₦airaland Forum

othermen:
Take advantage of the boy?? The boy took advantage of a sane environment. But I think it’s just terrible to cheer the family’s misfortune. The family could have erred, and their inactions or refusal to use their influence in the past, may have cost lives, that they should deserve our utter contempt- but we shouldn’t mock them nonetheless.

Of coz, they are likely to understate the consequences when discussing with him, but let us assume they didn’t and instead, they explained to the boy very well, what the long-term effects could be.

Of coz, there shouldn’t have been any monetary incentive, but I think many would be willing to support such a request, with cash or other supporting incentives. (A crime ??)

Let us assume, the family that needs a donor thought so too.
For the donor, could the monetary or other incentive be more propelling or compelling at the onset? Let us assume it was.

His kidney was going to be yanked, he wouldn’t give that without a promise for exchange of another reward. Let us assume the boy was naïve, and he was underpriced.

If he wasn’t underpriced, and the supposed donor wasn’t short on intelligence. Could the donor experience decisional regret? Of coz he could. In fact, recent studies on decisional regret among donors, indicate that younger age and lower education are predictors of regret.
So regret was an item and when it was time for the procedure, it became more stark. So stark, that the ‘affective’ theatrics couldn’t help; of coz, he knew that it was only because of the transplant, that anyone cared. Such reflection on the expectation of care can be sufficient to create an utter dissonance and complete turnabout.

After this, the Ekweremadu’s probably couldn’t keep him any longer, the promises of reward or the reward given were withdrawn; he is to return to wherever or whatever condition he was from, with his kidney. They were probably others as well, putting pressure on him, invested in all of it, with a rebuke for the boy.

So, what could he have done? Now, we know he is not likely returning to that condition he came from and he’s still got his kidney. In a year or two, his family would be with him in the UK.

Was Ekweremadu naïve and exploitative? Perhaps. Was he an organ trafficker? Then, he must be foolish as well to have decided to have the transplant in a standard hospital in the UK, and not in Iran or some shady place, where the donor’s consent is not required.

ufotunang:
..ok but did ekerewemadu and the doctor in nigeria first of diagonise or examine the boy kidney to know if it matches with his daughter kidney...2).... what did ekerewemadu tell the UK embassy in nigeria what they want to do with the boy in UK...did he tell the UK embassy in nigeria that they are traveling with the boy for a kidney transplant that the boy is the donor... and did the UK embassy in nigeria interview the boy to know why he is traveling to UK with ekerewemadu and he is to donate his kidney before the UK embassy would had approved a UK Visa for the boy to travel to donate his to Sonia for kidney for kidney transplant...so was the UK embassy in nigeria not aware of all of this... and what did ekerewemadu tell the UK embassy in nigeria before the UK embassy approved visa for all of them

FxMasterz:
For real?

othermen:
Take advantage of the boy?? The boy took advantage of a sane environment. But I think it’s just terrible to cheer the family’s misfortune. The family could have erred, and their inactions or refusal to use their influence in the past, may have cost lives, that they should deserve our utter contempt- but we shouldn’t mock them nonetheless.

Of coz, they are likely to understate the consequences when discussing with him, but let us assume they didn’t and instead, they explained to the boy very well, what the long-term effects could be.

Of coz, there shouldn’t have been any monetary incentive, but I think many would be willing to support such a request, with cash or other supporting incentives. (A crime ??)

Let us assume, the family that needs a donor thought so too.
For the donor, could the monetary or other incentive be more propelling or compelling at the onset? Let us assume it was.

His kidney was going to be yanked, he wouldn’t give that without a promise for exchange of another reward. Let us assume the boy was naïve, and he was underpriced.

If he wasn’t underpriced, and the supposed donor wasn’t short on intelligence. Could the donor experience decisional regret? Of coz he could. In fact, recent studies on decisional regret among donors, indicate that younger age and lower education are predictors of regret.
So regret was an item and when it was time for the procedure, it became more stark. So stark, that the ‘affective’ theatrics couldn’t help; of coz, he knew that it was only because of the transplant, that anyone cared. Such reflection on the expectation of care can be sufficient to create an utter dissonance and complete turnabout.

After this, the Ekweremadu’s probably couldn’t keep him any longer, the promises of reward or the reward given were withdrawn; he is to return to wherever or whatever condition he was from, with his kidney. They were probably others as well, putting pressure on him, invested in all of it, with a rebuke for the boy.

So, what could he have done? Now, we know he is not likely returning to that condition he came from and he’s still got his kidney. In a year or two, his family would be with him in the UK.

Was Ekweremadu naïve and exploitative? Perhaps. Was he an organ trafficker? Then, he must be foolish as well to have decided to have the transplant in a standard hospital in the UK, and not in Iran or some shady place, where the donor’s consent is not required.

bankulizer:
Don’t kick a man when he’s down.

Goodman2023:
Then what judgement was passed against david for telling police that he was 15...until details of his passport and bvn proved otherwise...no judgement for that ?

He gave false information during investigation...

So giving false information during investigation is not an offence in UK?

dominique:
But the boy was not kidnapped or coerced to donate his kidney, he offered to. He was the one willing to sell his kidney to highest bidder so why make him a victim? Ekweremadu is a corrupt politician that deserves to be flung in jail for stealing but that boy is no victim! He agreed to it, he's not underaged neither is he mentally unfit to decide on his own. I hope the UK authorities deports his snaky ass.

dominique:
But the boy was not kidnapped or coerced to donate his kidney, he offered to. He was the one willing to sell his kidney to highest bidder so why make him a victim? Ekweremadu is a corrupt politician that deserves to be flung in jail for stealing but that boy is no victim! He agreed to it, he's not underaged neither is he mentally unfit to decide on his own. I hope the UK authorities deports his snaky ass.

goldmatrix:
Even if the man's daughter has 4 set of kidneys would she donate or sell to the boy at point of need?

Real000:
React or commented

emekajacobogbon:
No mercy here,
Pray for grace for them to suffer there penance, I have worked with politicians,
I had to run for my life before I'm sucked dry.
Ritualist dey learn work for their hand.
Wickedness is out of this world, they will give you money, good food, house, but your soul is their target.

Goodman2023:
Then what judgement was passed against david for telling police that he was 15...until details of his passport and bvn proved otherwise...no judgement for that ?

He gave false information during investigation...

So giving false information during investigation is not an offence in UK?

FxMasterz:
You're right. But I think by putting him in the Victim position as a result of the inducement, they overlooked the crime. Moreso, no one pressed charges against him for this. It would have been the responsibly of Ekweremadu's lawyers to bring it to the attention of the court.

Neddstark:
Ike Ekweremadu, James Ibori
Thank you United Kingdom for upholding justice Nigeria will never do.

9jaRealist:
NO legal offense arises (or attaches) simply for lying to the police….
Unless a person lies under oath (perjury) or is actively OBSTRUCTING justice!



The Ekweremadus’ lawyers raised it, but the judge RIGHTFULLY discounted it…
The allegation against the Ekweremadus was LEGALLY PROVEN by financial records, and not by the dude’s testimony.

The offense of trafficking in human is a “strict liability” offense in the UK…
So long as the prosecution can show FINANCIAL INDUCEMENT, all these other side issues are legally irrelevant.
>

othermen:
Take advantage of the boy?? The boy took advantage of a sane environment. But I think it’s just terrible to cheer the family’s misfortune. The family could have erred, and their inactions or refusal to use their influence in the past, may have cost lives, that they should deserve our utter contempt- but we shouldn’t mock them nonetheless.

Of coz, they are likely to understate the consequences when discussing with him, but let us assume they didn’t and instead, they explained to the boy very well, what the long-term effects could be.

Of coz, there shouldn’t have been any monetary incentive, but I think many would be willing to support such a request, with cash or other supporting incentives. (A crime ??)

Let us assume, the family that needs a donor thought so too.
For the donor, could the monetary or other incentive be more propelling or compelling at the onset? Let us assume it was.

His kidney was going to be yanked, he wouldn’t give that without a promise for exchange of another reward. Let us assume the boy was naïve, and he was underpriced.

If he wasn’t underpriced, and the supposed donor wasn’t short on intelligence. Could the donor experience decisional regret? Of coz he could. In fact, recent studies on decisional regret among donors, indicate that younger age and lower education are predictors of regret.
So regret was an item and when it was time for the procedure, it became more stark. So stark, that the ‘affective’ theatrics couldn’t help; of coz, he knew that it was only because of the transplant, that anyone cared. Such reflection on the expectation of care can be sufficient to create an utter dissonance and complete turnabout.

After this, the Ekweremadu’s probably couldn’t keep him any longer, the promises of reward or the reward given were withdrawn; he is to return to wherever or whatever condition he was from, with his kidney. They were probably others as well, putting pressure on him, invested in all of it, with a rebuke for the boy.

So, what could he have done? Now, we know he is not likely returning to that condition he came from and he’s still got his kidney. In a year or two, his family would be with him in the UK.

Was Ekweremadu naïve and exploitative? Perhaps. Was he an organ trafficker? Then, he must be foolish as well to have decided to have the transplant in a standard hospital in the UK, and not in Iran or some shady place, where the donor’s consent is not required.

snipernigga:
Senators don't build hospitals, it's the executives that build hospitals

9jaRealist:
The UK Embassy did NOT grant a visa for a “kidney transplant”!
>

dominique:
But the boy was not kidnapped or coerced to donate his kidney, he offered to. He was the one willing to sell his kidney to highest bidder so why make him a victim? Ekweremadu is a corrupt politician that deserves to be flung in jail for stealing but that boy is no victim! He agreed to it, he's not underaged neither is he mentally unfit to decide on his own. I hope the UK authorities deports his snaky ass.

Sleekfingers:
1. They won't have taken him to the UK , without for knowing if he is a perfect match
2. It is the British doctor that , declared him mismatch. After asking him some questions. That's the normal procedures , before such surgery. And the young man answers was unsatisfiable. That is he declared him mismatch.
3. I don't think , the young man went to the embassy.
4. Ekweremadu wrote to the embassy that , the young man his Sonia's cousin. Which make him eligible to donate his kidney . But Ekweremadu lied. Shey, the young man na Sonia's cousin?
5. So Ekweremadu's statements to the embassy were all lies. Making a trafficker and an organ harvester under UK law....
6. Ekweremadu messed up , big-time.

shortgun:
How is a 21 year old man referred to as a boy?
The wicked 21 year old man will die shamefully for lying against a man whose only crime was that he wanted to save the life of his ailing daughter.

ufotunang:
...tthe UK embassy should had invited the boy for interview and know if the boy is aware of the kidney transplant and that if he agrees to be the kidney donor...then if the boy told the UK embassy he is not aware of it and he been a kidney donor...then they will not allow him to travel to UK and the UK embassy would had arrested ekerewemadu for lieing... that is the mistakes the UK embassy did for not inviting the boy for interview

WesternPanzer:
As an Igbo Man... We celebrate this Sentencing with pomp and pageantry

Ike, we are even praying you die in that Prison because you are entirely useless to the Igbo nation and humanity.

Who else noticed that some Yorubas and some Useless Northerners are the ones giving this man fake empathy

Go and check comments of Internet miscreants like seunmsg, ihordsppy, helinues and Iyabe ... and see how they support this animal. Same group of never do wells are also supporting another mentally deficient Tinubu who will destroy Nigeria kpata kpata.

I don't even want to talk about the Charlatans and nematodes like Reno Omockery.. The most iddiot God sent to earth from hell that should be jailed for life.

This should go a long way show you that we Ndigbo are people of good heart who hate corruption and corrupt animals like Ike Ekweremadu.

The Igbo nation is the first Nation in Nigeria to beat a sitting Sinator in Nigeria! A useless man who left Nigeria they basttardised to go and eat Yam in Germany. Ji gbuo gi dia... Useless man.

Who else noticed that whoever the Igbo nation spites and curses never makes it in life? After the Igbo nation beat up this morron of Ekweremadu... His problems started.

An Iddiot who was in the Federal Law Chambers for over 20 Solid Years... But couldn't build one standard hospital in Enugu or his village. Useless animal. Am not God

ButbI stamp my feet gidigba on ground and pray that YOUR DAUGHTER SONIA DIES. Let her die in Jesus name.. Amen. I say it with full chest.

Upgrade UNTH! For where? Develop Esut hospital to world class... If I hear! This iddiot man will rather loot the money to buy up estates in Abuja.

Ike, I pray to God today that heart attack should kill you in that prison. On the extreme, I pray today that your daughter dies eventually... So you can feel the pain of downtrodden Nigerians you people stole their destinies away and fed on for long.

But on the flip side... Watch how cursed and accursed Nigerians whose destinies have been stolen will come after me. Even some of them are willing to donate their kidneys abi liver to that baboon daughter of that gorilla looking sinator.

Same useless Nigerians their money was stolen to feed the useless girl fat and damage her kidneys. Now same plebiscites are willing to donate their kidneys to the destiny thief daughter so she can get well and continue eating from where they stopped. Nne... Gbasapu obi nwuo osiso... Common die dia osiso!

So that the shock of your death will give your father heart attack in prison and he follows you to hell straight...

dominique:
But the boy was not kidnapped or coerced to donate his kidney, he offered to. He was the one willing to sell his kidney to highest bidder so why make him a victim? Ekweremadu is a corrupt politician that deserves to be flung in jail for stealing but that boy is no victim! He agreed to it, he's not underaged neither is he mentally unfit to decide on his own. I hope the UK authorities deports his snaky ass.

dominique:
But the boy was not kidnapped or coerced to donate his kidney, he offered to. He was the one willing to sell his kidney to highest bidder so why make him a victim? Ekweremadu is a corrupt politician that deserves to be flung in jail for stealing but that boy is no victim! He agreed to it, he's not underaged neither is he mentally unfit to decide on his own. I hope the UK authorities deports his snaky ass.

dominique:
But the boy was not kidnapped or coerced to donate his kidney, he offered to. He was the one willing to sell his kidney to highest bidder so why make him a victim? Ekweremadu is a corrupt politician that deserves to be flung in jail for stealing but that boy is no victim! He agreed to it, he's not underaged neither is he mentally unfit to decide on his own. I hope the UK authorities deports his snaky ass.

ufotunang:
... that means ekerewemadu did not tell the UK embassy in nigeria about any kidney transplant and the boy been the kidney donor .. that means ekerewemadu lied to the UK embassy in nigeria

shortgun:
Thunder is already firing you, your kidney is not worth 5k Ode

othermen:
Take advantage of the boy?? The boy took advantage of a sane environment. But I think it’s just terrible to cheer the family’s misfortune. The family could have erred, and their inactions or refusal to use their influence in the past, may have cost lives, that they should deserve our utter contempt- but we shouldn’t mock them nonetheless.

Of coz, they are likely to understate the consequences when discussing with him, but let us assume they didn’t and instead, they explained to the boy very well, what the long-term effects could be.

Of coz, there shouldn’t have been any monetary incentive, but I think many would be willing to support such a request, with cash or other supporting incentives. (A crime ??)

Let us assume, the family that needs a donor thought so too.
For the donor, could the monetary or other incentive be more propelling or compelling at the onset? Let us assume it was.

His kidney was going to be yanked, he wouldn’t give that without a promise for exchange of another reward. Let us assume the boy was naïve, and he was underpriced.

If he wasn’t underpriced, and the supposed donor wasn’t short on intelligence. Could the donor experience decisional regret? Of coz he could. In fact, recent studies on decisional regret among donors, indicate that younger age and lower education are predictors of regret.
So regret was an item and when it was time for the procedure, it became more stark. So stark, that the ‘affective’ theatrics couldn’t help; of coz, he knew that it was only because of the transplant, that anyone cared. Such reflection on the expectation of care can be sufficient to create an utter dissonance and complete turnabout.

After this, the Ekweremadu’s probably couldn’t keep him any longer, the promises of reward or the reward given were withdrawn; he is to return to wherever or whatever condition he was from, with his kidney. They were probably others as well, putting pressure on him, invested in all of it, with a rebuke for the boy.

So, what could he have done? Now, we know he is not likely returning to that condition he came from and he’s still got his kidney. In a year or two, his family would be with him in the UK.

Was Ekweremadu naïve and exploitative? Perhaps. Was he an organ trafficker? Then, he must be foolish as well to have decided to have the transplant in a standard hospital in the UK, and not in Iran or some shady place, where the donor’s consent is not required.

dominique:
But the boy was not kidnapped or coerced to donate his kidney, he offered to. He was the one willing to sell his kidney to highest bidder so why make him a victim? Ekweremadu is a corrupt politician that deserves to be flung in jail for stealing but that boy is no victim! He agreed to it, he's not underaged neither is he mentally unfit to decide on his own. I hope the UK authorities deports his snaky ass.

dominique:
But the boy was not kidnapped or coerced to donate his kidney, he offered to. He was the one willing to sell his kidney to highest bidder so why make him a victim? Ekweremadu is a corrupt politician that deserves to be flung in jail for stealing but that boy is no victim! He agreed to it, he's not underaged neither is he mentally unfit to decide on his own. I hope the UK authorities deports his snaky ass.

dominique:
But the boy was not kidnapped or coerced to donate his kidney, he offered to. He was the one willing to sell his kidney to highest bidder so why make him a victim? Ekweremadu is a corrupt politician that deserves to be flung in jail for stealing but that boy is no victim! He agreed to it, he's not underaged neither is he mentally unfit to decide on his own. I hope the UK authorities deports his snaky ass.