₦airaland Forum

rottennaija:
And this what inec resorted conniving with politicians. They simply cancel results in areas they don't like, a lot of it happened in Akwa Ibom

It also happened in Cross River. The Supreme Court got it right.

Its confirmed supreme court has no shame, are they not they ones who rules evidences must be fact based not on hearsay, here they are admitting an evidence of 388 units with just 25 witnesses, no shame

Racoon:
https://www.farooqkperogi.com/2020/01/imo-judicial-abracadabra-and.html?m=1#.XiJ_Dz71hGU.twitter

You and your channels crew are mumu of life! Didn't all of you know that the new vote added will automatically increased the number of accredited voters by same amount immediately those vote are accepted! I wished I can call in when I saw the nomsense on Channels TV that day and they will be claiming they have staticitian! The arguement should have been shifted to total number of people on the registered instead! I swear you and PDP goons, e wail ku ni!

Will you and your Channels goons stop displaying your stupidity and 'stupiduty' in front your 'pikin' before they started asking you if you actually alright?

Blindersoff:
They said?

Who said?

What were the irregularities?

Wait for the links

You cannot give justice by creating mathematical impossibility. It means the 'justice' is built on lies hence injustice! Both parties presented their evidences but a simple way to know someone is not saying the truth is when figures don't add up.Supreme Court has sealed their name in shame because upcoming generations will know that supreme awarded a victory were valid votes were more than accredited voters!

Blindersoff:
This is not the focus of the ruling as no appeal was filed requesting a vote recount.

The SC has no business dabbling into an issue which is not in contention between both parties.

DMerciful:
You cannot give justice by creating mathematical impossibility. It means the 'justice' is built on lies hence injustice! Both parties presented their evidences but a simple way to know someone is not saying the truth is when figures don't add up.Supreme Court has sealed their name in shame because upcoming generations will know that supreme awarded a victory were valid votes were more than accredited voters!

Correction!

Only Hope Uzodinma presented evidence. INEC / UZODINMA failed to present refuting evidence to prove HOPE UZODINMAS evidence was fake.

You have sealed your name in shame for being very very obtuse

What about AA votes, Nwosu is from Orlu and he got substantial votes?

Blindersoff:
The cancelled results were FROM ORLU which happened to be Uzodinmas strongholds.

The judgement stated clearly that the appellant (UZODINMA) scored overwhelmingly above the others in the cancelled PUs and this means even if the others got votes it would read something like

APC 548
PDP 4

APC 729
PDP 13

Surely you cannot expect an Mbaise man to drag votes with an Orlu man in Orlu?

The other parties were mostly insignificant because the votes were mainly between APC and PDP

PDD and inec tried to rob this one,

Do you believe in all honesty that Uzodinma got those votes considering the infighting of APC at the time and the dislike of APC by SE?

Blindersoff:
Go back to your wild Jungle. The zoo is for groomed animals

sanpipita:
Its confirmed supreme court has no shame, are they not they ones who rules evidences must be fact based not on hearsay, here they are admitting an evidence of 388 units with just 25 witnesses, no shame

INEC and IHEDIOHA were asked to provide counter evidence since they claimed the tendered results were fake but could not.

Also there was no need for much witnesses because the DCP provided copies of signed results to the court in support of Hope Uzodinma and in this case the police being at the venues to serve as LAW ENFORCEMENT and being given copies to hold on to effectively rendered the police as witnesses and what they had in their possession could not be refuted by INEC or IHEDIOHA.

It was a lose lose situation for Ihedioha because he and his lawyers were stupid enough to think they could connive with INEC to rig him into power without taking into consideration the checks and balances created by the law

DMerciful:
What about AA votes, Nwosu is from Orlu and he got substantial votes?

Take that out with INEC who also gave Ihedioha inflated votes from Mbaise. Votes higher than accredited numbers

DMerciful:
Do you believe in all honesty that Uzodinma got those votes considering the infighting of APC at the time and the dislike of APC by SE?

You can ask Inec this question not me or the SC.

No sentiments attached to this ruling. Simple facts and clear Justice

Blindersoff:
The cancelled results were FROM ORLU which happened to be Uzodinmas strongholds.

The judgement stated clearly that the appellant (UZODINMA) scored overwhelmingly above the others in the cancelled PUs and this means even if the others got votes it would read something like

APC 548
PDP 4

APC 729
PDP 13

Surely you cannot expect an Mbaise man to drag votes with an Orlu man in Orlu?

The other parties were mostly insignificant because the votes were mainly between APC and PDP

you are putting up these figures the same the crook did his own aid by terrorist president that want turmoil in the East and am sure God will disgrace him with his prophet of Baal mbaka.

[s]

jcross19:
you are putting up these figures the same the crook did his own aid by terrorist president that want turmoil in the East and am sure God will disgrace him with his prophet of Baal mbaka.

[/s]

Type in your local dialect if English is a struggle

Summary of the Ruling:
(1) PDP failed to work with INEC.
(2) APC colluded with some INEC ofiicials to produce a fake result from the 388 PUs.
(3) INEC knowing fully well their abracadabra, they failed to tender any documents in Court
(4) Justice kekere-Ekun was confused and baffled about Inec decisions not to tender results.
(5) Justice Kekere-Ekun mistook lower court decisions to be mis-carriage of Justice and ruled otherwise
(6) Justice kekere-Ekun is still confused as I am typing

Blindersoff:
[s][/s]

Type in your local dialect if English is a struggle

[s]

Blindersoff:
[s][/s]

Type in your local dialect if English is a struggle

[/s]

Blindersoff:
[s][/s]

Type in your local dialect if English is a struggle

If it was clear justice, why all the controversies? Justice should not only be done but seen to be done. You remember Osun election? What was supreme court judgment?
When we support injustice, let's not forget what goes around comes around. I hope you're not Igbo because Igbos believe in equity and justice!

Blindersoff:
You can ask Inec this question not me or the SC.

No sentiments attached to this ruling. Simple facts and clear Justice

Blindersoff:
INEC and IHEDIOHA were asked to provide counter evidence since they claimed the tendered results were fake but could not.

Also there was no need for much witnesses because the DCP provided copies of signed results to the court in support of Hope Uzodinma and in this case the police being at the venues to serve as LAW ENFORCEMENT and being given copies to hold on to effectively rendered the police as witnesses and what they had in their possession could not be refuted by INEC or IHEDIOHA.

It was a lose lose situation for Ihedioha because he and his lawyers were stupid enough to think they could connive with INEC to rig him into power without taking into consideration the checks and balances created by the law

Lol did you hear yourself DCP tendered a sign results means they are authentic? How many police testified unit by unit that this results were excluded, go and read this same supreme court judgement on atiku and buhari and feel ashamed, how come burden on proof is suddenly on INEC and Ihedioha? how come this excluded results had only APC signature, let stop making excuses for bad behavior.

sanpipita:
Lol did you hear yourself DCP tendered a sign results means they are authentic? How many police testified unit by unit that this results were excluded, go and read this same supreme court judgement on atiku and buhari and feel ashamed, how come burden on proof is suddenly on INEC and Ihedioha? how come this excluded results had only APC signature, let stop making excuses for bad behavior.

Lol did you hear yourself? DCP tendered a signed result WHICH INEC/IHEDIOHA COULD NOT REFUTE. By law this then meant the SC had no choice but depend on evidence SOLELY PRESENTED BY UZODINMA because INEC AND IHEDIOHA Could not present even a single counter evidence backing up their claim that the results were fake and forged.

Can you show that the excluded results only had APC signature? You need to stop posting this foolishness of yours

Court dismissed!

DMerciful:
If it was clear justice, why all the controversies? Justice should not only be done but seen to be done. You remember Osun election? What was supreme court judgment?
When we support injustice, let's not forget what goes around comes around. I hope you're not Igbo because Igbos believe in equity and justice!

The controversies only exist in the hearts and minds of the emotional and sentimental. Justice bears no emotions or sentiments and Yes i am Igbo 100%

Blindersoff:
Lol did you hear yourself? DCP tendered a signed result WHICH INEC/IHEDIOHA COULD NOT REFUTE. By law this then meant the SC had no choice but depend on evidence SOLELY PRESENTED BY UZODINMA because INEC AND IHEDIOHA Could not present even a single counter evidence backing up their claim that the results were fake and forged.

Can you show that the excluded results only had APC signature? You need to stop posting this foolishness of yours

Court dismissed!

They had a choice, they showed that in Atiku v Buhari, INEC denied the results were fake, its easy to gloat when you feel you are on the winning side but these things come with implications, politicians will now use Uzodinma's strategy in future once they can manipulate judiciary with this dubious precedent set

Do you know why Nigeria has not grown? Injustice! When it suits us we support injustice but when it doesn't suit us we cry. In your heart you know Uzodinma did not win the election but you are supporting technicality. Continue!
100% Igbo and you appreciates injustice? Check your ancestry, you are not Igbo!

Blindersoff:
The controversies only exist in the hearts and minds of the emotional and sentimental. Justice bears no emotions or sentiments and Yes i am Igbo 100%

DMerciful:
Do you know why Nigeria has not grown? Injustice! When it suits us we support injustice but when it doesn't suit us we cry. In your heart you know Uzodinma did not win the election but you are supporting technicality. Continue!
100% Igbo and you appreciates injustice? Check your ancestry, you are not Igbo!

Anu ohia you check your own ancestry and you will see you are an efulefu.

What manner of nonsense is this? Do you think i am one of the foolish ones from igbo land who throw away justice because of ethnicity?

Simply because i do not support your myopic view you suddenly label me an Osu?

Inapu ara?

Neyoohpompy:
Summary of the Ruling:
(1) PDP failed to work with INEC.
(2) APC colluded with some INEC ofiicials to produce a fake result from the 388 PUs.
(3) INEC knowing fully well their abracadabra, they failed to tender any documents in Court
(4) Justice kekere-Ekun was confused and baffled about Inec decisions not to tender results.
(5) Justice Kekere-Ekun mistook lower court decisions to be mis-carriage of Justice and ruled otherwise
(6) Justice kekere-Ekun is still confused as I am typing

FALSE!!

1) PDP WORKED WITH INEC
2) PDP COLLUDED WITH SOME INEC OFFICIALS TO CANCEL UZODINMAS VOTES WITHOUT AN INCIDENCE FORM BACKING UP THE REASON FOR CANCELLATION
3) INEC KNOWING FULLY WELL IT WOULD BE EXPOSED FOR WORKING WITH PDP REFUSED TO PRODUCE ITS OWN COPIES SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY KNOW IT WOULD MATCH THOSE OF UZODINMA AND THUS EXPOSING THEM AND PDP
4) JUSTICE KEKERE EKUN SAW THROUGH THEIR FOLLY AND ACCORDING TO LAW HAD NO CHOICE THAN TO RELY ON THE EVIDENCE TENDERED BY UZODINMA IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY OTHER EVIDENCE
5)JUSTICE KEKERE EKUN CLEARLY SAW THE LOWER COURT RULING AS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
6) IF INEC COULD NOT SUBMIT THEIR OWN COPIES WHAT STOPPED PDP FROM SUBMITTING THEIR OWN COPIES? THE REASON IS BECAUSE BOTH INEC AND PDP PLANNED THIS TOGETHER.

PLEASE NOTE NUMBER 6 BECAUSE THIS IS FACT BASED ON WHAT HAPPENED

Blindersoff:
Or do you not know that in Mbaise Ihedioha scored results which were far more than accredited voters ?

Can we have official verification of this claim?
I am from Mbaise. Ahiazu-Mbaise to be precise. I'm interested in the number of accredited persons in my LGA.

Obviously, you are a layman in the matters.

1) The Supreme Court does not admit new evidence.

2) The Supreme Court only review the Judgements passed by lower courts to see if they are in accordance with the law.

3) If the Judgement is not in accordance with the laws, then the Supreme Court will pass it's own Judgement based on the prayer before the court and not on extraneous matters.

4) The petition of Hope Uzodinma is


* Do the INEC collation officers have the right to reject votes in the contested over 300 polling units after the presiding officers have accepted and signed the results sheets?

5) Ihedioa's legal team supposed to have filed a cross petition ( at the beginning) with the Election Petitition Tribunal seeking Judicial validation for the exclusion of those contentious votes.


This would have made INEC's decision at the collation centres legal.

RareDiamond:
Nawa for this ridiculously unjust judgement by the Supreme Court. This judicial rascality must stop.

Still on the Supreme Court ruling on Imo Guber Election: (Why the Supreme Court must reverse itself)

The law is settled as decided by the same Supreme Court in Buhari v. INEC (2008); that "weight can hardly be attached to a document tendered in evidence by a witness who cannot or is not in a position to answer questions on the document. One of such persons the law identifies is the one who did not make the document. Such a person is adjudged in the eyes of the law as ignorant of the content of the document”.

Questions for the CJN, Justice Tanko and other Supreme Court Justices:

1. Does the Supreme Court have powers to formulate and allocate votes as election results?

2. Were the said results certified by INEC as required by law?

3. Did Hope Uzodinma call 388 witnesses from the 388 polling units to speak to the results to obviate the principle of dumping which the Supreme Court used against the PDP and her candidate, Atiku Abubarka, in the last Presidential Appeal.

4. Were the presiding officers and or party agents of the 388 polling units called to testify by Uzodinma/APC, who were the Petitioners?

5. What are the figures from each of the various 388 polling units generated and allocated to Hope Uzodinma/APC by the Supreme Court?

6. Is the Supreme Court saying that all the votes from the alleged 388 polling units were for the APC alone in an election that was contested by over 70 candidates?

DesChyko:
Can we have official verification of this claim?
I am from Mbaise. Ahiazu-Mbaise to be precise. I'm interested in the number of accredited persons in my LGA.

Lmao i knew a contender would fall for this trap i set

Now i made a claim that Ihedioha got more votes than voters accredited and you asked me to prove it right?

Same way Ihedioha and Inec claimed uzodinmas tendered results were fake and the Supreme court asked them to prove it.

They however could not and thus threw out their case and Uzodinma got the victory

You just simplified the ruling for yourself. Now it should be clear to you and others still contesting it.

Sanchez01:
The added votes far exceeded the accredited voters count. That is the bone of contention and not how he won. The figures do not add up.

That is so because the number of accredited voters in the 388 PUs were also excluded. So if they had been added by INEC it will add it. This is not rocket science. INEC cannot exclude the votes cast in a PU and then add the number of accredited voters in that unit to the result.

NORSYK:
OK sir, but you know I'm telling you the truth.
Okorocha and nwosu were in full control of orlu zone during that election, Uzodinma was like orphan in orlu zone then

Based on the presidential and guber results,nobody was in full control of orlu.the only lgas nwosu won massively was his nkwerre and rochas ideato south.im the remaining part of orlu,he struggled to win.votes were shared.the results now shows that hope was actually the one in control.dont forget he was senator repping orlu

NORSYK:
Read the account of Alex Otti's lawyer Ken Ahia SAN ,


I was not going to respond on this matter no matter how goaded cos, because I was involved. The judgment and that of Abia did not come to me as a surprise but rather as a rude disappointment in our hallowed judiciary. However , in other to educate others like Mike, I wish to disagree with you on legal points.

First , in the case of Abia which was based on documentary evidence collected from INEC, public documents paid for and obtained from INEC,a party to the petition, the Scrt held that we should have called polling unit by polling units witnesses to prove the allegation, in Imo results DISPUTED by INEC tendered by a single policeman was accepted and relied on. Hope did not call witnesses from all those polling units. The POS did not testify.

Secondly, it is not correct that Ihedioha did not cross Appeal. He did . The case was listed as no 9 for hearing on 13/1/2020 as SC/1470/2019, RT HON. Emeka Ihedioha vs Sen Hope Uzodinma& 3 ors.

Finally, it is not true that it is only at the polling center that results can be rejected. See the guidelines 2019 by the provisions of paragraph 28(c)(i)-(iv) which reads;

i) Review the figures against reports from the polling units;

ii) Request explanation(s) from the Presiding Officer(s) concerned, the circumstances of the inconsistency;

iii) Accept the results form if satisfied with the explanations; and

iv) If not satisfied locate the point of discrepancy, resolve the discrepancy and request the Presiding Officer to endorse.

Just for our information. So if the SC will not accept results from INEC duly certified as authentic in Abia appeal on the ground that the witnesses were not called, but proceeded to accept result tendered by one policeman , not certified, also denounced by INEC, then the thing smelling is not fish.

Oga,do you have issues with comprehension? The case of otti and imo are different.otti petitioned based on overvoting and non compliance which needs polling unit proofs while hope case was purely based on excuses of results or non computation and the standard of proof is mainly documentary.why cant you differrntiate the both?
How many times will i tell you that the inec guidelines is inferior to the electoral act which prohibits cancellations at collation level

DMerciful:
What about AA votes, Nwosu is from Orlu and he got substantial votes?

Are you forgetting that aa and uche were disqualified