₦airaland Forum

OkCornel:
At this point, it’s clear you can’t debunk Josephus or the other Jewish scholars position on Jesus.

You’ve been caught pants down.

A deluge of other evidences to follow.

Debunk what?
Yes post the evidence

OkCornel:
Are Susan Krakowsky and Curtis Scissons Jewish?

I’m still waiting for you to debunk the position of Jewish scholars who agree Jesus existed at some point in their history.

Abi you wan deflect again? I’ve not even started yet.

Exactly yOu have not started yet, debunk what

Maynmann:
Debunk what?
Yes post the evidence

You’ve shot yourself in the foot with your own screenshot.

See where Jesus was called a “wise man” in the initial version of the testimonium flavanium?

By the way, you’re still quiet on these Jewish scholars.

OkCornel:
You’ve shot yourself in the foot with your own screenshot.

See where Jesus was called a “wise man” in the initial version of the testimonium flavanium?

By the way, you’re still quiet on these Jewish scholars.

Is that how you read?
It is you that shot yourself.

Too desperate.

You are still quiet about where you read about the Jewish scholar.

OkCornel:
You’ve shot yourself in the foot with your own screenshot.

See where Jesus was called a “wise man” in the initial version of the testimonium flavanium?

By the way, you’re still quiet on these Jewish scholars.

You can’t read, too desperate.
Where was he called “wise man”?

Maynmann:
Is that how you read?
It is you that shot yourself.

Too desperate.

You are still quiet about where you read about the Jewish scholar.

You’re still grasping around. Josephus works described Jesus as a wise man. And that’s first version of the Testimonium Flavanium.

Next evidence is from Josephus’ book - The war of the Jews (A history of the destruction of Jerusalem)

OkCornel:
You’re still grasping around. Josephus works described Jesus as a wise man. And that’s first version of the Testimonium Flavanium.

Next evidence is from Josephus’ book - The war of the Jews (A history of the destruction of Jerusalem)

It never did.
Can’t you read?
What first version?

OkCornel:
You’re still grasping around. Josephus works described Jesus as a wise man. And that’s first version of the Testimonium Flavanium.

Next evidence is from Josephus’ book - The war of the Jews (A history of the destruction of Jerusalem)

There is Nothing like “Jesus” in the war of the Jew.
Kindly show us the evidence
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jewish_War

Maynmann:
You can’t read, too desperate.
Where was he called “wise man”?

According to Josephus Flavius - a first century Jewish historian, Jesus existed.

Read slowly the part of your screenshot I’ve circled.

I’m awaiting your next deflection strategy.

Maynmann:
There is Nothing like “Jesus” in the war of the Jew.
Kindly show us the evidence
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jewish_War

Antiquity of the Jews I mean.

I have both books together.

OkCornel:
According to Josephus Flavius - a first century Jewish historian, Jesus existed.

Read slowly the part of your screenshot I’ve circled.

I’m awaiting your next deflection strategy.

You can’t read?
Read what you posted slowly.

OkCornel:
Antiquity of the Jews I mean.

I have both books together.

That’s a cheap lie.
You are just learning about it today that’s why you are goofing so badly.

Maynmann:
You can’t read
Read what you posted slowly.

Did Josephus refer to Jesus as a “wise man” and “a worker of good deeds” or not? Hmmm?

OkCornel:
Antiquity of the Jews I mean.

I have both books together.

“Second reference” talking about James brother
Read! Don’t be desperate

Maynmann:
That’s a cheap lie.
You are just learning about it today that’s why you are goofing so badly.

Now let’s head over to book 20, Chapter 9 of the Antiquity of the Jews. For Josephus comments on Jesus.

OkCornel:
Did Josephus refer to Jesus as a “wise man” and “a worker of good deeds” or not? Hmmm?

He didn’t.
Read from top.
Christian interpolation. Too desperate!

OkCornel:
Now let’s head over to book 20, Chapter 9 of the Antiquity of the Jews. For Josephus comments on Jesus.

Show us book 20 and what it says.
It was book 18 that contained Jesus and it is a interpolation.

Read!

Maynmann:
He didn’t.
Read from top.
Christian interpolation. Too desperate!

Read your screenshot slowly. The parts circled are not Christian interpolations. Rather, they are inconsistent with how Christians viewed Christ as their saviour and messiah. It downplayed on Jesus’ deity and simply labelled him a wise man and worker of good deeds. Not a messiah.

It’s simple English.

The question we should be asking ourselves here is DID JOSEPHUS DENY THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS? Yes or No

OkCornel:
Read your screenshot slowly. The parts circled are not Christian interpolations. Rather, they are inconsistent with how Christians viewed Christ as their saviour and messiah. It downplayed on Jesus’ deity and simply labelled him a wise man and worker of good deeds. Not a messiah.

It’s simple English.

The question we should be asking ourselves here is DID JOSEPHUS DENY THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS? Yes or No

It’s Christian interpolation.

They were explaining “for instance”

Read, don’t be desperate.

Jesus is a common Latin name, show us where he said Jesus of Nazareth exist!

Maynmann:
Show us book 20 and what it says.
It was book 18 that contained Jesus and it is a interpolation.

Read!

Did Josephus deny the existence of Jesus? Yes or No.

Now let’s head over to book 20, Chapter 9 of the Antiquity of the Jews

OkCornel:
Did Josephus deny the existence of Jesus? Yes or No.

Now let’s head over to book 20, Chapter 9 of the Antiquity of the Jews

Jesus is a common Latin name, show us where he said Jesus of Nazareth exist, he can’t even call it “Jesus” he is a JEW!

OkCornel:
Did Josephus deny the existence of Jesus? Yes or No.

Now let’s head over to book 20, Chapter 9 of the Antiquity of the Jews

A Jew saying “christos” bwahhahah

Maynmann:
Jesus is a common Latin name, show us where he said Jesus of Nazareth exist, he can’t even call it “Jesus” he is a JEW!

Josephus writing about the trial of James the brother of Jesus the Christ.

Read the part I’ve circled slowly. Then argue with the first century historian - Josephus Flavius.

Cc: Budaatum, LordReed, MaxinDHouse

Chapter 9 of Book 20 in the Antiquity of the Jews written by Josephus Flavius concludes this discussion.

OkCornel:
Josephus writing about the trial of James the brother of Jesus the Christ.

Read the part I’ve circled slowly. Then argue with the first century historian - Josephus Flavius.

Cc: Budaatum, LordReed, MaxinDHouse

Chapter 9 of Book 20 in the Antiquity of the Jews written by Josephus Flavius concludes this discussion.

It’s a Christian interpolation.
A Jew can’t say “christos” at that period in time!

Maynmann:
It’s a Christian interpolation.
A Jew can’t say “christos” at that period in time!

The literate ones can read and write in Koine Greek and Latin right?

You don’t have any point here. Stop clutching at straws.

Josephus Flavius’ work is incontrovertible evidence Jesus existed. Argue with him. End of discussion.

OkCornel:
The literate ones can read and write in Koine Greek and Latin right?

You don’t have any point here. Stop clutching at straws.

Josephus Flavius’ work is incontrovertible evidence Jesus existed. Argue with him. End of discussion.

At that period in time, NO

You are ignorant of what you are saying

OkCornel:
The literate ones can read and write in Koine Greek and Latin right?

You don’t have any point here. Stop clutching at straws.

Josephus Flavius’ work is incontrovertible evidence Jesus existed. Argue with him. End of discussion.

Original language was in Hebrew before Christians edited it.
A Jew can’t say “Jesus”

OkCornel:
The literate ones can read and write in Koine Greek and Latin right?

You don’t have any point here. Stop clutching at straws.

Josephus Flavius’ work is incontrovertible evidence Jesus existed. Argue with him. End of discussion.

It has been rejected by scholars as a Christian forged edition.

Don’t be desperate!

Maynmann:
At that period in time, NO

You are ignorant of what you are saying

The Hellenistic Jews (Timothy for example) were multilingual speakers/writers. You don’t have any point here. Sorry.

By the way, what I posted here is English, not Latin or Hebrew. Stop the needless deflection.

Better still, go and book 9 of Chapter 20 of the Antiquity of the Jews written in Hebrew and prove to us it states something different.

OkCornel:
The Hellenistic Jews (Timothy for example) were multilingual speakers/writers. You don’t have any point here. Sorry.

By the way, what I posted here is English, not Latin or Hebrew. Stop the needless deflection.

Better still, go and book 9 of Chapter 20 of the Antiquity of the Jews written in Hebrew and prove to us it states something different.

When was Timothy born?
When was flavinus born?
Do you know why they call it “Hellenistic”
This is pure ignorance!!!!’

You are ignorant of what you are saying. It has been rejected as a Christian forge don’t be desperate

Maynmann:
It has been rejected by scholars as a Christian forged edition.

Don’t be desperate!

Krakowsky and Scissons are seasoned Jewish scholars right?

Grabbing your evidence from random discussion threads on Reddit already says a lot.

Quite hilarious.

I understand, cognitive dissonance kicking in. You’ll be alright when you stop fighting THE TRUTH.

OkCornel:
Krakowsky and Scissons are seasoned Jewish scholars right?

Grabbing your evidence from random discussion threads on Reddit already says a lot.

Quite hilarious.

I understand, cognitive dissonance kicking in. You’ll be alright when you stop fighting THE TRUTH.

Goats and sheeps are seasoned Jewish scholars right?
Where are you getting yours from? Post link Hypocrite

Learning new things in panic mode have made you goofed so bad!