Ksslib:

I know. I know.

But I never said I skipped. Plus I am not confused, I fully understand everything. All i said was i might have missed some tiny details . Besides, It was never explicitly stated that Daenrys became barren in the process. All we know is that she sacrificed her child. The rest is debatable.

Only time will tell, I guess.

Gwaihir:


I have been following the recurring pattern in the series, if you pay attention you will see.

The prophecy said Dany will marry three men, one to dread, one to duty and one for love and all three will die. Plus its GOT, there is never going to be a happy ending.

But in a year or two, we see if I was wrong.

Ksslib:

Technically speaking, Jon died.

But joking apart, a part of me is verrrrry sure he is going to die. I just have this strong feeling.

Concerning the prophecy; who gave it? I can't seem to remember watching anything about that part.

Ksslib:
Just curious! The scence where Clegane stoned one particular Wight wearing yeezy from head to toe, twice.

The Wight launched forward because it was fed up and confused as to why Clegane will single him out from the crowd just to embarrass him in front of everyone.

Or because the second stone proved that the ice was thick enough to support weight.

That scene is fffucking hilarious. I've played it over ten times.

First stone cracks jaw.

Wight: **silence** but boiling inside with anger

Clegane : "Dumb CUnt"

Second stone lands close to feet.

Wight: **silence** c'mon dude! Am I the only person here? Pick on someine else. **then decides enough is enough**

Looks at stone, then looks back at Clegane.

Clegane: "ooh fffuck!!".

Hahaha. . Lwkmd.

Yungwhy:
Y'all stop bothering yourselves, she won't marry Jon Snow, or Maybe Probably not


Emilia Clarke just hinted that Daenerys might end up with a man who isn’t Jon Snow and I’m livid

Okay, yes: Daenerys Targaryen is definitely Jon Snow’s aunt in the Game of Thrones universe (unbeknownst to both of them). Therefore, it is definitely somewhat pro-incest for us as fans to root for their hookup.
Then again: WHATEVER. This is Game of Thrones , where we’ve all weirdly adjusted to Jaime and Cersei’s unsettling love affair. Incest is not off-limits for the show’s main characters — particularly when they are both young and incredibly good-looking.
The bottom line is that many people are on the edge of their seats, waiting for Jon and Daenerys to get busy (or at least to more than make eyes at one another). However, the real Daenerys, AKA actress Emilia Clarke, may have just squashed all of our hopes and dreams in regards to Dany’s romantic prospects.
During a behind-the-scenes cast commentary segment, Clarke discussed the moment when Jon, Daenerys and Ser Jorah’s worlds simultaneously collided.
According to Clarke, Jorah is “The one” as far as Daenerys is concerned.
“The thing about Ser Jorah is that he has been the one from the very beginning,” Clarke says. “I think he has an ability to see right through her.”
While this comment initially made me want to throw my laptop out the window, I do understand that, sure, Daenerys and Jorah have a powerful connection. That said … I have no interest in anything romantic happening between these characters.
In terms of the show’s more recent narrative, Jorah often comes across as an overzealous fanboy (despite his nobility). Jon Snow, however, is a man who doesn’t immediately buckle to Daenerys’ attractiveness, and isn’t afraid to voice his disagreements around her. Just like Dany, he is a ruling force to be reckoned with — which (seemingly) makes the two of them a much more suitable match.
That said, Clarke also went on to downplay Dany’s interactions with Jon Snow. “Busted! Me and Jon Snow just chillin’ on a cliff by ourselves,” she added. “Don’t read into it.”
Don’t read into it? Hopefully Clarke is just attempting to throw us off the scent of Dany’s (extremely obvious) feelings for Jon Snow. Otherwise, I fear for my laptop’s safety (because, as mentioned above, I will be forced to chuck it out the window).

http://theberry.com/2017/08/21/emilia-clarke-just-hinted-that-daenerys-might-end-up-with-a-man-who-isnt-jon-snow-and-im-livid-lr/?utm_source=thechive.com&utm_campaign=homepage&utm_medium=referral

snowstormm:
because the second stone prove that the ice was thick enough to support the weight

snowstormm:
which site is currently working well and will upload game of thrones early tomorrow?

Gbola5:


Three fires must you light... one
for life and one for death and
one to love... three mounts must
you ride... one to bed and one to
dread and one to love... three
treasons will you know... once
for blood and once for gold and
once for love...

These visions don't add up with;
-daughter of death
-slayer of lies
-bride of fire.
Mounts may not even mean husbands, neither was there any mention of them dying.

Yonce:



Just out of curiosity, where are the Greyjoys?

Especially Euron and Yara.

Yonce:



Just out of curiosity, where are the Greyjoys?

Especially Euron and Yara.

Yungwhy:
Y'all stop bothering yourselves, she won't marry Jon Snow, or Maybe Probably not


Emilia Clarke just hinted that Daenerys might end up with a man who isn’t Jon Snow and I’m livid

Okay, yes: Daenerys Targaryen is definitely Jon Snow’s aunt in the Game of Thrones universe (unbeknownst to both of them). Therefore, it is definitely somewhat pro-incest for us as fans to root for their hookup.
Then again: WHATEVER. This is Game of Thrones , where we’ve all weirdly adjusted to Jaime and Cersei’s unsettling love affair. Incest is not off-limits for the show’s main characters — particularly when they are both young and incredibly good-looking.
The bottom line is that many people are on the edge of their seats, waiting for Jon and Daenerys to get busy (or at least to more than make eyes at one another). However, the real Daenerys, AKA actress Emilia Clarke, may have just squashed all of our hopes and dreams in regards to Dany’s romantic prospects.
During a behind-the-scenes cast commentary segment, Clarke discussed the moment when Jon, Daenerys and Ser Jorah’s worlds simultaneously collided.
According to Clarke, Jorah is “The one” as far as Daenerys is concerned.
“The thing about Ser Jorah is that he has been the one from the very beginning,” Clarke says. “I think he has an ability to see right through her.”
While this comment initially made me want to throw my laptop out the window, I do understand that, sure, Daenerys and Jorah have a powerful connection. That said … I have no interest in anything romantic happening between these characters.
In terms of the show’s more recent narrative, Jorah often comes across as an overzealous fanboy (despite his nobility). Jon Snow, however, is a man who doesn’t immediately buckle to Daenerys’ attractiveness, and isn’t afraid to voice his disagreements around her. Just like Dany, he is a ruling force to be reckoned with — which (seemingly) makes the two of them a much more suitable match.
That said, Clarke also went on to downplay Dany’s interactions with Jon Snow. “Busted! Me and Jon Snow just chillin’ on a cliff by ourselves,” she added. “Don’t read into it.”
Don’t read into it? Hopefully Clarke is just attempting to throw us off the scent of Dany’s (extremely obvious) feelings for Jon Snow. Otherwise, I fear for my laptop’s safety (because, as mentioned above, I will be forced to chuck it out the window).

http://theberry.com/2017/08/21/emilia-clarke-just-hinted-that-daenerys-might-end-up-with-a-man-who-isnt-jon-snow-and-im-livid-lr/?utm_source=thechive.com&utm_campaign=homepage&utm_medium=referral

RobinHez:


I pray this is true..

The best relationship for Jon and Dany is friendship... It'd be more beautiful than whatever everyone is rooting for.

sarahade:


Dem dey here now.
inside my sitting room drinking Rum.
Mtcheeew.

RobinHez:

I pray this is true..
The best relationship for Jon and Dany is friendship... It'd be more beautiful than whatever everyone is rooting for.

Godstraight:
Am I the only one who think game of thrones is getting ruin

Endy10:


YES

MyNewJackeT:
youreNotALegend

any leaks yet, stop the memes, you're spamming this thread.

Godstraight:
Am I the only one who think game of thrones is getting ruined

BraniacX:
we enjoy the memes and you need to work on your sense of humor

MyNewJackeT:


you enjoy the memes because you can't watch it for real so you use memes to supplement it. thank God they blocked your free browsing cheats , let me see those people that will be derailing threads here.

kay9:



You bitter child of summer, you really know nothing...

Sansa and Arya Stark took their direwolves south with them, and barring that mishap by the Trident, would have brought them to Kings Landing. The last King in the North, Robb Stark, took his direwolf everywhere he went, to every war council and battlefield, and even to a marriage in the Twins. Jon Snow himself has always gone practically everywhere with his direwolf. He took it north of the Wall all the way to the Milkwater where he first met Mance Raydar; Ghost is practically a part of his identity, and Jon never goes anywhere he might be in danger without his direwolf. So kindly explain why Jon Snow will now suddenly decide to leave behind his direwolf when he's going to treat with a dragonqueen? Simple: the show's budget can't accomodate it.

The singular reason there's been a reduced screen-time for the direwolves starting season 5 was because of the CGI budget. This was why Summer was killed off and they had Jon go to Hardhome without his direwolf: budget. I suppose I could easily post D.and.D's own response back in 2015 when fans complained that the direwolves were getting less screen compared to Dany's dragons... but I'd rather not. Get off your lazy child-of-summer ass, do some search online and stop arguing blindly.

Ksslib:
That free-folk dude with an eye patch, whom the Lord of has resurrected - about six times I belive - kept hammering in the hound's ear that they were here for a reason.

Him, to fight the darkness with his flaming sword. Jon, to scatter Daenerys kpekus.

Well played, Lord of Light.

Nihilist:


You continue to display a shocking lack of comprehension. The only way a Raven could cover a 2500km distance in 32 hours flying at 80km/h is if it flew non-stop. There is no other way it could cover that distance within the time given in that chart.

The rest of your post is just unintelligent garbage as usual. What I don't get is why you always feel the need to inflict your particular brand of silliness on me, completely unsolicited. I would appreciate if you just ignore my posts in future - your unique blend of belligerence and stupidity might be your USP, but I'm not interested in your market fam.