budaatum:


He's being disingenuous and dishonest I think, or perhaps he wants to convince us his God does not exist. He sure has given us enough evidence to presume it doesn't.

And even admitting unknowingly that his god was created by humans just like a software .

TenQ:

No sir:
You are not Worthy of the knowledge: because you cannot even comprehend mundane "physical" things, how much more spiritual

Silly talk.

Like saying if one cannot comprehend how to levitate in their dreams,how can one comprehend what it means to fly a plane . What's the connection.

How does a knowledge of softwares connect with spirit and God.

No logicality in your thinking at all, and that's why you easily believe

triplechoice:

I'm sure your fellow believers are getting very embarrassed seeing how you're now trying to foolishly deny what they have been praising you for...

We are not!

Actually, he has gotten you all to say exactly everything we told you when you people were arguing that spirit does not exist.

And you.have said them making exactly the.same arguments we gave you.

So, TenQ laid a trap and you all walked into it confessing the very same things you denied and insalted us.!

Which is why none of you have dodged answering my question in response to my definition of sprit

In the thread https://www.nairaland.com/8060548/see-how-atheist-dodged-denying#129417835

Re: What Is Spirit? by Veecruz: 6:40pm On Apr 12
KnownUnknown:
Tell me in layman’s language, what is a spirit?

Veecruz
Spirit is the none physical and invisible part of a man and animals in layman's terms.
(Modify) (Quote) (Report) (Share)

TenQ:


Is Mathematics the abstract science of number, quantity, and space, either as abstract concepts ( pure mathematics ), or as applied to other disciplines such as physics and engineering ( applied mathematics or what is written on paper ?

Stupidity!
What is the proof of mathematics?

Can you please show me mathematics because I want to give some to my wife?

Now I know you are on a stupid clown show. Bwahahahahaha!

StillDtruth:


We are not!

Actually, he has gotten you all to say exactly everything we told you when you people were arguing that spirit does not exist.

And you.have said them making exactly the.same arguments we gave you.

So, TenQ laid a trap and you all walked into it confessing the very things you denied!

Good . So you admit he' has been lying he has not been talking about spirits indirectly.

You just came to expose his deception. Thank you every much for this and I hope he reads what you just said


Nobody fell into any trap, if we did,we wouldn't expose him

And everyone can see all of you running from it only for you people to run and go and attack poor TenQ, thinking that his case waa weak, whereas, you were confessing all the exact things we told you before which you were earlier denying.

triplechoice:


You're chatting with someone who doesn't know what's a proof of something. He only knows one thing and doesn't know that proof is synonymous with demonstration.

He wants to see a picture of intelligence before he accepts someone in front of him is demonstrating intelligence through what they say and do

He's a fucķing clown. I have had enough of his clown though, I'm outta here. LoLz.

triplechoice:
Good . So you admit he' has been lying he has not been talking about spirits indirectly.

You just came to expose his deception. Thank you every much for this and I hope he reads what you just said


Nobody fell into any trap, if we did,we wouldn't expose him

Wrong! The same way you people can switch and claim that you are not talking about spirit or you are talking about spirit, is the same rigbt TenQ has in stating what he is talking about.

So if he says he has not mentioned spirit you.have to address him there.

But i an free to thnk that he is definitely talking about spirit and he can correct me if he wants to.

What is good for the goose, is good for anoher goose.

StillDtruth:


Wrong! The same way you people can switch and claim that you are not talking about spirit or you are talking about spirit, is the same rigbt TenQ has in stating what he is talking about.

So if he says he has not mentioned spirit you.have to address him there.

But i an free to thnk that he is definitely talking about spirit and he can correct me if he wants to.

What is good for the goose, is good for anoher goose.

But I'm not atheist.

triplechoice:


Then ,Why have you been acting irresponsibly by derailing the thread with something that has nothing do with the topic under discussion, spirit?

Why don't you create your own thread and invite those whom you want to invite?


If you're not using all of these as an extended metaphor for spirits or God,why are you directing your questions specifically to atheists whose position negates spirits and God ?



If your intentions are what you say they're,why are you acknowledging the commendations of fellow believers, including the JW? Why not just tell them it's not about spirit so they focus on the main?

See , you can fool some,not all.

Your ignorance of what an extended metaphor is, is why you think you can fool everyone.

You can continue to play the ostrich. That's your business .

I'm sure your fellow believers are getting very embarrassed seeing how you're now trying to foolishly deny what they have been praising you for.

My friend this thread is set to take us to the land of spirits and goblins. So, please take your discussion about software to where it's much needed. Thank you

Modified. Let me paraphrase your nonsense below

If a God is not tangible, i e, it cannot measured in terms of mass, dimension, energy and time, does it prove it doesn't exist?

It doesn't prove it doesn't exist,but it proves it doesn't exist here in the material world. It's very possible it exist only in your head. That's all

If you know all of the meaning attached to the word, tangible, you don't need to be told how stuoid your question is. If something is not tangible at all. It doesn't exist anywhere to even talk of measuring it

Because anyone who cannot comprehend this common simple truth is too immature to comprehend deeper things

budaatum:
The only reason you resort to insults is you lack the intellectual capacity for an intelligent conversation, and that's enough for you to be considered intangible and therefore ignored.

The post wasn't directed at you so I don't know how it is your business when a fool is called by his proper name.

triplechoice:


You're chatting with someone who doesn't know what's a proof of something. He only knows one thing and doesn't know that proof is synonymous with demonstration.

He wants to see a picture of intelligence before he accepts someone in front of him is demonstrating intelligence through what they say and do

Fools!
What is the proof of mathematics?

triplechoice:


Silly talk.

Like saying if one cannot comprehend how to levitate in their dreams,how can one comprehend what it means to fly a plane . What's the connection.

How does a knowledge of softwares connect with spirit and God.

No logicality in your thinking at all, and that's why you easily believe

You have all betrayed your ignorance of common observables like
Information
Mathematics
Software and
Life.

Your level of intelligence is worth re-evaluating!

LordReed:


Now I know you are on a stupid clown show. Bwahahahahaha!

Caught in your own web of ignorance : show us the physical proof of mathematics.

Is 1+2=3 the proof of mathematics?

TenQ:
I have not even once related software in a machine to soul or spirit. All I've been knocking into your thick skulls is that
1. There are REAL existences that are not TANGIBLE!
2. Anything that is TANGIBLE must have either a mass , a dimension or energy and can relate with time.
3. It is stupidity to require a Physical proof of that which is not tangible.
4. I gave other examples of INTANGIBLES that are nevertheless REAL
a. LOGIC
b. MATHEMATICS
c. INFORMATION
d. LIFE
5. Then I gave a challenge for you to find a physical means (measurement of mass, dimension, energy) by which you can measure these real intangibles like Software, Logic, Mathematica nd Information

Again my Challenge to Atheists:
1. If an existence is not tangible i.e. cannot be measured in terms of Mass, Dimension, Energy and Time, does it prove it doesn't exist?
2. Is a software within a machine REAL or not?
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?



Unfortunately, all I see are confused shallow thinkers who do not know the difference between a MEDIUM to carry NON-TANGIBLES and the NON-TANGIBLE
Examples of Atheists
1. Mathematics is tangible because you can write it on paper
2. Life is Tangible because of the Effects it cases to living Beings
3. Logic is Tangible because we can write in in papers
4. Information is Tangible because we can write in in memo and we can transmit it by radio waves.
5. Softwares are tangible because the produce effects on the machine


How stupid can some educated people be?

CC: budaatum: jaephoenix: LordReed triplechoice:

Learn wisdom, not just talks!

I have come to the realization that either u are alexic or just plain stupid

I posted the definition of tangibility from merriam-webster, one of the most acceptable dictionaries and it clearly stated there that any concept/entity that can be appraised is tangible, but no, u won't read it but continue harassing us with ur dumbery. Thus words like mathematics, information are tangible

triplechoice:
But I'm not atheist.

What is the name of your Deity

TenQ:

In other words
1. Grief is Tangible
2. Grief can be Appraised by value.


Then everything and every emotion is tangible.

This is your brilliant conclusion!
SMH.


You see why you are a waste of precious time?

So you mean you are more intelligent than Merriam-Webster? Please answer this, dullard

TenQ:

This is not tangibility :

What is the shape or mass or energy of a software?

Anything that is tangible must have at least one of these three

Please when u read the definition of tangibility, reply me. Till then, I won't reply any of your tripe

TenQ:

Caught in your own web of ignorance : show us the physical proof of mathematics.

Is 1+2=3 the proof of mathematics?

You really should go back to kindergarten so that they'll show you using number blocks. With that your block head you need it. Bwahahahahaha!

jaephoenix:

I have come to the realization that either u are alexic or just plain stupid

I posted the definition of tangibility from merriam-webster, one of the most acceptable dictionaries and it clearly stated there that any concept/entity that can be appraised is tangible, but no, u won't read it but continue harassing us with ur dumbery. Thus words like mathematics, information are tangible

And your royal Ignoramus doesn't know when "the tangible" is a figure of speech


//her grief was tangible

Is a grief tangible?

TenQ:

Because anyone who cannot comprehend this common simple truth is too immature to comprehend deeper things

. You have failed already. We now know your god is as simple as a software that can easily be destroyed. I mean your on god not that of other Christians who know how to respect others they discuss with

TenQ:

What is the name of your Deity

I don't own a deity. I'm a deity and we're all deities.

TenQ:

You have all betrayed your ignorance of common observables like
Information
Mathematics
Software and
Life.

Your level of intelligence is worth re-evaluating!

I didn't betray anything. In fact I been observing very well how you continue to demonstrate your level of intelligence for the whole world to "commonly observe it
Your low IQ is a "common observable " Meet a doc to prescribe some IQ boosting pills to boost it .

TenQ:

Caught in your own web of ignorance : show us the physical proof of mathematics.

Is 1+2=3 the proof of mathematics?

Again, please go online and check what tangibility means. Merriam Webster said any concept that can be appraised is tangible, and that includes math. Mathematics is tangible because we can actually utilize it in programming, architecture, even medicine. Are you really this dumb in real life?

TenQ:

And your royal Ignoramus doesn't know when "the tangible" is a figure of speech


//her grief was tangible

Is a grief tangible?

Mumu, where is the figure of speech usage here? U don't know logic, or even English. Any concept that has an approximate value is tangible. Figure of speech, my ass

tangible
1 of 2
adjective
tan·​gi·​ble ˈtan-jə-bəl
Synonyms of tangible
1
a
: capable of being perceived especially by the sense of touch : PALPABLE
b
: substantially real : MATERIAL
2
: capable of being precisely identified or realized by the mind
her grief was tangible
3
: capable of being appraised at an actual or approximate value

triplechoice:
. You have failed already. We now know your god is as simple as a software that can easily be destroyed. I mean your on god not that of other Christians who know how to respect others they discuss with

I have not said anything about God to you have I?

See how common Logic finished all of you:but will you reason?
No!

triplechoice:


I don't own a deity. I'm a deity and we're all deities.

All atheists are their own deity. By that definition, you are an Atheist!

triplechoice:
I didn't betray anything. In fact I been observing very well how you continue to demonstrate your level of intelligence for the whole world to "commonly observe it
Your low IQ is a "common observable " Meet a doc to prescribe some IQ boosting pills to boost it .

It is here for all to see that to you Atheists on Nairaland
Information, Mathematics, Software and Life.
Are all Tangible Realities!


And you don't have an iota of shame!?

jaephoenix:

Again, please go online and check what tangibility means. Merriam Webster said any concept that can be appraised is tangible, and that includes math. Mathematics is tangible because we can actually utilize it in programming, architecture, even medicine. Are you really this dumb in real life?

Stupid atheists don't know when a word is a figure of speech.

Can you measure Grief?
Tell me, According to Webster dictionary, how many kilograms of Griefs is in your head?
What is the unit of measurement of Grief?

Your ignorance amaze me!

jaephoenix:

Mumu, where is the figure of speech usage here? U don't know logic, or even English. Any concept that has an approximate value is tangible. Figure of speech, my ass

tangible
1 of 2
adjective
tan·​gi·​ble ˈtan-jə-bəl
Synonyms of tangible
1
a
: capable of being perceived especially by the sense of touch : PALPABLE
b
: substantially real : MATERIAL
2
: capable of being precisely identified or realized by the mind
her grief was tangible
3
: capable of being appraised at an actual or approximate value

The village clown is still quoting what he doesn't understand.

I challenge you to give me the unit of measurement of grief?


To Mr Atheist :
"I've told you a million times!" means exactly that I told you 1,000,000 times.

"His eyes drank in the beauty of the scene." mean that one can drink with the eyes.

"I could eat a horse!" meaning, I could literally eat a full grown horse.

"The backpack weighed a ton." meaning that one the weighing scale it's weight was one tonne


Again:
Grief is tangible according to Webster Dictionary

I challenge you to give me the unit of measurement of grief?

You are the official clown of the community of atheists if you don't give me the unit of measurement of Grief!

LordReed:


You really should go back to kindergarten so that they'll show you using number blocks. With that your block head you need it. Bwahahahahaha!

Number block is the proof of mathematics!?

Don't you have shame!?


See how all of you are behaving like children caught in a lie!?

jaephoenix:

So you mean you are more intelligent than Merriam-Webster? Please answer this, dullard

I made a challenge :

Give me the unit of measurement of Grief!