboland is landlocked . All igbo people are good at is multiply like rabbits and spread poverty,baby factories ,thieves, homosexuals ,lesbians ,prostitutes ,voodoo rituals , etc. I dare you to prove me wrong.
Igbos should be grateful to The Akwa cross for feeding them through the Nigerian purse . The akwa cross region has the most fertile soil in the entire nigeria. In a sane world and if every region becomes autonomous ,Igboland would be similar to South Sudan and would receive aid from Akwa cross. Igbos would beg for visa to migrate to Akwa cross.
The Akwa cross army would be one of the most advanced in Africa and might invade and occupy igbo land if desired .


Every tribe has intelligent people and innovators. They can achieve great things if given the opportunity . most of the intelligent and succesful igbos,oron,yoruba,efik,hausa,ibibio,etc. were born and raised or live in developed nations and are more enlightened . An average man in an igbo,Oron,Yoruba,Ibibio,Hausa ,Ijaw village is unexposed . What makes you think yours is the best one . You think only you have great ideas for your igbo land? what a delusional slowpoke.

Im not igbo, im actually from akwa cross. I bet you feel really silly now huh?

You guys need to understand that I am not like you, my mind is completely different. I see the world with complete impartiality and objectivity. It doesn't matter if its my language or your "culture" that needs to be eliminated, the only thing that matters to me is the truth and the advancement of Africa.

GorkoSusaay:
You, certainly, are not very smart.
Being smart is not dependent on your ethnicity. It's incredible but it is true.

Do you have any proof for this claim?

Chanchit:
Imbe-cile. I just checked ur profile only to discover that you have brain damage. Take this truth from me, you are also among the 95% of blacks that do not deserve to reproduce.

thats not nice, give me a chance bro

This is subjective and just for fun.

In my opinion the smartest tribes in Nigeria are in the South, except the Ijaw who despite being southerners are not intelligent.

The Igbo appear to be the highest IQ Nigerians, but they have some severe character flaws. This is mainly a low level of conscientiousness (heritable trait) which gives them a higher tendency towards criminal behavior. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscientiousness

The dumbest tribe is by far the Hausa who despite scoring high in conscientiousness probably score very low in IQ. Their domination by a much smaller group, the Fulani, is evidence of this. The Yoruba may be further down the list but I place them at 3 because they seem to have made contributions. This being said i cant tell the difference between Yoruba and Edo, so perhaps these contributions were made by the former?

What is your list and why?


1. Igbo
2. Edo
3. Yoruba.
4. Ibibio
5. Kanuri
6. Fulani
7. Ekoi
7. Jukon
8. Nupe
9. Ijaw
10. Hausa


P.S Which tribe is this?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVl0KtUlvQo

quid:

Your so-called position was defeated long ago.
It is actually NOT a position, but a well -recognized rumor.

how was it defeated? please show me so i can see the error in my ways.

AAinEqGuinea:


I love all other ethnic groups, and my support of Biafra shouldn't assume contrare. All ethnic groups have demostrated that they are capable of self-governance. No one should be forced to say within some foreign amalgamation, further perpetuating foreign dominance. I don't care for tribalism, we're all black with interesting histories, stories, and languages. But it is terribly sad to see people who claim to be unified with you and your tribe who are also willing to re-live and subject you to similar horrors of 1967-70 if you dare try to secede again.

That's not unity or oneness, it's a forced relationship, more akin to slavery.

Funny how pleep's unwavering critism of Blacks echo similar rhetoric from Radio Biafra-"Biafra, God's perfect black Utopia". Pleep, heres your long awaited invitation to join the Biafran movement join us

I am pro Biafra. Ethnic states are vital and evidence suggests that a separate SE Nigeria would be a productive country.

You have got me thinking.....

The existence of such a large high IQ and enterprising expat community from this region would most certainly get things rolling.

For it to be successful we would need to find a way to conflate the Annang, Ibibio, Efik Oron into one group and slowly combine that language/culture with Igbo. If this does not happen Biafra will just trade one problem for another. I also do not feel that the deep Niger Delta (Rivers/Bayelsa) should be included because that is conquest not separatism.

anangboy:
Rid yourself of imaginary subjective illusions. There is nothing intellectual about wanton crap spewed by the clueless clod of cyberspace wearing the garb of anecdotal rhetoric. If you know nothing about the echoing constructs of racial subjugation and the intentionally flawed historical program, then what else is there to debate with you? I know a lot about fools like you, pseudo-intellectuals who literally think because a complex flawed perspective aligns with their congenital insecurities, that they have somehow unlocked a realm to understanding things on multi-faceted levels.

I'd rather spend my morning watching a loop with no satisfactory condition than discuss the sociology of racism with an intentional half-wit and his assemblage of convoluted nonsense.

So basically you cannot defeat my position, and you are mad because you don't like what i'm writing. Get over it.

And stop trying too hard in your writing, it looks silly.

quid:

Truth is usually a point a view.
Change your point of view, and your so-called "truth" changes.

Wake up from your intellectual slumber.

@ ChinosoDike2 do not argue with this guy, he is extremely unintelligent. 85 IQ at the maximum but probably lower.

Truth is not subjective, it is absolute. A Diamond is always made of Carbon, not sometimes, not maybe and it doesn't matter what your opinion is. Facts are facts. The only way a perceived 'truth' can change is if it was never true to begin with and is later disproven.

quid:

There are at least 5 theories about truth:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth

1) The Correspondence theory of truth
2) The Coherence theory of truth
3) The Constructivist theory of truth
4) The Consensus theory of truth
5) The Pragmatic theory of truth

So tell me, which of these theories conforms to your absolute theory of truth?

There may be 5 "theories of truth" but only one of them, if any, is actually true.

quid:

Listen to yourself.
You take statistics from, say, 2 million black people.
Then you make sweeping generalization about the remaining 1 billion+ black people in Africa, Jamaica, Haiti, Barbados, Europe, Brazil + Latin America.

Such statistical reasoning is VERY WEAK.
Your argument suffers from the fallacy of HASTY GENERALIZATION.

I know you want to be smart and scientific, but the argument is ultimately BS.
------------------------------------------------------

On second thought, this kind of useless statistical argument might arise from envy of your high IQ friends.
The oyibo women are not strong in childbirth like the blackwomen are, so they resort to scientific smear campaigns.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Wake up from your slumber

In basic statistics they teach you the difference between a population and a sample. In this case the population would be the entire black race and the sample would be a group of people randomly selected from this race.

The miracle of statistics is that you don't need to sample every single member of the population to gain useful and true information about the population. If we are trying to gain an understanding of black people's lack of sexual control we don't need to look any further than the samples provided by AIDS data.

The first 2 images are of South Africa. As you can see the prevalence of Aids correlates with the number of black people in the area. Some will say that AID's correlates with poverty, and it does, but the data shows that it also correlates with blacks. Upon further analysis we see that the correlation with poverty is caused chiefly because black genetics correlate with poverty as well.

When you look at the Caribbean you see that the countries with the most blacks also have the most AIDS. When you look at the United States you see that AIDS prevalence is also concentrated in the black population. However, when you look at other poor groups you do not see an abnormally high AIDS rate. For example in Mongolia (4k GDP per capita) the AIDS rate is non-existent. The same thing is seen in other non black 3rd world countries like; Yemen, Oman, Burma etc. The fact that AIDS doesn't correlate with poverty in areas with no blacks disproves any argument that there is correlation with AIDS and poverty independent of blacks.

In statistics the constant variable is the variable that controls the outcome. The constant variable resulting in an abnormally high AIDS prevalence in an area is the presence of black people in that area. So it can be inferred that the high AIDS infection rate among blacks is due to black behavior. This is the type of behavior I am calling attention to in this thread.

makahlj2:


He was only joking. Don't you have a sense of humor?

AAinEguinea is joking too... are you retarded?