₦airaland Forum

help3852:
Could it be possible that op is not the father of the child, and she's scared the truth might be revealed in future, Following the tale, she came in at night requested to be made love to insisted no condom, could it be possible… she did it elsewhere noticed she missed her period then ran to you to get cover up.

If you can know how many weeks old is the pregnancy then you will know if you are the father of the baby.

#Just thinking

Missmossy:
Something seems sinister here, its obvious she is definitely hiding something.

MrsChima:
Why would you have unprotected sex with someone that is not your wife and then come on this thread crying about the girl aborting your deposits

It doesn't matter of the father is against the union because you have bigger fish to fry!

JohnPortar:
Few weeks ago, we came to my apartment around 9pm, she said 'she was hot and needed to be loved'. To cut the long story short, we made out that night without protection ( she insisted, claiming if I love her, I should trust her enough). She called me few days ago that she missed her period and test confirmed that's she's pregnant

Feraz:
Madam, did you miss this part?

godsamist:
This kind generation don tire me,read their responses,somebody in relationship for a solid 5yrs?
Must relationship or courtship takes this long without you taking a bold step as a respossible man?
Most of you makes heaven weep!
May God really rescue this generation!

Jaypea98:
Its a done deal she already scheduled an appointment for today.
That's by the way though i hopeo ours is still intact. pls don't disappoint me

MizTyna:

Wisconsin Abortion Ban Would Allow Father To Sue For Emotional Distress


Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) said this week that he would sign a ban on abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy that does not contain exceptions for rape and incest victims, if the bill reaches his desk. The measure also contains a less-discussed provision that would allow the father to sue the doctor for "emotional and psychological distress" if he disagrees with the abortion, regardless of his relationship with the woman having the procedure.

Wisconsin Assembly Bill 237 would ban abortions after 20 weeks "postfertilization," which doctors would measure as 22 weeks of pregnancy since pregnancies are usually measured from the woman's last menstrual period. If the bill becomes law, doctors who perform an abortion after this time could be charged with a felony and fined up to $10,000, or face up to three and a half years in prison.

In addition to those penalties, the bill would allow the father to sue the doctor for damages, "including damages for personal injury and emotional and psychological distress," if the doctor performs or attempts to perform an abortion after the 20-week limit. The man does not need to be married to the woman or even in a relationship with her to sue her doctor, as long as the pregnancy is not a result of sexual assault or incest. The bill also says the woman can sue.

Walker and the co-authors of the bill, state Rep. Jesse Kremer (R) and Senate President Mary Lazich (R), did not respond to requests for comment. The Wisconsin House and Senate are expected to vote on the bill next week.

According to the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports reproductive rights, 6 of the 11 states that currently ban abortion at 20 weeks postfertilization -- Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Kansas, Nebraska and Oklahoma -- have similar language tucked into their respective laws that allow the parents to sue a doctor who performs an abortion after that point. In Kansas, the provision applies to the father only if he is married to the woman who had the abortion.

So far, the 20-week ban is not standing up well in court. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down Idaho's law last week, ruling it "unconstitutional because it categorically bans some abortions before viability." The Supreme Court decided in Roe v. Wade in 1973 that states cannot ban abortions before the fetus would be viable outside the womb, which is estimated to occur between 22 and 24 weeks of pregnancy.

Republican supporters of the bill argue that abortions should be banned after 20 weeks because fetuses can feel pain at that point -- a theory that has been refuted by the mainstream medical community.

"Whether you're pro-life or not, that's a good time to say that shouldn't be legal after a time when an unborn child can literally feel pain," Walker told reporters this week.

Opponents of the bill point out that less than 1 percent of abortions occur after 20 weeks, and the women who seek them have often discovered severe medical problems with the fetus that were not clear in earlier tests. Marcy Stech, a spokeswoman for the progressive women's PAC EMILY's List, said the Wisconsin bill is "extreme, outrageous and profoundly wrong."

"A woman’s right to choose is hers and hers alone," Stech said. "Scott Walker is the last person on earth who should be telling women how to make their deeply personal decisions."

dimarket:
She is hiding something

ladycomfort:
Sorry to divert but why is it that guys don't like marrying ladies that have aborted for them?

tpiar:
any such guy never intended to marry the lady in the first place imo.

misspicy:
kilo mu yin? thread of since April you guys are commenting in december

even if she kept the pregnancy she for don born by now

MissSlimbody:
This matter tie wrapper o

JohnPortar:
Hello NL's, I met this girl about 5yrs ago and we soon started dating, I have been introduced to her parents and she to mine. Though I have a feeling the girl's father is against our union.
.
.
Few weeks ago, we came to my apartment around 9pm, she said 'she was hot and needed to be loved'. To cut the long story short, we made out that night without protection ( she insisted, claiming if I love her, I should trust her enough). She called me few days ago that she missed her period and test confirmed that's she's pregnant.
.
.
I have a job that pays well, she's almost through with her youth service. We can get married next Saturday if she wants it but the problem is that she doesn't want to keep the baby claiming she's not ready to have a child and wants to face her career.
.
.
I don't know what to do/how to convince her to keep the baby. She's scheduled for the abortion tomorrow morning and I won't be able to forgive her if she goes ahead with it.
.
.
Guys, I need quick response abeg, how can I let her keep the baby? I called her mum to report her but as it turned out, the mum is in support of her daughter's decision.

ladycomfort:
Sorry to divert but why is it that guys don't like marrying ladies that have aborted for them?