TenQ:
Finally, you developed some balls
My Question ONE:
1. If an existence is not tangible i.e. cannot be measured in terms of Mass, Dimension, Energy and Time, does it prove it doesn't exist?
Your Response

Correct: Meaning that existence cannot be proved only by physical measurables like Mass, Dimension, Energy and Time
Conclusion: It is ignorance that makes Atheis require physical proof of existence such as the Soul/Spirit as a proof of its existence


My Question TWO:
2. Is a software within a machine REAL or not?
Your Response:

Correct: Meaning that an EXISTENCE can Be REAL without having ANY measurable physical evidence of like Mass, Dimension, Energy and Time


My Question THREE:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?

This is NOT the Question sir.
Can a software WITHIN a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means? In other words without using another software, can you measure or detect the presence of a computer program running inside an AI machine?


My Question FOUR:
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
Your Response:

This is not the Question!
Is it WISDOM to insist on requiring a physical evidence for a software withing an AI machine to conclude that it exist or STUPIDITY?

You are required to take either of the two positions and then give explanations or reasons if you think it requres it.

My Question FIVE:
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?
Your Response:

You gave not a single HOW TO in question 5.

The Question again: Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?



I promise to answer ALL your questions BUT ONLY after you have answered my Unanswered Questions: except you want me not to answer your own questions too. This is just fair!

Again:
These are the Questions you have not answered:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?

I answered your questions if you don't answer mine then no further conversation is necessary because that is the stupid game people like you play. You duck and weave when it gets to you answering questions. Not playing that game with you.

LordReed:


I answered your questions if you don't answer mine then no further conversation is necessary because that is the stupid game people like you play. You duck and weave when it gets to you answering questions. Not playing that game with you.

You Did NOT answer ALL my Questions: you answered Questions 1 and 2 ONLY




I promised to answer ALL your questions BUT ONLY after you have answered my Unanswered Questions: except you want me not to answer your own questions too. This is just fair!

Again:
These are the Questions you have not answered:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?

TenQ:

You Did NOT answer ALL my Questions: you answered Questions 1 and 2 ONLY




I promised to answer ALL your questions BUT ONLY after you have answered my Unanswered Questions: except you want me not to answer your own questions too. This is just fair!

Again:
These are the Questions you have not answered:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?

I don't care that you PROMISED. Answer them now.

I answered your 5 questions that you don't like my answers is not my problem.

You can't force anyone to see the when even wit the best logic. Logic is not the universal key
If it won't use his own brain to understand something, let his shift post using double, hypocritical standards

LordReed:


I don't care that you PROMISED. Answer them now.

I will use your exact method to answer Your questions except you FIRST answer my three other questions

Oya answer my own questions.
1. What is spirit?
ANSWER: Many atheist think spirits do not exist because it cannot be quantified

2. What is the spiritual realm?
ANSWER: The Soul/Spirit can be observed or measured by its effects. Something so simple that was staring at you since your first response to me on this thread.

3. How can we obtain evidence of the existence of spirit and spiritual realm?
ANSWER: Dumdum, you observe or measure the effects of the soul/spirit!
If we blast you with questions now you'll start going from pillar post and not answer any.

I have given you the kind of answer you gave me:
If you want to KNOW the REAL ANSWERS to your QUESTIONS, answer my three other Questions TRUTHFULLY





You Did NOT answer ALL my Questions: you answered Questions 1 and 2 ONLY
I promised to answer ALL your questions BUT ONLY after you have answered my Unanswered Questions: except you want me not to answer your own questions too. This is just fair!

Again:
These are the Questions you have not answered:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?


OR take the answers above as appropriate for your Questions!

TenQ:

I will use your exact method to answer Your questions except you FIRST answer my three other questions

Oya answer my own questions.
1. What is spirit?
ANSWER: Many atheist think spirits do not exist because it cannot be quantified

2. What is the spiritual realm?
ANSWER: The Soul/Spirit can be observed or measured by its effects. Something so simple that was staring at you since your first response to me on this thread.

3. How can we obtain evidence of the existence of spirit and spiritual realm?
ANSWER: Dumdum, you observe or measure the effects of the soul/spirit!
If we blast you with questions now you'll start going from pillar post and not answer any.

I have given you the kind of answer you gave me:
If you want to KNOW the REAL ANSWERS to your QUESTIONS, answer my three other Questions TRUTHFULLY





You Did NOT answer ALL my Questions: you answered Questions 1 and 2 ONLY
I promised to answer ALL your questions BUT ONLY after you have answered my Unanswered Questions: except you want me not to answer your own questions too. This is just fair!

Again:
These are the Questions you have not answered:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?


OR take the answers above as appropriate for your Questions!

LMAO! There you have it folks, prime example of disingenuousness.

TenQ:


Oya answer my own questions.
1. What is spirit?
ANSWER: Many atheist think spirits do not exist because it cannot be quantified

Lol

LordReed:


LMAO! There you have it folks, prime example of disingenuousness.

You are NOTHING but a Big IGNORANT Coward who FLEE from answering Direct Questions:

Paying you Back with your own Coin: why thou get angry?
Why don't you just accept "whatever" I post whether is has anything to do with the Question of not?

I HAVE ANSWERED YOUR QUESTIONS (exactly as you answered mine)


"I answered your questions if you don't answer mine then no further conversation is necessary because that is the stupid game people like you play. You duck and weave when it gets to you answering questions. Not playing that game with you."


In case you want us to move forward:


You Did NOT answer ALL my Questions: you answered Questions 1 and 2 ONLY
I promised to answer ALL your questions BUT ONLY after you have answered my Unanswered Questions: except you want me not to answer your own questions too. This is just fair!

Again:
These are the Questions you have not answered:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?


OR take the answers above as appropriate for your Questions!


Otherwise, I take it that a Dishonest Coward is FLEEING an intellectual conversation because he is boxed in the hole of his own logic: If this is your option, please have a nice day ahead!

KnownUnknown:



Lol

Answering an Intellectually Dishonest Fool according to his folly!

TenQ:

Answering an Intellectually Dishonest Fool according to his folly!

You describe yourself very well. Lol

KnownUnknown:


Described yourself very well. Lol

Mr KnownUnknown who deliberately cropped out my post to present a DISHONEST view of what I said:
Aren't you ashamed of yourself?

You don't even have any Intellectual Dignity or Honesty to speak the TRUTH!
Like a Pig grafted with a Donkey's head, you bray like the animal devoid of shame!

TenQ:

I will use your exact method to answer Your questions except you FIRST answer my three other questions

Oya answer my own questions.
1. What is spirit?
ANSWER: Many atheist think spirits do not exist because it cannot be quantified

2. What is the spiritual realm?
ANSWER: The Soul/Spirit can be observed or measured by its effects. Something so simple that was staring at you since your first response to me on this thread.

3. How can we obtain evidence of the existence of spirit and spiritual realm?
ANSWER: Dumdum, you observe or measure the effects of the soul/spirit!
If we blast you with questions now you'll start going from pillar post and not answer any.

I have given you the kind of answer you gave me:
If you want to KNOW the REAL ANSWERS to your QUESTIONS, answer my three other Questions TRUTHFULLY





You Did NOT answer ALL my Questions: you answered Questions 1 and 2 ONLY
I promised to answer ALL your questions BUT ONLY after you have answered my Unanswered Questions: except you want me not to answer your own questions too. This is just fair!

Again:
These are the Questions you have not answered:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?


OR take the answers above as appropriate for your Questions!

It is NOT surprising for me anyways : this is why I stopped entertaining DUMB atheists like you!

TenQ:

Mr KnownUnknown who deliberately cropped out my post to present a DISHONEST view of what I said:
Aren't you ashamed of yourself?

You don't even have any Intellectual Dignity or Honesty to speak the TRUTH!
Like a Pig grafted with a Donkey's head, you bray like the animal devoid of shame!




It is NOT surprising for me anyways : this is why I stopped entertaining DUMB atheists like you!

More nonsense from our resident expert. Lol, you should stick with arguing with Muslims about your former faith. Anything else is obviously beyond your capabilities.

By the way, I just used a spiritometer to measure all the ghosts and goblins in my vicinity.

TenQ:

You are NOTHING but a Big IGNORANT Coward who FLEE from answering Direct Questions:

Paying you Back with your own Coin: why thou get angry?
Why don't you just accept "whatever" I post whether is has anything to do with the Question of not?

I HAVE ANSWERED YOUR QUESTIONS (exactly as you answered mine)


"I answered your questions if you don't answer mine then no further conversation is necessary because that is the stupid game people like you play. You duck and weave when it gets to you answering questions. Not playing that game with you."


In case you want us to move forward:


You Did NOT answer ALL my Questions: you answered Questions 1 and 2 ONLY
I promised to answer ALL your questions BUT ONLY after you have answered my Unanswered Questions: except you want me not to answer your own questions too. This is just fair!

Again:
These are the Questions you have not answered:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?


OR take the answers above as appropriate for your Questions!


Otherwise, I take it that a Dishonest Coward is FLEEING an intellectual conversation because he is boxed in the hole of his own logic: If this is your option, please have a nice day ahead!

Bwahahahahaha! The dishonest coward here is you. You answered my questions with what can only be described as dishonesty and a blatant attempt to not answer the questions while pretend. You were even very transparent with it yet you want to point fingers at me. LMFAO!

You are just a dunce masquerading as someone with more than two brain cells.

LordReed:


Bwahahahahaha! The dishonest coward here is you. You answered my questions with what can only be described as dishonesty and a blatant attempt to not answer the questions while pretend. You were even very transparent with it yet you want to point fingers at me. LMFAO!

You are just a dunce masquerading as someone with more than two brain cells.

Paid you back with your OWN coin: why are you troubled!
Didn't I tell you exactly what I was doing?

Did you read this in my post header?

I will use your exact method to answer Your questions except you FIRST answer my three other questions

TenQ:

I will use your exact method to answer Your questions except you FIRST answer my three other questions

Oya answer my own questions.
1. What is spirit?
ANSWER: Many atheist think spirits do not exist because it cannot be quantified

2. What is the spiritual realm?
ANSWER: The Soul/Spirit can be observed or measured by its effects. Something so simple that was staring at you since your first response to me on this thread.

3. How can we obtain evidence of the existence of spirit and spiritual realm?
ANSWER: Dumdum, you observe or measure the effects of the soul/spirit!
If we blast you with questions now you'll start going from pillar post and not answer any.

I have given you the kind of answer you gave me:
If you want to KNOW the REAL ANSWERS to your QUESTIONS, answer my three other Questions TRUTHFULLY





You Did NOT answer ALL my Questions: you answered Questions 1 and 2 ONLY
I promised to answer ALL your questions BUT ONLY after you have answered my Unanswered Questions: except you want me not to answer your own questions too. This is just fair!

Again:
These are the Questions you have not answered:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?


OR take the answers above as appropriate for your Questions!

My Question still stand:


In case you want us to move forward:


You Did NOT answer ALL my Questions: you answered Questions 1 and 2 ONLY
I promised to answer ALL your questions BUT ONLY after you have answered my Unanswered Questions: except you want me not to answer your own questions too. This is just fair!

Again:
These are the Questions you have not answered:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?


OR take the answers above as appropriate for your Questions!


Otherwise, I take it that a Dishonest Coward is FLEEING an intellectual conversation because he is boxed in the hole of his own logic: If this is your option, please have a nice day ahead!

TenQ:

Why are you this elusive?

Me elusive? Your questions have been answered already, by me and some others,but you're unwilling to accept it or even understand it because you convinced yourself before asking them that they can't be answered .

Again my Challenge to Atheists:
1. If an existence is not tangible i.e. cannot be measured in terms of Mass, Dimension, Energy and Time, does it prove it doesn't exist?
2. Is a software within a machine REAL or not?
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?

Ok . I will sacrifice my time again to answer it directly in a way you can understand . But if after then you still don't accept my answers as correct,then please answer it yourself since you alone know the correct thing.

1. It's not a prove it doesn't exist. But the person who says it, the existence ,exist has the onerous task of finding a way of demonstrating to others how it exist .
2. I know the software inside an AI is real because of the visible effects it produces

3. Yes . We can do that indirectly through its features, some of which are, it's portability, flexibility, reliability , functionality etc


4. Yes it's wisdom so you aren't cheated by the person selling the machine that host the software. He just might be selling you a fake
And I just explained how it can be done indirectly. You don't need to see the software physically to know it's there but by interacting with it through usage .

5. I don't need to repeat myself. I have answered it up there. If you know how tests are carried to determine if someone is infected with something then you won't be asking all these kindergarten questions.

Now that I answered your questions, would you be humble enough to respond in kind by answering it correctly for me if you think I didn't answer them correctly?

Otherwise, admit that you are a bunch of good for nothing noise makers!

The above is actually meant for you,not me. FYI, I'm not an atheist. I don't need to be one to question you. Do I?

TenQ:


Paid you back with your OWN coin: why are you troubled!
Didn't I tell you exactly what I was doing?

Did you read this in my post header?

I will use your exact method to answer Your questions except you FIRST answer my three other questions


My Question still stand:


In case you want us to move forward:


You Did NOT answer ALL my Questions: you answered Questions 1 and 2 ONLY
I promised to answer ALL your questions BUT ONLY after you have answered my Unanswered Questions: except you want me not to answer your own questions too. This is just fair!

Again:
These are the Questions you have not answered:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?


OR take the answers above as appropriate for your Questions!


Otherwise, I take it that a Dishonest Coward is FLEEING an intellectual conversation because he is boxed in the hole of his own logic: If this is your option, please have a nice day ahead!

Again you are the dishonest coward who doesn't want his belief critiqued that's why you dishonestly answered. It should be clear to any one observing that you and the others like you are nothing but dishonest and stupid imbeciles.

LordReed:


Again you are the dishonest coward who doesn't want his belief critiqued that's why you dishonestly answered. It should be clear to any one observing that you and the others like you are nothing but dishonest and stupid imbeciles.

It's not only that he doesn't want his beliefs critiqued, but also that he is very clueless about what he has been trying to explain and because of that he cannot see how he has been fumbling with it.

triplechoice:
Me elusive? Your questions have been answered already, by me and some others,but you're unwilling to accept it or even understand it because you convinced yourself before asking them that it can't be answered .
Ok . I will sacrifice my time again to answer it directly in a way you can understand . But if after then you still don't accept my answers as correct,then please answer it yourself since you alone know the correct thing.

1. It's not a prove it doesn't exist. But the person who says it, the existence ,exist has the onerous task of finding a way of demonstrating to others how it exist .
2. I know the software inside an AI is real because of the visible effects it produces

3. Yes . We can do that indirectly through its features, some of which are, it's portability, flexibility, reliability , functionality etc


4. Yes it's wisdom so you aren't cheated by the person selling the machine that host the software. He just might be selling you a fake
And I just explained how it can be done indirectly. You don't need to see the software physically to know it's there but by interacting with it through usage .

5. I don't need to repeat myself. I have answered it up there. If you know how tests are carried to determine if someone is infected with something then you won't be asking all these your kindergarten questions.

Now that I answered your questions, would you be humble enough to respond in kind by answering it correctly for me if you think I didn't answer them correctly?

The above is actually meant for you,not me. FYI, I'm not an atheist. I don't need to be one to question you. Do I?

1. 😂... Atheist contradicting atheist

2. So you agree that we can accept the existence of something by it's effect, even if we cannot see it or hear it shey

You don't even feel comfortable answering these simple questions

Aemmyjah:



1. 😂... Atheist contradicting atheist

2. So you agree that we can accept the existence of something by it's effect, even if we cannot see it or hear it shey

You don't even feel comfortable answering these simple questions

I'm not an atheist please . And where's the contradiction. Show it

2. But the atheist have accepted that. Are you blind not to see it

3. Please stop projecting. It's you who don't feel comfortable with my answers

triplechoice:


I'm not an atheist please . And where's the contradiction. Show it

2. But the atheist have accepted that. Are you blind not to see it

3. Please stop projecting. It's you who don't feel comfortable with my answers

Ask your atheists who claim they can't accept someone existence they can't see

Aemmyjah:



Ask your atheists who claim they can't accept someone existence they can't see

I don't own atheists. They can speak for themselves. So ask them directly yourself.

triplechoice:


I don't own atheists. They can speak for themselves. So ask them directly yourself.

Where it suits you, you enjoy engaging with them
When it comes to you, you deny them

Can't you speak for yourself

triplechoice:


It's not only that he doesn't want his beliefs critiqued, but also that he is very clueless about what he has been trying to explain and because of that he cannot see how he has been fumbling with it.

True that. He has been on this software shtick for years now but has not for once made any reasonable point. All he does is bleat on about nonsense.

triplechoice:
Me elusive? Your questions have been answered already, by me and some others,but you're unwilling to accept it or even understand it because you convinced yourself before asking them that they can't be answered .
Ok . I will sacrifice my time again to answer it directly in a way you can understand . But if after then you still don't accept my answers as correct,then please answer it yourself since you alone know the correct thing.

1. It's not a prove it doesn't exist. But the person who says it, the existence ,exist has the onerous task of finding a way of demonstrating to others how it exist .

True!

triplechoice:

2. I know the software inside an AI is real because of the visible effects it produces

Correct! We actually Load in into the memory of the machine and it is real because it does exactly as it was designed to function.

triplechoice:

3. Yes . We can do that indirectly through its features, some of which are, it's portability, flexibility, reliability , functionality etc

The Question was:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?

It is IMPOSSIBLE to measure or Quantify the Software WITHIN a Machine by ANY Physical means.
What Physical thing would you want to measure as the software characteristics: its Mass, Dimension, Energy or Time ?

triplechoice:

4. Yes it's wisdom so you aren't cheated by the person selling the machine that host the software. He just might be selling you a fake
And I just explained how it can be done indirectly. You don't need to see the software physically to know it's there but by interacting with it through usage .

The Question was:
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
How would you determine its physical quantification? What Physical properties will suffice: is it Mass, Dimension, Energy or Time ?

It is NOT wisdom to insist of physical quantification of a software before we conclude that an AI machine is run by a software. The reason is because even though a software existence is real within a machine, it cannot be physically proved.

triplechoice:

5. I don't need to repeat myself. I have answered it up there. If you know how tests are carried to determine if someone is infected with something then you won't be asking all these kindergarten questions.
Now that I answered your questions, would you be humble enough to respond in kind by answering it correctly for me if you think I didn't answer them correctly?
The above is actually meant for you,not me. FYI, I'm not an atheist. I don't need to be one to question you. Do I?

The Question was:
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?
There is no known method of determining the presence of a software within either the CPU or RAM of HDD of a machine without the use of other softwares. We use tools such as the Disassembler to view the Hex codes within a storage or processing register of the machine

TenQ:


Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?[/i]
There is no known method of determining the presence of a software within either the CPU or RAM of HDD of a machine without the use of other softwares. We use tools such as the Disassembler to view the Hex codes within a storage or processing register of the machine

I disagree with you completely
You can't be arguing with a bushman about rocket science when you discern that he has not even seen an aeroplane before

You should have been able to discern that not everyone understands the science of computers and softwares or it was not part of the curriculum when they were in school .

😂

Aemmyjah:


I disagree with you completely
You can't be arguing with a bushman about rocket science when you discern that he has not even seen an aeroplane before

You should have been able to discern that not everyone understands the science of computers and softwares or it was not part of the curriculum when they were in school .

😂

I want to learn:
Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?
How will you quantify the software?

LordReed:


Again you are the dishonest coward who doesn't want his belief critiqued that's why you dishonestly answered. It should be clear to any one observing that you and the others like you are nothing but dishonest and stupid imbeciles.

Boo hoo!: cry me a tear!
From one who escapes answering Questions!

TenQ:

True!

Correct! We actually Load in into the memory of the machine and it is real because it does exactly as it was designed to function.

The Question was:
3. Can the software within a machine be "measured" or "quantified" by any physical means?

It is IMPOSSIBLE to measure or Quantify the Software WITHIN a Machine by ANY Physical means.
What Physical thing would you want to measure as the software characteristics: its Mass, Dimension, Energy or Time ?



The Question was:
4. Is it wisdom to insist on a physical quantification of a software within a machine to conclude that it exist?
How would you determine its physical quantification? What Physical properties will suffice: is it Mass, Dimension, Energy or Time ?

It is NOT wisdom to insist of physical quantification of a software before we conclude that an AI machine is run by a software. The reason is because even though a software existence is real within a machine, it cannot be physically proved.


The Question was:
5. Tell me, how can one prove the existence of a software WITHIN an AI machine's CPU or MEMORY without the use of another software?
There is no known method of determining the presence of a software within either the CPU or RAM of HDD of a machine without the use of other softwares. We use tools such as the Disassembler to view the Hex codes within a storage or processing register of the machine

Apart from tools,there are alternatives to knowing something. Ask a doctor to know that

See, a software is not the same as your God. Stop fooling yourself

TenQ:

Boo hoo!: cry me a tear!
From one who escapes answering Questions!

LoLz. Yes you slowpoke cry me a dishonest river as you are wont to do. Bwahahahahahahaha!

triplechoice:


Apart from tools,there are alternatives to knowing something. Ask a doctor to know that

See, a software is not the same as your God. Stop fooling yourself

I didn't know you were this dumb: tell me just one place I have mentioned the word God on this thread!

LordReed:


LoLz. Yes you slowpoke cry me a dishonest river as you are wont to do. Bwahahahahahahaha!

They throw tantrums when they can't answer simple questions like an Autistic kindergarten pupil

KnownUnknown:


Lol, what an ignorant son of bitch!!

The guy got you and the only thing you can say is to insult him?
You guys think you are smart and you ate the most senseless humans on earth.