Amujale:


What is the meaning of Christian persecution ?
Christianity cannot make any claims about persecution because it’s a false conception.
Rather than being persecuted, Christianity is the persecutor of true history ; their failed attempts to wipe out true history and as such murdering billions of people on the malicious pretext that their false and fabricated ideas was passed down to them from their God.
The problem with that argument is evident in the malicious writings of the weapon of mass destruction known as the Christian bible.
Christianity peddles a false representation of history.
The points in the previous post is very clear.
Jesus is a fictional character.

There is a software called Nero Burning ROM which has the image of city Rome burning as a result Emperor Nero political action, th event was latter blamed on Christian, is that a false hostory as well.


[img]https://i.redd.it/dlo2vitc1ko01.png[/img]

Here is a link to read more
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Fire_of_Rome

MuttleyLaff:
It is obvious, it is oblivious to you, that this was a test of Abraham's faith and for him to have an opportunity to shine, to show how deep his love of God and trust in God is. You dont know warris going on, lol.

Abraham willingness and/or preparedness earned him a mention, a place and/or position in the greatly desired or envied Hebrews chapter eleven "Hall of faith" or "Faith Hall of Fame" lol

no sir, we have seen this many times in movies and in reality. Not only that, you will have noticed that it is always the bad guys who make such request. Eg, in the beautiful story told by immortal technique in his track titled 'dance with the devil'. In this song a boy who wanted to join a gang was asked to prove his 'faith' by raping a woman. Unknown to him this woman he was to rape was his very own beloved mother. He raped her but wasn't aware because this gang had covered her head.

It is only a devil that would test your faith by asking putting you in a disastrous mental situation where you have to choose between a loved one whom you feel and touch, and a diety that you never knew, habe never seen and never heard (except the thought in your head). Why would a God of love test the faith of a man this way.. why then do you muttleylaff find islamic radicals evil? Is it not God also testing their 'faith'? Huh?
After all this God you choose to serve is one who has played a very important role in wars fought by his tribe-the Israelites.

Have you muttleylaff put your self for once in the shoes of the cannanites or the dwellers within the wall of jericho? Is it not the same way you see islamic jihadist now?
To you they are evil but to them they are simply exuberating their faith in their precious God. How dare you claim Yahweh is the light.
Abraham had not killed his son in the flesh, but verily verily I tell you, isaac had been slain in the mind of his beloved father..

GoodMuyis:


There is a software called Nero Burning ROM which has the image of city Rome burning as a result Emperor Nero political action, th event was latter blamed on Christian, is that a false hostory as well.


[img]https://i.redd.it/dlo2vitc1ko01.png[/img]

Here is a link to read more
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Fire_of_Rome

The story of the Roman Emperor Nero and his exploits does nothing to refute the fact that the Jesus character is fake.

The Romans were professional warmongers, and probably had the first ever known professional soldiers to be let loose into a conflict situation.

The Romans manufactured Christianity in their attempt to replace true history with the fakery inside of Abrahamic religious text.

Anyone who studies Roman history ought to have realised that the true aim of the Romans was to conquer the world, and that they manufactured the Christian bible as their means of their attempts to achieve that, they failed because they were overwhelmed by the Ottoman Turks another major ancient empire that would later make use of a different type of Abrahamic religious text alongside their swords.

The irony is mind boggling, one cannot persecute a lie. One cannot prosecute a falsehood.

Only things that are correct and true can really be subjected to prosecution.

Ancient Egyptian Mythology is a subject of prosecution by both Christianity and Islam.

Christianity cannot be persecuted but it can be revealed not to be true.

Another way of looking at it, is that only if Christianity was real would it have been able to assume that they have been persecuted, but Christianity is fake, therefore one cannot use such terminologies in association with it’s false narratives.

Reverse psychology is one of the greatest tricks inside of Abrahamic religious text.

When the Eurocentric warmongers set out to exploit foreign land, Abrahamic religious dignitaries were always present as part of the invading force.

Christianity doesn’t have the moral right to be making use of the term ‘persecution’ and Christianity in the same sentence unless it’s under the context of their own confessions of the uncountable times that Christianity was the one involved in such persecution and all the other wicked activities that can be associated with persecution.

Amujale:
What has Jesus done?

The answer by all accounts, is Jesus did nothing.

Jesus did nothing, due to the fact that fictional characters cannot really does stuff.

The Romans invented the Jesus character in order to pacify a militaristic rebel group that existed in the Palestinian regions.

In the manufacturing of the Christian bible, the authors that invented the Jesus character made up false claims of someone else's accomplishments whilst simultaneously defaming that same someone to which they had copied from.

For instance, the Jesus character is an adaptation of Romulus as well as various othe older religious iconic characters. i.e Buddha, Dionysus, Ela, Horus, Krishna, Merlin, Osiris e.t.c

Romulus is a Roman state god.

The similarities between Romulus and the Jesus character are too numerous to be a coincidence.


.Virgin Mother has a miraculous birth.

Essentially, Rhea Silvia/Romulus vs Mary/Jesus

Rhea Silvia, daughter of Numitor, king of Alba Longa. Before their conception, Numitor's brother Amulius seized power, killed all of Numitor's male heirs and forced Rhea Silvia to become a Vestak Virgin, sworn to chastity.

The narrative goes on, Rhea conceives the pregnancy of Romulus due to being miraculously impregnated by the Roman god Mars.

Therefore, according to the Romulus narrative, his mother was Rhea Silvia and his father was the Roman god Mars.

. Romulus grew up to be a shepherd. He was cared for by a shepherd and his wife: Faustulus and Acca Larentia.

. Romulus was killed by the Roman state.

. When Romulus was no more, similar rumours were spread. i.e the people wanted to search for his body but the Senate told them not to, 'for he had risen to join the gods'.

.Romulus was resurrected, taken to heaven and glorified by the Romans.

Proculus Julius was said to have sworn on a sacrd oath and recalled seeing Romulus descending from the sky in front of him.

.The people of Rome concluded that Romulus had become a god and ascended to heaven, after his death and ressurection, and began to worship him; calling him the son of god.

There are more than fifty known similarities between Romulus and the Jesus character and another one is expressed in the submissions of the 'Christ myth theory'; which holds the view that both Romulus and the Jesus character were mythical, fictional character who never existed.

As in Romulus himself was probably an adaptation of some other older religious character and concept. i.e ancient Egyptian Mythology, Buddhism, Hinduism e.t.c

That has always been the trend in Eurocentric ideologies of those times.

Conspiracy theories are easily deflated not by hearing more of the theories but by asking relevant questions.

It is a well known fact that the Jews hated the Romans. So, if the Romans invented the historical Jesus, how did it find its way into the Jewish traditions (the Jews dislike Jesus to no small measure)?
The Jews actually boast "we killed Jesus!"

Amujale:

Jesus is a fictional character.

Amujale:
Jesus has done nothing, because Jesus isn’t real.

Christianity is fake, therefore one cannot use such terminologies in association with it’s false narratives.

You and vayina keep avoiding the question I keep asking which is, Do you not learn anything from George Orwell's Animal Farm because Napoleon, Snowball, Squealer, Boxer and Mr Jones et al are not real? Funny people some, who "cannot use such terminologies in association" because in their opinion, they are "false narratives", when Words that have been written are not only real but create all other things that exist. Believers, I call them. Deniers of the physical material things before them for the crap they create inside their head. Not that there's crap in your head, mind. Just that, hmm.

You say Christianity has done much wrong because you see it as a belief system, and not as the education system that it is, the same education system that allows you to see as you do. Or tell, did you not educate yourself in Christianity? Would your eyes open without it? In fact, are you not a Christian? You sure as hell behave like one, asking us all to believe you without providing evidence for your claim after ensuring that we see when you present it. A believer, or at worst, one who asks others to believe them, like those pastors who peddle religion that you claim is false. Makes me wonder if you engaged at all in the thread "what would civilization be like without religion", someone will post you a link.

As fiction as the Bible is; and not just Jesus alone, but Moses, Adam and Eve, Job etc, it is a book, a teaching tool, and not the God. It shows how learning evolved over time and teaches how to learn and how to teach and open eyes, and those who at least accept that the physical words themself are real, and not fiction, but a substance that exists in a physical book you'd feel if I whack your head with it. The fact that a book is fiction does not invalidate it, especially one that has been influencing thought for almost 2000 thousand years. That influence, which you are aware of, is not "fictional", obviously has "real" "character" and "terminologies" which have done quite a lot, bad and good, and you can't show that to be false, or can you?

You fail to give us Nigerians credit, is what I think. In my lifetime there've been period when a family had one Bible on the mantle no one touched it except pa or the lucky one who carried it to church for him on Sunday. And now, everyone has one. Over time, more people will read it and as more time goes by more will understand what they read and perhaps consider the implications of their understanding. I wonder what we'd be if we didn't have the Holy Bible. We'd all believe the Quran I guess since something will fill the void.

1Sharon:


No hell in the old testament !!

By hell in this context, he means the grave.

budaatum:



You and vayina keep avoiding the question I keep asking which is, Do you not learn anything from George Orwell's Animal Farm because Napoleon, Snowball, Squealer, Boxer and Mr Jones et al are not real? Funny people some, who "cannot use such terminologies in association" because in their opinion, they are "false narratives", when Words that have been written are not only real but create all other things that exist. Believers, I call them. Deniers of the physical material things before them for the crap they create inside their head. Not that there's crap in your head, mind. Just that, hmm.

You say Christianity has done much wrong because you see it as a belief system, and not as the education system that it is, the same education system that allows you to see as you do. Or tell, did you not educate yourself in Christianity? Would your eyes open without it? In fact, are you not a Christian? You sure as hell behave like one, asking us all to believe you without providing evidence for your claim after ensuring that we see when you present it. A believer, or at worst, one who asks others to believe them, like those pastors who peddle religion that you claim is false. Makes me wonder if you engaged at all in the thread "what would civilization be like without religion", someone will post you a link.

As fiction as the Bible is; and not just Jesus alone, but Moses, Adam and Eve, Job etc, it is a book, a teaching tool, and not the God. It shows how learning evolved over time and teaches how to learn and how to teach and open eyes, and those who at least accept that the physical words themself are real, and not fiction, but a substance that exists in a physical book you'd feel if I whack your head with it. The fact that a book is fiction does not invalidate it, especially one that has been influencing thought for almost 2000 thousand years. That influence, which you are aware of, is not "fictional", obviously has "real" "character" and "terminologies" which have done quite a lot, bad and good, and you can't show that to be false, or can you?

You fail to give us Nigerians credit, is what I think. In my lifetime there've been period when a family had one Bible on the mantle no one touched it except pa or the lucky one who carried it to church for him on Sunday. And now, everyone has one. Over time, more people will read it and as more time goes by more will understand what they read and perhaps consider the implications of their understanding. I wonder what we'd be if we didn't have the Holy Bible. We'd all believe the Quran I guess since something will fill the void.

All the Abrahamic religious text are fake, false and counterintuitive.

The Abrahamic religions include Christianity, Islam and Judaism.

All the Abrahamic religions peddle a false representation of history.

In other words, the Abrahamic religions are a bunch of false ideologies that are used as tools of propaganda; either to advance their false claims or as a political tool by Arabian fundamentalists or Eurocentric rulers.

Amujale:


All the Abrahamic religions are fake, false and counterintuitive.

The Abrahamic religions include Christianity, Islam and Judaism.

All the Abrahamic religions peddle a false representation of history.

In other words, the Abrahamic religions are a bunch of false ideologies that are used as tools of propaganda; either to advance their false claims or as a political tool by Arabian fundamentalists or Eurocentric rulers.

They work "as tools" and you can't provide an alternative.

budaatum:



You and vayina keep avoiding the question I ..

You and vayina isn’t making any sense.

Carry your craze elsewhere, foolish guy.

Won’t you go and hide yourself under a tiny plank of wood and stay there until you have been reconnected with your senses.

You are scum.

You are pure scum.

Imagine, maybe you need to get a psycho analysis of the piece of dirt that you call your brain.

Remember, I told you to never quote me with your disingenuous comments.

You are a total disgrace to all the human senses.

Attempt to give one reasonable explanation for why someone with your mindset isn’t a bastard?

What would you call someone who doesn’t believe something to be true, yet continues to peddle as though it were true?

Exactly.

I don’t have time for scum such as yourself.

Truth is a good alternative to a falsehood.

Real history is the alternative to the fake narratives.

African secular history is the narrative that ought to learnt by all Africans; all the false narratives similar to the Abrahamic religions need to be thrown into the intellectual bin.

Abrahamic religious text should take its place on the fictional section of our libraries, far away from our own personal spirituality or secular history.

"Humans are immortal Souls" means Humans are "Living Spirit Souls of God that have everlasting Life".

When we die, our Souls are havested by God. The Wicked(Weeds) Souls are burnt and perished. The Righteous enter The Kindom of Heaven for Re-use.

Jesus' Resurrection the Third Day is the main Relevance of the Immortality of Human Souls.

Christ is "The Faith" and Those Souls who believe in Him shall not die but shall have Eternal Life.

Daejoyoung:

By hell in this context, he means the grave.

He better

budaatum:
I dragged this out of the cacophony hoping we'd have quiet here if you do not mind.


Can you show what you mean by what Jesus did first before we consider its "significance", and whether "humans are immortal Souls"?

What did Jesus do Jozzy?

Can we start from what John the Baptist say that, Jesus will baptized fire which is the confirmation of the release of the Spirit of God on all flesh. Joel 2:28


The animal sacrifice prescribed in Judaism is not perfect because animal blood which is used for atonement did not Soul or consciousness of wrong doing. Remember the blood of Abel speak and demand for justice. Since God will not demand for human sacrifice, something has to be done. Jesus brutal death can be trivialized but that does not change the fact that **He do away with animal sacrifice and provide a better one through himself** and that was done once and for all.

He break the standing order that only the High Priest can approach God directly, by giving us the Holy Ghost and showing us that we can call God our father without fear, of which the Muslim are still much afraid to do.

Amujale:

What would you call someone who doesn’t believe something to be true, yet continues to peddle as though it were true?

You consider such a person understands instead of "believe" that "something", though I wouldn't say I peddle since nowhere have I peddled anything to you. But if I did "peddle" anything, it surely wouldn't be to or with or for the benefit of a foulmouthed person like you.

xpmode:


Can we start from what John the Baptist say that, Jesus will baptized fire which is the confirmation of the release of the Spirit of God on all flesh. Joel 2:28

Explain "confirmation of the release of the Spirit of God" to me, and what you mean by "confirmation of the release of the Spirit of God on all flesh" please.

orunto27:


Christ is "The Faith" and Those Souls who believe in Him shall not die but shall have Eternal Life.

"Eternal life" but not on earth, right, since we all know dead people who are actually dead?

Amujale:

Truth is a good alternative to a falsehood.

Real history is the alternative to the fake narratives.

African secular history is the narrative that ought to learnt by all Africans; all the false narratives similar to the Abrahamic religions need to be thrown into the intellectual bin.

Abrahamic religious text should take its place on the fictional section of our libraries, far away from our own personal spirituality or secular history.

That's why you lobby and fight for history to be taught in our schools, right?

sonmvayina:


then it is useless and a distraction...obey Gods law, as it was done from the time of moses..or why place another god before the creator..you see my points so far..you have to disobey Gods law in other to make jesus relevant to anything...

our ancestors were teaching these laws before the white man came to set us on a dangerous path with their rebellion against the creator of all and we were progressing at our own pace...

We add to it because we evolved and know more. Today, we even add a lot more by going to school to learn. Or is there no Maths, History, Science and Languages in your Holy Book, and did you not go to worship five times a week? I can assure you'd need some to survive until you start in the afterlife and someone must have paid so you got some. I wonder why they did not limit you to the old Testament alone.

Humans always rebel against the creator is precisely the lesson of the first rebellion against any authority, after all, one can't sin if there were no laws.

Amujale:


You and vayina isn’t making any sense.

Carry your craze elsewhere, foolish guy.

Won’t you go and hide yourself under a tiny plank of wood and stay there until you have been reconnected with your senses.

You are scum.

You are pure scum.

Imagine, maybe you need to get a psycho analysis of the piece of dirt that you call your brain.

Remember, I told you to never quote me with your disingenuous comments.

You are a total disgrace to all the human senses.

Attempt to give one reasonable explanation for why someone with your mindset isn’t a bastard?

What would you call someone who doesn’t believe something to be true, yet continues to peddle as though it were true?

Exactly.

I don’t have time for scum such as yourself.

You are very funny, and rather immature. Did you not learn any manners Amujale? Did no one teach you them?

I wonder where you get your power to be telling buda not to quote you. Use it more. Make buda not quote you.

budaatum:



You and vayina keep avoiding the question I keep asking which is,

Care explaining what that is?

Furthermore, what question is it you write about?

Are they the numerous questions that you avoid during our previous discussions?

Or the inexplicable questions that you ask yourself when shuffling in and out of your stance on Christianity.

There really is no point arguing with you because we already know your stance on the Abrahamic religions isnt stable.

It isnt my concern what you personally choose to believe because i dont really care about uncle Toms.

budaatum:
Not ...that there's crap in your head, mind. Just that, hmm.

Again a wayward and uncalled for attack.

Calling the truth crap.

Defending all the lies inside of Christianity eventhough you have been caught on many occasions accepting the fact that Christianity is
fake.

budaatum:

...a Christian? You sure as hell behave like one, asking us all to believe you without providing evidence for your claim...

Here obviously shows that you know Christianity is fake yet you continue to peddlw their false narratives.

Making you an uncle Tom.

budaatum:

...
you'd feel if I whack your head with it...

You ought to go and whack the Romans with it for producing a weapon of mass destruction.

budaatum:
You consider such a person understands instead of "believe" that "something", though I wouldn't say I peddle since nowhere have I peddled anything to you. But if I did "peddle" anything, it surely wouldn't be to or with or for the benefit of a foulmouthed person like you.

You started an unprovoked and disingenous attack and have the nerve to call someone else foulmouthed?

The post wasnt addressed to budaatum, yet you took upon yourself to open your response to my unclad post with a senseless attack and continued that trend as highlighted in the above quotes.


Therefore, dont even start with your disingenous narrative.

Everyone can see that you are a trouble maker that hasnt any substance in your response to my initial post.

budaatum:


...In fact, are you not a Christian? You sure as hell behave like one, asking us all to believe you without providing evidence for your claim...

Give the thread one example of any of the facts given here by myself that came without the evidence to back them up.

Plus, its either you cant be bothered reading what is being said here or you are simply an untrustworthy person given that you some how associate a person that is revealing to the general public that Christianity is fake to himself be Christian.

I want to prove to you and everyone else that you are a dodgy person that would say anything without considering the accuracy of what it is you write.

Dont even bother with inconsequential gibberish.

Give us a clear and definitive response to the lie you gave in the above quote.

budaatum:

I wonder where you get your power to be telling buda not to quote you. Use it more. Make buda not quote you.

Amujale:

Remember, I told you to never quote me with your disingenuous comments.

The active word being "disingenuous".

I never said you shouldnt quote me, but that you shouldnt quote me with your disingenous responses; such that you did.

Amujale:


Give the thread one example of any of the facts given here by myself that came without the evidence to back them up.

You have only asserted stuff here. Stuff you learnt first by reading your Bible then going off to investigate. What evidence have you provided than mere assertions and which you ask to be believed? Do you not trust that others will come to realisation someday if you work harder at providing evidence instead of abusing people because you think you know better?

I'm not surprised though. All you see a book as is something to believe in with no regard of the skills gained by reading it and trying to understand it, despite it being what taught those skills to you.

Amujale:

Or the inexplicable questions that you ask yourself when shuffling in and out of your stance on Christianity.

There really is no point arguing with you because we already know your stance on the Abrahamic religions isnt stable.

Defending all the lies inside of Christianity eventhough you have been caught on many occasions accepting the fact that Christianity is
fake.

Nairaland rules do not require a post be to the person who responds. Others come here to read too, thankfully. And since this thread was created by me you should expect me to respond to as many posts as I wish to however I want.

You don't know my stance on Christianity. And no one is arguing with you. Nor was "crap in head an insult", as implied by my addition of "mind". But I guess one can be misunderstood so let me help you.

The Bible, which is what Christians worship, is a book, and books are not fake, even if they are historically, and in other ways, incorrect, and especially mythology, which a lot of the Bible is. And if the Romans did give the Bible, or anyone else for that matter, I'd be rather grateful to them personally. Just the thought of not having anything to read scares me.

The intention of the Bible is not to deceive, as you claim, but for one to learn skills of reading, and thinking, and reasoning from, and as suggested, where you likely learnt those skills yourself. Or do you see any other book being made available for people to learn from? Have you asked yourself what state we'd be in if we didn't have it? The only unfortunate here is the notion that it must be believed, but that's just an indication of the infant learning level of the reader who will go on to question their understanding someday just as you and many have done. Or would you claim to believe what you claim, instead of actually understanding what it is that you know?

I'll accuse you of being a Christian again. You won't get it of course, but someday it would be understood that the peddling of belief is a skill learnt precisely from the Bible, the skill of infants who lack understanding but who will grow up and leave their childish ways someday and gain understanding.

budaatum:

You have only asserted stuff here. Stuff you learnt first by reading your Bible then going off to investigate. What evidence have you provided than mere assertions and which you ask to be believed? Do you not trust that others will come to realisation someday if you work harder at providing evidence instead of abusing people because you think you know better?

I'm not surprised though. All you see a book as is something to believe in with no regard of the skills gained by reading it and trying to understand it, despite it being what taught those skills to you.

Again, no substance, nothing reasonable in your response except for more gibberish.

When you seem fit to respond accordingly we'll take in from there.

For now, all you seem to display is a distain for common sense.

Reverse psychology isnt working for you, you began abusing whilst veering of on a tangent, and you had to be put back into your box.

So dont complain when you attack someone and that person fights back, take it on the chin and move on; given that you are the person who initiated a response as such.

budaatum:

Nairaland rules do not require a post be to the person who responds. Others come here to read too, thankfully. And since this thread was created by me you should expect me to respond to as many posts as I wish to however I want..

Go back and read your initial response.

Are you aware that you started the bad mouthing?

You arent addressing your deceitful behaviour, and instead componuding your sitiation with these your meaningless stance of bravado.

Instead of your disingenous whalling, STOP and THINK!

Cease being a distruptive person.

Cease making yourself an agent to fakery.

budaatum:

You have only asserted stuff here. Stuff you learnt first by reading your Bible then going off to investigate.

You are a liar and a faker.

Provide us with atleast one example of any of such content.

Obviously everyone knows that your response will be inconsequential gibberish as usual.

You are all bluster with no substance.

budaatum:


...In fact, are you not a Christian? You sure as hell behave like one, asking us all to believe you without providing evidence for your claim...

Give the thread one example of any of the facts given here by myself that came without the evidence to back them up.

Plus, its either you cant be bothered reading what is being said here or you are simply an untrustworthy person given that you some how associate a person that is revealing to the general public that Christianity is fake to himself be Christian.

I challenge you to refute any off the previous content, clearly they contain analytical and sometimes visual evidence.

Therefore, claiming that no evidence is there is in itself proof that you are a liar and a faker.

Give us a clear and definitive response to the lies you are peddling.

The difference between other Nairalanders and yourself is that most of us are genuine with our content whilst you are a compulsive liar.

Now, that has been cleared up, back to the question posed by the thread.

Jesus did nothing because Jesus is a fictitious character, and in all reality, fictional characters cant does stuff.

Amujale:


Again, no substance, nothing reasonable in your response except for more gibberish.

When you seem fit to respond accordingly we'll take in from there.

For now, all you seem to display is a distain for common sense.

Reverse psychology isnt working for you, you began abusing whilst veering of on a tangent, and you had to be put back into your box.

So dont complain when you attack someone and that person fights back, take it on the chin and move on; given that you are the person who initiated a response as such.

There's no way all I write is gibberish. And if you take your time, you'd see that.

Christianity, or shall I say, the Abrahamic Religions, evolved out of Africa as syncretised in Egypt. Its a historical fact, and is pretty much what you are saying, though correct me if I misrepresent you. It's also fortunately detailed in biblical mythology, the unfortunate commonly known 'history' of the time. It wouldn't have been, if the earlier African writings had spread, but unfortunately, it didnt.

The Egyptians had a priestly class who kept knowledge to themselves which over time died off with them such that latter Egyptians believed superbeings came down from heaven and wrote the hieroglyphs and built the pyramids. If only they had educated the masses to read those heiroglyphs, can you imagine how great Africa would have been? Today, even, millions of us do not yet know anything about Egypt, or our own local history. And you fail to see that that is where the Bible comes in, to show what a story of a people looks like abd teach you how to discover your own. If we had not learnt yo read it we'd be further back in development, is my opinion.

You mentioned my view of Christianity earlier on, so I'll oblige, for what it's worth. I personally think it is a religion that is very easily manipulated by individuals sometimes for the good and for bad, but on the whole its done quite a lot of good considering the increase in life expectancies in nations that have adopted it.

Yes, Christianity's history is murky - walls of Jericho, Tower of Babel and the referenced in Scripture error of the Egyptians as narrated in the story of the Garden of Eden: a story of liberation distorted into the basis of enslavery "by the Romans" you would say. (And funny, I keep saying, because I see what you mean but wonder why you don't seem to wonder why the Jews themselves, long before the Romans, decided to tell Biblical myths to "deceive" themselves if not so they could have a record of their historical past as they knew it so that they don't get forgotten in history like the Egyptians were and have their dead dug up and paraded in museums like the Egyptians are, but have eternal peace like their book teaches them to have.)

There is a reason Jesus is said to have asked what truth is. An innocuous question but loaded with meaning and implication. A person who has not read would not know the sort of things you call truth. Christianity solves a problem Egypt had, and that still continues to destroy us today. Any God that asks anyone not to eat of the fruits of the garden of knowledge of good and evil is a tyrant, and a devil. And people who believe their gods tell them not to eat of the fruits of the tree of knowledge and evil will live shorter lifespans.

I'm going to do humble with you. Kindly recommend reading material on your topic so I can do home work please and accept my apology for insulting you. I did not mean "crap in head as an insult". It means things one choses to believe in one's head, as opposed to the things one has learnt by the use of ones senses; the latter being what I accuse you of if you'd pardon my choice of meanings.

Amujale:
Now, that has been cleared up, back to the question posed by the thread.

Jesus did nothing because Jesus is a fictitious character, and in all reality, fictional characters cant does stuff.

Yet, we read fictional Things Fall Apart, and Animal Farm. Do the fictional beings in those do nothing?