lalawealthy:
The fact is that all these are expected.to me,Obaseki shot himself coz he knew very well he had such discrepancies in his qualifications and went fighting this guys,trust me ,I doubt if he can survive this especially with the fact that he submitted different qualifications to INEC,THATS A REALLY BIG MESS..
Sentiments apart,let's be reasonably objective.

lalawealthy:


Sentiments still becloud your sense of reasoning when all the allegation is obvious in time past,what disqualified the APC candidates in Bayelsa is not as grievous as this.he presented different result to INEC,who are you then blaming?bros,B objective.

seanfer:


He attended the University of Benin where he graduated with an LL.B (Hons) and proceeded to the Nigerian Law School where he bagged the Bachelor of Law (BL) qualification and called to the Nigerian Bar in 1987.

That's little about Ize-Iyamu... I'm very sure you were not born when he was called to Bar 1987

seunmsg:
Obaseki cannot survive this case, his second term ambition is dead on arrival. He may not even contest the election with the way things are going.

engineerboat:


2016 Obaseki Presented His Certificate to INEC.

Same certificate was further verified by UI

and NYSC corrected the Said Obasek

So whats the case here

Xda59:


This clearly shows you don't even know what is going on. He has two different UI certificates lol.

UDUJ:
Bunch of two faced idiots

Can the assholes in the APC party come out and tell me they never knew he had certificate issues when he was their party's flag bearer before becoming the governor?

Old men with no iota of shame

Duru9:


My brother I've not done anything seriously
I couldn't cook today because of this same issues
Throughout yesterday I couldn't buy fuel inside car and work same issue too till now I can't login my bank app I can't withdraw

Very useless bank

SaintLucia:
The funniest thing be say the same Obaseki has been looking for every possible means to disqualify Ize Iyamu from contesting He even sponsored an unknown party who took Ize Iyamu to court citing while the APC NWC led by Buni shouldn't be the one to submit Ize Iyamu name to INEC but his wuruwuru friend Giadom. He did something funny recently in a Benin court asking the court to disqualify Ize Iyamu cos his ward acknowledged that he Ize Iyamu didn't register at his ward but the court told him and his counsel to mind their business after all they are no longer in APC.

APC will still bring another court case against him after this one cos he Obaseki participated in the APC and PDP process of the two political parties primary election which is against the electoral act as amended something Obaseki himself confirmed before he joined PDP

engineerboat:




Heyaaaaaaaaa.

Sorry hoooo.

I'm not sure you're from Edo

Kindledlight:


He shot himself in the foot because he fought those that have his secrets.

fergie001:

This is section 285(9):

“Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this constitution, every pre-election matter shall be filed not later than 14 days from the date of the occurrence of the event, decision or action complained of in the suit”.

Mind the word EVERY.
I must have explained from a layperson perspective wrt to the Primaries.
Lokpobiri didn't challenge the holding of the APC primaries....he was asking the Court to declare him winner.

In this case, INEC form CF001 was submitted by all parties on June 29, 2020.

If I may ask, what is the cause of action in this case?
seanfer ejimatic

ejimatic:
.

..when there are persistent inconsistencies in names and qualification's of candidate the integrity of the person is questionable even if he has countless affidavits to support them In view of this,..

fergie001:


The issue of Degi here doesn't apply because Degi refused to name the rotary public that gave him multiple names.

NYSC has admitted their mistake...
UI has affirmed he was their student.

Only the certification body or institution has a right to alter the name.

The case is more or else like Lawrence's than Degi's.

The issues of 2016....I don't have a full grasp, I don't know what he submitted then (many can't help me here on NL)..that's why I don't intend to discuss the substance of the case.

The publication by INEC was June 30, did you know when this was filed?
Helping with that info will go a long way.

ejimatic:
. 1 The truth is there are irregularities in Obaseki qualifications.All his affidavits were rejected in 2016.He has to explain the reasons for them. The court will decide on this matter. 2 I don't know the date of APC petition against Obaseki if it exists anyway and neither do I have access to the petition except what I saw online. If the date of the petition is after. June 30 the petitioner is in order as INEC will be one of the defendants in the case.

ejimatic:
. 1. If you file for divorce you need a copy of the wedding certificate to establish that wedding exists between the two patties in the first place..Wole Olqnipekun needs INEC publication showing Obaseki as a PDP candidate for his case to have credibility. PDP conducted his primary but INEC has not released the list of contestants in the forthcoming election.In view of this the petitioner is right to present his petition after the INEC publication of contestants.The INEC publication is an indication that all primaries have been completed .2. Wole Olanipekun will also present this case at the tribunal only IF Obaseki wins . 3 As I said yesterday the SC judgement on Degi in Bayelsa is a bad precedence for Obaseki.The apex court held that when there are persistent inconsistencies in names and qualification's of candidate the integrity of the person is questionable even if he has countless affidavits to support them In view of this, Obaseki has a lot of questions s to answer now. He may end up being another Degi in Nigeria.

fergie001:

Ya...?

I think this case is just to rattle Obaseki and/or Shaibu if indeed they did something funny. Other than that, its just merry-go-rounding for the following reasons:

-The case is past 2 weeks the date of the PDP Primaries, hence cannot qualify as a pre-election case (unless we follow Ekwo's reason on Nwosu).

- If its brought as a civil or criminal case, the Governor and his deputy have immunity so are under no obligation to attend proceedings or even enter appearances. The case will however amount to nothing until they no longer have that immunity.

- This case, one way or the other, would have come up at the tribunal where the real case lies.

So, the elections and then the TRIBUNAL (if Obaseki wins) is where I am looking towards.

ejimatic seanfer


ghettokid1 Fuckingmallam45 BuharinaWah powerfulguy...Today na Sunday nah...where is the thread haba.

fergie001:

Justice Odili & Ors had decided on what the cause of action is in an electoral dispute.
The cause of action is the PDP Primaries.

The CoA and Supreme Court also re-affirned same in the case of Lokpobiri v APC & 2 Ors.
The APC Primaries for Bayelsa took place on September 3....names were sent to INEC on the 7th September....PDP filed on the 14th September......Lokpobiri filed on the 19th September.

The Supreme Court told Lokpobiri it was statute-barred.

fergie001:

Section 285(9) explained this thoroughly.
Like I explained up there.....the cause of action is the Primaries.
That is what birthed INEC's acceptance of the name(s).

INEC has no power to disqualify.
If we go by same logic, PDP submitted on the 29th....the deadline for all parties to submit.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2020/06/29/apc-pdp-others-race-to-submit-candidates-for-edo-gov-election/amp/

That's why i said I don't know when they filed this.

seanfer:


Thanks for the well detailed explanations. This case is not about the PDP primary. But what the person the party is sponsoring submit to INEC.
Let’s wait and see how Obaseki and his Deputy can escape this 2 different cases

Dansuqi:


It is not when pdp submitted but when inec published the personal details of candidates.the crux of the matter is submission of false information of fundamental nature not primaties

fergie001:

This is section 285(9):

“Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this constitution, every pre-election matter shall be filed not later than 14 days from the date of the occurrence of the event, decision or action complained of in the suit”.

Mind the word EVERY.
I must have explained from a layperson perspective wrt to the Primaries.
Lokpobiri didn't challenge the holding of the APC primaries....he was asking the Court to declare him winner.

In this case, INEC form CF001 was submitted by all parties on June 29, 2020.

If I may ask, what is the cause of action in this case?
seanfer ejimatic

seanfer:


I get your point. My question is INEC make public the forms submitted which day? The court will surely tell us if the case is filled late or not.

seanfer:


That’s the point I am making. The case will start on what INEC publish as submitted by the candidates.
This is the same thing PDP used in Bayelsa.

kahal29:


You are very correct

fergie001:


The issue of Degi here doesn't apply because Degi refused to name the rotary public that gave him multiple names.

NYSC has admitted their mistake...
UI has affirmed he was their student.

You didn't complete it..when not backed by a recognised notary public or the certification body.

The case is more or else like Lawrence's than Degi's.

The issues of 2016....I don't have a full grasp, I don't know what he submitted then (many can't help me here on NL)..that's why I don't intend to discuss the substance of the case.

The publication by INEC was June 30, did you know when this was filed?
Helping with that info will go a long way.

kahal29:

Dansuqi:
The case of Obaseki is like Lawrence but the major target is shuaibu whose case is like degi

Dansuqi:


Fergie,get over here.I was correct afterall.I said it just that I couldn't remember the particular part of the electoral act.therefore,course of action is not limited to primaries

fergie001:

We came to a conclusion at the end of the thread.

Thanks.....

I don't even know anything about Shaibu and his credential issues.

fergie001:

Na waoh.....It was the same we concluded afterall nah......that we don't know when the case was filed but we know when INEC published.
That means, it has no time-limit.

fergie001:

We came to a conclusion at the end of the thread.

Thanks.....

I don't even know anything about Shaibu and his credential issues.