₦airaland Forum

SweetBuns:
The boys here suffer from severe cognitive bias.
The blind leading the blind. It still baffles me how they continue on this path of delusion and self deception.
Not only that, it also perpetuates hate and bitter bile towards the female gender whose only offence was just existing in the first place.
I'm surprised this immoral thread hasn't been taken down yet.
Please do something about this, seun

please do not ask for it to be taken down. Some very informative posts have been recorded on this thread that's been really helpful and will be to future readers.
It's just a very small group of overzealous boys taking it to the extreme even with some immature posts too, ignoring the fact that this is nairaland (an open forum) and not Whatsapp or telegram.
But please do not ask for it to be taken down...the bad eggs will outgrow their ignorance.
Thank you SweetBuns.

SweetBuns:
The boys here suffer from severe cognitive bias.
The blind leading the blind. It still baffles me how they continue on this path of delusion and self deception.
Not only that, it also perpetuates hate and bitter bile towards the female gender whose only offence was just existing in the first place.
I'm surprised this immoral thread hasn't been taken down yet.
Please do something about this, seun

Instead of calling it self deception, call it self awareness, but you won't cause it doesn't benefit you guys. Lol

Kimcutie:
Instead of calling it self deception, call it self awareness, but you won't cause it doesn't benefit you guys. Lol

you all underestimate women...seriously🤦🏽‍♂️!

Now who's the enemy of the thread?

AndrewTate:
you all underestimate women...seriously🤦🏽‍♂️!

Now who's the enemy of the thread?

bro I didn't underestimate anyone and please don't group me with "people".

luminouz:
You believe that girl closed down the ashewo beer parlour thread? Lol...she is a fuqin liar. Same way she lied about Martinez editing her post. The guys on the beer parlour derailed the thread themselves!!!

The women have their pinkpill thread. We don't clamour for the closure so I don't get how e dey pepper them na

That's another interesting thing - you won't see men bothered about a female space but you'll often see women either 1.) Exhibiting their lack of self-respect and restraint by (forcefully) attempting to insert themselves where they don't belong or 2.) Attempting to tear down that space.

Funny enough, a few days before landlord came I read a post on TheRationalMale on 'Male Spaces' by Rollo. Here are some take-aways from it:

Whether this condition is an all male club or cohort (gender segregated team sports for example) or a personal state that is typically attributed only to the masculine – characteristic strength, rationality, decisiveness, risk taking, even brashness or vulgarity – the Feminine Imperative encourages women to insert themselves, and by association the Feminine Imperative itself, into masculine exclusivity. Scout Willis’ (Bruce Willis’ daughter) most recent ‘activism’ to encourage female equality by going topless in public is an example of this female-to-male parity (google it) – in an equalist utopia, if men can do it, women should be able to as well.

The goal is to be a woman in male space.

The cover story is the same trope the Feminine Imperative (and its social arm, feminism) always finds useful; the never ending push towards gender equalism. The practice however reveals the push into male space serves two purposes – social control and male oversight.

Social control is the easier of the two to grasp. Even when changing the rules of an all-male game to accommodate a lack of genuine female interest in a male endeavor, it fundamentally alters the nature of that game.

An easy example of this would be NASCAR’s embracing a driver like Danica Patrick. It’s not that she’s an exceptional driver, and I can’t vouch for her genuine passion for NASCAR, but the social control she represents is that she is the first woman to (dubiously) be taken seriously in the nominally all-male space of NASCAR drivers. The goal has been achieved, all that’s left now is female oversight of this male space.

The second purpose in the goal of female inclusion into male space is really a policing of the thought dynamics and attitudes of the men in that space. When women are allowed access to the locker room the dynamic of the locker room changes. The locker room can take many different shapes: the workplace environment, the sports team, the group of all-male coders, the primarily male scientific community, the ‘boys club’, the group of gamer nerds at the local game store, even strip clubs and the sanctuary you think your ‘man cave’ is – the context is one of women inserting themselves into male space in order to enforce the dictates of feminine social primacy.

Shebi earlier someone here mentioned that once women are allowed into this space one will start hearing "a real redpiller..."

One of the most threatening aspects of conventional masculinity for the Feminine Imperative is the cooperative potential of male bonding. When only men comprise an in-group, team building, common purpose and a masculine-primary environment tend to define that group. I would argue that the modern insertion of feminine influence into all male spaces is a concerted effort to limit this bonding and unity in favor of a feminine-primary ‘correctness’.

This limitation may not be directly influenced by a present female; often all that’s needed to foster feminine-primary correctness is a feminine-identifying male in the in-group (anonymous White Knight), or even just a prevailing attitude of not wanting to offend the suspicions that other in-group men may subscribe to this feminine-identifying influence for fear it may get back to a woman they perceive may have authority.

Even the most well meaning of women involved (however peripherally) in the manosphere are still motivated by their innate security needs – and those hypergamous security needs imply a want for certainty and control. As such the psychological influence of the Feminine Imperative will always be a predominant motivator in their participation in this all male space. This leads women to a want to sanitize Game to fit the purposes of the imperative, as well as oversee the thought processes of the men who come to participate in it.

Kimcutie:
bro I didn't underestimate anyone and please don't group me with "people".

the “grouping” comes with a “similar” behavior!
I can't control that...you can!🤷🏾‍♂️

AndrewTate:
the “grouping” comes with a “similar” behavior!
I can't control that...you can!🤷🏾‍♂️

Similar?? I only brought facts to the table, I don't go around throwing words or use derogatory names, she said self deceptive, it should be called self awareness instead, how did I underestimate, omo ur free to do what u like bro, peace.

Dizzyyish:
That's another interesting thing - you won't see men bothered about a female space but you'll often see women either 1.) Exhibiting their lack of self-respect and restraint by (forcefully) attempting to insert themselves where they don't belong or 2.) Attempting to tear down that space.

Funny enough, a few days before landlord came I read a post on TheRationalMale on 'Male Spaces' by Rollo. Here are some take-aways from it:

Whether this condition is an all male club or cohort (gender segregated team sports for example) or a personal state that is typically attributed only to the masculine – characteristic strength, rationality, decisiveness, risk taking, even brashness or vulgarity – the Feminine Imperative encourages women to insert themselves, and by association the Feminine Imperative itself, into masculine exclusivity. Scout Willis’ (Bruce Willis’ daughter) most recent ‘activism’ to encourage female equality by going topless in public is an example of this female-to-male parity (google it) – in an equalist utopia, if men can do it, women should be able to as well.

The goal is to be a woman in male space.

The cover story is the same trope the Feminine Imperative (and its social arm, feminism) always finds useful; the never ending push towards gender equalism. The practice however reveals the push into male space serves two purposes – social control and male oversight.

Social control is the easier of the two to grasp. Even when changing the rules of an all-male game to accommodate a lack of genuine female interest in a male endeavor, it fundamentally alters the nature of that game.

An easy example of this would be NASCAR’s embracing a driver like Danica Patrick. It’s not that she’s an exceptional driver, and I can’t vouch for her genuine passion for NASCAR, but the social control she represents is that she is the first woman to (dubiously) be taken seriously in the nominally all-male space of NASCAR drivers. The goal has been achieved, all that’s left now is female oversight of this male space.

The second purpose in the goal of female inclusion into male space is really a policing of the thought dynamics and attitudes of the men in that space. When women are allowed access to the locker room the dynamic of the locker room changes. The locker room can take many different shapes: the workplace environment, the sports team, the group of all-male coders, the primarily male scientific community, the ‘boys club’, the group of gamer nerds at the local game store, even strip clubs and the sanctuary you think your ‘man cave’ is – the context is one of women inserting themselves into male space in order to enforce the dictates of feminine social primacy.

Shebi earlier someone here mentioned that once women are allowed into this space one will start hearing "a real redpiller..."

One of the most threatening aspects of conventional masculinity for the Feminine Imperative is the cooperative potential of male bonding. When only men comprise an in-group, team building, common purpose and a masculine-primary environment tend to define that group. I would argue that the modern insertion of feminine influence into all male spaces is a concerted effort to limit this bonding and unity in favor of a feminine-primary ‘correctness’.

This limitation may not be directly influenced by a present female; often all that’s needed to foster feminine-primary correctness is a feminine-identifying male in the in-group (anonymous White Knight), or even just a prevailing attitude of not wanting to offend the suspicions that other in-group men may subscribe to this feminine-identifying influence for fear it may get back to a woman they perceive may have authority.

Even the most well meaning of women involved (however peripherally) in the manosphere are still motivated by their innate security needs – and those hypergamous security needs imply a want for certainty and control. As such the psychological influence of the Feminine Imperative will always be a predominant motivator in their participation in this all male space. This leads women to a want to sanitize Game to fit the purposes of the imperative, as well as oversee the thought processes of the men who come to participate in it.

I love your post.

In my own simple English...they don't need to be here. It's a man's space. I wouldn't be found in their pinkpill thread in a thousand years commenting and disrupting. It makes no sense. That tells you that women are vain and their emotions are fickle.

SweetBuns:
The boys here suffer from severe cognitive bias.
The blind leading the blind. It still baffles me how they continue on this path of delusion and self deception.
Not only that, it also perpetuates hate and bitter bile towards the female gender whose only offence was just existing in the first place.
I'm surprised this immoral thread hasn't been taken down yet.
Please do something about this, seun

Ori e ti daru

AndrewTate:
the “grouping” comes with a “similar” behavior!
I can't control that...you can!🤷🏾‍♂️

Can you see that they've been accusing me wrongly on this thread, if not for your apology on their behalf I know what to do. That hateful soul is getting on my nerves, warn him, it's because of you I'm keeping quiet ooo hmmmm

Kimcutie:
You won't find women in CMO(Catholic Men Org.) neither will you find a man in CWO(Catholic Women Org.), this is like men's only space, even you guys do same thing. But you won't stop cause your aim is not pure.//

What is wrong with you people?!

STOP QUOTING HER!!!

AwesomeDuru:
What is wrong with you people?!

STOP QUOTING HER!!!

Understood bro, it got to a point and I had to talk

The hateful soul is saying I lied about the ashawobeerparlor thread and saying they derailed, the question is who caused the derail? That's why I always maintained that wisdom is of women and not men. Hateful bitter soul come and carry your sub

..

Kantebets:

Ori e ti daru

What gave you the right to insult her? What's wrong with you?

Lol

...

Dizzyyish:
That's another interesting thing - you won't see men bothered about a female space but you'll often see women either 1.) Exhibiting their lack of self-respect and restraint by (forcefully) attempting to insert themselves where they don't belong or 2.) Attempting to tear down that space.

Funny enough, a few days before landlord came I read a post on TheRationalMale on 'Male Spaces' by Rollo. Here are some take-aways from it:

Whether this condition is an all male club or cohort (gender segregated team sports for example) or a personal state that is typically attributed only to the masculine – characteristic strength, rationality, decisiveness, risk taking, even brashness or vulgarity – the Feminine Imperative encourages women to insert themselves, and by association the Feminine Imperative itself, into masculine exclusivity. Scout Willis’ (Bruce Willis’ daughter) most recent ‘activism’ to encourage female equality by going topless in public is an example of this female-to-male parity (google it) – in an equalist utopia, if men can do it, women should be able to as well.

The goal is to be a woman in male space.

The cover story is the same trope the Feminine Imperative (and its social arm, feminism) always finds useful; the never ending push towards gender equalism. The practice however reveals the push into male space serves two purposes – social control and male oversight.

Social control is the easier of the two to grasp. Even when changing the rules of an all-male game to accommodate a lack of genuine female interest in a male endeavor, it fundamentally alters the nature of that game.

An easy example of this would be NASCAR’s embracing a driver like Danica Patrick. It’s not that she’s an exceptional driver, and I can’t vouch for her genuine passion for NASCAR, but the social control she represents is that she is the first woman to (dubiously) be taken seriously in the nominally all-male space of NASCAR drivers. The goal has been achieved, all that’s left now is female oversight of this male space.

The second purpose in the goal of female inclusion into male space is really a policing of the thought dynamics and attitudes of the men in that space. When women are allowed access to the locker room the dynamic of the locker room changes. The locker room can take many different shapes: the workplace environment, the sports team, the group of all-male coders, the primarily male scientific community, the ‘boys club’, the group of gamer nerds at the local game store, even strip clubs and the sanctuary you think your ‘man cave’ is – the context is one of women inserting themselves into male space in order to enforce the dictates of feminine social primacy.

Shebi earlier someone here mentioned that once women are allowed into this space one will start hearing "a real redpiller..."

One of the most threatening aspects of conventional masculinity for the Feminine Imperative is the cooperative potential of male bonding. When only men comprise an in-group, team building, common purpose and a masculine-primary environment tend to define that group. I would argue that the modern insertion of feminine influence into all male spaces is a concerted effort to limit this bonding and unity in favor of a feminine-primary ‘correctness’.

This limitation may not be directly influenced by a present female; often all that’s needed to foster feminine-primary correctness is a feminine-identifying male in the in-group (anonymous White Knight), or even just a prevailing attitude of not wanting to offend the suspicions that other in-group men may subscribe to this feminine-identifying influence for fear it may get back to a woman they perceive may have authority.

Even the most well meaning of women involved (however peripherally) in the manosphere are still motivated by their innate security needs – and those hypergamous security needs imply a want for certainty and control. As such the psychological influence of the Feminine Imperative will always be a predominant motivator in their participation in this all male space. This leads women to a want to sanitize Game to fit the purposes of the imperative, as well as oversee the thought processes of the men who come to participate in it.

Right.

Another reason why they always force themselves into men's space is because, by default, a woman's life is boring & men's life is full of activities, so many spontaneous activities.

Side note: Since time immemorial, men have been building a lot of somethings out of nothings. — Men build, conquer, protect & raise strong offsprings.

So, when men come together in one accord, these activities become wildfire & this is irresistible to the females with default boring lives. They'll do anything to part of it or tear it down by manipulation (the classic "if I cannot join them, I'll beat them" thingy)

They're also the crusaders of "you'll be lonely at old age" when they come across high-achieving (single) men, that doesn't want marital commitment to slow him down.

They're surprised at how a man can be alone, yet not lonely — This concept look alien to them, thereby stirring up their curiosities.

According to that popular cliché: "behind every successful man is a woman" even proves this 'attaché by force' observation right.

I've never come across "behind every successful woman is a man", even when the saying is visible to the blind & audible to the deaf.

Kimcutie:
Understood bro, it got to a point and I had to talk

The more you give her attention, the more relevant she thinks she is.

No need reading her nonsense even.

Just skip all the noise and maintain frame!

heartofcity12:

Lol..I said so.


"What have you done that your mates haven't done sef"

Statements that will make you sit down and look at Baygon insecticide romantically

luminouz:
Lol..I said so.


"What have you done that your mates haven't done sef"

Statements that will make you sit down and look at Baygon insecticide romantically

Like as innn.. 😂.. No joy at all..

Karlifate:
Right.

Another reason why they always force themselves into men's space is because, by default, a woman's life is boring & men's life is full of activities, so many spontaneous activities.

Side note: Since time immemorial, men have been building a lot of somethings out of nothings. — Men build, conquer, protect & raise strong offsprings.

So, when men come together in one accord, these activities become wildfire & this is irresistible to the females with default boring lives. They'll do anything to part of it or tear it down by manipulation.

They're also the crusaders of "you'll be lonely at old age" when they come across high-achieving (single) men, that doesn't want marital commitment to slow him down.

They're surprised at how a man can be alone, yet not lonely — This concept look alien to them, thereby stirring up their curiosities.

According to that popular cliché: "behind every successful man is a woman" even proves this 'attaché by force' observation right.

I've never come across "behind every successful woman is a man", even when the saying is visible to the blind & audible to the deaf.

You nailed it bro.

Couldn't add more to it

Dizzyyish:
That's another interesting thing - you won't see men bothered about a female space but you'll often see women either 1.) Exhibiting their lack of self-respect and restraint by (forcefully) attempting to insert themselves where they don't belong or 2.) Attempting to tear down that space.

Funny enough, a few days before landlord came I read a post on TheRationalMale on 'Male Spaces' by Rollo. Here are some take-aways from it:

Whether this condition is an all male club or cohort (gender segregated team sports for example) or a personal state that is typically attributed only to the masculine – characteristic strength, rationality, decisiveness, risk taking, even brashness or vulgarity – the Feminine Imperative encourages women to insert themselves, and by association the Feminine Imperative itself, into masculine exclusivity. Scout Willis’ (Bruce Willis’ daughter) most recent ‘activism’ to encourage female equality by going topless in public is an example of this female-to-male parity (google it) – in an equalist utopia, if men can do it, women should be able to as well.

The goal is to be a woman in male space.

The cover story is the same trope the Feminine Imperative (and its social arm, feminism) always finds useful; the never ending push towards gender equalism. The practice however reveals the push into male space serves two purposes – social control and male oversight.

Social control is the easier of the two to grasp. Even when changing the rules of an all-male game to accommodate a lack of genuine female interest in a male endeavor, it fundamentally alters the nature of that game.

An easy example of this would be NASCAR’s embracing a driver like Danica Patrick. It’s not that she’s an exceptional driver, and I can’t vouch for her genuine passion for NASCAR, but the social control she represents is that she is the first woman to (dubiously) be taken seriously in the nominally all-male space of NASCAR drivers. The goal has been achieved, all that’s left now is female oversight of this male space.

The second purpose in the goal of female inclusion into male space is really a policing of the thought dynamics and attitudes of the men in that space. When women are allowed access to the locker room the dynamic of the locker room changes. The locker room can take many different shapes: the workplace environment, the sports team, the group of all-male coders, the primarily male scientific community, the ‘boys club’, the group of gamer nerds at the local game store, even strip clubs and the sanctuary you think your ‘man cave’ is – the context is one of women inserting themselves into male space in order to enforce the dictates of feminine social primacy.

Shebi earlier someone here mentioned that once women are allowed into this space one will start hearing "a real redpiller..."

One of the most threatening aspects of conventional masculinity for the Feminine Imperative is the cooperative potential of male bonding. When only men comprise an in-group, team building, common purpose and a masculine-primary environment tend to define that group. I would argue that the modern insertion of feminine influence into all male spaces is a concerted effort to limit this bonding and unity in favor of a feminine-primary ‘correctness’.

This limitation may not be directly influenced by a present female; often all that’s needed to foster feminine-primary correctness is a feminine-identifying male in the in-group (anonymous White Knight), or even just a prevailing attitude of not wanting to offend the suspicions that other in-group men may subscribe to this feminine-identifying influence for fear it may get back to a woman they perceive may have authority.

Even the most well meaning of women involved (however peripherally) in the manosphere are still motivated by their innate security needs – and those hypergamous security needs imply a want for certainty and control. As such the psychological influence of the Feminine Imperative will always be a predominant motivator in their participation in this all male space. This leads women to a want to sanitize Game to fit the purposes of the imperative, as well as oversee the thought processes of the men who come to participate in it.

On point!

HeartofCity once made a comment on the thread saying that the Red pill should be scientifically studied on why so much of what it preaches (and also predicts) turn out to be true and fulfilled. I agree with him. It just never lies no matter how much you try to ignore or play around it.

Men by nature, are usually not bothered about what women do in their in-groups like gossiping about irrelevant things or themselves (intra-gender competition) in their gathering like sororities or hair-saloons. Ladies have told me how surprised and pleasured they are, seeing random men meeting each other in a barber shop, mechanic garage or having friendly rivalries over their favourite sport teams while sharing drinks in a bar, exchange numbers and move on while the same can't happen easily for women. One told me yesterday that men tend to be better keeper of secrets and she like other ladies I know, tend to enjoy the company of men as it is often fun of course. This may also contribute to why they invade male spaces but the innate female imperative of control and tendency towards disorder often kicks in.

A female fûck buddy of mine some years back, who got married last year was telling me (in a private chat) about how he would feed his husband a "sleepy" meal so he could not hang out with his friends on weekends. In her words "He seems very happy hanging out with them. I can't stand him being so happy without me".

Skepticus:
On point!

HeartofCity once made a comment on the thread saying that the Red pill should be scientifically studied on why so much of what it preaches (and also predicts) turn out to be true and fulfilled.

Men by nature are usually not bothered about what women do in their in-groups like gossiping about irrelevant things or themselves (intra-gender competition) in their sorority gathering or hair-saloons. Ladies have told me how surprised and pleasured they are, seeing random men meeting each other in a barber shop, mechanic garage or having friendly rivalries over their favourite sport teams while sharing drinks in a bar, exchange numbers and move on while the same can't happen easily for women. One told me yesterday that men tend to be better keeper of secrets and she like other ladies I know, tend to enjoy the company of men as it is often fun of course. This may also contribute to why they invade male spaces but the innate female imperative of control and tendency towards disorder often kicks in.

A female fûck buddy of mine some years back, who got married last year was telling me (in a private chat) about how he would feed his husband a "sleepy" meal so he could not hang out with his friends on weekends. In her words "He seems very happy hanging out with them. I can't stand him being so happy without me".

Your last paragraph took me dafuq out.

Imagine if she decides he has outlived his usefulness. He will sleep forever!!!

abba09:
guy u are so bitter and misogynistic whats wrong with you FFs? are u ugly to the extent that u cant get girls? do u have a small dick or are u broke? this hatred u have towards female gender there is a reason behind it

This one na broke-shaming abi wetin? After littering NL with your details begging for crumbs to throw away at the gambling ground, you think you can school someone else doing much better than you?
GET A LIFE MOTHAFVCKER!!!

Puta

Eazzii:
This one na broke-shaming abi wetin? After littering NL with your details begging for crumbs to throw away at the gambling ground, you think you can school someone else doing much better than you?
GET A LIFE MOTHAFVCKER!!!

Puta

You have time o.

People who brags like him online, usually have nothing going on for them offline.

Rich people don't go about publicizing themselves. 👌

luminouz:
Your last paragraph took me dafuq out.

Imagine if she decides he has outlived his usefulness. He will sleep forever!!!

She isn't even the first to tell me this. One (a single mother and a girl I knew that was being pimped out for hookup in the night club I worked some years back) would say same about her "serious" boyfriend who set her business up (supplying the capital running into about 1.5 Million). She was cheating on him codedly at the same time (including me). I wasn't interested but she would flood my phone with unrequested nudes just to get my "attention". I would oblige her enough to keep the conversation going just to learn more about female nature. Her request to visit me is always cleverly ignored.

heartofcity12:
😆

I saw a meme like this on Telegram 😂

Someone said, "the guy that eventually pays for everything, gets nothing." 🤣🤣🤣🤣💔

luminouz:
I love your post.

In my own simple English...they don't need to be here. It's a man's space. I wouldn't be found in their pinkpill thread in a thousand years commenting and disrupting. It makes no sense. That tells you that women are vain and their emotions are fickle.

Their "pink pill" or whatever they call it, is a waste of time because women are the red-pill. Some ladies on nairaland once made an attempt to create a version of their own but came out with nothing. If they wrote anything truly red pill, it would be a own goal because it would expose their own true nature. This is why a lot of them get angry at genuinely red-pilled men who are as smart and as cunning as it is a mirror reflection of their own true nature but they secretly crave them. It might explain why Martinez39s has his own fair share of female troll/stalkers who never seem to get tired despite ignoring them.

Skepticus:
She isn't even the first to tell me this. One (a single mother and a girl I knew that was being pimped out for hookup in the night club I worked some years back) would say same about her "serious" boyfriend who set her business up (supplying the capital running into about 1.5 Million). She was cheating on him codedly at the same time (including me). I wasn't interested but she would flood my phone with unrequested nudes just to get my "attention". I would oblige her enough to keep the conversation going just to learn more about female nature. Her request to visit me is always cleverly ignored.

Damn!!

Men are in danger oh

Skepticus:
Their "pink pill" or whatever they call it is a waste of time because women are the red-pill. Some ladies on nairaland once made an attempt to create a version of their own but came out with nothing. If they wrote anything truly red pill, it would be a own goal because it would expose their own true nature. This is why a lot of them get angry with genuinely red-pilled men who are as smart and as cunning as it is a mirror reflection of their own true nature but they secretly crave them. It might explain why Martinez39s has his own fair share of female troll/stalkers who never seem to tire of you despite ignoring them.

Nailed it again