Iamgrey5:
You are absolutely right Sagay

Although they can't impose fine because the igbo judge saved his people from embarrassment by going against the final judgment. Hence, because the judgment was not unanimous, the judges cannot give a fine.

amaniro:
As a lawyer I read Sagay books but to be honest, the guy is dumb as Fvck when it comes to common sense

Iamgrey5:
You are absolutely right Sagay

Although they can't impose fine because the igbo judge saved his people from embarrassment by going against the final judgment. Hence, because the judgment was not unanimous, the judges cannot give a fine.

amaniro:
As a lawyer I read Sagay books but to be honest, the guy is dumb as Fvck when it comes to common sense

michoim:

You lie...you only follow your dumb sentiments

AgbariOjukwu1:


Lol, Law of contract and Family Law text book.


But if indeed you are a lawyer you should know that Sagay is one of the best in the country.

Iamgrey5:
The judge who gave the judgment in favour of PDP is igbo

festacman:
Although the Justices of Supreme Court have powers to award cost to punish appellants when necessary, imposing those hefty amounts against Afe Babalola and Wole Olanipekun was unnecessary humiliation. They could have throwned out the review request without denigrating the some of the finest members of the Bar who have made so much contribution to the legal profession.

In as much as giving in to judgement review requests by selfish and inconsiderate politicians would ultimately bastardize the image of the apex court but insisting that the institution can NEVER review its judgement even in the face of new strong evidence is simply judicial dictatorship. The implication of this ruling is that an innocent man on death row can still be executed once Supreme Court upholds his conviction even if a new incontrovertible evidence emerges. It is a poor attempt by fallible human beings to play God. The thought of this is scary.

Iamgrey5:
is the Judge not igbo

festacman:
Although the Justices of Supreme Court have powers to award cost to punish appellants when necessary, imposing those hefty amounts against Afe Babalola and Wole Olanipekun was unnecessary humiliation. They could have throwned out the review request without denigrating the some of the finest members of the Bar who have made so much contribution to the legal profession.

In as much as giving in to judgement review requests by selfish and inconsiderate politicians would ultimately bastardize the image of the apex court but insisting that the institution can NEVER review its judgement even in the face of new strong evidence is simply judicial dictatorship. The implication of this ruling is that an innocent man on death row can still be executed once Supreme Court upholds his conviction even if a new incontrovertible evidence emerges. It is a poor attempt by fallible human beings to play God. The thought of this is scary.

Iamgrey5:
The judge who gave the judgment in favour of PDP is igbo

Iamgrey5:
You are absolutely right Sagay

Although they can't impose fine because the igbo judge saved his people from embarrassment by going against the final judgment. Hence, because the judgment was not unanimous, the judges cannot give a fine.

amaniro:
As a lawyer I read Sagay books but to be honest, the guy is dumb as Fvck when it comes to common sense

festacman:


[s]Although the Justices of Supreme Court have powers to award cost to punish appellants when necessary, imposing those hefty amounts against Afe Babalola and Wole Olanipekun was unnecessary humiliation. They could have throwned out the review request without denigrating the some of the finest members of the Bar who have made so much contribution to the legal profession.

In as much as giving in to judgement review requests by selfish and inconsiderate politicians would ultimately bastardize the image of the apex court but insisting that the institution can NEVER review its judgement even in the face of new strong evidence is simply judicial dictatorship. The implication of this ruling is that an innocent man on death row can still be executed once Supreme Court upholds his conviction even if a new incontrovertible evidence emerges. It is a poor attempt by fallible human beings to play God. The thought of this is scary.[/s]

AgbariOjukwu1:


Lol, Law of contract and Family Law text book.


But if indeed you are a lawyer you should know that Sagay is one of the best in the country.

amaniro:
As a lawyer I read Sagay books but to be honest, the guy is dumb as Fvck when it comes to common sense

amaniro:
As a lawyer I read Sagay books but to be honest, the guy is dumb as Fvck when it comes to common sense

Iamgrey5:
You are absolutely right Sagay

Although they can't impose fine because the igbo judge saved his people from embarrassment by going against the final judgment. Hence, because the judgment was not unanimous, the judges cannot give a fine.

greggng:



You are the one that is dump cos I was waiting to see how you use yiur common sense to analyse the two judgement and tell us why u believe the man is dump but you ended up insulting him....cos you have nothing to offer

Iamgrey5:
The judge who gave the judgment in favour of PDP is igbo

Provalker:
Sagay is a hopeless lunatic who should be confined to the four walls of the asylum.

BabaO2:
you are only too sentimental, it is a goose and gander judgements, on what basis did supreme court awarded fine on lawyers for Bayelsa's case, and that same ground was not contravened on imo's case? [b]Infact imo's case was a frivolous one ignorantly or intentionally caused by PDP and their lawyers for hoarding important documents/information for reasons best known to them[\b]