₦airaland Forum

jcross19:
if the results are true then everything need to add up but that's not case here , to tell you that it's fraudulent .

The results were already falsified and inflated before Uzodinmas results were added so of anyone needs to explain it is INEC

Blindersoff:
Exactly. Since they called it fake then they should produce their own copies.

They could not and this then proves that the one they called fake is actually real because they knew it would not contradict what they already had

Results from those polling units were marred with irregularities,that's why it was rejected.

Blindersoff:
Exactly. Since they called it fake then they should produce their own copies.

They could not and this then proves that the one they called fake is actually real because they knew it would not contradict what they already had

Note , they said the elections in those areas were ruin with irregularities hence they cancelled them. How will you expect them to tender results from places they claimed elections did not hold up to satisfactory ?

Do they have the power to cancel irregularities?

I don't mean to spam this thread but please help locate this fraudster https://www.nairaland.com/5649187/beware-online-scammer-ifeanyi-christian#86070313

Blindersoff:
This is not the focus of the ruling as no appeal was filed requesting a vote recount.

The SC has no business dabbling into an issue which is not in contention between both parties.

At this point you can just be called mentally unstable. A given number of ppl are accredited to vote in an election and the sharia court dabbles into it and the total votes casted supercede the number of accredited voters and a grown up, went to school, but uneducated adult says it's perfect. Wonderful. Pls eeh sone things are sacroscant and one is the number of accredited voters in an election. This value is sacroscant and constant. It is important because it gives you a backdrop to check and balance results from the polls against any malpractice. except i don't know how you guys do una own in una zoo.

Plus10:
Results from those polling units were marred with irregularities,that's why it was rejected.

What irregularities? Plus who rejected them? Were those who rejected them the ones meant to do so after all party agents have duly signed on the documents?

SC declared the cancellation as illegal and thus reinstated them

Simple

berrystunn:
Note , they said the elections in those areas were ruin with irregularities hence they cancelled them. How will you expect them to tender results from places they claimed elections did not hold up to satisfactory ?

Do they have the power to cancel irregularities?

They said?

Who said?

What were the irregularities?

Blindersoff:
The results were already falsified and inflated before Uzodinmas results were added so of anyone needs to explain it is INEC

I laugh again! if you believe that opposition party could ousted APC out of IMO is a big lie, APC have the whole mercenaries in the state to maneuver the result but they failed ! this is my question are you telling me that 388 polling units voted only for APC?

lahizak:
So wat u re telling me in essence is dat a duplicate result copy was brought forward. INEC claimed it is not theirs and failed to bring forth the original copies which they can easily claimed was damaged during one of d election violence. Den immediately, d court decided dat as a result of dat, d result brought by d other party is valid. Here is a question though, after uzodimma brought the duplicate copy to the court, who supposed to determine if d duplicate copy is legut or not. D court or the issuing body? Better put, weneva dere is an issue of forgery in court, who is called to validate the document, d court or an expert on d document?

But they didn't claim it was "damaged".

Because if they claimed, they would need to to prove beyond reasonable doubt that it happened..

Therefore the Supreme had no choice but to rely on what is before them..

For those talking about Accreditation...The Supreme Court in cases of Ikpeazu Vs Alex Otti, Ifeanyi Okowa Vs Ogboru, Wike Vs Peterside had already settled that the court only deal with Registered Voters and not Electronic accredited voters in 2015..

MedicH:
At this point you can just be called mentally unstable and insane. A given number of ppl are accredited to vote in an election and the sharia court dabbles into it and the total votes casted supercede the number of accredited voters and a grown up, went to school, but uneducated adult says it's perfect. Wonderful. Pls eeh sone things are sacroscant and one is the number of accredited voters in an election. This value is sacroscant and constant. It is important because it gives you a backdrop to check and balance results from the polls against any malpractice. except i don't know how you guys do una own in una zoo.

At this point you can just be called mentally unstable and insane if you cannot understand something as simple as A RULING BODY CAN ONLY MAKE JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENTS ON APPEALS PRESENTED BEFORE THEM AND CANNOT STRAY FROM THE APPEAL TO AN AREA WHICH IS NOT IN CONTENTION OR WHICH HAS NOT ALSO BEEN TABLED AS AN APPEAL.

Stupid people everywhere

jcross19:
I laugh again! if you believe that opposition party could ousted APC out of IMO is a big lie, APC have the whole mercenaries in the state to maneuver the result but they failed ! this is my question are you telling me that 388 polling units voted only for APC?

The cancelled results were FROM ORLU which happened to be Uzodinmas strongholds.

The judgement stated clearly that the appellant (UZODINMA) scored overwhelmingly above the others in the cancelled PUs and this means even if the others got votes it would read something like

APC 548
PDP 4

APC 729
PDP 13

Surely you cannot expect an Mbaise man to drag votes with an Orlu man in Orlu?

The other parties were mostly insignificant because the votes were mainly between APC and PDP

Blindersoff:
The court does not handle forensics.

Experts do and the experts in this case are the supposed owners of the documents submitted by hope. INEC!

They are to prove that the one with Hope was fake but they could not because the originals could not be produced and I can conclude from this alone that they knew hopes documents were not fake and if they had brought theirs out it would not contradict that of hope so they just decided to put up a very weak defence perhaps because they had already been paid by PDP to try and discredit the result but never knew Uzodinma would push the case as far as he did.

The SC was the litmus test that revealed their agenda

Put on a weak defence? INEC dont even need to bring out d original result b4 dey could claim dat d document wit him is fake? Truth is dat INEC proved beyond reasonable doubt dat d document is fake but tge judges decided dat wat INEC said does not matter, is wat dey want dey will do hence d saying dat INEC did not prove beyond doubt. And paid or not, INEC is still independent, so d jugdes should av atleast heed their word. Finally, im guessing now dat d supreme court has made their statements and their judgement is now public, more legal minds in d country and outsude d country will analyze it and we shall all read. Im sure this is not d last we will hear about this issue. Lastly, ot rly seems APC need Imo state badly 4 one reason or the other. And funny enough all d 7 judges were uninanimous on this topic dat generate such huge outrage, dat means sumtin is fishy, the only time judges are unanimous is when issues are straightforward which obviously dis is not, wonder how not even 1 judge vote against it. Strange

Only fools will believe that Uzodinma garnered up to 100,000 votes during the governorship election that had Emeka Ihedioha, uche nwosu, Ararume and Ohakim.. Someone that never campaigned, it's disgusting to that Uzodinma is reaping where he didn't sow

lahizak:
Put on a weak defence? INEC dont even need to bring out d original result b4 dey could claim dat d document wit him is fake? Truth is dat INEC proved beyond reasonable doubt dat d document is fake but tge judges decided dat wat INEC said does not matter, is wat dey want dey will do hence d saying dat INEC did not prove beyond doubt. And paid or not, INEC is still independent, so d jugdes should av atleast heed their word. Finally, im guessing now dat d supreme court has made their statements and their judgement is now public, more legal minds in d country and outsude d country will analyze it and we shall all read. Im sure this is not d last we will hear about this issue. Lastly, ot rly seems APC need Imo state badly 4 one reason or the other. And funny enough all d 7 judges were uninanimous on this topic dat generate such huge outrage, dat means sumtin is fishy, the only time judges are unanimous is when issues are straightforward which obviously dis is not, wonder how not even 1 judge vote against it. Strange

Can you provide how INEC proved beyond reasonable doubt that the documents were fake?

I want to learn something new

Blindersoff:
At this point you can just be called mentally unstable and insane if you cannot understand something as simple as A RULING BODY CAN ONLY MAKE JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENTS ON APPEALS PRESENTED BEFORE THEM AND CANNOT STRAY FROM THE APPEAL TO AN AREA WHICH IS NOT IN CONTENTION OR WHICH HAS NOT ALSO BEEN TABLED AS AN APPEAL.

Stupid people everywhere

Just like i said i may not know how you animals run it in the zoo.

Peace

NgeneUkwenu:
But they didn't claim it was "damaged".

Because if they claimed, they would need to to prove beyond reasonable doubt that it happened..

Therefore the Supreme had no choice but to rely on what is before them..

For those talking about Accreditation...The Supreme Court in cases of Ikpeazu Vs Alex Otti, Ifeanyi Okowa Vs Ogboru, Wike Vs Peterside had already settled that the court only deal with Registered Voters and not Electronic accredited voters in 2015..

I said damage as an example to show how easy it would av been 4 INEC to cover up not providin d original copy

MedicH:
Just like i said i may not know how you animals run it in the zoo.

Peace

Go back to your wild Jungle. The zoo is for groomed animals

Blindersoff:
Go back to your wild Jungle. The zoo is for groomed animals

Haha stale. Animals indeed.

H

There's a deliberate attempt to force this supreme courts fraud down the throat of discerning people. I watched how the Inec agents collated the results after the presidential election and noticed many areas where the total votes counted exceeded accredited voters and this was presented to the Inec head after the vote counts, he shrugged it off and didn't address it. How then is it now embraced in this instance. Secondly even if intelligent people would accept this lie, if total votes exceeds accredited votes, the supreme Court should not rule in favor of he complainant as the resources to which the complains were made truncates the authorised channel but should rather seek to fix the situation through other avenues and not this nonsense here.


Raccoon you're doing a great job. I sight you

There's a deliberate attempt to force this supreme courts fraud down the throat of discerning people. I watched how the Inec agents collated the results after the presidential election and noticed many areas where the total votes counted exceeded accredited voters and this was presented to the Inec head after the vote counts, he shrugged it off and didn't address it. How then is it now embraced in this instance. Secondly even if intelligent people would accept this lie, if total votes exceeds accredited votes, the supreme Court should not rule in favor of he complainant as the resources to which the complains were made truncates the authorised channel but should rather seek to fix the situation through other avenues and not this nonsense here..


Raccoon you're doing a great job. I sight you

Blindersoff:
The cancelled results were FROM ORLU which happened to be Uzodinmas strongholds.

The judgement stated clearly that the appellant (UZODINMA) scored overwhelmingly above the others in the cancelled PUs and this means even if the others got votes it would read something like

APC 548
PDP 4

APC 729
PDP 13

Surely you cannot expect an Mbaise man to drag votes with an Orlu man in Orlu?

The other parties were mostly insignificant because the votes were mainly between APC and PDP

Uche nwosu was way popular and accepted in orlu zone than Uzodinma, plus Okorocha's incumbency, there's no way Uzodinma could have won any other lga outside his oru east and west in orlu zone

berrystunn:
Note , they said the elections in those areas were ruin with irregularities hence they cancelled them. How will you expect them to tender results from places they claimed elections did not hold up to satisfactory ?

Do they have the power to cancel irregularities?

Stop misleading readers,No where did INEC claim the results were cancelled.Provide proof otherwise.


Moreover if results were cancelled due to irregularities,where is the report and evidence to that effect?

There is usually a report for any cancellation of results from any polling unit.

The supreme court judgement is sound and based on evidence not emotions.

NORSYK:
Uche nwosu was way popular and accepted in orlu zone than Uzodinma, plus Okorocha's incumbency, there's no way Uzodinma could have won any other lga outside his oru east and west in orlu zone

Tell that to 388 polling units

lahizak:
So wat u re telling me in essence is dat a duplicate result copy was brought forward. INEC claimed it is not theirs and failed to bring forth the original copies which they can easily claimed was damaged during one of d election violence. Den immediately, d court decided dat as a result of dat, d result brought by d other party is valid. Here is a question though, after uzodimma brought the duplicate copy to the court, who supposed to determine if d duplicate copy is legut or not. D court or the issuing body? Better put, weneva dere is an issue of forgery in court, who is called to validate the document, d court or an expert on d document?

this your argument is lame..read the judgment first. There was no such argument that there was violence or elections did not hold there. Moreover the appellant brought their copy and also provided copies issued to police officers at the polling units. INEC is with original bring it forward. They didn't so SC has no other option

[s]

NgeneUkwenu:
But they didn't claim it was "damaged".

Because if they claimed, they would need to to prove beyond reasonable doubt that it happened..

Therefore the Supreme had no choice but to rely on what is before them..

For those talking about Accreditation...The Supreme Court in cases of Ikpeazu Vs Alex Otti, Ifeanyi Okowa Vs Ogboru, Wike Vs Peterside had already settled that the court only deal with Registered Voters and not Electronic accredited voters in 2015..

[/s]

lahizak:
Put on a weak defence? INEC dont even need to bring out d original result b4 dey could claim dat d document wit him is fake? Truth is dat INEC proved beyond reasonable doubt dat d document is fake but tge judges decided dat wat INEC said does not matter, is wat dey want dey will do hence d saying dat INEC did not prove beyond doubt. And paid or not, INEC is still independent, so d jugdes should av atleast heed their word. Finally, im guessing now dat d supreme court has made their statements and their judgement is now public, more legal minds in d country and outsude d country will analyze it and we shall all read. Im sure this is not d last we will hear about this issue. Lastly, ot rly seems APC need Imo state badly 4 one reason or the other. And funny enough all d 7 judges were uninanimous on this topic dat generate such huge outrage, dat means sumtin is fishy, the only time judges are unanimous is when issues are straightforward which obviously dis is not, wonder how not even 1 judge vote against it. Strange

It is settled in law that before you can label a document forged, the original must be shown and demonstrated....

Remember INEC Never argued that election did not take place there.

There was never a publication that the votes were cancelled...

If INEC claimed they cancelled, that means Ihedioha was not validly elected because the total number of cancelled votes was higher than the difference between the Winner and the losers..

So what did INEC do: They cleverly refused to collate the results from those areas Uzodinma won in Orlu Zone, because they had a deal to return IHEDIOHA as Governor..

Supreme Court is not a Father Christmas that will cancel and order rerun when neither of parties asked for it...

Uzodinma asked to be returned as duly elected, INEC and Ihedioha asked for dismissal of the case...

Did you learn anything now?

[s]

NgeneUkwenu:
It is settled in law that before you can label a document forged, the original must be shown and demonstrated....

Remember INEC Never argued that election did not take place there.

There was never a publication that the votes were cancelled...

If INEC claimed they cancelled, that means Ihedioha was not validly elected because the total number of cancelled votes was higher than the difference between the Winner and the losers..

So what did INEC do: They cleverly refused to collated the results from those areas Uzodinma won in Orlu Zone, because they had a deal to return IHEDIOHA as Governor..

Supreme Court is not a Father Christmas that will cancel and order rerun when neither of parties asked for it...

Uzodinma asked to returned as duly elected, INEC and Ihedioha asked for dismissal of the case...

Did you learn anything now?

[/s]

I am waiting for PDP and Co to organize another set of protest. Are they already tired of protesting so soon?

lahizak:
I said damage as an example to show how easy it would av been 4 INEC to cover up not providin d original copy

Let's even assume that INEC pleaded "damage" and it was accepted by the court....Then INEC should ordered a rerun in those areas rather than declare IHEDIOHA winner when the the total number of cancelled votes were higher that the margin between the Winner and the Losers?

Do you honestly believe INEC didn't know what they did in Imo State?

NgeneUkwenu:
It is settled in law that before you can label a document forged, the original must be shown and demonstrated....

Remember INEC Never argued that election did not take place there.

There was never a publication that the votes were cancelled...

If INEC claimed they cancelled, that means Ihedioha was not validly elected because the total number of cancelled votes was higher than the difference between the Winner and the losers..

So what did INEC do: They cleverly refused to collate the results from those areas Uzodinma won in Orlu Zone, because they had a deal to return IHEDIOHA as Governor..

Supreme Court is not a Father Christmas that will cancel and order rerun when neither of parties asked for it...

Uzodinma asked to be returned as duly elected, INEC and Ihedioha asked for dismissal of the case...

Did you learn anything now?

I said earlier that I can deduce from all this that PDP connived with INEC to rig Ihedioha into office and what you said above was how they wanted it done.

However Uzodinma was adamant and dragged the case all the way and it took the SC to scatter all the plans already done by INEC and PDP.