Veecruz:


hahahahahahahahaha
Ignorant son of a devil had nothing to say but to insalt. bhuahahahahahaha

Atheists are the most stupid guys on earth. I was surprised to see that he could no longer defend his opinion and all he could do was to insult you.
Just imagine!!

KnownUnknown:


Let me try to alleviate the poverty of your mind, which I know is an impossible task. Lmao

http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/webproj/212_spring_2019/Matt_Perry/mattPerry212/physics.html

https://www.britannica.com/science/sound-physics

You are an empty headed atheist. Go and sit down.

Referinng him to the nonsense you read online that turned your brain upside down.

Mumu

KnownUnknown:


You’re literally too stupid for me to continue any interaction with you.

The guy you call stupid is wise. You are the fool.
You started a topic and you can't defend it. How unwise you are!

TenQ:

They throw tantrums when they can't answer simple questions like an Autistic kindergarten pupil

Bwahahahahaha! You that can't get it through your thick skull that intangible things can manifest physical effects and need a kindergarten teacher to explain that to you. LMAO!

budaatum:


You'd likely argue that you can't see the oxygen you breath too, which just shows how dumb you are.

And can you see the oxygen you breathe ?

Can you see the air you breath?

Is it visible?

You are guys are actors.
You act smart but remain the most stupid of humans.

TenQ:

One of their senior members on NL just told me that a Software in an AI machine is physical!

What an ignorant and deluded understanding!


Have a nice day. I've stopped giving Atheists my attention on Nairaland

Another name for Atheism is Senselessness.

Engage them only when your are bored and need to be entertained by clowns.

AuthorMan:


Atheists are the most stupid guys on earth. I was surprised to see that he could no longer defend his opinion and all he could do was to insult you.
Just imagine!!

My brother that is what they do when they see that they have no valid argument to make.

AuthorMan:



Another name for Atheism is Senselessness.

Engage them only when your are bored and need to be entertained by clowns.

That is why i always go playing with them. Very stupid evil people.

AuthorMan:


The guy you call stupid is wise. You are the fool.
You started a topic and you can't defend it. How unwise you are!

What topic did I start?

AuthorMan:


And can you see the oxygen you breathe ?

Can you see the air you breath?

Is it visible?

You are guys are actors.
You act smart but remain the most stupid of humans.

Lol

TenQ:

I want to learn:
Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?
How will you quantify the software?

Our dumdum professor, LordReed knows all things

AuthorMan:


The guy you call stupid is wise. You are the fool.
You started a topic and you can't defend it. How unwise you are!

Very unwise

Aemmyjah:


Our dumdum professor, LordReed knows all things

And you dumbarse know nothing.

Page 5 and not one explanation of what a spirit is.

TenQ:

No!
It is not in my place to challenge your definition except you are an atheist

It was meant for Triplechoice to answer, not you

KnownUnknown:
Page 5 and not one explanation of what a spirit is.

You already know, just like the rest of the world which is why all you atheists dodged and dodged and are still dodging my question

So, it is stupid to explain what you yourself have proven you know, just like the rest of the world

AuthorMan:


And can you see the oxygen you breathe ?

Can you see the air you breath?

Is it visible?

You are guys are actors.
You act smart but remain the most stupid of humans.

Tell them o.

LordReed:


Bwahahahahaha! You that can't get it through your thick skull that intangible things can manifest physical effects and need a kindergarten teacher to explain that to you. LMAO!

That was not the issue.
The issue had been:

These are the Questions you have not answered:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?




No more no less!

AuthorMan:



Another name for Atheism is Senselessness.

Engage them only when your are bored and need to be entertained by clowns.

I agree with you,

Answering the Questions below had been a challenge to them

3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?

Aemmyjah:


Our dumdum professor, LordReed knows all things

Please tell him to answer the Question because we want to learn

How can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?
How will you quantify the software?

StillDtruth:


It was meant for Triplechoice to answer, not you

No problem sir!

TenQ:

That was not the issue.
The issue had been:

These are the Questions you have not answered:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?




No more no less!

IT IS the ISSUE. You cannot measure intangible things directly because surprise they are intangible. But go ahead keep knocking your thick skull against this simple thing. LoLz.

LordReed:


IT IS the ISSUE. You cannot measure intangible things directly because surprise they are intangible. But go ahead keep knocking your thick skull against this simple thing. LoLz.

You just answered question Three:

It now remains 4 and 5

Questions:
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?

TenQ:

I didn't know you were this dumb: tell me just one place I have mentioned the word God on this thread!

My friend shut up with your very low IQ.

You're derailing the thread by bringing in what's irrelevant nonsense.
if you won't define spirit or talk about God which is the main reason this thread was created then take your software explanations to the right section

Examples or analogies are meant for making definitions or explanations more clearer. If you won't define anything but continue to use something as an analogy for what you refuse to define , then you're engaged in self deception .And that's very unbecoming of someone who claims to be a Christian.


You want to go through the backdoor ,using a computer software ,to prove your God and you think everyone is as dumb as you not to notice. Nonsense!

AuthorMan:


And can you see the oxygen you breathe ?

Can you see the air you breath?

Is it visible?

You are guys are actors.
You act smart but remain the most stupid of humans.

You are obviously as limited as the op, who, on being cornered, changed his "see" to "with the naked eye", but I guess you might be too lazy to read the thread.

Perhaps changed your "see" to detect, then hold your nose and cover your mouth for 5 minutes, and come tell me if you don't 'see' the air you have not been breathing.

triplechoice:
My friend shut up with your very low IQ.

You're derailing the thread by bringing in what's irrelevant nonsense.
if you won't define spirit or talk about God which is the main reason this thread was created then take your software explanations to the right section

Examples or analogies are meant for making definitions or explanations more clearer. If you won't define anything but continue to use something as an analogy for what you refuse to define , then you're engaged in self deception .And that's very unbecoming of someone who claims to be a Christian.


You want to go through the backdoor ,using a computer software ,to prove your God and you think everyone is as dumb as you not to notice. Nonsense!

See the Ignorant donkey opening mouth like basket spewing rubbish he knows NOTHING about.
He never programmed once in his life and he wouldn't ask questions or keep his mouth shut!

LordReed:


My dear buda software is a non physical effect of physical interactions. They are like thoughts, even though it is the interation of the brain and body that produces thoughts, thoughts themselves are not physical.

These dunderheads are trying to gift you into accepting that a non physical realm exists. You can total accept that non physical things exist without accepting some nebulous non physical realm.

Software may indeed produce non-physical effects (though that does depend on the effect you mean), but the software itself must physically exist for it to produce any effect at all.

Just think. If I were to give you a software called Microsoft Windows, you will be receiving physical code, be it on a disk or downloaded. I can't just think it in my head and give it to you.

Same as thoughts. I can think in my head what I am writing here, but until I make my thoughts physical on here for you to receive and read, you'd have nothing whatsoever to respond to.

Same as air we breathe too, which we can not see with the naked eye, but can detect with other senses.

Do be aware that when they say "see", I read 'detect' with any of the other senses. I don't just have to look with my eyes, since I can smell with my nose, and hear with my ears, and feel with my hands etc, and I can even enhance those senses so they "see" better what one can not see with the naked eye.

However, they have not yet told me how they enhance any of their senses so they see the spirits they claim they "see".

triplechoice:
This thread is fun to read.

@ TenQ


The definition for non physical that we have says it has to do with the mind ,spirit or non tangible

So, my question for you is this,

is a computer software a mental phenomenon or spirit ?

I'm going to read further, Triple, to see if they bothered to answer this brilliant question of yours.

TenQ:

I don't know where you find me use the word EFFECT except you are dazed.

My question was:
Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?

I can simply delete the software IN an AI machine, and you would know it is not there anymore. I can also show you the code that makes up the software in the AI machine.

Software is simply physical code, which I can very easily print out and show you. It's not like thoughts in your head, which is not physical, but more like your thoughts written down and thereby made physical so you can share your thought with others.

TenQ:

Anyone that cannot understand that non-tangible things can be real but not measurable cannot understand why the soul or spirit is tangible but cannot be physically measured.

It's damn hard discussing with language challenged individuals who don't know what the words they use mean!

Tangible, means real and not imaginary; able to be shown, touched, or experienced.

Software in any machine is real and not imaginary. It is able to be shown, touched, or experienced! But I don't think you can say the same about spirits, or can you?

KnownUnknown:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_measurement#:~:text=Software%20size%20is%20principally%20measured,indication%20of%20effort%20than%20functionality.

I should have read this far to see you've already educated them, but I bet it's far above their level of comprehension since they are likely to have read it with their naked minds.

LordReed:


It amazes me how someone who sees himself as intelligent will be struggling with something so simple. Software produces effects that can be measured, simple but TENQ needs a kindergarten teacher to explain it to him.

Software itself is tangible, since you can very easily observe its physically existing code.