₦airaland Forum

freshkpomo:
Zombie Africans, always looking for who to blame... develop your country una go say no.... Na so some mumu islamists dey blame America say na him make Nigeria poor...

I believe say na same way west exploit Africa,them exploit Asia, but Asia today are Giants.. see South Korea, Singapore, China and Japan alll doing well...but you see our mumu Africans? Them must always find who to blame fir their failure.. Buhari and Osinbajo dey blame Jonathan, APC dey blame PDP, Muslims dey blame America,Christians dey blame one old woman fir village.... Everybody just dey blame and the truth is we are our own problem.

olorunthobby:
The truth is we have to build our continent to avoid stuff like this. These guys don’t care about us a bit . If the worst happens, they will throw us out!!
That's why I laugh at those who think that the solution to the poor governance is leaving the country for this people. There is no place like home. I wish we all know that we have to make this place a better place for all of us. If Nigeria gets it right, Africa will be safe.

olorunthobby:
The truth is we have to build our continent to avoid stuff like this. These guys don’t care about us a bit . If the worst happens, they will throw us out!!
That's why I laugh at those who think that the solution to the poor governance is leaving the country for this people. There is no place like home. I wish we all know that we have to make this place a better place for all of us. If Nigeria gets it right, Africa will be safe.

Stevenson20:
Ukraine dey war front, and you dey bring this topic now. What do you want us to do with it now

Gamesmart:
Thank you.

Seems you are one of the minorities amongst Dahomey people though.

Now back to the bank:

1) Your ancestors civilisation was on par with white civilisation.

2) Your ancestors' people were taken as slaves, given white people's religion and brainwashed through torture and kidnapping and conquest.

3) The whites were able to take your people as slaves, give you their religion, brainwash you and had superior weapons.

Disproving approach A
Can you immediately see the contradiction between (1) and (2)/(3)?

How come people you claim to have "on par" civilisation with be able to come and take you as slaves, give you their religion and brainwash you [through torture and kidnapping and conquest etc.] if they are not superior to you?

How come you were not able to do it to them too if your civilisation and brains were not inferior?

Disproving approach B
It seems like your opinion is based on not understanding what "civilisation" is. Hence, why you think your backward people had "on par" civilisations with White civilisations.

If I am wrong, please prove me wrong by educating me on what Dahomey ancestors did on the following civilisations metrics:

- What educational system did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with White education systems before they came to you?

- What kind of buildings and architecture did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the buildings and architecture of the Whites?

- What technology and engineering did your Dahomey ancestors develop that you felt was on par with the technology and engineering of the Whites?

- What kind of economy did your Dahomey ancestors develop that you felt was on par with the economies of the Whites?

- What books did your Dahomey ancestors write that you felt was on par with the books the Whites were writing?

- What kind of dressing did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the dressing of the Whites?

Please tell me.

Baawaa:
God is in control, everything will soon normalized

patrickmuf:
A colleague of mine called a friend on video call who is in Ukraine for studies. She said they are not selling tickets to blacks. They prioritized ticket sales to whites first...

This is not hear say, it was a video call and I saw it live. Since then, I no send the Ukrainians...

Lifewasgood:
Anyone who believes the blacks and white have equal rights is living in the 31st century; we are in the 21st century. Even Obama wasn’t pure black he was half caste. The only thing I’m applauding here is Biden and his cohorts warning the world weeks before it happened and many refused to listen, so blame yourself and no one for war crime

Litmus:
Actually, why would public transport be selling tickets in the first place ? you'd have thought Ukrainian authorities would suspend charging...

chaloskyx:
moral of the story Africans and their leaders develop yourselves cause when it comes down to survival Europe and the rest of the world would forget morals and ethics and bring back their hidden colonial mentality. you feel cause they talk of terms such as democracy and freedom when it comes to national interest they would stick by them see lets paint a scenario of there being ww III and the entire Europe and north America is decimated and only African is left untouched do you know what your so called democratic nations would turn their attention to Africa they wont hesitate to colonise us all again to rebuild their nation we have always been pawns to them forget they allow you migrate its just another way of exploiting the best of us so that such talents arnt used to develop Africa

Litmus:
Actually, why would public transport be selling tickets in the first place ? you'd have thought Ukrainian authorities would suspend charging...

1stGenAmerican:
They suspended charges days ago. Even so, did they actually say no you can’t buy because you’re Black? The person listening on the phone understands the language? I also thought most Internet was down but video call is working so I guess not.

Gamesmart:
Thank you.

Seems you are one of the minorities amongst Dahomey people though.

Now back to the bank:

1) Your ancestors civilisation was on par with white civilisation.

2) Your ancestors' people were taken as slaves, given white people's religion and brainwashed through torture and kidnapping and conquest.

3) The whites were able to take your people as slaves, give you their religion, brainwash you and had superior weapons.

Disproving approach A
Can you immediately see the contradiction between (1) and (2)/(3)?

How come people you claim to have "on par" civilisation with be able to come and take you as slaves, give you their religion and brainwash you [through torture and kidnapping and conquest etc.] if they are not superior to you?

How come you were not able to do it to them too if your civilisation and brains were not inferior?

Disproving approach B
It seems like your opinion is based on not understanding what "civilisation" is. Hence, why you think your backward people had "on par" civilisations with White civilisations.

If I am wrong, please prove me wrong by educating me on what Dahomey ancestors did on the following civilisations metrics:

- What educational system did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with White education systems before they came to you?

- What kind of buildings and architecture did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the buildings and architecture of the Whites?

- What technology and engineering did your Dahomey ancestors develop that you felt was on par with the technology and engineering of the Whites?

- What kind of economy did your Dahomey ancestors develop that you felt was on par with the economies of the Whites?

- What books did your Dahomey ancestors write that you felt was on par with the books the Whites were writing?

- What kind of dressing did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the dressing of the Whites?

Please tell me.

Gamesmart:
Thank you.

Seems you are one of the minorities amongst Dahomey people though.

Now back to the bank:

1) Your ancestors civilisation was on par with white civilisation.

2) Your ancestors' people were taken as slaves, given white people's religion and brainwashed through torture and kidnapping and conquest.

3) The whites were able to take your people as slaves, give you their religion, brainwash you and had superior weapons.

Disproving approach A
Can you immediately see the contradiction between (1) and (2)/(3)?

How come people you claim to have "on par" civilisation with be able to come and take you as slaves, give you their religion and brainwash you [through torture and kidnapping and conquest etc.] if they are not superior to you?

How come you were not able to do it to them too if your civilisation and brains were not inferior?

Disproving approach B
It seems like your opinion is based on not understanding what "civilisation" is. Hence, why you think your backward people had "on par" civilisations with White civilisations.

If I am wrong, please prove me wrong by educating me on what Dahomey ancestors did on the following civilisations metrics:

- What educational system did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with White education systems before they came to you?

- What kind of buildings and architecture did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the buildings and architecture of the Whites?

- What technology and engineering did your Dahomey ancestors develop that you felt was on par with the technology and engineering of the Whites?

- What kind of economy did your Dahomey ancestors develop that you felt was on par with the economies of the Whites?

- What books did your Dahomey ancestors write that you felt was on par with the books the Whites were writing?

- What kind of dressing did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the dressing of the Whites?

Please tell me.

Gamesmart:
Thank you.

Seems you are one of the minorities amongst Dahomey people though.

Now back to the bank:

1) Your ancestors civilisation was on par with white civilisation.

2) Your ancestors' people were taken as slaves, given white people's religion and brainwashed through torture and kidnapping and conquest.

3) The whites were able to take your people as slaves, give you their religion, brainwash you and had superior weapons.

Disproving approach A
Can you immediately see the contradiction between (1) and (2)/(3)?

How come people you claim to have "on par" civilisation with be able to come and take you as slaves, give you their religion and brainwash you [through torture and kidnapping and conquest etc.] if they are not superior to you?

How come you were not able to do it to them too if your civilisation and brains were not inferior?

Disproving approach B
It seems like your opinion is based on not understanding what "civilisation" is. Hence, why you think your backward people had "on par" civilisations with White civilisations.

If I am wrong, please prove me wrong by educating me on what Dahomey ancestors did on the following civilisations metrics:

- What educational system did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with White education systems before they came to you?

- What kind of buildings and architecture did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the buildings and architecture of the Whites?

- What technology and engineering did your Dahomey ancestors develop that you felt was on par with the technology and engineering of the Whites?

- What kind of economy did your Dahomey ancestors develop that you felt was on par with the economies of the Whites?

- What books did your Dahomey ancestors write that you felt was on par with the books the Whites were writing?

- What kind of dressing did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the dressing of the Whites?

Please tell me.

Gamesmart:
Thank you.

Seems you are one of the minorities amongst Dahomey people though.

Now back to the bank:

1) Your ancestors civilisation was on par with white civilisation.

2) Your ancestors' people were taken as slaves, given white people's religion and brainwashed through torture and kidnapping and conquest.

3) The whites were able to take your people as slaves, give you their religion, brainwash you and had superior weapons.

Disproving approach A
Can you immediately see the contradiction between (1) and (2)/(3)?

How come people you claim to have "on par" civilisation with be able to come and take you as slaves, give you their religion and brainwash you [through torture and kidnapping and conquest etc.] if they are not superior to you?

How come you were not able to do it to them too if your civilisation and brains were not inferior?

Disproving approach B
It seems like your opinion is based on not understanding what "civilisation" is. Hence, why you think your backward people had "on par" civilisations with White civilisations.

If I am wrong, please prove me wrong by educating me on what Dahomey ancestors did on the following civilisations metrics:

- What educational system did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with White education systems before they came to you?

- What kind of buildings and architecture did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the buildings and architecture of the Whites?

- What technology and engineering did your Dahomey ancestors develop that you felt was on par with the technology and engineering of the Whites?

- What kind of economy did your Dahomey ancestors develop that you felt was on par with the economies of the Whites?

- What books did your Dahomey ancestors write that you felt was on par with the books the Whites were writing?

- What kind of dressing did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the dressing of the Whites?

Please tell me.

Gamesmart:
Thank you.

Seems you are one of the minorities amongst Dahomey people though.

Now back to the bank:

1) Your ancestors civilisation was on par with white civilisation.

2) Your ancestors' people were taken as slaves, given white people's religion and brainwashed through torture and kidnapping and conquest.

3) The whites were able to take your people as slaves, give you their religion, brainwash you and had superior weapons.

Disproving approach A
Can you immediately see the contradiction between (1) and (2)/(3)?

How come people you claim to have "on par" civilisation with be able to come and take you as slaves, give you their religion and brainwash you [through torture and kidnapping and conquest etc.] if they are not superior to you?

How come you were not able to do it to them too if your civilisation and brains were not inferior?

Disproving approach B
It seems like your opinion is based on not understanding what "civilisation" is. Hence, why you think your backward people had "on par" civilisations with White civilisations.

If I am wrong, please prove me wrong by educating me on what Dahomey ancestors did on the following civilisations metrics:

- What educational system did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with White education systems before they came to you?

- What kind of buildings and architecture did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the buildings and architecture of the Whites?

- What technology and engineering did your Dahomey ancestors develop that you felt was on par with the technology and engineering of the Whites?

- What kind of economy did your Dahomey ancestors develop that you felt was on par with the economies of the Whites?

- What books did your Dahomey ancestors write that you felt was on par with the books the Whites were writing?

- What kind of dressing did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the dressing of the Whites?

Please tell me.

Gamesmart:
Thank you.

Seems you are one of the minorities amongst Dahomey people though.

Now back to the bank:

1) Your ancestors civilisation was on par with white civilisation.

2) Your ancestors' people were taken as slaves, given white people's religion and brainwashed through torture and kidnapping and conquest.

3) The whites were able to take your people as slaves, give you their religion, brainwash you and had superior weapons.

Disproving approach A
Can you immediately see the contradiction between (1) and (2)/(3)?

How come people you claim to have "on par" civilisation with be able to come and take you as slaves, give you their religion and brainwash you [through torture and kidnapping and conquest etc.] if they are not superior to you?

How come you were not able to do it to them too if your civilisation and brains were not inferior?

Disproving approach B
It seems like your opinion is based on not understanding what "civilisation" is. Hence, why you think your backward people had "on par" civilisations with White civilisations.

If I am wrong, please prove me wrong by educating me on what Dahomey ancestors did on the following civilisations metrics:

- What educational system did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with White education systems before they came to you?

- What kind of buildings and architecture did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the buildings and architecture of the Whites?

- What technology and engineering did your Dahomey ancestors develop that you felt was on par with the technology and engineering of the Whites?

- What kind of economy did your Dahomey ancestors develop that you felt was on par with the economies of the Whites?

- What books did your Dahomey ancestors write that you felt was on par with the books the Whites were writing?

- What kind of dressing did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the dressing of the Whites?

Please tell me.

olas24u:
Dahomey is different from the oyo empire,oyo empire contolled dahomey,Oyo subjugated the kingdom of Dahomey in the west in two phases (1724–30, 1738–48) and traded with European merchants on the coast through the port of Ajase ...

olas24u:
The system of education was oral and was the ifa system
What is Ifa system?
Image result for ifa educational system
The word Ifa refers to the mystical figure Ifa or Orunmila, regarded by the Yoruba as the deity of wisdom and intellectual development. ... The Ifa divination system is applied whenever an important individual or collective decision has to be made.

olas24u:
What kind of buildings and architecture did your Dahomey ancestors have that you felt was on par with the buildings and architecture of the Whites?
Traditional Yoruba architectural forms can be seen as hollow squares or circles, and buildings can be viewed as compounds consisting of various sub-units arranged in quadrilateral shapes surrounding an open courtyard.

olas24u:
blacksmithing, weaving, leatherworking, glassmaking, and ivory and wood carving, the black smith made guns ,and did metal work

olas24u:
The traditional Yoruba economy is based on farming, hunting, fishing, trade, craft specialization, and the ownership of domestic animals. Precolonial economic specialization was based on patrilineage. Each Yoruba town and village had compounds specializing in different industries or crafts

olas24u:
What books did your Dahomey ancestors write that you felt was on par with the books the Whites were writing?most were oral and could be found in ifa ,interpretationsa and ,meanings

olas24u:
What books did your Dahomey ancestors write that you felt was on par with the books the Whites were writing?most were oral and could be found in ifa ,interpretationsa and ,meanings

1stGenAmerican:
And why would African nations allow powerless, decimated nations to colonize them?

aremuforlife:
This guy don't know what war situation is like.
Ukraine is in war, they have to prioritise their citizens before anybody.

SATANICALLY:
https://twitter.com/DavidHundeyin/status/1497290916855312385?s=19[/quote]Lessons relearned...

While working in harmony
with others, think of yourself
as well.

The world will always be a battlefield. Go within you to gain inner peace!


As I speak, Poland and Hungary have allowed visa-free entry for these young Nigerian students fleeing Ukraine.

Thanks to Ifedayo Olarinde (Freeze) who is half-Romanian via his mum for working hard to see to the
comfort and safety of Nigerians trying to get into Romania as well.