wickedtuna:
lol..i wonder what side budaa is on

Why wonder if you can read it here?

Only people who have not bothered to do their research are on the side of a non-flat earth. You just need walk till you get to the end of the earth and fall off to know. Unfortunately most who have never get to return to tell what they found.

[img]https:///view/earth-flat-ship-fall-turtle-gif-15304558[/img]

aadoiza:


I told you before that you couldn't win this war. 99% of the world lives in abject and brazen ignorance. You can see the signatures of their ignorance and arrogance all over the thread.
People tend to believe what they are told more than their own observations and perceptions.

Their own observation?
You're an ignoramus

EMILO2STAY:
honestly i didnt know that people are this ignorant and are willing to be in it until I started this thread, am only trying to wake people up, those who have sense should use it. I myself was once like them but I used my reasoning and common sense.
its a pity many dont care to look into things like this, they only care about davido and chioma kind of news. we have all been deceived by the ruling elite and the deceit is still waxing strong. ignorance is a choice those who seek the truth shall find it.

the ruling elite who are all controlled and connected by the occult know the world is a flat plane but would not tell the people because the whole purpose of the heliocentric lie is to hide the creator. that is why the heliocentric model is more endearing to the atheist.

You make it looks like Nigeria is the world,
Are you more intelligent than Iranian, North Korea, China etc that always oppose the US?
They should be the one telling people that the world is FLAT,
Na wah for you Muslim extremists

budaatum:

Why wonder if you can read it here?

Only people who have not bothered to do their research are on the side of a non-flat earth. You just need walk till you get to the end of the earth and fall off to know. Unfortunately most who have never get to return to tell what they found.

[img]https:///view/earth-flat-ship-fall-turtle-gif-15304558[/img]

That falling off the edge of the Earth model only works in a Heliocentric universe with deep dark endless black space.

The flat Earth cosmology doesn't involve any edges only a cosmic egg the worlds exist within. These are worlds separated by different frequencies and parallel realities. The shifting of past, present and future aught to let you perceive we live in a magical universe. The mechanical Euclid universe is nonexistent and Western science continues to fall behind Quatum reality science.

Wake up out your slumber

The Earth has a dome above and is a closed ecological system



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owYTRgcMEv8



Mag Bitter Truth exposes the fake satellite crashing over Michigan in a backyard.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzDii3CodvI

Wake up out your slumber

Tensor:


You make it looks like Nigeria is the world,
Are you more intelligent than Iranian, North Korea, China etc that always oppose the US?
They should be the one telling people that the world is FLAT,
Na wah for you Muslim extremists

is that the reason you caused distraction in the thread by uploading many useless pictures.

And for your info, I am not a muslim

EMILO2STAY:
is that the reason you caused distraction in the thread by uploading many useless pictures.

And for your info, I am not a muslim

op please i would want to learn more about your flat earth model. we round earthers have tried to explian the principles by which our spherical world exist.
you can start with,
1)What is the framework /model/ thesis for the structure of the universe considering the earth is flat.
2) why do everything else in the sky look spherical?
3? lets agree the sun and the moon are the same size, how do we get eclipse and so on?
4)why does the earth have no visible end?

lets start from somewhere.

kkins25:

op please i would want to learn more about your flat earth model. we round earthers have tried to explian the principles by which our spherical world exist.
you can start with,
1)What is the framework /model/ thesis for the structure of the universe considering the earth is flat.
2) why do everything else in the sky look spherical?
3? lets agree the sun and the moon are the same size, how do we get eclipse and so on?
4)why does the earth have no visible end?

lets start from somewhere.

1. The earth is flat and circular around it like a disc covered by a dome and ice walls surround its circumference which we call the south pole or antarctica. The earth is the center of the universe.

2. The sun and moon are roundish in shape no one has actually gone so close to them to determine if its spherical or just round shingles disc.
The stars are not really spherical at all.

3. We get eclipse because the sun is covered by the moon when it passes behind the moon and this is only possible if they are the same size, small and close.

4. The earth has an end, all earth crust ends up around the ocean, while this oceans ends up at the ice barriers we call antarctica. The weather conditions around antarctica poses health risk which is why people are not really interested in exploring the area plus it is closed off from any person who wishes to explore with some people even threatened at gun point to turn back. no one has actually reached to the ends of the antarctic ice wall to know for sure what lies beyond. Their is only one person who has explored the antarctic deeply, admiral byrd, he claimed to have seen land mass bigger than the whole continent of USA with rich resources. But I personally believe he found the dome at the ends of the earth which is why the area was closed off immediately after his exploration.

EMILO2STAY:
1. The earth is flat and circular around it like a disc covered by a dome and ice walls surround its circumference which we call the south pole or antarctica. The earth is the center of the universe.

2. The sun and moon are roundish in shape no one has actually gone so close to them to determine if its spherical or just round shingles disc.
The stars are not really spherical at all.

3. We get eclipse because the sun is covered by the moon when it passes behind the moon and this is only possible if they are the same size, small and close.

4. The earth has an end, all earth crust ends up around the ocean, while this oceans ends up at the ice barriers we call antarctica. The weather conditions around antarctica poses health risk which is why people are not really interested in exploring the area plus it is closed off from any person who wishes to explore with some people even threatened at gun point to turn back. no one has actually reached to the ends of the antarctic ice wall to know for sure what lies beyond. Their is only one person who has explored the antarctic deeply, admiral byrd, he claimed to have seen land mass bigger than the whole continent of USA with rich resources. But I personally believe he found the dome at the ends of the earth which is why the area was closed off immediately after his exploration.

There are worlds beyond the Ice Wall. We live in the second disc from the center which is Shambala. It is the center of everywhere the North pole. Shambala is called the Inner Earth. The Orishas and other ancestors are said to live Inner Earth. There are even myths of beings living in parallel worlds within our reality and we can contact their frequency by summoning them through evocation. The outer rings of the outer wall are more rings of seas and lands with their own time dimensions. Since our ring is smaller our time goes by quicker 24 hrs 360 days with 5 holy days. The outer rings are bigger so their time is slower than our time with days longer and their year is longer. This time dimension continues as the rings of sea then land rings get bigger. Some lands are totally uninhabitable and some bursting with beings.

The land of our world is in a ring shape and not separated by seas. You can literally walk all the way around the world without crossing the sea. Pangea actually never stopped this I am being told.


Wake up out your slumber

Tensor:


Their own observation?
You're an ignoramus

When you've got anything reasonable, devoid of invectives, to say you'll probably have my attention.

EMILO2STAY:
is that the reason you caused distraction in the thread by uploading many useless pictures.

And for your info, I am not a muslim

You're a Muslim!
You can use Taqiyyah

This thread is useless so I just made it more useless

www.nairaland.com/attachments/10518808_on1_jpeg926d4721e86a4d22f963da7ebd10f2b0

You can have this
Just happy small

Tensor:
www.nairaland.com/attachments/10518808_on1_jpeg926d4721e86a4d22f963da7ebd10f2b0

You can have this
Just happy small

I already have the pic, you shouldn't have bothered.

Tensor:


You're a Muslim!
You can use Taqiyyah

This thread is useless so I just made it more useless

its useless for people who don't have to think and reason. Just as it is useless to animals.

EMILO2STAY:
its useless for people who don't have to think and reason. Just as it is useless to animals.

For some its social codintioning yet for a few its the bloodline.

EMILO2STAY:
its useless for people who don't have to think and reason. Just as it is useless to animals.

I agree . BBNAIJA and other distractions created by the elites are keeping people asleep to the truth

Truthwords:
I agree . BBNAIJA and other distractions created by the elites are keeping people asleep to the truth

The lying bloodline can't win like they used too because we are in the Aeon of Sango its the age of enlightenment.

[quote author=EMILO2STAY post=83733994] {/quote]

1. The earth is flat and circular around it like a disc covered by a dome and ice walls surround its circumference which we call the south pole or antarctica. The earth is the center of the universe.

have you forgotten that this poles are made of ice, of course not. lets assume that what you say is true. then that would put the north pole at the centre of the earth where it has enough sunshine to make it turn green. the south and north poles exist because of inadequate sunlight to to warm up the temperatures of the environment. how do you explain the reluctance of the north pole to become liquefied based on your proposed model?

2. The sun and moon are roundish in shape no one has actually gone so close to them to determine if its spherical or just round shingles disc. The stars are not really spherical at all.

whether they are spherical in shape or not does not matter. its good you acknowledge that they are round.
Also we need to take note that this "shingles" disk as you say are made up of something. here's why;
based on your proposed model the moon does not reflect the sun's glorious light. both bodies are both luminous. don't you think, sir, that there must exist some principle by which the moon and sun produce light? surely you are sane enough to agree with me that some chemical reaction is occurring on this bodies that causes them to emit such light.
my point is the components of this celestial bodies are not observed to be falling down as a result of gravitational pull.

3. We get eclipse because the sun is covered by the moon when it passes behind the moon and this is only possible if they are the same size, small and close.

i suggest that you think this your statement . if the moon and the sun are rotating above the earth, it means that it should be visible at all times to all nations. lets say you are in Nigeria and i am of japan. remember we are on a flat plane which means that even if it is day time in nigeria and it is night in japan; i should be able to see the sun with a telescope, all i have to do would be get to high altitude.

now lets talk of the eclipse, comparing your model above with what we have here; a solar eclipse at the southern hemisphere[img]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse#/media/File:SE1935Dec25A.png[/img] and then with what i have here [img]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse#/media/File:SE1935Feb03P.png[/img] you can see sir that a solar eclipse cannot happen at the north pole and south pole at the same time.thats no1 flaw in your model

no2 flaw of your model with respect to eclipses is the conspicuous inconsistency of the direction of travel of the sun and moon. i assume that for solar eclipse to occur the moon has to be inbtw the sun and earth, which means that the sun actually has a higher altitude than the moon in your model.
this probably is possible in your model. but there is still irregularities with respect to who experiences the eclipse in this model of yours. let me try and demonstrate: this is my model again[img] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7d/SE1935Feb03P.png[/img]. you can see that it sensibly demonstrate how the moon blocks beam of light from the sun. But your model does not take into account that the light from the sun is diverging or rather traveling in all directions. contrary to your model below
assumes that light travels in one direction from the sun. this would affect the countries or part of the earth affected by the solar eclipse. inorder for your model to be accurate you have to 'lie' about the nature of light and deliberately ignore the principles by which light operates. i can say my model is accurate because i remember well my physics experiment with my ss2 kids two years ago, which left their jaws wide open.

Another flaw of yours is the lunar eclipse.
for the lunar eclipse to occur the earth has to be in between the moon and the sun. how is this possible on your model: here is what the HQ of your school of thought says concerning the matter;

There is also a possibility that the Shadow Object is a known celestial body which orbits the sun, and which projects its shadow upon the moon; but more study would be needed to track the positions of Mercury, Venus and the sun's asteroid satellites and correlate them with the equations for the lunar eclipse before any conclusion could be drawn.

if i read correctly, flat earthers like yourself are suggesting that the shadow cast on the moon is not of the earth but of another "known" celestial body which they don't know. in order words the flat earth model cannot explain the phenomenon of a flat earth. it simply makes no logical sense.

another flaw is the nature of the moon. you say the moon is producing its own light, and have even come about somewhat credible arguments such as these;

If the moon is a reflector of the sun's light, she could not radiate or throw down upon the earth any other light than such as she first receives from the sun. No difference could exist in the quality or character of the light; and it could not possibly differ in any other respect than that of intensity or quantity. It has been asserted in opposition to the above, that the moon might absorb some of the rays of light from the sun and reflect only the remaining rays.

however, the flaw in these thought is that the author forgets to consider what reflection really is. if you shine light to a red tshirt you can observe that the reflection would be red. same with other colours aside black of course. the author uses the word reflection in the sense that the moon reflects like a mirror. but the moon is not a smooth surface neither is it composed of finely polished aluminium.

if the moon produces its own light then why does it change colour to what some refer as a 'blood moon' or an orange colour during lunar eclipses?
my model has explained irrefutably [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_eclipse#/media/File:Total_lunar_eclipse_on_January_21,_2019_(45910439045)_(cropped).jpg]here.[/url]
meanwhile your model proposes this;

A Lunar Eclipse occurs about twice a year when a satellite of the sun passes between the sun and moon.
This satellite is called the Shadow Object or Antimoon. Its orbital plane is tilted at an angle to the sun's orbital plane, making eclipses possible only when the three bodies (Sun, Object, and Moon) are aligned. Within a given year a maximum of three lunar eclipses can occur. Despite the fact that there are more solar than lunar eclipses each year, over time many more lunar eclipses are seen at any single location on earth than solar eclipses. This occurs because a lunar eclipse can be seen from the entire half of the earth beneath the moon at that time, while a solar eclipse is visible only along a narrow path on the earth's surface.

i have not tested this per se but i also remember when i discussed with my students on refraction and defraction of light waves. we carried out experiment using glass prisms and rectangular blocks to demonstrate that light could be split into its components when you channel it through a glass prism. when light passes through the earths atmosphere it is been refracted, and gives the sky a characteristic color of blue. this same principle is also operating during a blood moon.

4. The earth has an end, all earth crust ends up around the ocean, while this oceans ends up at the ice barriers we call Antarctica. The weather conditions around Antarctica poses health risk which is why people are not really interested in exploring the area

you seem to only consider humans. but you forget to note that whales, polar bears, seals, and a plethora of other organsms live on/by this antartica. humans are simply not adapted to endure such harsh wether conditions. if the land had supported plant growth then be rest assured that it would have been populated by now. do note that it was not a penguin taking this pictures.

plus it is closed off from any person who wishes to explore with some people even threatened at gun point to turn back. no one has actually reached to the ends of the antarctic ice wall to know for sure what lies beyond. Their is only one person who has explored the antarctic deeply, admiral byrd, he claimed to have seen land mass bigger than the whole continent of USA with rich resources. But I personally believe he found the dome at the ends of the earth which is why the area was closed off immediately after his exploration.

have you considered that someone subjected to cold wether conditions are vunerable to hypothermia? and may have been hallucinating. same thing happens with someone lost in the deep abys of the arabian deserts, it would certainly look like the sand is an endless ocean.
cheers!!!

Kkins25


You are over educated. Which is you have too much miseducation or an overdose of the indoctrination because you teach these theories to students.

First off the Sun is a disc and no one has seen the Sun from 360 degrees round anymore than they have seen other sides of the Moon. The Sun is no sphere it is a disc like the Moon.


The Sun is not a gas giant ball and the Moon a giant lifeless rock planet.

Purpose of the Sun and Moon is simple one heats the Earth and the other cools it down. One provides light for day and the other night. One gets all the glory and other all the worry. The moon in full worries people all throughout history.

Yet lets get practical because somehow the whole point behind the globe is cover up. From what? Astrological magick and heavenly forces. Whether the Earth is round or flat Astrology works! Ifa works! Vodoun works!

The globe is a distraction nothing more.

Wake up out your slumber

EMILO2STAY, I suggest you respond here to these issues raised by Kkins25 rather than "book space" on the new thread you opened on the same issue.

You need to tackle the flaws he put forward in your model. At the end of the day we need FACTS, verifiable facts at that, to convince one to move to either side of the argument.

sagenaija:
EMILO2STAY, I suggest you respond here to these issues raised by Kkins25 rather than "book space" on the new thread you opened on the same issue.

You need to tackle the flaws he put forward in your model. At the end of the day we need FACTS, verifiable facts at that, to convince one to move to either side of the argument.

Eclipses are caused by the X moons Rahu and Ketu. All heavenly objects Sun moon and x moons are disc not spheres.

Godhatesodomy:

Eclipses are caused by the X moons Rahu and Ketu. All heavenly objects Sun moon and x moons are disc not spheres.

I hope you are not a troll.

[quote author=kkins25 post=83847191][/quote]


1. On arctic and antarctic: Yes the northern pole is the center of the earth, it actually had more green life than the south because it is smaller and receives a little more sun light than the south. Even human activities are more in the arctic than the antarctic. There has been oil explorations in the arctic but never in the antarctic that is to show you how hospitable it is compared to the south pole antarctic were oxygen level drops at a certain distance.
lf the earth is truly a globe with half the sphere lite and the other half not, then arctic and the antarctic polar regions and area of comparable latitudes north and south of the equator should share similar conditions and characteristics such ad comparable temperature, seasonal changes length of day light, plant and animal life.
In reality however the north and south poles differ greatly in many ways, such as different amount of heat and cold. difference in summer and winter, difference in plant and animal life. The great contrast is a strong argument against the globe earth model.

Antarctic is by far the coldest place on earth with an average annual temperature of approximately -57°f and a record low of -135.80°. While the arctic north pole enjoys a comparable warn 4°. The northern arctic region enjoys moderately warm summers and manageable winters, while the southern antarctic regions never even warms up enough to perpetually melt snow and ice.


2. On sun and moon being pulled by gravity: the saying that the sun and moon are burning gases is just fallacy it has never been tested in any way to determine if any of the celestial bodies are burning gases there absolutely no proof of that. It is just guess work.

There is no proof of gravity till date it still remains a theory, another problem with gravity is that it is theorizes that gravity sticks people and every thing on the earth to the globe then how come it causes the earth to go around the sun and the moon to orbit around the earth, is gravity some sort of magic? With a mind of its own.
it has been observed that the sun and moon are not a piece of rock in space. I know your theory on gravitational pull on the moon is based on the fallacy that the moon is a rock in space or planet. This is absolutely false in every way.
Research has shown an amazing discovery that the moon is a semi translucent Self illuminating object. why? because through out history it is on record that stars have been seen through the moon sometimes even the blue cloud and the moon exhibit different properties from the sun. The nature of the sun light is warm, drying preservative and antiseptic, while that of the moon is silver, cool, damp, putrifying and septic. This is a clear indicator that the moon is producing its own light. Secondly it is impossible for a semi translucent object to uniformly reflect light equally outwardly in all directions as the moon does. And the space travels to the moon by NASA in 1969 and beyond is all fake as I have proved in my new thread. So your saying that the moon orbits the earth due to gravitational pull based on the theory that the moon is a planet is false and can never be proven.

EMILO2STAY:


1. On arctic and antarctic: Yes the northern pole is the center of the earth, it actually had more green life than the south because it is smaller and receives a little more sun light than the south. Even human activities are more in the arctic than the antarctic. There has been oil explorations in the arctic but never in the antarctic that is to show you how hospitable it is compared to the south pole antarctic were oxygen level drops at a certain distance.
lf the earth is truly a globe with half the sphere lite and the other half not, then arctic and the antarctic polar regions and area of comparable latitudes north and south of the equator should share similar conditions and characteristics such ad comparable temperature, seasonal changes length of day light, plant and animal life.
In reality however the north and south poles differ greatly in many ways, such as different amount of heat and cold. difference in summer and winter, difference in plant and animal life. The great contrast is a strong argument against the globe earth model.

Antarctic is by far the coldest place on earth with an average annual temperature of approximately -57°f and a record low of -135.80°. While the arctic north pole enjoys a comparable warn 4°. The northern arctic region enjoys moderately warm summers and manageable winters, while the southern antarctic regions never even warms up enough to perpetually melt snow and ice.

2. On sun and moon being pulled by gravity: the saying that the sun and moon are burning gases is just fallacy it has never been tested in any way to determine if any of the celestial bodies are burning gases there absolutely no proof of that. It is just guess work.

There is no proof of gravity till date it still remains a theory, another problem with gravity is that it is theorizes that gravity sticks people and every thing on the earth to the globe then how come it causes the earth to go around the sun and the moon to orbit around the earth, is gravity some sort of magic? With a mind of its own.

1. kkins25 asked: “don't you think, sir, that there must exist some principle by which the moon and sun produce light?” Please address this.

2. He also said: “you can see sir that a solar eclipse cannot happen at the north pole and south pole at the same time. no1 flaw in your model”
And: “lets assume that what you say is true. then that would put the north pole at the centre of the earth where it has enough sunshine to make it turn green. the south and north poles exist because of inadequate sunlight to warm up the temperatures of the environment. how do you explain the reluctance of the north pole to become liquefied based on your proposed model?”
And this: “you seem to only consider humans. but you forget to note that whales, polar bears, seals, and a plethora of other organsms live on/by this antartica.”

3. And: “if the moon and the sun are rotating above the earth, it means that it should be visible at all times to all nations. lets say you are in Nigeria and i am of japan. remember we are on a flat plane which means that even if it is day time in nigeria and it is night in japan; i should be able to see the sun with a telescope, all i have to do would be get to high altitude.”

4. And this: “Another flaw of yours is the lunar eclipse.
for the lunar eclipse to occur the earth has to be in between the moon and the sun. how is this possible on your model”

[quote author=Godhatesodomy post=83850036]Kkins25

You are over educated. [s]Which is you have too much miseducation or an overdose of the indoctrination because you teach these theories to students. [/s]

First off the Sun is a disc and no one has seen the Sun from 360 degrees round anymore than they have seen other sides of the Moon. The Sun is no sphere it is a disc like the Moon.

if its impossible for NASA to go outside the earth, i wonder how possible it is for you to know that the sun is a disc.

The Sun is not a gas giant ball and the Moon a giant lifeless rock planet.

but you have no proof, do you? where is your evidence?

Purpose of the Sun and Moon is simple, one heats the Earth and the other cools it down. One provides light for day and the other night. One gets all the glory and other all the worry. The moon in full worries people all throughout history.

The sun has no purpose just like the moon. its all a cosmic coincidence.

Yet lets get practical because somehow the whole point behind the globe is cover up. From what? Astrological magick and heavenly forces. Whether the Earth is round or flat Astrology works! Ifa works! Vodoun works!

GPS doesn't work on a flat earth model. the google map-get direction feature which you frequently use works on a globe model.

The globe is a distraction nothing more.

Wake up out your slumber

flat earth is nothing but a deliberate exuberance of ignorance.

Emilo2stay, sagenaija has pointed out issues you should be "ironing out". also do tell us how we have satellite images of the earth since you say gravity is a hoax

[quote author=kkins25 post=83847191][/quote]

solar eclipse.
The solar eclipse is a clear indicator that the sun and moon hover around the circuit of the flat earth. Because they are in the atmosphere and about the same size we see the moon covering the face of the sun sun perfectly during a solar eclipse. The sun being the faster luminary hovering over the the circumference of the earth while spotlighting the areas directly below it goes behind the moon during a solar eclipse and is obscured by the moon untill it passes away from the cover of the moon and restores its light on the earth during this occurrence it can be clearly seen that the two luminaries are about the same size.
This would not be possible in the heliocentric model were the sun is said to be 400times bigger than the moon and 400 times farther away thereby making the moon to be like just a grain of sand compared to the sun and the moon 230, 000 miles away from the earth if this is the case how can the moon obscure the suns 93millionmiles journey to the earth. The image you gave from Wikipedia does not sensibly demontrate a solar eclipse if the sun is 400times bigger and 93million miles away. Because that will make the moon an insignificant object In the suns light making it impossible for the moon to perfectly cover the face of the sun the way it does.
Secondly I never said the suns light travels in a straight path to the earth. Don't put words in my mouth. and I don't have to lie about any thing because there is nothing I have said that cannot be observed and tested.
The mistake comes from you're diagram which assumes the sun to be 93million miles away in space, which is just a fallacy which has never been measured in any way or detected since the time of its postulation till date. If the sun is that far away then the solar eclipse will no be possible. But because the two luminaries are close, small and about the same size that is why eclipses are possible on the earth.

Lunar eclipse.

I have said it before that The suggestion that it is the Earth's shadow that causes a lunar eclipse is nothing more than assumption. There os no proof and it's just a propaganda to push forward the globe earth model.
It is not known with certainty what causes lunar eclipses.
Through out history there has been over 50cases where the sun and moon have been seen in the sky during a lunar eclipse. This would not be possible if the Earth's shadow was responsible for the eclipse.
Now According to the Newtonian theory, it is necessary in a Lunar Eclipse, for the Sun to be on the opposite side of the supposed globular Earth, so that the Earth's shadow may thus in passing be cast upon the Moon. But, as Lunar Eclipses have occurred when both the Sun and the Moon were above the horizon, it stands to reason that, in such circumstances, it would be absolutely impossible for the shadow of the Earth to have been the cause of the Eclipse of the Moon.
But During an Eclipse of the Moon its surface has repeatedly been seen during the whole time it lasted, thus clearly proving that its Eclipse could not have been caused by the shadow of the Earth.
Again, the Earth, with a supposed diameter of 8,000 miles, is said to revolve round the Sun, with the velocity of about 1,000 miles per hour;
the Moon being reckoned to have a diameter of 2,200 miles, and to go round the Earth at the rate of 180 miles per minute, thus, according to calculation, the Eclipse of the Moon, by the shadow of the Earth passing it, should not take four minutes, whereas the usual time occupied by a Lunar Eclipse is generally about two hours, and it has been known to have been extended to four.

It is clearly evident that there is not the shadow of a proof that the shadow of the Earth is the cause of a Lunar Eclipse, and therefore no argument can be drawn from this alleged proof that the Earth is a globular Planet.
Another thing is that you have to stop quoting from a third party and use it as argument against me because there are so many flat earthers who are out there to miss misinform people and ridicule the idea.
Eclipses have been predicted and calculated for ages regardless of heliocentric or geocentric cosmology or what causes it. the chaldeans used to predict the eclipse for thousands of year yet they have an entire different theory of the universe than we have.

[quote author=kkins25 post=83847191][/quote]

The last point you raised is totally unnecessary because it doesn't change the well known fact, a well known fact I mean "fact" that
1. The antarctic os the coldest region on earth.
2.the arctic and antarctic differ greatly in weather conditions.
3.it is impossible to have different weather conditions on the poles on a globe earth model.
4.that 10countries signed a treaty to guard the arctic militarily.
5. That people have been turned back and gun point if they attempt to explore the south pole.
6.they people have been fined jailed and threatened for trying to explore antarctica.
7.that oxygen level in the antarctica is very low an snot good for human habitation.
8. There has never been any official report of anybody reaching the ends of the ice walls.
9 that the arctic and antarctic differ in plant and animal life.
Admiral byrd was not hallucinating when he said what he said because he did it on live t. v and not out in the cold. This is a man nick named the true Indiana jones who even got government support to explore the southern region. You are been silly here and desperate. Don't let your pride as a school teacher make you over confident of heliocentrism because it is built on theories or else I will throw question to you, you will never be able to answer.

kkins25:
... do note that it was not a penguin taking this pictures.

kkins25, got some "wee yu kip kwayet there" savage jokes sha....

[quote author=kkins25 post=83874142][/quote]


You have not seen the Sun from Space because Space doesn't exist. Gods word is true the Earth is a closed ecological system an firmanent. No one has seen all sides of the Sun nor the Moon.


GPS is wireless communication relayed from radio towers connected by worldwide underground and above ground cables. Wireless communication would exist in both models Flat or Globe. Astrology works in both models Flat or Globe. Look at the bigger picture that the great science of Ancient Egypt was Alchemy and Astrology and its been hidden behind NASA lies. All those Freemasons study Egypt not NASA. They talk alot about how great Rome and Greece were yet its a lie they are studying Ancient Egypt the civilization built by African kings.




Wake up out your slumber

sagenaija:

I hope you are not a troll.

The only trolls are those who keep on insisting the world is a globe in a thread full of evidence to the contrary.

Wake up out your slumber

Godhatesodomy:


The only trolls are those who keep on insisting the world is a globe in a thread full of evidence to the contrary.

Wake up out your slumber

Dictionary defition:
evidence
/ˈɛvɪd(ə)ns/
Learn to pronounce
noun
the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
.. .. .. .. .. ..
With ALL the available technology of today it should be easy to provide VERIFIABLE proofs to some of your arguments. We have seen NONE here.
What we see are people living in dream world. Preferring to taunt rather than engage in a meaning exchange of information. They are the ones who are actually dozing and living in the unreal while accusing others of sleep.
Cheers!

sagenaija:

Dictionary defition:
evidence
/ˈɛvɪd(ə)ns/
Learn to pronounce
noun
the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
.. .. .. .. .. ..
With ALL the available technology of today it should be easy to provide VERIFIABLE proofs to some of your arguments. We have seen NONE here.
What we see are people living in dream world. Preferring to taunt rather than engage in a meaning exchange of information. They are the ones who are actually dozing and living in the unreal while accusing others of sleep.
Cheers!

You can't be serious.


Nasa hasn't been to the Moon once let alone returning. With all the advancement of rocket science claimed took them to the Moon then how come Nasa uses Russian rockets? They haven't never been to Mars or any other planet except in the movies or using CGI.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-YBw1cH8Fs

Wake up out your slumber