Janosky:


MUMU WAILER DECEIVING HIMSELF
Is 2 chronicles 36:20:23 and Ezra 2:1-4 in your own Bible?
Which year did King Cyrus give a decree for the Jews to return from captivity and rebuild Jerusalem?

Counting back from that year (confirmed by history) & 70 years in your own Bible) gives you what year?

Courz Oteneaaron OZUO pro max.

MaxInDHouse:


I have decided to stop engaging oteneaaron (Courz)

Courz:


Mumu Janosky with your maggot infested brain, where is your evidence to prove 607 Bce? Where are the Scholars that back up 607 Bce? Where are the archeologists to confirm 607 Bce? Where are the Cuneiform tablets found by Archeologists that prove that Jerusalem was destroyed in 607bce? You can't be jumping up and down this thread like a little boy ranting like an Idiot! Where are your evidence? Surely there must be proof to confirm 607 right? Oya show us! We have shown our own. Any intelligent person will take us seriously because we have shown all proof in this thread. But an uneducated fool will take you JWs seriously. Watchtower knows 607 is a scam. That's why they are forcing you JWs to accept it or else you are called Apostates. They know the fraud they made with 607 and 1914. Once these doctrines get New Light, it means they were never selected in 1919. The original inventors of 1914 that you JWs copied from have discarded the doctrine because they know it is False! When will you people discard it?

MaxInDHouse:


Since i've noticed how Emusan always avoid the things that points to JWs as having truth i have decided not to respond to his post.
We are not sent to entertain arguments rather we were sent to search for the lost sheep of the house of Israel!

Emusan:


They are the one who will make dubious claims they will be the same people telling you to look for the evidence that support their claims. Very pathetic set of people!

Since Oga intelligent officer was exposed of those videos, you notice he couldn't talk again about the fraud of 607BC, he was so happy seeing @mightysparrow changing the subject matter with him

Emusan:


They are the one who will make dubious claims they will be the same people telling you to look for the evidence that support their claims. Very pathetic set of people!

Since Oga intelligent officer was exposed of those videos, you notice he couldn't talk again about the fraud of 607BC, he was so happy seeing @mightysparrow changing the subject matter with him

Did secular history prove that king Cyrus of Persia released the Jewish captives in Babylon (captive for 70 years) to return to Jerusalem in 537 BCE & rebuild the temple to fulfil 2 chronicles 36:2023 & Ezra 1:1-4 ?

The years of BCE was counted backwards. When you add 70 years Jewish captivity to year 537 BCE , what do you get?

MUMU WAILER DECEIVING HIMSELF

Oga, carry your IBERIBEISM & STUPIDITY out of this forum.

Emusan:


They are the one who will make dubious claims they will be the same people telling you to look for the evidence that support their claims. Very pathetic set of people!

Since Oga intelligent officer was exposed of those videos, you notice he couldn't talk again about the fraud of 607BC, he was so happy seeing @mightysparrow changing the subject matter with him

Janosky:



Did secular history prove that king Cyrus of Persia released the Jewish captives in Babylon (captive for 70 years) to return to Jerusalem in 537 BCE & rebuild the temple to fulfil 2 chronicles 36:2023 & Ezra 1:1-4 ?

The years of BCE was counted backwards. When you add 70 years Jewish captivity to year 537 BCE , what do you get?

MUMU WAILER DECEIVING HIMSELF

Oga, carry your IBERIBEISM & STUPIDITY out of this forum.

Janosky:
Did secular history prove that king Cyrus of Persia released the Jewish captives in Babylon (captive for 70 years) to return to Jerusalem in 537 BCE & rebuild the temple to fulfil 2 chronicles 36:2023 & Ezra 1:1-4?

The years of BCE was counted backwards. When you add 70 years Jewish captivity to year 537 BCE , what do you get?

MUMU WAILER DECEIVING HIMSELF

Oga, carry your IBERIBEISM & STUPIDITY out of this forum.[/b]

Courz:
See the Fraud Watchtower did in broad daylight to arrive at 607 Bce. They desperately need this date to be correct. So, they did some mago mago in the calculation of the dates. Now see where it gets interesting. The Same Watchtower depended on the secular sources and tablets to arrive at the date when Babylon fell but at the same time made the claims that these secular sources are not reliable. It is just like a person using a method to create something but at the same time the person is claiming that this method is not reliable. So, the question is, if these secular sources and tablets are not reliable, why are you using them in the first place to arrive at a date? After arriving at a date, you now formed your own calculation that involves adding more years to the reign of Kings at that time. You see the wayo they did just so that the dating can stretch to fit 607 Bce?

Courz:
You use the same Bible Scholars and their information to do calculation to suit yourself at a certain point then you decided to do your own calculation from that point to arrive at 607 and then say the source you used is unreliable. All because you are desperate to make 607 and 1914 correct by all means necessary. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Can you see the mago mago? The American wonder they performed here. Chai! It is good to be educated. No wonder they don't want JWs to go to University.

Emusan:


The funny thing is, these are secular historians of which even Watchtower will claim they are bias, these people just did their jobs and established fact.

Even Judaism doesn't bother themselves with the date of Jerusalem destruction neither Christianity but only Watchtower is trying to spin the historical fact and make use of this delusion and their members swallowed it.

That's why you won't see them providing a single link or video that supported their claim rather than telling you to google it.

And no matter how you search Google you won't come across a single reputable source supporting 607BC as the year Jerusalem was destroyed apart from Watchtower website and few JWs who also repeating the lies on their website.

Janosky:



Did secular history prove that king Cyrus of Persia released the Jewish captives in Babylon (captive for 70 years) to return to Jerusalem in 537 BCE & rebuild the temple to fulfil 2 chronicles 36:2023 & Ezra 1:1-4 ?

The years of BCE was counted backwards. When you add 70 years Jewish captivity to year 537 BCE , what do you get?

MUMU WAILER DECEIVING HIMSELF

Oga, carry your IBERIBEISM & STUPIDITY out of this forum.

Emusan:


That is why I keep asking JaNosense to provide the SECULAR HISTORIANS since he agreed that secular historians were truthful about the date.

One can easily spot their fraud even in their calculation of 3 1/2years to arrive at 2520 years.

How can 2520days suddenly changed to 2520years?

No where God ever said 1day will automatically become 1year. They just took Bible verse out of context to get their dubious calculation.

The quote on Watchtower 2011 says it all. Only untruthful person will read the above quote from Watchtower 2011 and still support them.

Aemmyjah:



They will rather take sides with what secular writers say about the date even if it could mean to them that what the Bible said about Jerusalem lying desolate for 70 years was a lie and Daniel said he discerned the 70 years are elapsed. They have no problem to support secular things and go against Bible cos it's only Jehovah's Witnesses that have the courage to say, it was 607 BCE that Jerusalem was sacked and 70 years will be the 537 BCE. When they argue on 587 BCE, they themselves invalidate the Bible and support historians that are not even reliable

See what I found on our site about what historians wrote about the dates of the Babylonian kings

If these historians are reliable, why do they disagree?

KINGS

1. King Nabopolassar

BEROSSUS c. 350-270 B.C.E. (21)

POLYHISTOR 105-? B.C.E. (20)

JOSEPHUS 37-?100 C.E. (—)

PTOLEMY c. 100-170 C.E. (21)

2. King Nebuchadnezzar II

BEROSSUS c. 350-270 B.C.E. (43)

POLYHISTOR 105-? B.C.E. (43)

JOSEPHUS 37-?100 C.E. (43)

PTOLEMY c. 100-170 C.E. (43)

3. King Amel-Marduk

BEROSSUS c. 350-270 B.C.E. (2)

POLYHISTOR 105-? B.C.E. (12)

JOSEPHUS 37-?100 C.E. (18)

PTOLEMY c. 100-170 C.E. (2)

4. King Neriglissar

BEROSSUS c. 350-270 B.C.E. (4)

POLYHISTOR 105-? B.C.E. (4)

JOSEPHUS 37-?100 C.E. (40)

PTOLEMY c. 100-170 C.E. (4)

5. King Labashi- Marduk

BEROSSUS c. 350-270 B.C.E. (9 months)

POLYHISTOR 105-? B.C.E. (—)

JOSEPHUS 37-?100 C.E. (9 months)

PTOLEMY c. 100-170 C.E. (—)

6. King Nabonidus

BEROSSUS c. 350-270 B.C.E. (17)

POLYHISTOR 105-? B.C.E. (17)

JOSEPHUS 37-?100 C.E. (17)

PTOLEMY c. 100-170 C.E. (17)

(#) = Length of king’s reign (in years) according to classical historians.

Aemmyjah:
😂
No peace for the apostates wicked
Says my God


Who listens to a liar? Someone that modifies people's comments. Chai

Courz:


Fornicator Aemmyjah, is this all you can say? Oh what a shame. You're speechless because I just showed you the mago mago Watchtower used on your head. They did American wonder. They stretched a King's reign and did Abracadabra and voila! 607 was born! They used secular sources to do calculation to a date. Then afterwards did their own imaginary calculation then turned around and said the secular sources are unreliable. Please, why are they using the same sources still to calculate 607? Why did your Watchtower depend on the same secular sources and tablets to calculate 607 but at the same time claim that they are unreliable? Just answer this question. Let me see if you still have some brain cells left.

Aemmyjah:
😂
No peace for the apostates wicked
Says my God. Who listens to a liar? Someone that modifies people's comments. Chai

Aemmyjah:


Quoting from apostate web page to make it look like our site
De play
No peace for the apostates
Desperate liar
😂

How many years did God's people spend in exile?
Despite your lies and slander, we are still flourishing. Shame on you

If I may ask, what year did scholars say Jesus was born? What year did he become the Messiah? Well, we were able to establish it using Bible chronology too

No peace for the wicked apostates, says my God. Creating nuisance to themselves in the name of attention seeking...
You can even prove that those historians were reliable. See the differences in the dates they gave about the kings of Babylon.
Even if we are wrong, it shouldn't make you mad
People only throw stone at a tree when it is ripe
No peace for the apostates wicked. They're like a roaring lion like their own father running from thread to thread and social forum, looking for trouble

Can't even give a sound conviction for the existence of God. Saying your belief in God's existence is cos you escape one chance motor
Peace will continue to delude you as you keep working with the great apostate. Your attacks and lies can't do us any harm. Tell us how it has affected us...

Janosky:



Did secular history prove that king Cyrus of Persia released the Jewish captives in Babylon (captive for 70 years) to return to Jerusalem in 537 BCE & rebuild the temple to fulfil 2 chronicles 36:2023 & Ezra 1:1-4 ?

The years of BCE was counted backwards. When you add 70 years Jewish captivity to year 537 BCE , what do you get?

MUMU WAILER DECEIVING HIMSELF

Oga, carry your IBERIBEISM & STUPIDITY out of this forum.

MaxInDHouse:


I keep wandering if apostates do sleep at all with the hatred that fills their hearts.
Abeg is it by force to be a JW?
If you feel you're no longer comfortable with a religion why not join another and start telling people the new things you're learning in your new found faith?
But thanks to JEHOVAH apostates can never ever find a better performing group than JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES so instead of talking about new things they've learned in their new religion it's always the remaining of what they learned from JWs they keep parroting!

Courz:


Fornicator Aemmyjah, simply answer the question. Why did Watchtower use secular sources to calculate and arrive at a date favourable to them but turned around and said those sources are unreliable and yet still use the same sources till today?

Aemmyjah:



Even if 70 years taken away from 537 BCE will lead to 607 BCE. 70 years of exile as God said. This mad apostates claiming to be Christians will rather fight those defending the Bible out of envy and hate.

How many years did God say his people will be in exile? 587 - 537 BCE (50 years) or 607 - 537 BCE (70 years).
They'll rather make the Bible look inaccurate
No peace for the apostates wicked
😂

Aemmyjah:


I don't make conclusions or answer questions from an apostate page.
You can't make me an idiot like you

Tell me, how many years were the Jews in captivity? 70 or 50?
Let's do simple maths and see how much you know about addition and subtraction

MaxInDHouse:


I keep wandering if apostates do sleep at all with the hatred that fills their hearts.
Abeg is it by force to be a JW?
If you feel you're no longer comfortable with a religion why not join another and start telling people the new things you're learning in your new found faith?
But thanks to JEHOVAH apostates can never ever find a better performing group than JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES so instead of talking about new things they've learned in their new religion it's always the remaining of what they learned from JWs they keep parroting!