Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried - Politics (5) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried (34300 Views)
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by Cekpo34(m): 5:41pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
NgeneUkwenu:Am sure the electoral act will be further amended to accommodate Card Reader! Nice observation sha! |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by zicoraads: 6:02pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
Lalasticlala...must every trash be on the Home Page? ![]() |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by hush15: 6:05pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
MaziOmenuko: |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by BeauHomme: 6:05pm On Jan 31, 2016*. Modified: 7:09pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
Ngene, pls why are you doing this? Anyone who followed the Agbaje(PDP) vs Ambode(APC) case would have known that APC's insistence on card reader in the Rivers election case had suffered a big blow through APC's victory at the Lagos tribunal. Wike's(Rivers,PDP) prayer as regards card reader was the same as Ambode's(Lagos,APC). If supreme court did not reverse the Appeal court ruling in favour of Ambode, why would you expect them to contradict their stance with the Rivers case? They can only follow precedence. Lagos' Agbaje vs Ambode case, which Ambode(APC) won, was the case that killed the justification for card reader(and not the Wike vs Peterside case as you intend to establish). In Wike vs Peterside, supreme court wouldn't have contradicted their earlier stance on a related matter. Mrs Ngene, you know all these, don't you? Speak it as it is, madam. You have your political views which I respect, but by adulterating facts just to push such views down our throats, I think you're going too far Ma. NgeneUkwenu: |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by smartleo(m): 6:06pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
vayne:This writer above me seems not to understand the points of the OP.please read the post without a politically and tribalism frame mindset.THIS POST IS ONE OF THE BEST POST I HAVE EVER READ ON NL. |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by smartleo(m): 6:07pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
vayne:This writer above me seems not to understand the points of the OP.please read the post without a politically and tribalism frame mindset.THIS POST IS ONE OF THE BEST POST I HAVE EVER READ ON NL. |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by zicoraads: 6:08pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
But sincerely speaking, I am starting to get concerned about Omenka's well being ![]() Cc:Firefire ![]() |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by zicoraads: 6:09pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
smartleo:Best post you say? Surely, you meant it as an irony ![]() |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by Firefire(m): 6:14pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
zicoraads:I fear for his whereabout also, please tag me once you finds him. I hope he is well. ![]() At least we have heard from Mr. Ngenekwenu. |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by Godiloveu(f): 6:18pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
vayne:Uncle, it is a give and take, APC have given R/state to PDP, to get A-Ibom state. Shikena! |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by mrDennis(m): 7:05pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
I will like to ask all of us then serving corpers who presided over elections using card reader. Because the ignorant majority here don't even know the number of lives saved by the Use of card readers. That thing is THE BEST THING EVER done , it's not by force it reads ur thumbprint ., it's main duty is to ensure accredited voters no pass ballots , I'm ashamed of my then fellow corpers who allowed themselves be swayby money especially in akwa ibom where total votes were over 100% higher than accredited voters. Later these same people will be complaining naija is hard cos the big 10-20k they got has finished and their eyes are opened . The card reader works , it reads the card. Confirms it a original and that his polling unit. If finger print doesn't work. U look at the voters face , look at the voters card and if they are the same let him vote #simple . Politicians are not our problem... Our lack of foresight is the problem . If someone offers me 10k to rig for him I have to ask myself how such a person plans to recoup his investment? |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by frankyychiji: 7:25pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
NgeneUkwenu:Give us the source of that bullshit you posted up there coz you have noodles for brains and couldn't compose that. |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by bashydemy(m): 8:14pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
vayne:The way you reason baffle me i swear, You call wike slayer of APC? now who is the slayer of PDP? Ameachi, Tinubu Buhari etc, The render PDP to be a regional party and winning more states.... |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by baralatie(m): 8:23pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
BeauHomme: |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by alexlee50: 8:33pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
Nellybii:it was easy, that election was conducted by the state independent electrocal commission.there was virtually no election in any of the local governments in rivers state.let me tell you a little about the south south people. To them Jonathan was their person and they shared that sentiments. Watch what will happen in the state assembly and senatoral election. It's PDP all the way |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by smartleo(m): 8:35pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
zicoraads:Best in its original form,although perspective differs |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by nwadiuko1(m): 8:45pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
NgeneUkwenu:if the inec head is wise he or she would push for it to be included in the next constitutional amendment before the next election |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by payosehtor(m): 8:53pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
bloodkiIler:the op was only expressing her fears for the precedent set by that judgment. the old pdp you're braging about her ability to resist has no monopoly of violence or resistance.but is that best for us |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by nwadiuko1(m): 8:55pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
asha80:please explain |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by payosehtor(m): 9:34pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
MaziOmenuko: MaziOmenuko: MaziOmenuko:a constitutional loophole discovered by a corruption prone party (pdp) just watch out how those 'stealing is not corruption' appostles will resist any attempt 2 constitutionalis de card readers |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by chrisxxx(m): 9:38pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
Supreme Court in their wisdom knew the real sponsors of the violence prior, during and after the election. The person has this antecedent of sponsoring violence. |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by fof1: 9:53pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
NgeneUkwenu: |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by charmingeyes(m): 10:29pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
MaziOmenuko:To me, the situation was worsened by the inability of the card readers to perform. If INEC uses functional card readers, it will not unnecessarily become ground for debate concerning election authenticity. |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by osusuallstars: 11:07pm On Jan 31, 2016 |
was card reader used in the north were the dullard won overwhelmingly. remember pictures of children queuing to vote. |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by godwinkessi: 1:50am On Feb 01, 2016 |
NgeneUkwenu:So opposition should be worried cos it favoured them? This Yoruba boy is really mad. **** |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by Nobody: 2:44am On Feb 01, 2016 |
vayne:**** how on earth will.a normal person be happy that PDP, that ruled Nigeria for 16 yes, with nothing to show for it can still win elections and litigations? we are black fools in Nigeria...how else will a man vote for a party that ruined he's future and destryoyrd his nation? I pity our future... return PDP to power and subject yourselves to eternal ddamnation...if I were d APC, I'd rig every election and payback the PDP as well as save d people from this bunch of shameless thieves who are nof being punished |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by asha80(m): 8:52am On Feb 01, 2016 |
nwadiuko1:it is self explanatory unless you want to pretend |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by nwadiuko1(m): 9:32am On Feb 01, 2016 |
asha80:sorry I was a little sleepy when I read it. . now I understand.....thanks |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by Babacele: 9:32am On Feb 01, 2016 |
NgeneUkwenu:hmmmmmm.....but courts ain't no father Xmas. I blame our lawyers who played into the hands of Olanipekun. He lull them into false victory n allowed him dictate the theme of the case. it is a bitter lesson. I m waiting for their reasons though. |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by Babacele: 9:35am On Feb 01, 2016 |
chrisxxx:and who is the person? abi u d fear or lie ni? |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by chrisxxx(m): 10:02am On Feb 01, 2016 |
Babacele:Bros I follow Fela pattern. You r free to complete it. The person sponsored violence when Omehia was the governor. |
| Re: Supreme Court Ruling: Wike Vs Peterside: Why The Opposition Should Be Worried by Babacele: 10:20am On Feb 01, 2016 |
chrisxxx:No dey spread lies just tell us how, when ,n who. real felasophers name names n call spade by its name. abi U no know Fela? Go ask . We Felasophers no dey fear n no dey lie. |
Governor Wike Vs Governor Ambode - See Gobe (photos) • Rivers: Updates At The Supreme Court Wike Vs Dakuku • Live Updates: Rivers State Gov. Election Petition Verdict: Wike Vs Peterside • 2 • 3 • 4
Boko Haram 'hoists Flag In Villages' - BBC • Wike: "I Will Release Video Of Police Commissioner Plotting To Rig Elections" • Sallah; Buruji Kashamu Hosts Large Crowd Of Constituents In His Mansion. Photos




