positivelord:


have you heard of Whistle-blower before....stamp is not needed....
Atiku is definitely coming...

Atiku is actually losing.seems you are not familiar with court proceedings

Officialgarri:
There's a way the court works and these people PDP are tendering as witnesses will make PDP lose easily.... Although they will lose afterall.

Whenever there is inconsistency in your testimony, the Judge will declare all your previous testimonies as questionable, even if the facts are glaring.

For example, they brought a PO who has no good knowledge of court proceedings, then he comes to talk about a code and at the end, he couldn't present the code...

At last, it's either he doesn't find the code or INEC changes the code from their end. This will falsify his claim and all his testimonies will be dismissed.

Gbam.that was a wasted witness.

Officialgarri:
There's a way the court works and these people PDP are tendering as witnesses will make PDP lose easily.... Although they will lose afterall.

Whenever there is inconsistency in your testimony, the Judge will declare all your previous testimonies as questionable, even if the facts are glaring.

For example, they brought a PO who has no good knowledge of court proceedings, then he comes to talk about a code and at the end, he couldn't present the code...

At last, it's either he doesn't find the code or INEC changes the code from their end. This will falsify his claim and all his testimonies will be dismissed.

The codes are different for all the Polling Unit and we were told not to disclose the code to anyone, I also transmitted all the results of my PU to the said server and I kept wondering why INEC are saying there is no server, something that My SPO said we won't be paid if we fail to transmit the result.

garfield1:

Atiku is actually losing.seems you are not familiar with court proceedings

I enlighten me,bro

Be patient and follow the case, there are many good things that would improve our systems from this case. By the way, have you had the opportunity of reading the guidelines issued for the conduct of the election?
We need to follow the case as there are too many things to be clarified.

Dgr8hassiE:
The law of the land does not recognise that sir.

Lols what a crock of lies

So how did the various party agents ascertain the results and signed off on it?

How were the results announced?

Did he mean thousands of people all queued up to use a single card reader to vote?

How would anyone trust the operator of the reader won't manipulate the results?

How does one even vote on the card reader, did they need to scroll through the endless list of candidates? How is that even possible and how long did it take?

Were ballot papers and boxes not used then?

How were the results tallied in the presence of the party agents?

I think we Corps members and Ex Corps members that participated in this election should do a protest, either online or Offline, How will they stress us mentally, saying we must transmit the results to there server and the result must be the same with the one of the EC8 papers only for them to say there is no server, they could have just said they were test running the process, they can't say I transmitted the result to a thin air....

The biggest joker is that you had a code and the code is the key word as a witness. Yet you cannot get the code and cannot give valid and credible reason for not being able to get it. What a farce?!

Officialgarri:
There's a way the court works and these people PDP are tendering as witnesses will make PDP lose easily.... Although they will lose afterall.

Whenever there is inconsistency in your testimony, the Judge will declare all your previous testimonies as questionable, even if the facts are glaring.

For example, they brought a PO who has no good knowledge of court proceedings, then he comes to talk about a code and at the end, he couldn't present the code...

At last, it's either he doesn't find the code or INEC changes the code from their end. This will falsify his claim and all his testimonies will be dismissed.

Thank you, for the first time in along time, you just brought out the beauty of the glory of nairaland of the past- with your spot on submission and point of view

olutop:

The codes are different for all the Polling Unit and we were told not to disclose the code to anyone, I also transmitted all the results of my PU to the said server and I kept wondering why INEC are saying there is no server, something that My SPO said we won't be paid if we fail to transmit the result.

Kindly tell us how voting was done on that small machine, how you tallied the results, how agents signed off, and how you transmitted the results.

Neoteny:
Lols what a crock of lies

So how did the various party agents ascertain the results and signed off on it?

How were the results announced?

Did he mean thousands of people all queued up to use a single card reader to vote?

How would anyone trust the operator of the reader won't manipulate the results?

How does one even vote on the card reader, did they need to scroll through the endless list of candidates? How is that even possible and how long did it take?

Were ballot papers and boxes not used then?

How were the results tallied in the presence of the party agents?

Barrage of questions that can give Atiku headaches for life.

ashacot:


He said he does not have the code he used to transmit the result of his unit to INEC SERVER but he had it on his phone.

ATIKU OR PDP HAS STOLEN THE PHONE.
JOKERS

Mr Man, am not sure you understood him, what he meant was, he don't have it written down on paper but the code is stored in his phone, he trying to let the court know he has the code if they wanted to see it.

olutop:

The codes are different for all the Polling Unit and we were told not to disclose the code to anyone, I also transmitted all the results of my PU to the said server and I kept wondering why INEC are saying there is no server, something that My SPO said we won't be paid if we fail to transmit the result.

Are u saying u transmitted the votes each party had to the server

Dgr8hassiE:
The law of the land does not recognise that sir.

True, law of the land only recognise what it likes to recognise theee days..

This witness just wasted a slot, seems the lawyers no brief am well before mounting the box.

ashacot:


He said he does not have the code he used to transmit the result of his unit to INEC SERVER but he had it on his phone.

ATIKU OR PDP HAS STOLEN THE PHONE.
JOKERS

Learn to read and understand what u read. He never said he didn't have the code. He told the court that it was not attached in the evidence document he submitted. The code is still in his phone which could be presented if requested.

The code here is not the major issue. The major issue is weda results were transmitted electronically or not. If they were transmitted, where were they transmitted to and for what purpose where they transmitted.

[quote author=Neoteny post=80060523]

Kindly tell us how voting was done on that small machine, how you tallied the results, how agents signed off, and how you transmitted the results.[/quote
The voting was done manually now, and we documented the result on the EC8A papers, on that SCR there is an Icon there called E- collation, the PO click on it, it will bring out a login page where you will put the codes we were given, a result sheet will them come up containing the list of parties registered for that particular election, along with Total accredited voters, valid votes, Total registered voters etc, you input each parties vote in front of there acronym with the other variables(Total registered voters,valid votes etc) the computer will compute and tell you if there is an error or not. We then click on submit, we gave 1 copy of the EC8A duplicate to the Rack tech who then check if what is on the server and the 1 on the Ec8A tallies before allowing us to leave the RAcentre.....
The reason for this was to prevent result sheet alteration b4 it gets to the collation center, I think because they did some magic with the result sheets that is why they are saying there is no server.

Coming were @ dreaming?

Francisayo:


Are u saying u transmitted the votes each party had to the server

Exactly along with the Total registered voters,Total accredited voters, Total votes cast, Total valid votes and Invalid votes.....In all the elections.

let's asume there was a server with all the codes and operation being narrated.
do you think those old crude non-tech presiding/returning officers can operate such? mumu people. they cant even handle excel sheet properly. naija never reach that level!

Neoteny:


Kindly tell us how voting was done on that small machine, how you tallied the results, how agents signed off, and how you transmitted the results.

The voting was done manually now, and we documented the result on the EC8A papers, on that SCR there is an Icon there called E- collation, the PO click on it, it will bring out a login page where you will put the codes we were given, a result sheet will them come up containing the list of parties registered for that particular election, along with Total accredited voters, valid votes, Total registered voters etc, you input each parties vote in front of there acronym with the other variables(Total registered voters,valid votes etc) the computer will compute and tell you if there is an error or not. We then click on submit, we gave 1 copy of the EC8A duplicate to the Rack tech who then check if what is on the server and the 1 on the Ec8A tallies before allowing us to leave the RAcentre.....
The reason for this was to prevent result sheet alteration b4 it gets to the collation center, I think because they did some magic with the result sheets that is why they are saying there is no server.

Officialgarri:
There's a way the court works and these people PDP are tendering as witnesses will make PDP lose easily.... Although they will lose afterall.

Whenever there is inconsistency in your testimony, the Judge will declare all your previous testimonies as questionable, even if the facts are glaring.

For example, they brought a PO who has no good knowledge of court proceedings, then he comes to talk about a code and at the end, he couldn't present the code...

At last, it's either he doesn't find the code or INEC changes the code from their end. This will falsify his claim and all his testimonies will be dismissed.

see this one consoling himself.

Staro:
Prof Mahmud should be languishing in kirikiri

He will end there soon.

He did not draft the court processes.. Atiku's lawyers did.. They should have asked him for the code and included it in the court papers if they felt it was important.. He said he had the code on his phone but it wasn't included in the court papers.. Fault of Atiku's lawyers..

drlateef:
The biggest joker is that you had a code and the code is the key word as a witness. Yet you cannot get the code and cannot give valid and credible reason for not being able to get it. What a farce?!

How can you ask him server name and number?

There is problem oo

This brings to fore my fear that the honourable Justices know nothing about servers.

and if they do not, there is a problem already.

Please, Atiku should employ the services of Lawyers that can analyse this issues of servers very well because it is very delicate to Noobs.

We are waiting.

Atiku is coming.

So from his testimony it means the elections in that polling unit was peaceful. Why then are they not satisfied with the results collated and signed in their presence but rather looking for the one in an imaginary server?

Officialgarri:
There's a way the court works and these people PDP are tendering as witnesses will make PDP lose easily.... Although they will lose afterall.

Whenever there is inconsistency in your testimony, the Judge will declare all your previous testimonies as questionable, even if the facts are glaring.

For example, they brought a PO who has no good knowledge of court proceedings, then he comes to talk about a code and at the end, he couldn't present the code...

At last, it's either he doesn't find the code or INEC changes the code from their end. This will falsify his claim and all his testimonies will be dismissed.

Please go back and read it slowly.. Now do you get it? He didn't attach the code on his written statement that doesn't mean he doesn't have the code.. He has it on his phone and can produce it if asked.. Comprehension is not easy I guess

Burr they said there was no server!

This point is a killer, if PDP spend time on it. Atiku will not be declared, but the election will be cancelled.

He also insisted that INEC did not direct Presiding Officers to allow voters who could not be authenticated by the card reader machine to vote manually with their picture captured.

He said, “No, we were not directed to allow people to vote manually.

“The card reader worked for every voter who came to my polling unit.”

positivelord:
Atiku is coming sooner than we thought...

I believe there was a server. The same INEC that claims there is no server later agreed they used it to do test run in some states where by-election took place. All their lies is to justify what they have done. A liar or thief must cover his tracks.

Atiku is being led on a wild goose chase...

Server or not, the extant regulations do not recognise e-collection of results.

Atiku is playing into the hands of the APC because at the end of the day, the tribunal would throw out the 'server' case.

APC are playing along so that atiku's focus remains on the server issue until such a time that the time frame for the consideration of the case lapses...


Atiku should base his case on substantive infractions that are within the confines of the regulations of INEC...