₦airaland Forum

It is wrong.

However, if your heart wants to, fine.

Don't mention me or quote this comment

vickieGold:
Is it wrong for a girl to give héros boyfriend money and buys Phone for him?
I have been asking myself this question cos i do that a lot

Vinshu:
It is wrong.

However, if your heart wants to, fine.

ronald4lif:
Is it also wrong to give a girlfriend money?

ethene:
Pls can I be ur boyfriend?

Vinshu:
No. A man is supposed to take care of his woman. That's the order of nature. Like I said, if woman wants to do all that for her man, it's her choice. But ideally, it's a man's job.

Vinshu:
It is wrong.

However, if your heart wants to, fine.

Vinshu:
No. A man is supposed to take care of his woman. That's the order of nature. Like I said, if woman wants to do all that for her man, it's her choice. But ideally, it's a man's job.

darkenedrebel:
This has not a modicum of sense in it. He is only a boyfriend and she is merely a girlfriend. They are not even courting or planning to get married.

Besides, who mandated that males do not deserve to be loved or aren't meritorious of entreaties in a relationship?. Is there any injunction, written or unwritten that states that relationships are a one-way traffic? (i.e) only the male is expected to give and should not expect to receive.
You don't sound intelligent at all.

Drefan2:
Being a two-faced has never helped anyone.

ronald4lif:
In an egalitarian climate of which you pride yourself as an advocate of that course, financial responsibility isn't balked to one gender. It's a 50/50 responsibility and to employ nature as a factor to abdicate one's individual's financial responsibility is laughable.

Same nature you pseudo feminists employ when it suites you has it that women are 'naturally' astute in culinary duties, chores and nursing of babies but feminist has rubbished that orthodox tradition and aim to enforce that men should cook, perform house chores and change diapers while also feeding babies. Equality without equal responsibility is no equality.

Btw, what study has established that it's natural for a man to take care of a woman's financial needs? Please highlight it let's scrutinise them.

Vinshu:
You are the one who doesn't sound intelligent. Care is different from love. And my "care" in this context is related to the things the op listed (giving money and buying phones)

Vinshu:
I did not write anything about love Open your eyes, calm down, use your brain and read. No one will pay you for commenting. Stop rushing to comment without sense

Vinshu:
When you get married do not take care of your wife or family. Wait for her to do it for you. Nonsense

Vinshu:
And @embolden

When you get married you'd understand. Even the bible made it clear that a man who cannot take care of his family is worse than an Infidel. Search the verse out. That answers your question. Like I said, it's natural order.

However, everyone is free to make their own choices. A woman is free to do the job of her man while man is free to not do anything. Live and let live but we should deny the natural order of things.

ronald4lif:
I'd expected you to rise above pettiness and come up with a robust averment to affirm your point and not this drivel. Only unsound minds and those who lack the mental shrewdness to engage in intellectual jostling cite the bible or any sectarianism doctrine as a basis for any argument.

Natural order, job of her man bla bla bla. You have not been able to provide a logical a priori antithesis nor table these 'jobs' of a man. You've only succeeded in exposing yourself as a pseudo feminist who only champion the cause when it's convenience to them.

Here you are discouraging women taking up financial resoonsibility and offering gifts to their man but shamelessly encouraging receiving gifts whilst tacitly fueling the culture of women sponging on a man. Hypocrite.

Not that I'm surprised though, online rodents of your ilks feminism clatter has always been a farce to sound minds.

kaycodes:
Young lady it's called a relationship for a reason.

If it's wrong for the lady to take care of her man, then you have a warped sense of what love and care means.

Don't deceive yourself and other gullible teens here, a relationship is not a business opportunity, both partners have an equal duty to care for each other in whatever capacity they feel comfortable with.

What I don't encourage or never will is gold digging irrespective of which gender is doing the digging. Anyways we all know which gender prefers digging to working for it in Nigeria, pun intended.

Vinshu:
Dude, you continue to make no sense thinking you are. Do You know why I enjoy replying you? Its because you are going to Asia thinking you are going to America.

On a good day I'd just ignore you and wouldn't even read your epistle and save my eyes the stress. But I enjoy it.

You have been blabbing about feminism. But let's see somethings:

- All my threads I have created recently doesn't in anyway depict feminism or encourage it.
- My comments do not depict feminism neither does it encourage it.

All I have been preaching about is for men to cater for their women. Why is that hard for you to swallow?

Why have you been making noise about feminism all along? Dude, read all your epistles. Its off the point here. No one is talking feminism. Find something else to say.

If I want to talk feminism I will. I ain't talking that on this thread.

Vinshu:
Shut your mouth kid.

Don't fail your wife and kids. Do your job as a man and let your wife do her job as a woman. Not being a sissy looking for the woman that will feed you and buy you phones.

Vinshu:
Your first moniker was banned for insulting rosieluv. Thread carefully or we might welcome Drefan3 and so on.

Besides, what has "two-faced" got to do with this? Alot of people lack understanding.

Vinshu:
Shut your mouth kid.

Don't fail your wife and kids. Do your job as a man and let your wife do her job as a woman. Not being a sissy looking for the woman that will feed you and buy you phones.