EMILO2STAY:
oh yes global positioning system but not One picture of earth from space they keep recycling and photo shopping one image.

They have footages from ISS, you said it was produced in the cinema

EMILO2STAY:
you haven't proved gravity to me with all the science you studied.

I doubt if anyone on this board owes you any proof, so don’t demand for one. There’re literally unlimited materials both online and offline to use in educating yourself. It is 2019!

nwabekeyi:
Highlight the portion of this article that said satellites can be launched into the thermsophere.
Does that even make any sense to you?

Satellites are lunched into orbit not into the atmosphere (how can a satellite orbit in the thermosphere?)

Show us where the article said satellites are lunched into the thermosphere.

lol you can't use your head. The thermosphers is between. 85 to 500km

Ola17:


I doubt if anyone on this board owes you any proof, so don’t demand for one. There’s literally unlimited materials both online and offline to use in educating yourself. It is 2019!

stop saying nonsense if you know and believe in something then you should be able to prove it. I taught you guys are educated and know a lot in science. Why will a single proof be difficult.

nwabekeyi:
They have footages from ISS, you said it was produced in the cinema

ok show me. But why not a single image or perhaps a live feed from space 247showing the rotation of the earth.

nwabekeyi:
Should I start by explaining what a magnet is or what?

don't pretend. I said explain to me why gravity will make 50ton ship stick to the earth drag off small objects from sticking to a massive ball bur allow a small magnet to attract an object to it with out the object falling off to the ground. Explain this magic to me pls.

nwabekeyi:
Do you even know the function of a ground based GPS?
Or you just want to confuse yourself?

Tell us, what’s the function of a ground based GPS?

no I don't know why. you defined gps so why don't you tell me.

EMILO2STAY:
lol you can't use your head. The thermosphers is between. 85 to 500km

Why don't satellites melt in the upper thermosphere? The gas pressure at that height is so low that the thermal mass of the gas molecules is almost zero. Yes, each molecule has a very high temperature, but there are so few of them that they just can't increase the temperature of the satellites very much.

If you know how ideal gas equation work, you will understand why a satellite cannot burn in the thermosphere

EMILO2STAY:
no I don't know why don't you tell me.

So why did you mention it initially?

I must tell you that I learnt something new today, I didn’t know that satellites are lunch into the thermosphere. I also now know why the high temperature cannot distabilize them

EMILO2STAY:
ok show me. But why not a single image or perhaps a live feed from space 247showing the rotation of the earth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21X5lGlDOfg




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69-kc-azAY4

EMILO2STAY:
don't pretend. I said explain to me why gravity will make 50ton ship stick to the earth drag off small objects from sticking to a massive ball bur allow a small magnet to attract an object to it with out the object falling off to the ground. Explain this magic to me pls.

i don’t think you can understand it without first knowing how a magnet work. Maybe we should start from the basics

EMILO2STAY:
ok show me. But why not a single image or perhaps a live feed from space 247showing the rotation of the earth.

try following NASA on Twitter, you will see live updates everyday from the ISS

nwabekeyi:
Why don't satellites melt in the upper thermosphere? The gas pressure at that height is so low that the thermal mass of the gas molecules is almost zero. Yes, each molecule has a very high temperature, but there are so few of them that they just can't increase the temperature of the satellites very much.

If you know how ideal gas equation work, you will understand why a satellite cannot burn in the thermosphere

lol story for the gods.. That is how they lie with big grammar. They also gave a similar excuse in wikipeadia, If that is the case if that is the case why do we feel the heat from the sun.

.

EMILO2STAY:
stop saying nonsense if you know and believe in something then you should be able to prove it. I taught you guys are educated and know a lot in science. Why will a single proof be difficult.

Like I said, there are countless materials both online and offline to clear your doubt if you are open minded and honestly want to learn, just look in the right places. It may not be a good idea sourcing information and knowledge from conspiracy theory websites.

EMILO2STAY:
lol story for the gods.. That is how they lie with big grammar. They also gave a similar excuse in wikipeadia, If that is the case if that is the case why do we feel the heat from the sun.

Thats not story when you understand ideal gas equation

Your inability to grasp it doesn’t make it false

Ola17:




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21X5lGlDOfg




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69-kc-azAY4

loooool this theatre works so you can see curvature from that altitude but can never experience it here on earth.

nwabekeyi:
Thats not story when you understand ideal gas equation

Your inability to grasp it doesn’t make it false

go back and rwad the Wikipedia version and come back and explain to me why we still feel the heat of the sun.

EMILO2STAY:
but I thought gravity is pulling it. how come gravity can be able to stick objects like cars and trains on the earth but let something like air overcome it?

Lol gases are relatively light hence Mg acting on gas molecules is low

this nigger lowkey believes in talking donkeys and pregnant virgins

Im done here

Ola17:
.

Like I said, there are countless materials both online and offline to clear your doubt if you are open minded and honestly want to learn, just look in the right places. It may not be a good idea sourcing information and knowledge from conspiracy theory websites.

I am very open minded oga. I am sure these people fake this things it is not difficult. I used to believe just like. The first space mission was I. 1957, the van Allen belt was discovered in 1958. Even NASA said before sending people to space they would have to solve the problems of the van Allen radiation belt. So how did they go to the moon.

EMILO2STAY:
go back and rwad the Wikipedia version and come back and explain to me why we still feel the heat of the sun.

I don’t need to becasue I know that if the pressure of an ideal gas is very low which is the case at that high altitude, thermal mass becomes zero, they can’t be hot enough to burn a satellite.

If you didn’t skip elementary chemistry classes in SS1, this won’t surprise you. It’s simple ideal gas equation

2metrelaurie:


Lol gases are relatively light hence Mg acting on gas molecules is low

this nigger lowkey believes in talking donkeys and pregnant virgins

Im done here

Ok explain this

""The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 °C (4,530 °F) during the day. Despite the high temperature, an observer or object will experience cold temperatures in the thermosphere, because the extremely low density of gas (practically a hard vacuum) is insufficient for the molecules to conduct heat. A normal thermometer will read significantly below 0 °C (32 °F), at least at night, because the energy lost by thermal radiation would exceed the energy acquired from the atmospheric gas by direct contact""
How do we feel the heat of the sun which is 93million miles away in deep vacuum.

nwabekeyi:
I don’t need to becasue I know that if the pressure of an ideal gas is very low which is the case at that high altitude, thermal mass becomes zero, they can’t be hot enough to burn a satellite.

If you didn’t skip elementary chemistry classes in SS1, this won’t surprise you. It’s simple ideal gas equation

if this happens because they are in a vacuum then tell me why we feel the heat of the sun which is also in a vacuum.

nwabekeyi:
i don’t think you can understand it without first knowing how a magnet work. Maybe we should start from the basics

I don't know how a magnet works but I know it attracts object and I don't know how gravity works but they say it gums people to the earth but leave mosquitoes to fly. Just explain.

EMILO2STAY:
if this happens because they are in a vacuum then tell me why we feel the of the sun which is also in a vacuum.

correct the typo...I’m struggling to understand your question

EMILO2STAY:
I don't know how a magnet works but I know it attracts object and I don't know how gravity works but they say it gums people to the earth but leave mosquitoes to fly. Just explain.

If you learn how a magnet works, your question will be answered. This is probably basic 2 physics and you think you can understand astronomy?

nwabekeyi:
If you learn how a magnet works, your question will be answered. This is probably basic 2 physics and you think you can understand astronomy?

your wasting time and dodging the question. If I don't know then explain it to me nahh.

EMILO2STAY:
your wasting time and dodging the question. If I don't know then explain it to me nahh.

Im not dodging anything. How do I explain gravitation to someone who doesn’t know the principle of magnetism?

nwabekeyi:
Im not dodging anything. How do I explain gravitation to someone who doesn’t know the principle of magnetism?

as if I do not live here on earth with you and the gravity. I see you are shying away from it so fashi the matter make i attend to other mentions.

EMILO2STAY:
I am very open minded oga. I am sure these people fake this things it is not difficult. I used to believe just like. The first space mission was I. 1957, the van Allen belt was discovered in 1958. Even NASA said before sending people to space they would have to solve the problems of the van Allen radiation belt. So how did they go to the moon.

What do you understand the Van Allen belt to be? To start with, it is just an area above earth’s lower orbit. This area is made up of charged protons, neutrons and solar particles. It is not a solid wall or something of sorts. The only risk this belt poses to spacecrafts and rockets is increased amount of radiation which is easily overcome with proper equipment insulation.

EMILO2STAY:
as if I do not live here on earth with you and the gravity. I see you are shying away from it so fashi the matter make i attend to other mentions.

I just think it’s a stupid question to use the force of magnetism to refute gravitational force.

These are two different forces entirely, basic physics knowledge would have prevented you from asking that question.

Ola17:


What do you understand the Van Allen belt to be? To start with, it is just an area above earth’s lower orbit. This area is made up of charged protons, neutrons and solar particles. It is not a solid wall or something of sorts. The only risk this belt poses to spacecrafts and rockets is increased amount of radiation which is easily overcome with proper equipment insulation.

lol, did I say it is a solid wall?. The van Allen radiation belt is lethal enough to fry any space craft or air craft going through it. But they went to the moon in something that was wrapped in foil tape and curtain rails.


Pls stop arguing with me and go do some research about the Apollo 11 missions. Why haven't they gone back to the moon In nearly 50yrs. They have the technology to go to space and broadcast every day but say they don't have the technology to go to the moon.

EMILO2STAY:
as if I do not live here on earth with you and the gravity. I see you are shying away from it so fashi the matter make i attend to other mentions.

It is quite obvious you are here for attention and not necessarily to learn.