₦airaland Forum

johnw47:
most dum and no test-is for truth, atheist

i showed your blindness in my post, i showed that you were wrong, what else was there to reply to,
see how dum you are, you as dum as false jw's

1Co 14:33  For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints


why would i want to chat with a dum atheist as yourself, u r as puffed up as mad max thinking
you are clever when it can be seen just how big a dope you are

Ok. Noted

MaxInDHouse:
Bible is not yours yet you spent the whole day and night talking about what is written in it.

Ọmọ you're really really dumb o!

Same way you spend days and night over it.
Meanwhile this evasion tactics won't work again.
Again did you do Words and Synonyms in Kindergarten?

jaephoenix:
Same way you spend days and night over it.
Meanwhile this evasion tactics won't work again. Again did you do Words and Synonyms in Kindergarten?

Who cares what works with your brain anymore?

If you say something is not yours yet you wake up each day to mark register along with those adhering to it as their own don't you think something is seriously wrong with you?

Meanwhile the Author of that book said:

At that time those who fear Jehovah spoke with one another, each one with his companion, and Jehovah kept paying attention and listening. And a book of remembrance was written before him for those fearing Jehovah and for those meditating on his name. Malachi 3:16

Ọmọ whatever makes you wakes up everyday thinking about what is written in that book you're surely serving as evidence that the Author is REAL!

MaxInDHouse:
Who cares what works with your brain anymore?

If you say something is not yours yet you wake up each day to mark register along with those adhering to it as their own don't you think something is seriously wrong with you?

Meanwhile the Author of that book said:

At that time those who fear Jehovah spoke with one another, each one with his companion, and Jehovah kept paying attention and listening. And a book of remembrance was written before him for those fearing Jehovah and for those meditating on his name. Malachi 3:16

Ọmọ whatever makes you wakes up everyday thinking about what is written in that book you're surely serving as evidence that the Author is REAL!

Your Christian brothers are constantly harassing Muslims on religion section everyday, you haven't for once cautioned them. Now atheists are harassing you guys, and you are suddenly defensive.
By the way, you're derailing this thread. I thought u said JWs don't derail threads but it looks like you're doing a fine job of it.
Please answer the question.

jaephoenix:
Your Christian brothers are constantly harassing Muslims on religion section everyday, you haven't for once cautioned them. Now atheists are harassing you guys, and you are suddenly defensive.
By the way, you're derailing this thread. I thought u said JWs don't derail threads but it looks like you're doing a fine job of it.
Please answer the question.

Quote a Jehovah's Witnesses among them and see me caution my brother!

MaxInDHouse:
Quote a Jehovah's Witnesses among them and see me caution my brother!

They are all christians. Whether he's a JW or not

jaephoenix:
They are all christians. Whether he's a JW or not

Now you're lying to your own soul!

What if i tell you that they are atheists?

You don't just lay claims, you back it up with proof. That has always been your motto!

Are they PRACTICING what Christ taught?

If not then you're just shying away from facts staring at you!

MaxInDHouse:
Now you're lying to your own soul!

What if i tell you that they are atheists?

You don't just lay claims, you back it up with proof. That has always been your motto!

Are they PRACTICING what Christ taught?

If not then you're just shying away from facts staring at you!

The definition of an atheist is one who doesn't believe in a god. Unfortunately those guys(TenQ, advocatejare, Oladegbu etc) that harrass Muslims all believe in Yahweh, so they are Christians, and of course, theists.
I understand you pull out definitions out of your ass and re-define phenomena with your own parameters.
But I'm sorry to tell you this. The world doesn't revolve around you, or your child molesting cult.
When you have time, write your own dictionary and thesaurus. Call a car bicycle if you like. Thats your fvcking business

jaephoenix:
The definition of an atheist is one who doesn't believe in a god.

So what proof do you have that these people BELIEVE (TRUST) in a god?

MaxInDHouse:
So what proof do you have that these people BELIEVE (TRUST) in a god?

They claim so. Same way you claim here too. Do you expect me to go to their house to ask all of them and also ask you too in your own house?

jaephoenix:
They claim so. Same way you claim here too. Do you expect me to go to their house to ask all of them and also ask you too in your own house?

What about the adage that says:
"actions speak louder than words"?
That's the edge true believers have above all others.
If you someone is your king surely all moróns will take you for your word but true believers will first consider what the supposed king say and closely watch how you concur, whatever makes you undermine or ignore the utterances of the one you call "king" shows you are lying.
So i ask you again:
What proof do you have that these people BELIEVE (TRUST) in a god?

MaxInDHouse:
What about the adage that says:
"actions speak louder than words"?
That's the edge true believers have above all others.
If you someone is your king surely all moróns will take you for your word but true believers will first consider what the supposed king say and closely watch how you concur, whatever makes you undermine or ignore the utterances of the one you call "king" shows you are lying.
So i ask you again:
What proof do you have that these people BELIEVE (TRUST) in a god?

one of the proofs that a Christian believes in God is:
his good works, he ceases lying etc.
and of course it's the Holy Spirit Who is behind the good works done in him, and for others



here is proof that you false jw mad max, don't believe in the True God Jehovah:

Exo_20:16  You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor

Pro_14:5  A trustworthy witness will not lie, But a false witness utters lies

Mar 10:19  You know the commandments: Do not murder, Do not commit adultery, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Do not defraud, Honor your father and mother


lost false jw mad max, you are a false witness, just like Jehovah said not to be

MaxInDHouse:
What about the adage that says:
"actions speak louder than words"?
That's the edge true believers have above all others.
If you someone is your king surely all moróns will take you for your word but true believers will first consider what the supposed king say and closely watch how you concur, whatever makes you undermine or ignore the utterances of the one you call "king" shows you are lying.
So i ask you again:
What proof do you have that these people BELIEVE (TRUST) in a god?

Honestly with actions, I'd rate JWs lower scores in the 'Christianity ratings'. I'm a neutral here and an atheist(and an ex-pentecostal). The best christians would be Catholics. They are least discriminatory and least likely to hate or kill a non-catholic. Pentecostals are laced with hate, malice, deceptions etc. JWs are the most deceptive. Just like you. You keep telling us you're the best thing since sliced bread but your actions speak differently. With multiple reports of child mol@station and the way you people ignore them, I don't trust you.
So if I was a Christian, I'd be catholic or one of these Orthodox denoms. They aren't perfect but they are slightly better

jaephoenix:
Honestly with actions, I'd rate JWs lower scores in the 'Christianity ratings'. I'm a neutral here and an atheist(and an ex-pentecostal). The best christians would be Catholics. They are least discriminatory and least likely to hate or kill a non-catholic. Pentecostals are laced with hate, malice, deceptions etc. JWs are the most deceptive. Just like you. You keep telling us you're the best thing since sliced bread but your actions speak differently. With multiple reports of child mol@station and the way you people ignore them, I don't trust you.
So if I was a Christian, I'd be catholic or one of these Orthodox denoms. They aren't perfect but they are slightly better

This is where you missed it all!

According to the Bible the one and only proof of a Christian group is their ability to stay away from military action and politics.

As for scandals there is no religion on this planet that can stand out in that.

Jesus never promised that scandals won't be mentioned in the midst of his disciples because he is gathering sinners not righteous {Luke 5:32} so the one and only proof of Christ working with a group is their ability to settle matters amicably without resorting to military action! Matthew 10:16

MaxInDHouse:
This is where you missed it all!

According to the Bible the one and only proof of a Christian group is their ability to stay away from military action and politics.

As for scandals there is no religion on this planet that can stand out in that.

Jesus never promised that scandals won't be mentioned in the midst of his disciples because he is gathering sinners not righteous {Luke 5:32} so the one and only proof of Christ working with a group is their ability to settle matters amicably without resorting to military action! Matthew 10:16

An atheist calling himself a neutral in religious matters

Aemmyjah:
An atheist calling himself a neutral in religious matters

Rule number one.

You must not say to a suspect:

"You are lying"

jaephoenix:
Honestly with actions, I'd rate JWs lower scores in the 'Christianity ratings'. I'm a neutral here and an atheist(and an ex-pentecostal). The best christians would be Catholics. They are least discriminatory and least likely to hate or kill a non-catholic. Pentecostals are laced with hate, malice, deceptions etc. JWs are the most deceptive. Just like you. You keep telling us you're the best thing since sliced bread but your actions speak differently. With multiple reports of child mol@station and the way you people ignore them, I don't trust you.
So if I was a Christian, I'd be catholic or one of these Orthodox denoms. They aren't perfect but they are slightly better

The people atheists would blame for all the wars, slavery and role in conflicts are this ones this baby atheist say would not kill. Russia and Ukraine are regarded as twins or sisters. Have you heard what the archbishop of the churches said regarding the wars
What about the Crusades, Inquisition, Opium war?
The nations that fought in the 2 world wars were predominately Catholic
I am also an ex-pentecostal and felt Catholic would be the right place with God's approval but i did an unbiased research - too much blood in their history and a religion that play politics cannot be clean

Aemmyjah:
The people atheists would blame for all the wars, slavery and role in conflicts are this ones this baby atheist say would not kill. Russia and Ukraine are regarded as twins or sisters. Have you heard what the archbishop of the churches said regarding the wars
What about the Crusades, Inquisition, Opium war?
The nations that fought in the 2 world wars were predominately Catholic
I am also an ex-pentecostal and felt Catholic would be the right place with God's approval but i did an unbiased research - too much blood in their history and a religion that play politics cannot be clean

Why are you trying to make him feel like a liar?

Few rhetorical questions will do if he is truthfully NEUTRAL!

MaxInDHouse:
This is where you missed it all!

According to the Bible the one and only proof of a Christian group is their ability to stay away from military action and politics.

As for scandals there is no religion on this planet that can stand out in that.

Jesus never promised that scandals won't be mentioned in the midst of his disciples because he is gathering sinners not righteous {Luke 5:32} so the one and only proof of Christ working with a group is their ability to settle matters amicably without resorting to military action! Matthew 10:16

Care to show me the particular bible passage?

Aemmyjah:
An atheist calling himself a neutral in religious matters

I know definitions is a problem for JWs. Maybe they muddle up y'all English language in those Kingdom Halls.
The definition of a neutral(in this context) is someone that is not involved in a topic or matter. There are football neutrals, music neutrals.
In this case, as an atheist, I'm not involved in any religion, and wouldn't take sides.
Thus I'm in a better position to arbitrate disputes between religions. You can't get a Christian to arbitrate in disputes between a Christian and Muslims, or Pentecostal and Catholics. There would be bias if you do that.
Y'all JW should use a lil bit of your brains

MaxInDHouse:
Rule number one.

You must not say to a suspect:

"You are lying"

Rule number 1 where?

Aemmyjah:
The people atheists would blame for all the wars, slavery and role in conflicts are this ones this baby atheist say would not kill. Russia and Ukraine are regarded as twins or sisters. Have you heard what the archbishop of the churches said regarding the wars
What about the Crusades, Inquisition, Opium war?
The nations that fought in the 2 world wars were predominately Catholic
I am also an ex-pentecostal and felt Catholic would be the right place with God's approval but i did an unbiased research - too much blood in their history and a religion that play politics cannot be clean

Are you aware there non-conflict or anti-conflict Christian sects like Jains, Quakers? You think JWs are the only anti-conflicts Christians ? What about pacifist religions like Jains, Hindus, Buddhists etc?

jaephoenix:
Care to show me the particular bible passage?

Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves. Matthew 10:16

Jesus' disciples are sheep in the midst of wolves so they must be WISE as serpents and HARMLESS as dove!

jaephoenix:
Rule number 1 where?

That's between my brother and i sir!

jaephoenix:
Are you aware there non-conflict or anti-conflict Christian sects like Jains, Quakers? You think JWs are the only anti-conflicts Christians ? What about pacifist religions like Jains, Hindus, Buddhists etc?

You said Catholics would not kill and you'd have become one
Now you are mentioning Buddha and Hindus as if they have not had history of conflict
MaxInDHouse, you are very much needed. Pls come and rescue this guy from what is disturbing him

jaephoenix:
I know definitions is a problem for JWs. Maybe they muddle up y'all English language in those Kingdom Halls.
The definition of a neutral(in this context) is someone that is not involved in a topic or matter. There are football neutrals, music neutrals.
In this case, as an atheist, I'm not involved in any religion, and wouldn't take sides.
Thus I'm in a better position to arbitrate disputes between religions. You can't get a Christian to arbitrate in disputes between a Christian and Muslims, or Pentecostal and Catholics. There would be bias if you do that.
Y'all JW should use a lil bit of your brains

Max, do you have those tools to reset someone brain.
Football neutrals are those who are fair minded and do not support or team nor against

Atheist that reject and oppose the existence of a Creator and see religion as a sham is playing neutral between religions? Ur mumu no too much?
It is like a hardcore racist playing neutral in an affair between Nigerian and a Kenyan
Go and download sense, because you are an atheist does not mean that everyone here are also stupid

jaephoenix:
I know definitions is a problem for JWs. Maybe they muddle up y'all English language in those Kingdom Halls.
The definition of a neutral(in this context) is someone that is not involved in a topic or matter. There are football neutrals, music neutrals.
In this case, as an atheist, I'm not involved in any religion, and wouldn't take sides.
Thus I'm in a better position to arbitrate disputes between religions. You can't get a Christian to arbitrate in disputes between a Christian and Muslims, or Pentecostal and Catholics. There would be bias if you do that.
Y'all JW should use a lil bit of your brains

You are against religion. Stop deceiving yourself and you are in the worst position to arbitrate such topics

MaxInDHouse:
Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves. Matthew 10:16

Jesus' disciples are sheep in the midst of wolves so they must be WISE as serpents and HARMLESS as dove!

Same bible that said this

Luke 22:36 KJV
Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

As you can see, your buybull is full of doublespeaks. Thus why I raised this thread. Look around you. One religion, with one book with thousands of sects/denominations etc. An all knowing god cannot get his shit together and give his subject a book that is reliable. And what's worse? He knew there would be confusions in the book and people would be deceived but it still doesn't stop him from writing a bleeped up book

jaephoenix:
Same bible that said this

Luke 22:36 KJV
Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

As you can see, your buybull is full of doublespeaks. Thus why I raised this thread. Look around you. One religion, with one book with thousands of sects/denominations etc. An all knowing god cannot get his shit together and give his subject a book that is reliable. And what's worse? He knew there would be confusions in the book and people would be deceived but it still doesn't stop him from writing a bleeped up book

That's why you need to read actions because it speaks louder than words.

Jesus is the leader as Christ it's his footsteps that Christians must follow {Hebrews 5:7} so can you quote anywhere Jesus used sword to attack or defend himself?

Ọmọ Jesus was speaking in idioms that's why his first century disciples never used swords to either attack or defend themselves after his ascension!

MaxInDHouse:
That's why you need to read actions because it speaks louder than words.

Jesus is the leader as Christ it's his footsteps that Christians must follow {Hebrews 5:7} so can you quote anywhere Jesus used sword to attack or defend himself?

Ọmọ Jesus was speaking in idioms that's why his first century disciples never used swords to either attack or defend themselves after his ascension!

Really? That word is an idiom? Please explain how that verse is an idiomatic expression

Aemmyjah:
You are against religion. Stop deceiving yourself and you are in the worst position to arbitrate such topics

Ok. No p

Aemmyjah:
Max, do you have those tools to reset someone brain.
Football neutrals are those who are fair minded and do not support or team nor against

Atheist that reject and oppose the existence of a Creator and see religion as a sham is playing neutral between religions? Ur mumu no too much?
It is like a hardcore racist playing neutral in an affair between Nigerian and a Kenyan
Go and download sense, because you are an atheist does not mean that everyone here are also stupid

Do you JWs have a problem against using dictionaries. I notice you, MadMax and 2 other JWs always get your definitions wrong.
The literal definition of “atheist” is “a person who does not believe in the existence of a god or any gods,” according to Merriam-Webster. He or she doesn't reject or oppose the notion of a creator. Learn to use what's left of your destroyed brain