₦airaland Forum

MuttleyLaff:
EmperorHarry, I am quite sure you know that some Christians spend their whole lives trying to force others to live according to their unstudied opinions and their false veneer of spirituality and over spiritualised actings.

This is why, you'll see the likes of especially TV01, then Shepherd00 and openmine closely following suit behind TV01 and most other christians/believers be claiming that two consenting adults in a strictly monogamous, kind, trusting, caring, loving, helpful, faithful, honest, unharmful and committed life long until death do them part SSA relationships relationships or gay unions transgresses the male-female complementarity which God built into humans at creation

I have stuff, that if I should drop it on these guys, their legs will buckle and they fall flat on their arse from the sheer weight of it. I havent typed anything substantial yet and they already are each and everytime be screaming blue murder. The trio, TV01, Shepherd00 and openmine, just make me all the time, literally be laughing out loud, watching them go schtum or dropping facts I introduce, as if it's like I've asked them to hold on to a hot potato, even diving under the sofa, to hide from the big fat lie elephants in the room I introduce to them.

Not just enlightenment EmperorHarry, but understanding, insight, awareness and lots of nuggets of information, learning, knowledge and education will come forth from the "desconstructing the lies & myth of consensual adult homosexuality/same sex union" thread

[img]https://s3/images/HeightView.jpg[/img]

[img]https://s3/images/DiffHeightSameView.jpg[/img]

[img]https://s3/images/SmartAssMuttlely.jpg[/img]

Talking of perspective, the fifth person, not shown anywhere in any of the three pictures above, either isnt standing on anything in the room or is not even in the room and so is not seeing anything at all, as in has no perspective.
C'est la vie, that's the life of perspective, isnt it, in jpegs forms?

EmperorHarry, dont mind these guys, homosexuality is ancient, it has been with us from time immemorial and it will be here with us, until the end of time, this side of eternity. One poster, in sifia pains, cried out in agony when I typed that in 5-15 years time, gays will be in government in Naija. No one has to be a prophet to know that. It's not sign of the times or end time things, but is just unavoidably inevitable. What was the reason given by Lot, for not allowing those wicked and cruel men of Sodom and Gomorrah have gay sex with the angels when they attempted gang raping them? Is there any good Bible student on this thread, worth his/her mettle dare answer that question, huh?

EmperorHarry, if I am given a pound for every time I've been told and assumed to be not straight on this thread, I soon be fantastiscally rich from being extremely financially wealthy and will contesting with the likes of Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Aliko Dangote, Mike Adenuga, Tony Elumelu, Femi Otedola, Cletus Ibeto, Folorunsho Alakija, Ned Nwoke, Abdulsamad Rabiu, Arthur Eze etcetera and give them a good run for their money.
Quite a few posters, on this thread, more confused than a fart let ripped out, on the production line a fan-making factory, have said, I am gay, then changed, saying I am not gay, and so they're sorry for calling me gay, but then revert back, insisting I am afterall gay. Another, said they are made to believe, I may be actively involved in these atrocious and shameless activities

With or without, the religious nature, the evidence SSA is there in the Bible and in Nature. No species has been found in nature, of course this includes human beings, that homosexual behaviour has not been shown to exist or be exhibited. EmperorHarry, openmine, Shepherd00 and TV01, you wouldnt be surprised to know that, humans are the only species, known to be homophobic and discriminates against homosexual behaviour. Animals dont shun other gay animals. Animals dont police of gay sexual behavior. Animals dont punished nor ostracied each other for exhibiting gay behaviours

I disconcur that there is an apparent lack of lesbian references on this thread because in certain instances, I've introduced and used the terms homosexuals and lesbians together in my sentences separated by an oblique stroke (/), otherwise called slash. I also have had the opportunities to introduce lesbians such as Mpho Andrea Tutu-van Furth, google her up to know who her famous daddy is and Beyonce's husband, Jay-Z's mum, who happens to be another very loyal and committed in attitude lesbian, just as Mpho is. Besides all that, when I use the phrase "two consenting adults" it isnt just about homosexuals but it encompasses lesbians too.

I could type on more, but time no dey, there isnt that much time, besides, I wanted this to be a short post
cc EmperorHarry

Another wasteful attempt to eagerly grab a disciple to his fold!

openmine:
Another wasteful attempt to eagerly grab a disciple to his fold!

My dear, you out of everyone should be the first to know from Bible reading and studying that, its that single one that matters, count and isn't at all a wasted or wasteful effort. Anything to have the chance to smell the gates of heaven is not wasteful attempt.

I am quite sure you haven't read anyone proselytising on this thread, so your disciple grabbing is just yet another of your usual pitiful sight of clutching at any available straw in sight.

MuttleyLaff:
My dear, you out of everyone should be the first to know from Bible reading and studying that, its that single one that matters, count and isn't at all a wasted or wasteful effort. Anything to have the chance to smell the gates of heaven is not wasteful attempt.

I am quite sure you haven't read anyone proselytising on this thread, so your disciple grabbing is just yet another of your usual pitiful sight of clutching at any available straw in sight.

Eyah ema binu......
So why all those long explanations that you refer to as 'short posts' if not to convince him like you did for Okcornel before he refused and you went all bashful on him!
You did the same for so many of your atheist pals who deserted you esp one who warned you not to mention him again!
Na who no know muttleylaff schemes

openmine:
Eyah ema binu......
So why all those long explanations that you refer to as 'short posts' if not to convince him like you did for Okcornel before he refused and you went all bashful on him!
You did the same for so many of your atheist pals who deserted you esp one who warned you not to mention him again!
Na who no know muttleylaff schemes

Oh c'mon now openmine, how many times do I have to tell you, erhn? I am a one man Mopol, Billy-No-Mates. I have no pals as you can see I am alone.

As per OkCornel, I only laid heavy on him, for nothing other than being a hypocrite, trying to pull on me something he doesn't and wouldn't tolerate. OkCornel and I go way back, he knows there's nothing personal in it, that I was fighting fire with fire, that's all.

As for budaatum, he always at times gets hold of the wrong end of the stick. I am not scared of him

openmine:
Eyah ema binu......
So why all those long explanations that you refer to as 'short posts' if not to convince him like you did for Okcornel before he refused and you went all bashful on him!
You did the same for so many of your atheist pals who deserted you esp one who warned you not to mention him again!
Na who no know muttleylaff schemes

How old are you? Can you stop baiting him with your false reps of buda please.

[img]https://media1./images/cf8e85e5a2119a0d1135997f6480d14d/tenor.gif?itemid=7885372[/img]

MuttleyLaff:
Oh c'mon now openmine, how many times do I have to tell you, erhn? I am a one man Mopol, Billy-No-Mates. I have no pals as you can see I am alone.

As per OkCornel, I only laid heavy on him, for nothing other than being a hypocrite, trying to pull on me something he doesn't and wouldn't tolerate. OkCornel and I go way back, he knows there's nothing personal in it, that I was fighting fire with fire, that's all.

As for budaatum, he always at times gets hold of the wrong end of the stick. I am not scared of him

budaatum:
How old are you? Can you stop baiting him with your false reps of buda please.

Buda what's your own nah?
Did I call your name or did I cc you like Muttleylaff does?
There are so many of his pals that refused to 'pick his call'...
Abeg take am easy ohh....no be fight

MuttleyLaff:
Oh c'mon now openmine, how many times do I have to tell you, erhn? I am a one man Mopol, Billy-No-Mates. I have no pals as you can see I am alone.

As per OkCornel, I only laid heavy on him, for nothing other than being a hypocrite, trying to pull on me something he doesn't and wouldn't tolerate. OkCornel and I go way back, he knows there's nothing personal in it, that I was fighting fire with fire, that's all.

As for budaatum, he always at times gets hold of the wrong end of the stick. I am not scared of him

Shey you are the one that called this buda's name and now he thinks I did!
Why do you like bringing problems for others?

As per bro Okcornel,
why must you have issues with someone who disagrees with you?
Is it compulsory that one must always agree with you?

Mopol kor batallion ni

openmine:
Shey you are the one that called this buda's name and now he thinks I did!
Why do you like bringing problems for others?

As per bro Okcornel,
why must you have issues with someone who disagrees with you?
Is it compulsory that one must always agree with you?

Mopol kor batallion ni

In 807 posts on 28 pages you have spent your own time talking about poo debating where to put it and according to who, do you think it says something about you?

Take responsibility for your own open time!

budaatum:
In 807 posts on 28 pages you have spent your own time talking about poo debating where to put it and according to who, do you think it says something about you?

Take responsibility for your own open time!

Hmmm...guy this transferred aggression does not work with me ohh
Yeah am debating poo according to you...so? how is that your business? Or how i use my time here?

i know i had referred to you before and that was in the past but not today!
I wasn't referring to you and you are not the only one that was cc'ed that complained or warned to muttleylaff!
Direct your complaints and annoyance to muttleylaff who mentioned you not me!

You are not the centre of the world so please don't push it that far okay?
Thanks

openmine:
how is that your business? Or how i use my time here?

It isn't. I just could not help wonder out loud why a mind as sound as yours would spend it talking about poo so long.

Kindly accept my most sincere apology.

budaatum:
It isn't. I just could not help wonder out loud why a mind as sound as yours would spend it talking about poo so long.

Kindly accept my most sincere apology.

Different strokes for different folks bro
Though your concerns could have been processed in a milder way...but no probs...we are good!

The 'milder ways' seemed not to be your stroke, but it never was my business. Sorry.

budaatum:
The 'milder ways' seemed not to be your stroke, but it never was my business. Sorry.

okay

openmine:
Another wasteful attempt to eagerly grab a disciple to his fold!

I think say na only me see am. And watch carefully, his disciple doesn't subscribe to the dictates of the Bible.

I wonder why not even one Bible believing Christian will see the light Muttley has seen.

MuttleyLaff:
EmperorHarry, I am quite sure you know that some Christians spend their whole lives trying to force others to live according to their unstudied opinions and their false veneer of spirituality and over spiritualised actings.

This is why, you'll see the likes of especially TV01, then Shepherd00 and openmine closely following suit behind TV01 and most other christians/believers be claiming that two consenting adults in a strictly monogamous, kind, trusting, caring, loving, helpful, faithful, honest, unharmful and committed life long until death do them part SSA relationships relationships or gay unions transgresses the male-female complementarity which God built into humans at creation. What of the same male-female complementarity which God built into animals and nature at creation, hmm?

I have stuff, that if I should drop it on these guys, their legs will buckle and they fall flat on their arse from the sheer weight of it. I havent typed anything substantial yet and they already are each and everytime be screaming blue murder. The trio, TV01, Shepherd00 and openmine, just make me all the time, literally be laughing out loud, watching them go schtum or dropping facts I introduce, as if it's like I've asked them to hold on to a hot potato, even diving under the sofa, to hide from the big fat lie elephants in the room I introduce to them.

Not just enlightenment EmperorHarry, but understanding, insight, awareness and lots of nuggets of information, learning, knowledge and education will come forth from the "desconstructing the lies & myth of consensual adult homosexuality/same sex union" thread

[img]https://s3/images/HeightView.jpg[/img]

[img]https://s3/images/DiffHeightSameView.jpg[/img]

[img]https://s3/images/SmartAssMuttlely.jpg[/img]

Talking of perspective, the fifth person, not shown anywhere in any of the three pictures above, either isnt standing on anything in the room or is not even in the room and so is not seeing anything at all, as in has no perspective.
C'est la vie, that's the life of perspective, isnt it, in jpegs forms?

EmperorHarry, dont mind these guys, homosexuality is ancient, it has been with us from time immemorial and it will be here with us, until the end of time, this side of eternity. One poster, in sifia pains, cried out in agony when I typed that in 5-15 years time, gays will be in government in Naija. No one has to be a prophet to know that. It's not sign of the times or end time things, but is just unavoidably inevitable. What was the reason given by Lot, for not allowing those wicked and cruel men of Sodom and Gomorrah have gay sex with the angels when they attempted gang raping them? Is there any good Bible student on this thread, worth his/her mettle dare answer that question, huh?

EmperorHarry, if I am given a pound for every time I've been told and assumed to be not straight on this thread, I soon be fantastiscally rich from being extremely financially wealthy and will contesting with the likes of Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Aliko Dangote, Mike Adenuga, Tony Elumelu, Femi Otedola, Cletus Ibeto, Folorunsho Alakija, Ned Nwoke, Abdulsamad Rabiu, Arthur Eze etcetera and give them a good run for their money.

It's hilarious, when quite a few posters, on this thread, more confused than a fart let ripped out, on the production line of a fan-making factory, say, I am gay, then change, saying I am not gay, and so they're sorry for calling me gay, but then revert back, insisting I am afterall gay. Another just yesterday, I think its openmine, said he is made to believe, I may be actively involved in these atrocious and shameless activities, obviously that is to say, he's made to believe that I am gay. Face palm and SMH at him.

With or without, the religious nature, the evidence SSA is there in the Bible and in Nature. No species has been found in nature, of course this includes human beings, that homosexual behaviour has not been shown to exist or be exhibited. EmperorHarry, openmine, Shepherd00 and TV01, you wouldnt be surprised to know that, humans are the only species, known to be homophobic and discriminates against homosexual behaviour. Animals dont shun other gay animals. Animals dont police other of their animals of gay sexual behavior. Animals dont punished nor ostracied each other for exhibiting gay behaviours.

I disconcur that there is an apparent lack of lesbian references on this thread because in certain instances, I've introduced and used the terms homosexuals and lesbians together in my sentences separated by an oblique stroke (/), otherwise called slash. I also have had the opportunities to introduce lesbians such as Mpho Andrea Tutu-van Furth, google her up to know who her famous daddy is and Beyonce's husband, Jay-Z's mum, who happens to be another very loyal and committed in attitude lesbian, just as Mpho is. Besides all that, when I use the phrase "two consenting adults" it isnt just about homosexuals but it encompasses lesbians too.

I could type on more, but time no dey, there isnt that much time, besides, I wanted this to be a short post
cc EmperorHarry

Yes, you could type on and try to convince yourself that by being verbose you're scoring points.

Nonsense.

EmperorHarry:
Muttleylaff,openmine,Shepherd00 and TV01.I am a liberal individual that understands what ignorance and prejudice can do to unenlightened people and the innocent victims.Sleep paralysis to the unenlightened is caused by demonic powers trying to kill one.Perhaps someone(B) is beside said unenlightened person(A) during such episodes,said unenlightened and "spiritually woke" individual(A) starts questioning the presence of the person at that moment.Let's say A has painted B in negative light prior to the incident,paranoia would make A feel this corroborates his/her suspicions and then said suspicions graduate to perceived fact and heaven forbid A is a honorary gossip, the matter spirals out of control without B the slightest bit aware of what's going on.Imagine a 6 year old being accused of possessing "demons"(for reason out of one's control) beaten,treated with cruelty and unfairly,secluded from an immediate society due to hearsay.Cats are not exempted from this darkness that engulfs the unenlighted.You can only imagine the fate of individuals adults and nonadults with SSA sexual orientation in pitch black countries like Nigeria.I only seek to know just what the bible states clearly about homosexuality so as redirect the ignorant to the only objective source of "infallible" knowledge they deem acceptable. Now if muttleylaff says he has seen the light from the sacred fire and he's lit his Olympic torch in a quest to run the marathon of enlightenment into the darkness that engulfs the ignorant and prejudiced territory of homosexuality in christianity then he should be allowed to given he has packed all he needs to complete this tedious task.
If in the end his torch is put out by the winds of irrefutable evidence,then I'd want to know just how open-minded the bible(when viewed in the context of the average christian) is towards homosexuality which TV01 and openmine have given answers to from their perspective (which represents pretty much the greater population currently) on the subject.If homosexuality is kicked against within christendom for now at least the individuals should not be seen as sinful creatures due to their sexual orientation(which mostly is out of their control by nature) and don't need to be tortured or delivered from the "spirit of homosexuality".

Please note I am straight.It's not everyone that supports homosexuality that is gay or bi.Also,due to the religious nature of the thread I refer to the bible as an objective truth and evidence for or against the subject.
I'd like state that the apparent lack of feminine opinions or lesbian references on this thread makes it kinda gay....

...Just kidding

You have no idea.

MuttleyLaff:
[img]https://s3/images/GayPunish.jpg[/img]

openmine, would that by a twist of fate, be you in the above jpeg with the placard and wagging your finger at those two men minding their own business, erhn? They are adult grown men, you know openmine. They in fact are consenting adults in a strictly monogamous, kind, trusting, caring, loving, helpful, faithful, honest, unharmful and committed life long until death do them part SSA relationships

I am quite aware we werent, but just was putting it into perspective that what is game and good for the goose, is equally game and good for the SSA relationship gander

What repetition are you accusing me of? What have I erroneously and incorrectly learned that I've repeatedly regurgitated here, hmm? Have I repeatingly been asking same questions at every available opportunity huh? Or is it, have I being grinding away using the "dripping tap" technique whilst repeating the questions instead of sticking to whatever is currently being discussed, huh? That's called subterfuge, "dripping tap" technique, is a trick or a dishonest way of trying to achieve something. OkCornel and Shepherd00 enjoy and like playing that trick, so if you are accusing me of something like that, you better be sure about it.

OK aside that, are you afterall not my dear overzealous and dedicated heckler fan ni? Do you want deny that you dont hold the coveted position and honour of being the dear overzealous and dedicated heckler #1 fan of mine, especially when talking of on this thread ni? openmine I am just following Bible. I am giving to you what I owe you. I am paying you respect and honor, acknowledging that you are my dear overzealous and dedicated heckler fan, that all. Check out Romans 13:7 nau, it's all in there. I've always from the beginning said, everything I type on this thread can be fact-checked, so this one is no exception and you can take it to the bank

Are you "sifially" pained, that I sound intelligible ni? Why then, what's generating this bitterness from you, hmm? It is unhealthy, if you dont know. If EmperorHarry is expecting something from me, he deems will be meaningful and useful info to him, as it crossed your mind openmine, that maybe, it means I've somehow given EmperorHarry reasons to believe in some facts, if not all, that's so far has been typed on this thread?. Is that whats terrified you? Or what exactly is the problem or cause for your dogged determination to heckle and disturb the peace of the thread sef openmine?

"And we ourselves know and believe the love which God has for us.
God is love, and those who live in love,
live in union with God and God lives in union with them."
- 1 John 4:16

My dear and beloved nwanne brother Image123, like I told above, my dear overzealous and dedicated heckler fan, these are two adult grown men and they in fact, are consenting adults in a strictly monogamous, kind, trusting, caring, loving, helpful, faithful, honest, unharmful and committed life long until death do them part SSA relationships, doing no nobody or anyone any harm. Nothing evil, nothing bad, and nothing wrong going on with them. What they are accused of or painted guilty of, is loving for real, each other and God is not vexed nor perturbed over that. God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him and him too.
cc EmperorHarry

MuttleyLaff, you are possessed by a demon of Perversion to comfortably see nothing wrong with the picture you posted and say there's nothing bad with two men having sex

You are sick.

MuttleyLaff:
Dont mind this man ojaare, what's his business with, if this is the case, in what you and yours until death do apart, do in the privacy and comfort of your home, hmm?
Balls afterall, are there to be played with, arent they?

I dont want to offend you, so I'll refrain from commenting on this

#IfYouKnowYouKnow
Well, if you know, you know and who no know, no go know. Sorry.

This is déjà vu. It like one of those, "if you are the Son of God, throw yourself down, jump off!" or "If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread." moments. I am so-so sorry Shepherd00 but I've got trust issues not yet to tell and trust you with both info.



Shepherd00, please kindly tell EmperorHarry from the abundance of your vast knowledge and understanding the following:
1/ What again are men sexing men activities that carry a punishment of death by stoning?
2/ Why particularly did these men sexing men activities deemed an abomination and why so it carried a punishment of death?
cc EmperorHarry

I'm glad that people are reading.

26 pages of heterosexual men discussing homosexuality....

openmine:
Shey you are the one that called this buda's name and now he thinks I did!
Why do you like bringing problems for others?

I am not scared of nobody, I am scared of no man, so I helped called out his name, for sake of any wondering who you're refering, since you chickenly couldnt bring yourself to outrightly ention his moniker ID

openmine:
As per bro Okcornel,
why must you have issues with someone who disagrees with you?
Is it compulsory that one must always agree with you?

Mopol kor batallion ni

openmine, do you remember Ted Haggard? Do you remember the depth of his hypocrisy? Being cold dead hypocrite in every way? Preaching vile hatred against gays, I guess was preaching to himself, knowing fully well he is one? Well, like I've said, I dont disagree with OkCornel, we agree to disagree, however I reserve my right to disagree with his hypocrisy, which I've made clear what that is.

Shepherd00:
I think say na only me see am. And watch carefully, his disciple doesn't subscribe to the dictates of the Bible.

1/ https://www.nairaland.com/5221576/deconstructing-lies-myth-consensual-adult/24#79630518
2/ https://www.nairaland.com/5221576/deconstructing-lies-myth-consensual-adult/24#79631067

I'll try and get time to response to those two above openmine URL link posts. I have never seen an elephant fly but two post took the biscuit. He was writing like he was trying to cram too much rubbish into a bin bag, like trying to get huge bags of rubbish quashed into a rubbish bin. Instead of him to read more, do the research, he wouldnt and didnt, so opened himself to displaying such ignorance and embarrassing himself by just talking and typing off the top of his head

I thought openmine was only a prude, didnt realise it gets better, he lives a sheltered bubble life. His above #1 post, I am to response to just proves it

Shepherd00:
I wonder why not even one Bible believing Christian will see the light Muttley has seen.

Do you know who Jimmy Carter is. You would know Archbishop Desmond Tutu sha though, if not former POTUS Jimmy Carter

Shepherd00:
You have no idea.

You really think EmperorHarry doesnt

Shepherd00:
MuttleyLaff, you are possessed by a demon of Perversion to comfortably see nothing wrong with the picture you posted and say there's nothing bad with two men having sex

You are sick.

That must be your twin brother in the picture, since you have vast knowledge and understanding more than I do concerning what is perversion and know more than I do on the badness of two men having sex together, please tell, what exactly, as in, what specifically is bad in two consenting males, adults in a strictly monogamous, kind, trusting, caring, loving, helpful, faithful, honest, unharmful and committed life long until death do them part relationship bad and why particularly, you see their sexual behaviour considered evil, abnormal and unacceptable?

Shepherd00:
I'm glad that people are reading.

Ditto here too

HappyPagan:
26 pages of heterosexual men discussing homosexuality....

The fundamental issue here is that there’s a competition of strong and aggressive masculine pride going on

MuttleyLaff:
I am not scared of nobody, I am scared of no man, so I helped called out his name, for sake of any wondering who you're refering, since you chickenly couldnt bring yourself to outrightly ention his moniker ID

openmine, do you remember Ted Haggard? Do you remember the depth of his hypocrisy? Being cold dead hypocrite in every way? Preaching vile hatred against gays, I guess was preaching to himself, knowing fully well he is one? Well, like I've said, I dont disagree with OkCornel, we agree to disagree, however I reserve my right to disagree with his hypocrisy, which I've made clear what that is.

1/ https://www.nairaland.com/5221576/deconstructing-lies-myth-consensual-adult/24#79630518
2/ https://www.nairaland.com/5221576/deconstructing-lies-myth-consensual-adult/24#79631067

I'll try and get time to response to those two above openmine URL link posts. I have never seen an elephant fly but two post took the biscuit. He was writing like he was trying to cram too much rubbish into a bin bag, like trying to get huge bags of rubbish quashed into a rubbish bin. Instead of him to read more, do the research, he wouldnt and didnt, so opened himself to displaying such ignorance and embarrassing himself by just talking and typing off the top of his head

I thought openmine was only a prude, didnt realise it gets better, he lives a sheltered bubble life. His above #1 post, I am to response to just proves it

Do you know who Jimmy Carter is. You would know Archbishop Desmond Tutu sha though, if not former POTUS Jimmy Carter

You really think EmperorHarry doesnt

That must be your twin brother in the picture, since you have vast knowledge and understanding more than I do concerning what is perversion and know more than I do on the badness of two men having sex together, please tell, what exactly, as in, what specifically is bad in two consenting males, adults in a strictly monogamous, kind, trusting, caring, loving, helpful, faithful, honest, unharmful and committed life long until death do them part relationship bad and why particularly, you see their sexual behaviour considered evil, abnormal and unacceptable?

Ditto here too

The fundamental issue here is that there’s a competition of strong and aggressive masculine pride going on

Which hypocrisy are you speaking of Muttley?

That I avoid questions or what?

I'm sure if you had links to the threads to back up your assertion, you would have put them here.

Anyways, back to the matter of homosexuality, expect my updates later today...

MuttleyLaff:
I am not scared of nobody, I am scared of no man, so I helped called out his name, for sake of any wondering who you're refering, since you chickenly couldnt bring yourself to outrightly ention his moniker ID

openmine, do you remember Ted Haggard? Do you remember the depth of his hypocrisy? Being cold dead hypocrite in every way? Preaching vile hatred against gays, I guess was preaching to himself, knowing fully well he is one? Well, like I've said, I dont disagree with OkCornel, we agree to disagree, however I reserve my right to disagree with his hypocrisy, which I've made clear what that is.

A pot calling a kettle black!

MuttleyLaff:
1/ https://www.nairaland.com/5221576/deconstructing-lies-myth-consensual-adult/24#79630518
2/ https://www.nairaland.com/5221576/deconstructing-lies-myth-consensual-adult/24#79631067

[s]I'll try and get time to response to those two above openmine URL link posts. I have never seen an elephant fly but two post took the biscuit. He was writing like he was trying to cram too much rubbish into a bin bag, like trying to get huge bags of rubbish quashed into a rubbish bin. Instead of him to read more, do the research, he wouldnt and didnt, so opened himself to displaying such ignorance and embarrassing himself by just talking and typing off the top of his head[/s]

[s]I thought openmine was only a prude, didnt realise it gets better, he lives a sheltered bubble life. His above #1 post, I am to response to just proves it[/s]

Bring it on Muttleylaff!
I have your time today!
Was thinking of chilling from this thread based on an advise from a participant whom you annoyed but for you,i will take an exception after this latest comment!!
While complying your host of debris,dont forget to insert scriptures while making your ridiculous claims!
Am fully waiting and ready!

OkCornel:
Which hypocrisy are you speaking of Muttley?

That I avoid questions or what?

This is a different page in a closed chapter. New chapter has been created and we are on a new and current page on that new chapter OkCornel. Give that one up please OkCornel

OkCornel:
I'm sure if you had links to the threads to back up your assertion, you would have put them here.

Have you yet provided alBHAGDADI with Bible verse(s) where God has discontinued tithing or disapproved tithing? I rest my case and that's the last time I'll be talking about your hypocrisy of trying to play that line of questioning type or sort with me. You can try continue or bring it up again, but be reset assured its a brick wall you're talking to if you do

Since openmine couldnt be bothered to answer back, which isnt unsual. How about you then OkCornel. Do you remember Ted Haggard? Do you remember the depth of his hypocrisy? Him being cold dead hypocrite in every way? Preaching vile hatred against gays, I guess was preaching to himself, knowing fully well he is one? Well, like I said to openmine, I dont disagree with you, as we agree to disagree, however I reserve my right to disagree with your hypocrisy, which I've made clear above what that is. We've crossed that bridge, please permit it to be water under the bridge, let it go. It is the past and consequently no longer to be regarded as important to be brought up again and again and again.

OkCornel:
Anyways, back to the matter of homosexuality, expect my updates later today...

This is more like it. I thought it was TV01 who's the man on this thread, but it seems it's you who is the "The Biggie Man"

openmine:
A pot calling a kettle black!

You got it wrong as usual and its not surprising. You are the black pot cum kettle called snow black

openmine:
Bring it on Muttleylaff!
I have your time today!

Two posters, OkCornel and openmine raring to get shocked when confronted with more facts, some knowledge, education, questions and fyis. Two for the price of one. Must be one of my usual lucky and blessed days. Maybe I should play the national lottery. You aint going to win it, if not in it, some say. I am going to knock their heads together. Dem una both, don buy market.

openmine:
Was thinking of chilling from this thread based on an advise from a participant whom you annoyed but for you, i will take an exception after this latest comment!!
While complying your host of debris, dont forget to insert scriptures while making your ridiculous claims!
Am fully waiting and ready!

Oh would it be the same participant, who was that annoyed at you, was asking you, how old sef are you, hmm?

Would it be the same participant, who said to you:
"In 807 posts on 28 pages you have spent your own time talking about poo debating where to put it and according to who, do you think it says something about you" hmm?

Is it the same participant who doesn't know that, what one man sees as poo, is what another man sees as potpourri and treasure erhn. Is it the same participant, who doesnt realise that poo that he is indifferent to, sooner or later finds its way to back to discomfortably haunt him. You try holding poo in, say for 3 days long and with a straight face, then you'll know what I am talking of.

The same budaatum hmm, who doesnt know that I will be debating poo, as long as there exists consenting SSA adults in a strictly monogamous, kind, trusting, caring, loving, helpful, faithful, honest, unharmful and committed life long until death do them part relationship that are being bullied, beaten, shamed, abandoned, rejected, scared for their lives, put to death etcetera. It is a fundamental human rights issue and will do with debating. It says a lot about kindness, justice and compassion to your neighbour, your fellow human being.

MuttleyLaff:
Two posters, OkCornel and openmine raring to get shocked when confronted with more facts, some knowledge, education, questions and fyis. Two for the price of one. Must be one of my usual lucky and blessed days. Maybe I should play the national lottery. You aint going to win it, if not in it, some say

I do hope you know the highlighted MUST be closely accompanied by SCRIPTURES and not your digressive and ponderous posts with little or no trajectory!
As long as this issue pertains the scriptures,you are already on a nose-dive!
However,am waiting to be 'stunned' by you dishing out of scriptures to prove 'God sees nothing untoward about homosexual deeds' AS USUAL

MuttleyLaff:
Oh would it be the same participant, who was that annoyed at you, was asking you, how old sef are you, hmm?

Would it be the same participant, who said to you:
"In 807 posts on 28 pages you have spent your own time talking about poo debating where to put it and according to who, do you think it says something about you" hmm?

Is it the same participant who doesn't know that, what one man sees as poo, is what another man sees as potpourri and treasure erhn. Is it the same participant, who doesnt realise that poo that he is indifferent to, sooner or later finds its way to back to discomfortably haunt him. You try holding poo in, say for 3 days long and with a straight face, then you'll know what I am talking of.

The same budaatum hmm, who doesnt know that I will be debating poo, as long as consenting SSA adults in a strictly monogamous, kind, trusting, caring, loving, helpful, faithful, honest, unharmful and committed life long until death do them part relationship are being bullied, beaten, shamed, abandoned, rejected, scared for their lives, put to death etcetera. It is a fundamental human rights issue and will do with debating. It says a lot about kindness, justice and compassion to your neighbour, your fellow human being.

When you call out someone who has reminded you of not being mentioned, be prepared to face the person rather than allow me take the fall for it!
You don't need to mention the person....Quit this puerile games!

openmine:
I do hope you know the highlighted MUST be closely accompanied by SCRIPTURES and not your digressive and ponderous posts with little or no trajectory!
As long as this issue pertains the scriptures, you are already on a nose-dive!
However, am waiting to be 'stunned' by you dishing out of scriptures to prove 'God sees nothing untoward about homosexual deeds' AS USUAL

"O tun ni dan iru ẹ, eleyi wo mọ" Oya, try these three direct, simple and easy for size and be stunned questions about the scriptures then openmine:

1/ What was the reason given by Lot, for refusing and/or not allowing those wicked and cruel men of Sodom and Gomorrah have gay sex with the angels when they attempted gang raping the angels who had an appearance of human beings, as in, men?
2/ Did Lot say: "Oh no, please you cant dont that. No, men sexing men? Haba guys, God doesnt want men sexing men nau, abeggy dont do that. Shoo! shoo!!. Go away please, ẹ dakun, ẹ jọr. Ẹma ko ba mi. Please I beg you, dont get me into trouble", hmm?
3/ You would expect Lot to say to the guys that God doesnt approve of men sexing men, so they shouldnt consider doing it with these angels, wouldnt you openmine, hmm?

Watch, as the usual other posters like OkCornel, that I am even seeing now below, reading this page, dive for cover, burying heads in sand

openmine:
When you call out someone who has reminded you of not being mentioned, be prepared to face the person rather than allow me take the fall for it!
You don't need to mention the person....Quit this puerile games!

You dont seem to get it sha openmine. I said I am not afraid of anyone, unlike you, to mention anybaga, especially whenever, if and when I choose to do so. No one has a moniker copyrighted on Nairaland, to be laying down rules on them. I can mention monikers, as many times as I feel like, especially if I am not scared of who uses what moniker ID. Let whoever is aggrieved they are mentioned, come beat me at my house. I'll pay the taxi fare, to my home and return.

Its really isnt puerile games, its the "agbaya" in me manifesting on you. That's me being real with you, by telling you that truth.
cc EmperorHarry

MuttleyLaff:
Have you yet provided alBHAGDADI with Bible verse(s) where God has discontinued tithing or disapproved tithing?

Since you want to bring up the subject matter of tithing, then let's deal with it once and for all here.

1) The matter under contention is not whether tithing should be discontinued, but why pro-tithers are not tithing the way God specified it to be done. It is very obvious you are also against obligatory monetary tithing which runs contrary to the specific instructions God gave on how tithing should be done in Deuteronomy 14 v 22-29

2) Do you remember the early church controversy on the Mosaic Law and the council set up per Acts 15? Tithing (not monetary tithing) was never binding on the gentile Christians.

3) There is no Levitical Priesthood, who then are the Levites entitled to tithes today?

Tithing was never abolished outrightly. But the conditions under which God laid it out to be done is currently impossible to follow.

In place of tithing, there is freewill giving which is not limited by those conditions. The early church practiced that, and that is what the church ought to follow.

But if you or alBHAGDADI disagrees, you can counter me by showing a few Christians (especially those of non-Jewish origin) that tithed in the Scriptures.

MuttleyLaff:
I rest my case and that's the last time I'll be talking about your hypocrisy of trying to play that line of questioning type or sort with me. You can try continue or bring it up again, but be reset assured its a brick wall you're talking to if you do

I have also questioned alBH.AGDADI in this manner, and you liked it. Why are you complaining now? Are the questions too hard to answer?

MuttleyLaff:
Since openmine couldnt be bothered to answer back, which isnt unsual. How about you then OkCornel. Do you remember Ted Haggard? Do you remember the depth of his hypocrisy? Him being cold dead hypocrite in every way? Preaching vile hatred against gays, I guess was preaching to himself, knowing fully well he is one? Well, like I said to openmine, I dont disagree with you, as we agree to disagree, however I reserve my right to disagree with your hypocrisy, which I've made clear above what that is. We've crossed that bridge, please permit it to be water under the bridge, let it go. It is the past and consequently no longer to be regarded as important to be brought up again and again and again.

This is more like it. I thought it was TV01 who's the man on this thread, but it seems it's you who is the "The Biggie Man"

Let's get on with the discussions today shall we?

MuttleyLaff:
Two posters, OkCornel and openmine raring to get shocked when confronted with more facts, some knowledge, education, questions and fyis. Two for the price of one. Must be one of my usual lucky and blessed days. Maybe I should play the national lottery. You aint going to win it, if not in it, some say. I am going to knock their heads together. Dem una both, don buy market.

I hope you won't run away from my questions this time around...

MuttleyLaff:
"O tun ni dan iru ẹ, eleyi wo mọ" Oya, try these three direct, simple and easy for size and be stunned questions about the scriptures then openmine:

1/ What was the reason given by Lot, for refusing and/or not allowing those wicked and cruel men of Sodom and Gomorrah have gay sex with the angels when they attempted gang raping the angels who had an appearance of human beings, as in, men?
2/ Did Lot say: "Oh no, please you cant dont that. No, men sexing men? Haba guys, God doesnt want men sexing men nau, abeggy dont do that. Shoo! shoo!!. Go away please, ẹ dakun, ẹ jọr. Ẹma ko ba mi. Please I beg you, dont get me into trouble", hmm?
3/ You would expect Lot to say to the guys that God doesnt approve of men sexing men, so they shouldnt consider doing it with these angels, wouldnt you openmine, hmm?

Watch, as the usual other posters, dive for cover, burying heads in sand

Why are you so predictable Muttleylaff?
You question is in no way related to the issue at hand!
More like a diversion that can only be done by a prevaricator!
I don't need evasive questions!
We all need answers!
You said you would provide FACTS AND KNOWLEDGE to buttress your claim about God seeing nothing untoward about homosexual acts!
You are the owner of the thread,we are the ones that should be asking the question!
No more prevarication Muttleylaff

MuttleyLaff:
dont seem to get it sha openmine. I said I am not afraid unlike you, to mention anybaga, especially whenever, if and when I choose to do so. No one has a moniker copyrighted on Nairaland, to be laying down rules on them. I can mention monikers, as many times as I feel like, especially if I am not scared of who uses what moniker ID. Let whoever is aggrieved they are mentioned, come beat me at my house. I'll pay the taxi fare, to my home and return.
cc EmperorHarry

Well unlike you,I respect people's opinion of being left out from a conversation esp when they are constantly insisting on it!
But you are so determined to display the puerile side of you! Pathetic!
Maturity is not by age ohh Muttleylaff!

OkCornel:
[s]Since you want to bring up the subject matter of tithing, then let's deal with it once and for all here.

1) The matter under contention is not whether tithing should be discontinued, but why pro-tithers are not tithing the way God specified it to be done. It is very obvious you are also against obligatory monetary tithing which runs contrary to the specific instructions God gave on how tithing should be done in Deuteronomy 14 v 22-29

2) Do you remember the early church controversy on the Mosaic Law and the council set up per Acts 15? Tithing (not monetary tithing) was never binding on the gentile Christians.

3) There is no Levitical Priesthood, who then are the Levites entitled to tithes today?

Tithing was never abolished outrightly. But the conditions under which God laid it out to be done is currently impossible to follow.

In place of tithing, there is freewill giving which is not limited by those conditions. The early church practiced that, and that is what the church ought to follow.[/s]

[s]But if you or alBHAGDADI disagrees, you can counter me by showing a few Christians (especially those of non-Jewish origin) that tithed in the Scriptures.

I have also questioned alBH.AGDADI in this manner, and you liked it. Why are you complaining now? Are the questions too hard to answer?[/s]

Let's get on with the discussions today shall we?

When alBH.AGDADI questioned you back in that manner, did you give the Bible verse he was asking from you, huh. I dont think you'll say you did

OkCornel:
I hope you won't run away from my questions this time around...

You are going to use small hands, get smacked back with big and bigger hands

MuttleyLaff:
When alBH.AGDADI questioned you back in that manner, did you give the Bible verse he was asking from you, huh. I dont think you'll say you did

I guess Deuteronomy 14 v 22-29 and Acts 15 were extracted from the Koran isn't it?

Besides, the main matter on ground is tithing in a manner not consistent with how God specified it should be done.

Or does your Bible suddenly support monetary tithing practiced in the church today?

MuttleyLaff:
You are going to use small hands, get smacked back with big and bigger hands

Story for the gods...

If God truly sees nothing untoward a same sex relationship, why haven't you provided one example of a same sex marriage approved by God in the Old or New Testament... or from the Apocrypha and other early church writings?

openmine:

Why are you so predictable Muttleylaff?
You question is in no way related to the issue at hand!
More like a diversion that can only be done by a prevaricator!
I don't need evasive questions!
We all need answers!
You said you would provide FACTS AND KNOWLEDGE to buttress your claim about God seeing nothing untoward about homosexual acts!
You are the owner of the thread, we are the ones that should be asking the question!
No more prevarication Muttleylaff

Shouldnt Lot be in a better position and know any better whether or not God approves men sexing men, hmm openmine? Its no diversion nor is it evasive, why cant you just admit that the question big pass you. You are right that I opened this thread up, so that means the buck starts and ends with me, not you the contributors. I have last say what goes or doesnt on the thread. If you dont like that, exit door is over there. and do a vamoose "alọrami rami"

openmine:
Well unlike you, I respect people's opinion of being left out from a conversation esp when they are constantly insisting on it!
But you are so determined to display the puerile side of you! Pathetic!
Maturity is not by age ohh Muttleylaff!

Respect is earned and deserved, not demanded or dished out just like that
No one said maturity is by age. "Agbaya" just cant be contained at times, especially for people that deserve getting "agbaya" treatment given to.

OkCornel:
I guess Deuteronomy 14 v 22-29 and Acts 15 were extracted from the Koran isn't it?

Besides, the main matter on ground is tithing in a manner not consistent with how God specified it should be done.

Or does your Bible suddenly support monetary tithing practiced in the church today?

Are you thick or what? Where in Deuteronomy 14:22-29 or Acts 15, do you see God approving or disapproving tithing, hmm?

Oh oh, its not a matter of how God specified it, is it now? You see what I mean by, dont try that line of questioning type with me now? It wouldnt wash with you, same way, it isnt going to with me too. Now bringing it up, like I've advised you not to. I have moved on from it. This is my last call.

OkCornel:
Story for the gods...

If God truly sees nothing untoward a same sex relationship, why haven't you provided one example of a same sex marriage approved by God in the Old or New Testament... or from the Apocrypha and other early church writings?

Oya, try these three direct, simple and easy for size questions about the scriptures then to see if or not If God truly sees anything untoward a same sex relationship or men sexing men. Dont ignore them, no excuses and dont do an AWOL

1/ What was the reason given by Lot, for refusing and/or not allowing those wicked and cruel men of Sodom and Gomorrah have gay sex with the angels when they attempted gang raping the angels who had an appearance of human beings, as in, men?
2/ Did Lot say: "Oh no, please you cant dont that. No, men sexing men? Haba guys, God doesnt want men sexing men nau, abeggy dont do that. Shoo! shoo!!. Go away please, ẹ dakun, ẹ jọr. Ẹma ko ba mi. Please I beg you, dont get me into trouble", hmm?
3/ You would expect Lot to say to the guys that God doesnt approve of men sexing men, so they shouldnt consider doing it with these angels, wouldnt you openmine, hmm?