sukkot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPCwHMyToBQ

Lunatic, when was World War III supposed to begin?

shymexx:
Stop stalking me everywhere!

You're an airhead!

Regardless of what buzugee says, his knowledge of history is like Yao Ming compared to ya Gary Colemen ar.se.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqFa-stYnto

sukkot:
like i said my bros, a man once said give me control of a nations money and i care not who runs the nation. the same elites control the moneys of all these countries including russia and china. all that smoke and mirror and false flag operations and pretending to beef each other is a song and a dance for the public. they are all in bed together. notice how america is moving all its military hardware to russia and china ? under the pretext of the ukraine situation and north korea situation ? all smokes and mirrors. thats there new military wing. america has been abandoned and sold to china. you are about to see this all unfold. i used to think like you too. i thought they were actually angry at each other and were beefing. then i got wise to all their staged events and false flags. brah ? we are living in a crazy matrix. it will all unfold and unravel

Big bredrin, man ah respect yuh POV, buh ah nuh think dem rasclart blue bloods afi tek Putin fi ah puss.yhole. Yuh noe dem bludclart afi waan thief dem oil/gas inna Russia, and Putin ah bad man fi see everything dem ah do. Deya.

Anyway, the only way what you said can be plausible is if Mikhail Khodorkovsky, or one of the Russian oligarchs in the West can dispose Putin during the next election. I heard Khodorkovsky has already declared his intentions. And with the Yukos link with the Rothschild, he'll be a perfect fit for whatever you said to even be a little bit plausible. Then you have the old guards from the Soviet era who'll never even allow that - and they're the ones in-charge of the Russian military - like Sergey Shoygu and other communist hardliners. If the West ever had a chance in Russia, it was during Yeltsin reign. And the fact that they couldn't do anything other than auction off all its assets, and made it weak, says it all.

Then China is another different kettle of fish entirely. They're ingrained in their history, and even a Chinese baby understands the dark history of China with the West. They're taught from an early age - especially the massacres and the opium holocaust. So, I don't see it ever aligning that way.

Yes, we need a new world order. But personally, based on my scholarship, it looks more like a bipolar/multi-polar world - and not your postulation. But I respect ya opinion though.

Missy89

You can't keep running forever.

Bring ya ar.se in here before I call the sheriff.

Support the movement go view make ur comments on gossips,sport,fashion etc tnx chizuuifejika..com God bless

shymexx:
Missy89

You can't keep running forever.

Bring ya ar.se in here before I call the sheriff.

Running? why?

You want me to comment on the thread? and talk about China's domination ?

is that it?. i wanted to then i realized that american academics cant be trusted

Missy89:


Running? why?

You want me to comment on the thread? and talk about China's domination ?

is that it?. i wanted to then i realized that american academics cant be trusted

You're too emotional.

Still talking about three weeks ago, no? Move on and drop some knowledge without being overly partial. Just make sure you're objective as possible. And I hope you will be after I showed you the light.

Anyway, I'm still awake for about 30 mins...need to watch the first half of the Redskins vs. Cowboys game before I hit the sheets.

Might check back before I sleep off.

InvertedHammer:

I believe you are not in kindergarten.

I cannot spell everything out for you.

You keep pretending that you don't get the point by playing with lexical semantics...I have no time for unbridled logomachy.

Next thing may be you asking me to un.dress a lady to show you what a clitor1s looks like

Oh puuuuleeeezzz!

Spare me the dramatics, okay? I don't do emotional men. I asked you based on your wild, generalist assumptions if every woman at the marketplace ties a two-piece wrapper, a headtie and bathroom slippers when out shopping?

You either respond maturely or kindly stop quoting me. I can do without silly, snide remarks, thank you very much Mr!

5minsmadness:


It looks like someone finally lost his patience

C'mon sharrap there jor! Just stick to the sidelines and be a good boy, okay?

shymexx:


Lmao...double standard loool.

People should be allowed to dress in whatever they are comfortable in.

Agreed.

Afterall, she wasn't even stark n aked - but you'd think she was, going by the very prudish comments on this thread.

EnlightenedSoul:


Correct me if I'm wrong. Having not been on a Nation's Cup team yourself only makes you what you've already admitted to being; a giggling incompetent observer.

But hey, I'm always open to a good success story and the inspiration that comes with, so I'll tell you what? Perhaps football wasn't your forté. Why not take the floor and regale me, the mere birth instrument/sex tool, with the astounding accomplishments you've achieved courtesy of your penis_. Who knows, I may just be impressed.

Now, don't you disappoint. Do 'Dick Masterson' proud!

Women can be so silly that they seek for blackmail in place of objectivity. If your little emotion ravaged head cannot grasp what I wrote, I can explain cos that's what the deformed males want.
According to my post which you couldn't reply accordingly, I meant that at 'right circumstancesg', everyone can be successful, but it takes A(not every) man(women are also present, they have achievements too, but that of the man covers it and makes it look dormant.) to make something astounding.
As per female football, I was only telling you the quality of what we accept from this bìtch called women. As per my achievements, I disvirgìned 13 bìtches and still married a virgin, I love pink pùssy and succulent brèäst!
All men developed from women, with the hope of becoming a man, those that couldn't make it developed faster(things of low quality easily reach perfection) and were naturally deformed by nature, for the purpose of giving birth to the superior and inferior.

InvertedHammer:

A response to every statement is "explain". Explain what? Provocative dressing?
Jesus Christ of Nazareth!!!
I did lose my patience on that one[/color] [/b].
/

Why can't you explain it? It is a very valid question. What is provocative dressing? Please tell us because I want to know too! A woman is not free to come out of the house without judgement from left and right.
Is lipstick provocative? Is a skirt provocative? what length? toe length skirt? ankle length skirt? knee length skirt? Should a woman wear a blouse that lets you know that she owns a pair of breast? or should she throw on a sack to cover up the fact that she has a pair of buttocks and breasts? Her hair is also provocative isn't it. She should cover it up? How about eyeshadow? Or high heels? those are too provocative? or maybe what about trousers? can she wear it? In fact, women should hide all evidence of her femininity and womanhood because it is shameful and provocative. Abeg tell us.
Abi the west only corrodes women's morality? what effect does it have on men? you are a man after all. give us your insight on men's morality and the west's corroding effect on it. since you prefer to focus so much on women's dressing and morality. shior.

Afghanistan in 2014 (under taliban control) vs 1970s (westernized)
[img]http://www.trbimg.com/img-50bff38f/turbine/la-afp-getty-514637383.jpg-20121205/600[/img]
[img]http://www.amnesty.org.uk/webfm_send/135[/img]

http://www.amnesty.org.uk/womens-rights-afghanistan-history#.VE8SYcnIrNs

shymexx:


You're too emotional.

Still talking about three weeks ago, no? Move on and drop some knowledge without being overly partial. Just make sure you're objective as possible. And I hope you will be after I showed you the light.

Anyway, I'm still awake for about 30 mins...need to watch the first half of the Redskins vs. Cowboys game before I hit the sheets.

Might check back before I sleep off.

Tbh. I dont get what you guys are really talking about. Looks like i have to read the whole thread

sukkot:
i need a brain transplant after reading one too many of your posts. i have lost many brain cells

You need a brain transplant to be entitled to be called a primate in the first place.

EfemenaXY:

C'mon sharrap there jor! Just stick to the sidelines and be a good boy, okay?

Oh I intend to my dear. I only chip in when its absolutely necessary

5minsmadness:


Oh I intend to my dear. I only chip in when its absolutely necessary

Good boy.

As long as you remember to keep it zipped. And I mean this in every sense of that word.

And for those clamouring for 'freedom of dressing' please feel free to take a cue from these ladies exhibiting their 'freedom'.

Really I don't know why I was complaining in the first place, its a free world, afterall

EfemenaXY:


Good boy.

As long as you remember to keep it zipped. And I mean this in every sense of that word.

There you go again
Two quotes haven't gone by and you are already referring to my crotch
Efemenaaaaaa
Willy whipping v0yeur! I hail ma!

red101:

Why can't you explain it? It is a very valid question. What is provocative dressing? Please tell us because I want to know too! A woman is not free to come out of the house without judgement from left and right.
Is lipstick provocative? Is a skirt provocative? what length? toe length skirt? ankle length skirt? knee length skirt? Should a woman wear a blouse that lets you know that she owns a pair of breast? or should she throw on a sack to cover up the fact that she has a pair of buttocks and breasts? Her hair is also provocative isn't it. She should cover it up? How about eyeshadow? Or high heels? those are too provocative? or maybe what about trousers? can she wear it? In fact, women should hide all evidence of her femininity and womanhood because it is shameful and provocative. Abeg tell us.
Abi the west only corrodes women's morality? what effect does it have on men? you are a man after all. give us your insight on men's morality and the west's corroding effect on it. since you prefer to focus so much on women's dressing and morality. shior.
Afghanistan in 2014 (under taliban control) vs 1970s (westernized)
[img]http://www.trbimg.com/img-50bff38f/turbine/la-afp-getty-514637383.jpg-20121205/600[/img]
[img]http://www.amnesty.org.uk/webfm_send/135[/img]
http://www.amnesty.org.uk/womens-rights-afghanistan-history#.VE8SYcnIrNs

Holy smokes!

Are those women or masquerades? And yet people complain about this mode of dressing referred to as being draped in an oversized tent?

Fückïng shït!

I bet applying InvertedHammer's theories of the path of least resistance and the higher probability of something happening must work a treat because despite the clothing, I still see exposed hands and feet meaning they would be totally at fault here if they get räpêd or assaulted. They are still "provocatively" dressed. Maybe wearing heavy duty safety boots and hand gloves might work?

And for guys like our complaining @op (5minsMadness), they aren't decently dressed because it's possible to discern the shapes of their heads.

5minsmadness:


There you go again
Two quotes haven't gone by and you are already referring to my crotch
Efemenaaaaaa
Willy whipping v0yeur! I hail ma!

Durrttyy man.

Ever heard the expression "to keep one's mouth zipped"? As per to make NO comments?

sukkot:
hey my dude Rilwayne001 i have been on the plantation slaving for mama charlie and mama charlie is queen elizabeth. charles mum. good to see you around bro

Okay sir,

Trust all is fine with you

EfemenaXY:


Durrttyy man.

Ever heard the expression "to keep one's mouth zipped"? As per to make NO comments?

But we BOTH know that's not what you meant now don't we?

As long as you remember to keep it zipped. And I mean this in every sense of that word

EfemenaXY:


Holy smokes!

Are those women or masquerades? And yet people complain about this mode of dressing referred to as being draped in an oversized tent?

Fückïng shït!

I bet applying InvertedHammer's theories of the path of least resistance and the higher probability of something happening must work a treat because despite the clothing, I still see exposed hands and feet meaning they would be totally at fault here if they get räpêd or assaulted. They are still "provocatively" dressed. Maybe wearing heavy duty safety boots and hand gloves might work?

And for guys like our complaining @op (5minsMadness), they aren't decently dressed because it's possible to discern the shapes of their heads.

I will continue with the debate when you concentrate on thread. General mode of dressing for women is topic for another day. Today is about Nigeria, not Afghanistan nor Middle East.

Heck. Why don't you throw Australia and China into the mix?

Simple issue about western influence on Nigeria women's dressing....you continue to railroad every topic about women into it.

Perhaps you are being influenced by the erroneous assertion that men cannot win in any argument with women especially considering the fact that women tend to veer of topic just to irritate the opponent into submission. I know that's exactly what you are doing--taking a blind stab at anything just for the heck of it just to pat yourself on the back.

\

5minsmadness:


But we BOTH know that's not what you meant now don't we?

No, I don't know.

But feel free to try and claw your way back / save face.

EfemenaXY:
C'mon sharrap there jor! Just stick to the sidelines and be a good boy, okay?

EfemenaXY:

Good boy.
As long as you remember to keep it zipped. And I mean this in every sense of that word.

Not only do you read dirty meanings to innocent situations (i.e: the lady in sportswear minding her own business at the bus stop), you also deliberately read sêxüäl innuendo into what isn't?

Even so early in the morning?

Duurrttyy mind.

Mtcheew!

EfemenaXY:


No, I don't know.

But feel free to try and claw your way back / save face.





Not only do you read dirty meanings to innocent situations (i.e: the lady in sportswear minding her own business at the bus stop), you also deliberately read sêxüäl innuendo into what isn't?

Even so early in the morning?

Duurrttyy mind.

Mtcheew!

\

You know that it is not only men that should zip it.

In my neck of woods, there is a popular saying that a particular area of women anatomy deserves a zip but the only problem is that there is no tailor competent enough to carry out the task.

/

InvertedHammer:

I will continue with the debate when you concentrate on thread. General mode of dressing for women is topic for another day. Today is about Nigeria, not Afghanistan nor Middle East.
Heck. Why don't you throw Australia and China into the mix?
Simple issue about western influence on Nigeria women's dressing....you continue to railroad every topic about women into it.
Perhaps you are being influenced by the erroneous assertion that men cannot win in any argument with women especially considering the fact that women tend to veer of topic just to irritate the opponent into submission. I know that's exactly what you are doing--taking a blind stab at anything just for the heck of it just to pat yourself on the back.
\

You think this is about "winning"?

On mobile now but don't worry. I'll be back to tear down your argument and shred you to pieces.

InvertedHammer:


\

You know that it is not only men that should zip it.

In my neck of woods, there is a popular saying that a particular area of women anatomy deserves a zip but the only problem is that there is no tailor competent enough to carry out the task.

/

The discussion was between you and I. He shouldn't have brought his snout in, especially as he had nothing of relevance to contribute.

I've learnt zilch from his post.

Good Morning sha!

EfemenaXY:


You think this is about "winning"?

On mobile now but don't worry. I'll be back to tear down your argument and shred you to pieces.

/
I am on mobile too. I already know what you will say.

Hint: Every keystroke you type will only fulfill the stereotype. Let me guess....you will give examples of women in some country, throw in a few insults and voila! Get some likes. And in all, nothing about Nigeria nor the topic of discussion will be mentioned.

Bite me!!!

\

EfemenaXY:


The discussion was between you and I. He shouldn't have brought his snout in, especially as he had nothing of relevance to contribute.

I've learnt zilch from his post.

Good Morning sha!

/

I believe it is an open forum....anyone can share his/her opinion.



\

Misogynist2014:
Women can be so silly that they seek for blackmail in place of objectivity. If your little emotion ravaged head cannot grasp what I wrote, I can explain cos that's what the deformed males want.
According to my post which you couldn't reply accordingly, I meant that at 'right circumstancesg', everyone can be successful, but it takes A(not every) man(women are also present, they have achievements too, but that of the man covers it and makes it look dormant.) to make something astounding.
As per female football, I was only telling you the quality of what we accept from this bìtch called women. As per my achievements, I disvirgìned 13 bìtches and still married a virgin, I love pink pùssy and succulent brèäst!
[s]All men developed from women, with the hope of becoming a man, those that couldn't make it developed faster(things of low quality easily reach perfection) and were naturally deformed by nature, for the purpose of giving birth to the superior and inferior. [/s]

When, and with what did I blackmail you? And lolll @ "little emotion ravaged head".

I must say, you seem hopelessly confused. On one hand, you proclaim that anyone can achieve success under the right circumstances, and yet in that same breath you extrapolate the undeniable intellectual contributions of men, and diminish that of women w/o giving credence to that same self-indicated significance of circumstance. The resultant asinine implication that women's exclusion from education and intellectual circles until very recently, not to mention their inability to own property or exert will over their own lives, had no effect on their inclusion in academic accomplishment is so ludicrous, I can't take your comment seriously.

On football, that you were speaking of the 'quality we expect' as opposed to *whatever else*, does nothing to remove you from your perch as the giggling incompetent observer that you are.

On your "achievements", you disappoint. I don't know how asking about your achievements translated into a boast sesh on how many women you've "disvirgined" (egad, the cringe-worthiness of this word alone is inexplicable), or that you've married a virgin (yayyyy). I must say I was surprised to learn about that last bit there. Married, you say?? O.o

The crossed out portion makes no 'effin sense. I can only suggest that you reread it, and come up with something a bit more coherent for consideration.

EnlightenedSoul:


When, and with what did I blackmail you? And lolll @ "little emotion ravaged head".

I must say, you seem hopelessly confused. On one hand, you proclaim that anyone can achieve success under the right circumstances, and yet in that same breath you extrapolate the undeniable intellectual contributions of men, and diminish that of women w/o giving credence to that same self-indicated significance of circumstance. The resultant asinine implication that women's exclusion from education and intellectual circles until very recently, not to mention their inability to own property or exert will over their own lives, had no effect on their inclusion in academic accomplishment is so ludicrous, I can't take your comment seriously.

On football, that you were speaking of the 'quality we expect' as opposed to *whatever else*, does nothing to remove you from your perch as the giggling incompetent observer that you are.

On your "achievements", you disappoint. I don't know how asking about your achievements translated into a boast sesh on how many women you've "disvirgined" (egad, the cringe-worthiness of this word alone is inexplicable), or that you've married a virgin (yayyyy). I must say I was surprised to learn about that last bit there. Married, you say? Danggg O.o

The crossed out portion makes no 'effin sense. I can only suggest that you reread it, and come up with something a bit more coherent for consideration.

When I said you are emotional, you debunked it, yet read all what you've written, isn't it emotional, my signature says all about me, but your tiny head refuse to reason. People like me and my very good foe carefreewannabe, most times try to mix fiction, lies with reality just for us to entertain ourselves. From the beginning of our chat, you have always gone personal, but I've always avoided u cos u are a typical woman, emotion over objectivity.
You can't deny that you enjoy chatting with me, can you? Its just that your little head has stemed you from reasoning like a man.

EnlightenedSoul:


When, and with what did I blackmail you? And lolll @ "little emotion ravaged head".

I must say, you seem hopelessly confused. On one hand, you proclaim that anyone can achieve success under the right circumstances, and yet in that same breath you extrapolate the undeniable intellectual contributions of men, and diminish that of women w/o giving credence to that same self-indicated significance of circumstance. The resultant asinine implication that women's exclusion from education and intellectual circles until very recently, not to mention their inability to own property or exert will over their own lives, had no effect on their inclusion in academic accomplishment is so ludicrous, I can't take your comment seriously.

On football, that you were speaking of the 'quality we expect' as opposed to *whatever else*, does nothing to remove you from your perch as the giggling incompetent observer that you are.

On your "achievements", you disappoint. I don't know how asking about your achievements translated into a boast sesh on how many women you've "disvirgined" (egad, the cringe-worthiness of this word alone is inexplicable), or that you've married a virgin (yayyyy). I must say I was surprised to learn about that last bit there. Married, you say?? O.o

The crossed out portion makes no 'effin sense. I can only suggest that you reread it, and come up with something a bit more coherent for consideration.

Misogynist is a troll. I mean, look at his name. My eyes just skip over his posts.