koboko69:
Party affiliations and senseless hates has eaten the grey matter of so many Nigerians. It is pathetic that i see so called youths, (many unemployed) come online to keep attacking Ngige. Have some people sworn to be slaves all their lives. These useless banks declare mind blowing profits at the end of every year, but at any little opportunity they are looking for excuse to sack Nigerians. Why can't they be patriotic and endure with Nigeria in these hard times rather than mass sack then later they declare mind profits. Many of these banks dont even allow unions, what kind of slavery is that? The annoying thing is they don't even follow laid down procedures for mass retrenchment. They rather employ contract staffs, then sack u at Will. Always looking for cheap labour but are quick to declare huge profits. Imagine waking up in the morning, prepare for work, get to the office, log on to ur username, and u can't log in.... which simply means u have been sacked. You guys can keep being slaves in your country.....

Go and peruse your economics textbook and stop exposing your uninformed mind. They in business for profit.Bank should be patriotic and endure my ass..

ckmayoca:



Lol if everyone now get skilled who will then patronise the skilled?

a carpenter will patronize a tailor. And vice versa

koboko69:
Party affiliations and senseless hates has eaten the grey matter of so many Nigerians. It is pathetic that i see so called youths, (many unemployed) come online to keep attacking Ngige. Have some people sworn to be slaves all their lives. These useless banks declare mind blowing profits at the end of every year, but at any little opportunity they are looking for excuse to sack Nigerians. Why can't they be patriotic and endure with Nigeria in these hard times rather than mass sack then later they declare mind profits. Many of these banks dont even allow unions, what kind of slavery is that? The annoying thing is they don't even follow laid down procedures for mass retrenchment. They rather employ contract staffs, then sack u at Will. Always looking for cheap labour but are quick to declare huge profits. Imagine waking up in the morning, prepare for work, get to the office, log on to ur username, and u can't log in.... which simply means u have been sacked. You guys can keep being slaves in your country.....

God bless you koboko69

futurewise11:


Go and peruse your economics textbook and stop exposing your uninformed mind. They in business for profit.Bank should be patriotic and endure my ass..

Look. I don't engage intellectually deficient clowns online. Every one has a choice of having a slavery mentality or not having one. If your Economics text book thought u to be a slave in your country. Good luck to you. Guess ur Economic textbooks also thought u, staffs should be laid off without due process, it also thought u that it is wrong to have unions as workers of an establishment, it also thought u that after years of studying you should be employed as a contract staff, paid as a contract staff, work as a full staff, make money for them as a full sack, then fire u like a slave. Well done!

Retrench on what reason?
Why does downsizing always have to affect the commoners only?
Why not retrench some management staffers so u can save better?

Feranchek:


Isi gi dia!

my head big ooo

Remii:
very unfortunate, the same people the govt is trying to protect. For those saying govt has no say in who private employers engage, why do we have Nigerian content act? Many of the so called CEOs today may not be on their seats if not for govt compelling multinationals to employ Nigerians. Ngige did not say don't sack but follow the rule and do it responsibly as last resort. Some people just resume on Monday to discover there passwords have been disabled,i is that how to treat a dedicated worker?

As regards password, that is the way. Imagine what many would do with sensitive client information if pre-informed

koboko69:


Look. I don't engage intellectually deficient clowns online. Every one has a choice of having a slavery mentality or not having one. If your Economics text book thought u to be a slave in your country. Good luck to you. Guess ur Economic textbooks also thought u, staffs should be laid off without due process, it also thought u that it is wrong to have unions as workers of an establishment, it also thought u that after years of studying you should be employed as a contract staff, paid as a contract staff, work as a full staff, make money for them as a full sack, then fire u like a slave. Well done!

You my friend is not making sense. We are in a country governed by Laws, and the Banks as a 'Private sector' has not violated any Law.

The FG can not use the excuse of Unemployment to blackmail Private Employers, moreso, when they themselves are retrenching workers. Or haven't you heard that the FG sacked morethan 3000 Nigerians this yr alone?

Stop using your emotions, use your cognitive domain! You will realise that your disposition on this issue is less than average

Bluffly:

As regards password, that is the way. Imagine what many would do with sensitive client information if pre-informed

not necessarily, people with sensitive info can hurt you any time, that's why you chose wisely and after background checks, it has to be those who can't burn the bridge. For whatever reason, management needs to follow the rules by given general on need to lay off then execute accordingly just just insensitively. After all we are are all coworkers, some are just managers, while some are not.

Remii:
not necessarily, people with sensitive info can hurt you any time, that's why you chose wisely and after background checks, it has to be those who can't burn the bridge. For whatever reason, management needs to follow the rules by given general on need to lay off then execute accordingly just just insensitively. After all we are are all coworkers, some are just managers, while some are not.

Password management is not contained in the employment letter. Background check my foot, in a volatile environment with no citizens record. We are talking of a banking institution here and not a construction coy. Money matters is a delicate one.

koboko69:


Look. I don't engage intellectually deficient clowns online. Every one has a choice of having a slavery mentality or not having one. If your Economics text book thought u to be a slave in your country. Good luck to you. Guess ur Economic textbooks also thought u, staffs should be laid off without due process, it also thought u that it is wrong to have unions as workers of an establishment, it also thought u that after years of studying you should be employed as a contract staff, paid as a contract staff, work as a full staff, make money for them as a full sack, then fire u like a slave. Well done!

There's legal procedure in handling dispute in every dispute, which can be harness to seek redress.

You said said bank should be patriotic and complain about contract staff issue.Are you forced to sign up for such cadre of employment? Is there any labour law against such?NO. Contract staffing system is not illegal or strange. It's a stepping ladder for those who knows there worth and its a global practice.Presently in Germany alot of companies (Daimler,Bosch etc)are doing something similar. Its a cost saving strategy which is not illegal

Companies are not charity organisation who cares about your emotions or financial difficulties.If the term of employment is not economically sensible, its at your prerogatory to resign....nobody force u.Many contract staff in the banking system are better off because they not easily sacked compare to full staff.

I repeat visit your economics (monopsony)textbook again.

onexile:
You my friend is not making sense. We are in a country governed by Laws, and the Banks as a 'Private sector' has not violated any Law.

The FG can not use the excuse of Unemployment to blackmail Private Employers, moreso, when they themselves are retrenching workers. Or haven't you heard that the FG sacked morethan 3000 Nigerians this yr alone?

Stop using your emotions, use your cognitive domain! You will realise that your disposition on this issue is less than average

May God deliver my people from slavery mentality. Read Section 20 of the Labour Act. Thank me later. in fact private sectors have been violating almost every thing contained i. The labour act. That Nigeria is a lawless country should not cage ur brain into slavery. Who are they banks to even engage in negotiations in the first place when they have banned or union activities. Or u don't even know as a staff of an organization, it is ur right to belong to a union of workers engaged by your organization. My people perish cos they lack knowledge, yet they come on line to argue blindly.
The only way u can make a sensible point ks if u tell me the private sectors are not governed by the labour act in Nigeria

these are people imposed on us by apc

koboko69:



May God deliver my people from slavery mentality. Read Section 20 of the Labour Act. Thank me later. in fact private sectors have been violating almost every thing contained i. The labour act. That Nigeria is a lawless country should not cage ur brain into slavery. Who are they banks to even engage in negotiations in the first place when they have banned or union activities. Or u don't even know as a staff of an organization, it is ur right to belong to a union of workers engaged by your organization. My people perish cos they lack knowledge, yet they come on line to argue blindly.
The only way u can make a sensible point ks if u tell me the private sectors are not governed by the labour act in Nigeria

You are trying howbeit unsuccessfully to be logical. Pls stop looking for an escape route.

Yes i have read the labour Act, infact i just finished reading it a while ago. Okay now lets argue in-line and within the contest.


So i ask you a simple question, tell me precisely what labour law the Banks has violated in this instance?


I am waiting for your response before we go into the basics of that Labour Act.

ckmayoca:



Lol if everyone now get skilled who will then patronise the skilled?

Being skilled require one to be proficient in a particular area of specialization and not be a jack of all trade. For instance, an electrician will patronize barber, tailor, carpenter etc. So therefore, you can not expect one person to be all. If you have what i don't have, then there will definately b patronage. Clarified?

onexile:
You are trying howbeit unsuccessfully to be logical. Pls stop looking for an escape route.

Yes i have read the labour Act, infact i just finished reading it a while ago. Okay now lets argue in-line and within the contest.


So i ask you a simple question, tell me precisely what labour law the Banks has violated in this instance?


I am waiting for your response before we go into the basics of that Labour Act.

First and formost, there is laid down procedures to declare redundancy. It is must u call all unions involved and discuss and negotiate with them. Unfortunately, the executives of the banks have successfully cowered its workers to working without belonging into any union. In fact any form of union is not even allowed in the banking sector, which is a pure violation of a worker's right. The old generation banks, had unions then, forgotten the name they call it, UNI...cant remember. Offcourse, they have also been silenced. Now they have the NLC to negotiate and discuss with, how many of them do that before ur password refuse to log on again. I remember FCMB wrote a letter to my friend then, asking for 2 million because he didn't use the specified number of years before resigning, unfortunately for them, thr guy's father is a Lawyer. He simply wrote them back that, they breached the contract first by slashing his salary after which no new contract was signed. So therefore, the contract at which he was to return 2million to the bank if he resigns before the specific years is void already. That was the last time he heard from them. Free your self from slavery mentality. Imagine a bank sacks u at will, but want u to pay for resigning.

koboko69:


First and formost, there is laid down procedures to declare redundancy. It is must u call all unions involved and discuss and negotiate with them. Unfortunately, the executives of the banks have successfully cowered its workers to working without belonging into any union. In fact any form of union is not even allowed in the banking sector, which is a pure violation of a worker's right. The old generation banks, had unions then, forgotten the name they call it, UNI...cant remember. Offcourse, they have also been silenced. Now they have the NLC to negotiate and discuss with, how many of them do that before ur password refuse to log on again. I remember FCMB wrote a letter to my friend then, asking for 2 million because he didn't use the specified number of years before resigning, unfortunately for them, thr guy's father is a Lawyer. He simply wrote them back that, they breached the contract first by slashing his salary after which no new contract was signed. So therefore, the contract at which he was to return 2million to the bank if he resigns before the specific years is void already. That was the last time he heard from them. Free your self from slavery mentality. Imagine a bank sacks u at will, but want u to pay for resigning.

You keep talking about 'mental slavery' but from our correspondences so far, i keep wondering between both of us who actually is a victim of Mental Slavery. But i'm not gonna indulge you in that malopiniotic rendezvous.

Now according to you, "the executives of the banks have successfully cowered its workers to working without belonging into any union"

pls can you explain what you mean by 'successfully cowered'?

*Were they under compulsion to sign the contract agreement?

*Are you saying they were oblivious of the terms and conditions applicable to the contract agreement?


I am still waiting for your response. And precisely, the Labour Law you alleged the Bank broke.

futurewise11:


Go and peruse your economics textbook and stop exposing your uninformed mind. They in business for profit.Bank should be patriotic and endure my ass..

+100

onexile:
You my friend is not making sense. We are in a country governed by Laws, and the Banks as a 'Private sector' has not violated any Law.

The FG can not use the excuse of Unemployment to blackmail Private Employers, moreso, when they themselves are retrenching workers. Or haven't you heard that the FG sacked morethan 3000 Nigerians this yr alone?

Stop using your emotions, use your cognitive domain! You will realise that your disposition on this issue is less than average

That's exactly what he is doing, letting his emotions make decisions for him. That is one sure-fire way to fail in business.

bzeey:


Being skilled require one to be proficient in a particular area of specialization and not be a jack of all trade. For instance, an electrician will patronize barber, tailor, carpenter etc. So therefore, you can not expect one person to be all. If you have what i don't have, then there will definately b patronage. Clarified?

Mine was a sacarsm. Thanks anyway.

onexile:
You keep talking about 'mental slavery' but from our correspondences so far, i keep wondering between both of us who actually is a victim of Mental Slavery. But i'm not gonna indulge you in that malopiniotic rendezvous.

Now according to you, "the executives of the banks have successfully cowered its workers to working without belonging into any union"

pls can you explain what you mean by 'successfully cowered'?

*Were they under compulsion to sign the contract agreement?

*Are you saying they were oblivious of the terms and conditions applicable to the contract agreement?


I am still waiting for your response. And precisely, the Labour Law you alleged the Bank broke.

I just decided to help u. Now tell me which of the banks have followed this procedures.

20. (1) In the event of redundancy-

(a) the employer shall inform the trade union or workers' representative concerned of the reasons for and the extent of the anticipated redundancy;

(b) the principle of "last in, first out" shall be adopted in the discharge of the particular category of workers affected, subject to all factors of relative merit, including skill, ability and reliability; and

(c) the employer shall use his best endeavours to negotiate redundancy payments to any discharged workers who are not protected by regulations made under subsection (2) of this section.

(2) The Minister may make regulations providing, generally or in particular cases, for the compulsory payment of redundancy allowances on the termination of a worker's employment because of his redundancy.

(3) In this section "redundancy" means an involuntary and permanent loss of employment caused by an excess of manpower.

Even though u clearly saw this in my last quote. U still deliberately ignored and asked what law the banks broke again. I smh for my country men

onexile:
You keep talking about 'mental slavery' but from our correspondences so far, i keep wondering between both of us who actually is a victim of Mental Slavery. But i'm not gonna indulge you in that malopiniotic rendezvous.

Now according to you, "the executives of the banks have successfully cowered its workers to working without belonging into any union"

pls can you explain what you mean by 'successfully cowered'?

*Were they under compulsion to sign the contract agreement?

*Are you saying they were oblivious of the terms and conditions applicable to the contract agreement?


I am still waiting for your response. And precisely, the Labour Law you alleged the Bank broke.

Am not done with u. Now act 6.

(6) No contract shall-

(a) make it a condition of employment that a worker shall or shall not join a trade union or shall or shall not relinquish membership of a trade union; or

(b) cause the dismissal of, or otherwise prejudice, a worker-
(i) by reason of trade union membership, or
(ii) because of trade union activities outside working hours or, with the consent of the employer, within working hours, or
(iii) by reason of the fact that he has lost or been deprived of membership of a trade union or has refused or been unable to become, or for any other reason is not, a member of a trade union.

God deliver my people! They are so used to slavery, that even when someone is trying to protect them, political differences wont let them think straight.

koboko69:


If you didn't have selective blindness u have clearly seen the points highlighted. Keep trying to play around with words when u can clearly understand the point.
When i say slavery mentality, is exactly the silly question u asking me. Asking if they were under compultion, if the laws of the land were strictly followed in the first place, will there be some useless, wicked clauses in the "agreement". Off course because everything goes in Nigeria, it is now a way of life, even when cheated, u can even defend your employer. Have u heard of any banking union in the past 5 years? Go back to my previous post, this time read clearly and understand. If all u can come up with again is this same thing u wrote before. Then am sorry to say, u have also be corporately enslaved mentally.

I thought I was arguing with a Sensible person, but your consistent verbal assault has left me with no option but to indulge you.


I will advice you go take your bath cos you're actually stinking!


Now listen dude, all those points you narrated has not answered my simple question which is, were they under compulsion to sign the contract?


Was there a gun pointed to their heads as they were signing the contract?

Pls answer these questions and stop your Iberiberism

onexile:


It's obvious that you are not only foolish, but you're silly in addition. You're a slow cretin whose empty head has been filled with petroleum jelly.

I weep for your phone as it has to endure the macabre touch from your grotesquely leprous fingers. I am hooked to slavery? Just hear yourself? Had it been you took my passionate appeal to take a shower, seriously your brain would have been functioning at tip top shape. But instead you ignored it, and now the petrifying stench emanating from your horribly disfigured body has clouded your sense of reasoning.

I appeal to all Imams and Clergymen to put you in their prayer you really need it.

Oga i dey see your hand work ooo

abeg take am easy oooo! I will advice that guy not to go this line with you. Lol

onexile:


It's obvious that you are not only foolish, but you're silly in addition. You're a slow cretin whose empty head has been filled with petroleum jelly.

I weep for your phone as it has to endure the macabre touch from your grotesquely leprous fingers. I am hooked to slavery? Just hear yourself? Had it been you took my passionate appeal to take a shower, seriously your brain would have been functioning at tip top shape. But instead you ignored it, and now the petrifying stench emanating from your horribly disfigured body has clouded your sense of reasoning.

I appeal to all Imams and Clergymen to put you in their prayer you really need it.

Oga i dey see your hand work ooo

abeg take am easy oooo! I will advice that guy not to go this lane with you. Lol

onexile:


It's obvious that you are not only foolish, but you're silly in addition. You're a slow cretin whose empty head has been filled with petroleum jelly.

I weep for your phone as it has to endure the macabre touch from your grotesquely leprous fingers. I am hooked to slavery? Just hear yourself? Had it been you took my passionate appeal to take a shower, seriously your brain would have been functioning at tip top shape. But instead you ignored it, and now the petrifying stench emanating from your horribly disfigured body has clouded your sense of reasoning.

I appeal to all Imams and Clergymen to put you in their prayer you really need it.

So cause they were not compelled to sign the contract, that makes it right. Even when the labour law prohibits it. U asked for sections the banks violated like a million times, i answered like a zillion times, even quoted it for u, since u were too lazy, and all u can bring forth is were they compelled to sign?? What a pathetic reasoning. Now await ur ban

Mynd44 lalasticlala, i viewed as a guest with another browser, this particular post is still Active while the aggressor still roams around. I reported this more than 2 hrs ago

uchelvlink:
Oga i dey see your hand work ooo

abeg take am easy oooo! I will advice that guy not to go this lane with you. Lol

Lol. Na the same sch of slavery thinking una belong na. Am i surprised

koboko69:


So cause they were not compelled to sign a contract, that makes it right. Even when the labour law prohibits it. What a pathetic reasoning. Now awiat ur ban

Now you're beckoning on your abient marauders to come ban me? I thought you had the Anatem to counter my verbal conquest? Why are you trying to run now that i have decided to indulge, and exponge your acute neurosm?


Were you not the one who kept on opiniating that i am Mentally Enslaved? Did i not warn you severally?


Now i am ready for you dude. Just bring it On, stop looking for Mods that will separate fight.

onexile:


It's obvious that you are not only foolish, but you're silly in addition. You're a slow cretin whose empty head has been filled with petroleum jelly.

I weep for your phone as it has to endure the macabre touch from your grotesquely leprous fingers. I am hooked to slavery? Just hear yourself? Had it been you took my passionate appeal to take a shower, seriously your brain would have been functioning at tip top shape. But instead you ignored it, and now the petrifying stench emanating from your horribly disfigured body has clouded your sense of reasoning.

I appeal to all Imams and Clergymen to put you in their prayer you really need it.

Oga stop this childisj rants. I have gone through both arguments. I am surprised you can not still understand the point here. Does thw fact they were not forced to sign make it right even when labour laws are flouted?