₦airaland Forum

ubunja:
Alpha Beta
Alpha Fuccs, Beta Bucks

As we have explained before and will continue to do so, The Alpha of the redpill has nothing to do with leadership, being an outstanding member of the community or being a pillar of society - that's not the redpill Alpha.

The original meaning of Alpha in the Greek alphabet is "first", or "primary", or "principal" (most significant) occurrence or status of a thing. see the 1st picture below.

In relationships and male/female dynamics, "alphas" then are those men that women choose FIRST, the guys that ladies go to FIRST, the males that females deal with FIRST before everyone else have their turn.

Now who are these men that women deal with first, who women give first preference?
Easy!
Look at the 2nd picture below and read the words "the more you delay to marry us the more they eat us"
Who are THEY who get to eat before women get married?
Well it's the same ones the woman in the 3rd picture is talking about: "I fucced everybody I wanted to fucc. Time to get married now".
Who is EVERYBODY that this woman WANTED TO FUCC? And who are THEY who eat women the longer men delay to marry women?

It's the alphas. The men who get to fucc the puccy first before the others are given a chance to put a ring on it.

Now which class of men in society do we all know of that is always fuccing women but never marries them? Well strictly speaking there are TWO CLASSES who get that privilege: (1) the Bad Boys, Thugs, Players & their ilk, and (2) the rich men.

(with the rich men a lot has to be clarified but I'll do so another time)

The rich men are not especially good at sex but get puccy thrown at them because they've money, while the bad boys, Thugs etc, don't have money but get puccy thrown at them because they can lay the pipe. So a woman looking for fun, especially in her younger years who doesn't want anything serious deals either with rich men or with players and Thugs. Hence the rich man in his mansion and the thug on the street FUCC THE SAME WOMEN. Difference being that women deal with the rich man publicly but deal with the thug player usually secretly.
Now this 20% of men that women fornicate with goes by different names. It used to be called the Ćöćk Ćäröuśėl. Nowadays it's called the Hoe Phase or more commonly "The Streets". Hence we say of a hoe "she belongs to the streets". The streets ARE the alpha Fuccs. That's where women have the most fun. It's every guy's worst nightmare. Because not every guy is invited. Which is why men shame women for it, cause it's to discourage the Alpha Fuccs of women's lives.

Now the rich man and the thug player are the top 20% of men (collectively called The Streets) who are the cream of society (as far as sex is concerned) who all women give unlimited sex to, while the rest of the Male population, the other 80%, aka the Betas, will get their chance of (almost) unlimited sex inside marriage.

By now it must be clear that women very much want to enjoy dick first before settling down in marriage. The men the women sleep with before marriage are their first and primary choice. Their favorites. IF WOMEN DIDN'T HAVE TO MARRY, THEY WOULD HAVE [b] NO REASON [b] TO DEAL WITH BETAS.. In other words, [b] IF WOMEN DIDN'T NEED MONEY THEY'D HAVE NO REASON TO DEAL WITH 80% OF MEN. It's for this reason why many men are forcing marriage down women's throats. The reason many men want marriage to matter, because it's the only way they'll get a woman to give them unlimited sex.

A woman who doesn't wish to marry renders Betas powerless. They have zero chances with her. Because what they hope to give her in exchange for sex (lifelong commitment, lifelong financial support) the woman doesn't want. So the Beta, in his infinite wisdom, wants women's opportunities, such as education and employment, to be severely limited so women are kept at a disadvantage which then gives the Betas a chance to get the women. It's why Betas populate religions and other moral movements which promotes monogamy and marriage. Now this is not me taking a swipe at religion.
Anywho If there's one thing to realize, it's this:
The Streets = the Alpha Fuccs. Because that's where women go to first, or where they end up again after failed relationships and marriages.

CaveAdullam:
Your career woman will fvck her way to the top.

Your career woman will fvck her clients for monthly upkeeps.

Your career woman will get tired by her boss and she will have less time for you and the family.

Your career woman will have higher respect for her boss and clients than you.

Your career woman will be more submissive to her boss than you.

Your career woman will ration more time to her boss than you.

Your career woman will always use her boss as a yardstick to judge your worth and competence.

You won't get good fvcks from your career woman because she will always be tired as a result of career work + office romance.

Your housewife will gossip + frolick with other men when you're not around. If she's dumb + lazy, forget it, you just married a liability!

What can both of you do?

Let her join you in your line of business, thereby making you her boss. Take her as one of your employee and monitor the organization properly. You regulate her work time so that she can manage work + family efficiently. Which means, as your employee, her work will be less strenuous compared to other employees.

Or, you set up a business for her and oversee the daily activities. She's just a worker there and you the manager.

Or, outsource some of your work to her inorder to keep her busy which will reduce your workload, and also grant her an opportunity to learn more and develop herself.

Or, get engaged to a woman that her dream blends together with yours so that both of you can pursue and achieve a common goal. (If she relents on her goal, it means she's not serious about her future, dump her)!

Or, you can support her if her ambition has a headway and not threatening on the progress of the relationship.

The economic situation of most nations these days has disabled men from being a complete provider for the family, wives this times must truly express their helpmeet characteristics. On the otherhand, leaving your wife or spouse to the full hands of a boss is more disastrous to the existence of your relationship.

Again 50/50 can't work, whether she agrees on it or not, she already deems you as the man and leader. By your actions as a man, you will even encroach on her 50% part. This deal is impossible! (However, should in case it becomes possible, there will be tug of war as a result of leadership role).

Authority: Select only for good women.

DAY 75, REDPILL 2022

Altairx440:
Ronaldo out
kikikikikiki
cheers to psg, fcb and pessi fans
let them know pain
no offense lololol

iamphenomenal:
Bro this pill is too bitter...too bitter to swallow at once
Swallowing all at once nearly made me cry right now

Guy you should try diluting things a bit (just joking)

CaveAdullam:
1. Men and women mating strategies are not really in collaboration, and that's why the mating strategies has been oscillating between polygamy and monogamy for aeons. Where men want many women (polygamy), women want a high quality male (monogamy) to themselves excluding other females. Though both sexes are complementary but it comes with costs and compromises. Men and women don't understand this, hence, there is continuous conflict in the sexual market place.

iamphenomenal:
Bro this pill is too bitter...too bitter to swallow at once
Swallowing all at once nearly made me cry right now

Guy you should try diluting things a bit (just joking)

Sapy442:
Yes bro, ontop pussy

ubunja:
Alpha Beta
Alpha Fuccs, Beta Bucks

As we have explained before and will continue to do so, The Alpha of the redpill has nothing to do with leadership, being an outstanding member of the community or being a pillar of society - that's not the redpill Alpha.

The original meaning of Alpha in the Greek alphabet is "first", or "primary", or "principal" (most significant) occurrence or status of a thing. see the 1st picture below.

In relationships and male/female dynamics, "alphas" then are those men that women choose FIRST, the guys that ladies go to FIRST, the males that females deal with FIRST before everyone else have their turn.

Now who are these men that women deal with first, who women give first preference?
Easy!
Look at the 2nd picture below and read the words "the more you delay to marry us the more they eat us"
Who are THEY who get to eat before women get married?
Well it's the same ones the woman in the 3rd picture is talking about: "I fucced everybody I wanted to fucc. Time to get married now".
Who is EVERYBODY that this woman WANTED TO FUCC? And who are THEY who eat women the longer men delay to marry women?

It's the alphas. The men who get to fucc the puccy first before the others are given a chance to put a ring on it.

Now which class of men in society do we all know of that is always fuccing women but never marries them? Well strictly speaking there are TWO CLASSES who get that privilege: (1) the Bad Boys, Thugs, Players & their ilk, and (2) the rich men.

(with the rich men a lot has to be clarified but I'll do so another time)

The rich men are not especially good at sex but get puccy thrown at them because they've money, while the bad boys, Thugs etc, don't have money but get puccy thrown at them because they can lay the pipe. So a woman looking for fun, especially in her younger years who doesn't want anything serious deals either with rich men or with players and Thugs. Hence the rich man in his mansion and the thug on the street FUCC THE SAME WOMEN. Difference being that women deal with the rich man publicly but deal with the thug player usually secretly.
Now this 20% of men that women fornicate with goes by different names. It used to be called the Ćöćk Ćäröuśėl. Nowadays it's called the Hoe Phase or more commonly "The Streets". Hence we say of a hoe "she belongs to the streets". The streets ARE the alpha Fuccs. That's where women have the most fun. It's every guy's worst nightmare. Because not every guy is invited. Which is why men shame women for it, cause it's to discourage the Alpha Fuccs of women's lives.

Now the rich man and the thug player are the top 20% of men (collectively called The Streets) who are the cream of society (as far as sex is concerned) who all women give unlimited sex to, while the rest of the Male population, the other 80%, aka the Betas, will get their chance of (almost) unlimited sex inside marriage.

By now it must be clear that women very much want to enjoy dick first before settling down in marriage. The men the women sleep with before marriage are their first and primary choice. Their favorites. IF WOMEN DIDN'T HAVE TO MARRY, THEY WOULD HAVE [b] NO REASON [b] TO DEAL WITH BETAS.. In other words, [b] IF WOMEN DIDN'T NEED MONEY THEY'D HAVE NO REASON TO DEAL WITH 80% OF MEN. It's for this reason why many men are forcing marriage down women's throats. The reason many men want marriage to matter, because it's the only way they'll get a woman to give them unlimited sex.

A woman who doesn't wish to marry renders Betas powerless. They have zero chances with her. Because what they hope to give her in exchange for sex (lifelong commitment, lifelong financial support) the woman doesn't want. So the Beta, in his infinite wisdom, wants women's opportunities, such as education and employment, to be severely limited so women are kept at a disadvantage which then gives the Betas a chance to get the women. It's why Betas populate religions and other moral movements which promotes monogamy and marriage. Now this is not me taking a swipe at religion.
Anywho If there's one thing to realize, it's this:
The Streets = the Alpha Fuccs. Because that's where women go to first, or where they end up again after failed relationships and marriages.

DEMZEE:
THAT IS WHY MEN SHOULD SEEK TO BE THE BEST VERSION OF THEMSELVES AND SEE PUSSY AS A BYPRODUCT OF THEIR SUCCESS

MEN SHOULD BE WILLING TO WALK AWAY FROM PUSSY, GENUINE DESIRE OR NOT!

PUNISH BAD BEHAVIOR
REWARD GOOD BEHAVIOR

CONTROL YOUR WOMAN OVERTLY AND COVERTLY

SEEK FEAR AND RESPECT FROM FEMALES YOU DEAL WITH SEXUALLY FOREMOSTLY

CaveAdullam:
@bolded is what bluepill individuals and society always think when the concept of the redpill is being discuss. But most of the redpill theories are grounded in science, nature and human behaviors worldwide and with reasonable empirical data.

Have a nice day!

Dizzyyish:
I just read a FP thread by gid redpiller about his mom being a deadbeat. The replies were quite interesting.. Most of which would be the opposite if the deadbeat was his dad.

Some are redpilled towards woman but once they get to their moms 'she's an angel, she's the exception'. Perhaps, it doesn't occur to them that these women for the streets would one day be mothers and their children would also see them through "angel" lens.

Martinez39s:
Our guy Ric Flair is on his fifth divorce.

luminouz:
Take your stuff to football thread.

DieRich5:
corrected

ubunja:
It has already been established in the red pill that women are willing to share a high value man, that most women would rather share a valuable enough man than have one low-value man to themselves.

Hypergamy and Polygamy are actually complimentary and neatly dovetail each other, satisfying both male and female imperatives simultaneously. Monogamy as a form of Mating Strategy is actually a Beta invention. Monogamy satisfies the feminine in that all of a man's resources a woman has total access to them. But it's about the resources. Not the set up. If a woman can get MORE resources from a man being his 5th wife, guess what? SHe'll leave that monogamous relationship and go join the polygamous ones.

If a president of a country has 3 wives, he'll feel like a king indeed in his home (male imperative satisfied) and his wives will also feel their hypergamy has been realized in that they each have an access to the high value man. The Female doesn't have a total aversion to sharing its the Male - for obvious reasons: cuckoldry.

Calibrator:
As a Single guy living in our Buharised Country.

Have your own personal at least moderately or tastefully furnished apartment, a well paying hustle and a little redpill knowledge to boot in this present economy and you will know that most of these women you see ain't shiit.




There is hunger in the land especially amongst the female folks.
Don't let their online packaging to deceive you, shishi no dey their aza

ubunja:
Alpha Beta
Alpha Fuccs, Beta Bucks

As we have explained before and will continue to do so, The Alpha of the redpill has nothing to do with leadership, being an outstanding member of the community or being a pillar of society - that's not the redpill Alpha.

The original meaning of Alpha in the Greek alphabet is "first", or "primary", or "principal" (most significant) occurrence or status of a thing. see the 1st picture below.

In relationships and male/female dynamics, "alphas" then are those men that women choose FIRST, the guys that ladies go to FIRST, the males that females deal with FIRST before everyone else have their turn.

Now who are these men that women deal with first, who women give first preference?
Easy!
Look at the 2nd picture below and read the words "the more you delay to marry us the more they eat us"
Who are THEY who get to eat before women get married?
Well it's the same ones the woman in the 3rd picture is talking about: "I fucced everybody I wanted to fucc. Time to get married now".
Who is EVERYBODY that this woman WANTED TO FUCC? And who are THEY who eat women the longer men delay to marry women?

It's the alphas. The men who get to fucc the puccy first before the others are given a chance to put a ring on it.

Now which class of men in society do we all know of that is always fuccing women but never marries them? Well strictly speaking there are TWO CLASSES who get that privilege: (1) the Bad Boys, Thugs, Players & their ilk, and (2) the rich men.

(with the rich men a lot has to be clarified but I'll do so another time)

The rich men are not especially good at sex but get puccy thrown at them because they've money, while the bad boys, Thugs etc, don't have money but get puccy thrown at them because they can lay the pipe. So a woman looking for fun, especially in her younger years who doesn't want anything serious deals either with rich men or with players and Thugs. Hence the rich man in his mansion and the thug on the street FUCC THE SAME WOMEN. Difference being that women deal with the rich man publicly but deal with the thug player usually secretly.
Now this 20% of men that women fornicate with goes by different names. It used to be called the Ćöćk Ćäröuśėl. Nowadays it's called the Hoe Phase or more commonly "The Streets". Hence we say of a hoe "she belongs to the streets". The streets ARE the alpha Fuccs. That's where women have the most fun. It's every guy's worst nightmare. Because not every guy is invited. Which is why men shame women for it, cause it's to discourage the Alpha Fuccs of women's lives.

Now the rich man and the thug player are the top 20% of men (collectively called The Streets) who are the cream of society (as far as sex is concerned) who all women give unlimited sex to, while the rest of the Male population, the other 80%, aka the Betas, will get their chance of (almost) unlimited sex inside marriage.

By now it must be clear that women very much want to enjoy dick first before settling down in marriage. The men the women sleep with before marriage are their first and primary choice. Their favorites. IF WOMEN DIDN'T HAVE TO MARRY, THEY WOULD HAVE [b] NO REASON [b] TO DEAL WITH BETAS.. In other words, [b] IF WOMEN DIDN'T NEED MONEY THEY'D HAVE NO REASON TO DEAL WITH 80% OF MEN. It's for this reason why many men are forcing marriage down women's throats. The reason many men want marriage to matter, because it's the only way they'll get a woman to give them unlimited sex.

A woman who doesn't wish to marry renders Betas powerless. They have zero chances with her. Because what they hope to give her in exchange for sex (lifelong commitment, lifelong financial support) the woman doesn't want. So the Beta, in his infinite wisdom, wants women's opportunities, such as education and employment, to be severely limited so women are kept at a disadvantage which then gives the Betas a chance to get the women. It's why Betas populate religions and other moral movements which promotes monogamy and marriage. Now this is not me taking a swipe at religion.
Anywho If there's one thing to realize, it's this:
The Streets = the Alpha Fuccs. Because that's where women go to first, or where they end up again after failed relationships and marriages.

Cr7772:
Jesus, my eye is paining me o
Truth in its purest form.

Ubunja, I have a question.
Going by some of your assertions, are you trying to say that some men aren't destined to be alphas no matter how hard they try?

CaveAdullam:
True. I agree!

Like I said before, human mating strategies comes with costs and compromises. There are always unintended consequences.

1. Women will share high value men which is true. But how many high value men are there for the total population of women? There's one king Solomon in the Bible, one (male) president for each nation.

2. Nations where there are mate inequalities always breeds violence. You see places like some parts of Northern Nigeria, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan are experiencing more unrest/violence perpetuated by (young) males and most of them are unmarried. From scientific research, married men where found more happier than unmarried men. Married men have something to lose unlike unmarried men, hence, will most times desists from crimes. Married men were even found to have a lower testosterone level than unmarried men.

3. Remember: the higher the number of mates, the lower the resources. So, it's not about women having problem sharing a high value man per se, but that if his resources won't be hindered or slowed down when coming to her. This is not about the women only but their offsprings. Take note that there'll always be less emotional and psychological support for her because her husband's mates are plentiful.

4. All of our actions are not solely based on evolutionary instincts, there are moments we engage in conscious thinking and deliberate actions: women will always consider these things seeing that they must always pleases their husband to get his attention. Yes, women please men they love and vice versa. But there will always be a time both will introspect if they're receiving same energy they are giving to their spouse.

5. Aside reproductive and sexual advantage, polygamy is detrimental to men (because now we're in a modern age, less offsprings can do the job of ancestral survival). As the number of mates increases for a man, his resources reduces. Monogamy which involves one woman is stressful for a man not to even talk of multiple women. What about the resulting offsprings? Controlling children of different women is a tug of war, no peace in that home.

6. Quite alright women will share high value men but it must also be brought to their consciousness that only a tiny minority of the male population are high value using any of the yardstick: resources or physique. The majority of men are average or below average. And it's impossible to have a single man with all the earthly endowment. Rather, they should settle for men within their range and build with him, instead of waiting at the finish line. However, this is difficult because it's a wrestle against hypergamy, which of course is important in order to enjoy a lasting relationship.

7. From time immemorial, humans have been juggling between polygamy and monogamy depending on the zeitgeist of their time. Monogamy is still considered as the primary but we don't know which one came first. Even egalitarianism was once a practice in many hunter gatherer communities.

8. On a societal and civilization level, monogamy is very important, as it breeds productivity, high mental strength and propels a society towards high mental and social energy + rationality. Monogamy is also a contributing factor the Western world is far above their counterparts especially in Africa where polygyny or polygamy is the norm.

9. Casual sex or promiscuity or hook up culture is also a mating strategy closer to polygamy, however, involves no commitment as required in monogamy or polygamy. Men attempting to take advantage of their polygynous instincts can engage in casual sex. Ditto for women who want to gain enough resources from different men which they are unable to get from a single high value man. However, this also comes with costs, compromises, direct and unintended consequences.

10. To satisfy men's polygyny, they should be encouraged to become high value, a long process indeed which will eventually boils down to monogamy because majority of women will have their own high value men exclusively.

Thanks.

Lightway:
Yes, that's what it means.

Not all men are born good looking, tall, with a big dick

Not all men can or will get rich

Simple

DEMZEE:
THAT IS WHY MEN SHOULD SEEK TO BE THE BEST VERSION OF THEMSELVES AND SEE PUSSY AS A BYPRODUCT OF THEIR SUCCESS

MEN SHOULD BE WILLING TO WALK AWAY FROM PUSSY, GENUINE DESIRE OR NOT!

PUNISH BAD BEHAVIOR
REWARD GOOD BEHAVIOR

CONTROL YOUR WOMAN OVERTLY AND COVERTLY

SEEK FEAR AND RESPECT FROM FEMALES YOU DEAL WITH SEXUALLY FOREMOSTLY

ubunja:
You're making a case for monogamy, which in itself is not a bad thing cause polygamy is detrimental for the society in that many men are cut off sex resulting in instability. This is the argument the Beta Males have used to suppress the alpha fuccs and usher in civilization. It has worked for ages, but in modern society with women themselves becoming less and less interested in marriage and becoming more and more independent, the argument is losing its power. The almost 50% divorce rate in the west, with almost 80% of the divorces initiated by women, is testament of how desperate women want out of monogamy.

It's not hard to see that Polygamy came before Monogamy since even on this thread it has been said that historically more women have reproduced than men. Meaning more women have had mates compared to men. Which means humanity's origins are polygamous - with a few top men hoarding all the women. That is, Until the Betas made the argument you're making and each man was allocated a wife, then civilization began.

But we've come full circle. Monogamy has reached its expiry date. But instead of polygamy making a come back, the new Mating Strategy (especially in the west) that's gaining speed, is POLYAMORY.

CaveAdullam:
I agree.

We do like to think that with the power of positive thinking, a positive mindset, discipline, determination, consistency, everyone can achieve whatever they desire. To some extent it's true but there are more to it.

Genetics (IQ, immune system, facial outlook, height), socioeconomic status, family background, race, country, politics, economy, are an important determinants more than positive mindset on how successful every individuals will turn out. What about unforseen circumstances like sickness, war, natural disasters, fire outbreak, accidents.

This is a sad reality the populations of humans are oblivious to. Humans that are highly successful are those that were favoured on the positive side of the aforementioned factors. The majority at the bottom of the hierarchy always think those at the top got there by a positive mindset which is false.
And after adhering to a positive mindset with nothing in return, many do resort to criminal activities while others finds solace in religion.

Imagine in a third world poverty nation like Nigeria, where the only mode of escape out of penury, pain, hunger, useless politics is via the internet (either for good or bad purpose). What then would have happened to the entire population had it been the internet is absent?

Only few will eventually struggle their way through to the top(even the top got categories. LoL)! While the majority will never make it except by pure serendipity. Acknowledging this with a weak heart can either drive one to misanthropic, nihilistic or pessimistic tendencies.

Positive mindset is good. However, if you eventually get to the top, kudos. And if you never get there, kudos too, you tried even though the universe never favored you.

A sad reality indeed!

Thanks.

Mr Man your truth-speaking is getting too much Abeg
Must you always speak the truth?
Chai

Lightway:
Men are pained

You want to die for pussy.... Pussy won't die for you

CaveAdullam:
I agree.

We do like to think that with the power of positive thinking, a positive mindset, discipline, determination, consistency, everyone can achieve whatever they desire. To some extent it's true but there are more to it.

Genetics (IQ, immune system, facial outlook, height), socioeconomic status, family background, race, country, politics, economy, are an important determinants more than positive mindset on how successful every individuals will turn out. What about unforseen circumstances like sickness, war, natural disasters, fire outbreak, accidents.

This is a sad reality the populations of humans are oblivious to. Humans that are highly successful are those that were favoured on the positive side of the aforementioned factors. The majority at the bottom of the hierarchy always think those at the top got there by a positive mindset which is false.
And after adhering to a positive mindset with nothing in return, many do resort to criminal activities while others finds solace in religion.

Imagine in a third world poverty nation like Nigeria, where the only mode of escape out of penury, pain, hunger, useless politics is via the internet (either for good or bad purpose). What then would have happened to the entire population had it been the internet is absent?

Only few will eventually struggle their way through to the top(even the top got categories. LoL)! While the majority will never make it except by pure serendipity. Acknowledging this with a weak heart can either drive one to misanthropic, nihilistic or pessimistic tendencies.

Positive mindset is good. However, if you eventually get to the top, kudos. And if you never get there, kudos too, you tried even though the universe never favored you.

A sad reality indeed!

Thanks.