Zenithpeak:


When a blind is showing another blind man a ditch..... We all know it will definitely end in premium tears.

Scam is sponsoring scam as if we are all as foolish as they are.

Sanchez01:

It is not a dvck measuring contest. And I took you on from the angle of referring to those who don't buy the 250 million charade as Illiterates.

There is:

1. Samarium–neodymium dating method.
2. Potassium–argon dating method.
3. Rubidium–strontium dating method.
4. Uranium–thorium dating method.
5. And there is the lead (something...)

The Uranium–thorium dating method is more accurate for dating fossils of over 500,000 as against the carbon dating method you sold and branded people Illiterates over. Although the latter is considered more accurate generally, the Uranium-thorium is still much more accurate.

I believe approximation/estimation pattern is at play here. And if it is, it still makes a mockery of science in the end as to the true age of the earth. You can't tell me a fossil of 250 million years ago was recently discovered when science only discovered that sperm cells don't in fact swim but wriggle.

That science is very notorious for gross exaggeration is an open secret. Science interests me a whole lot and it has led me on a heuristic method of learning for about a decade but don't come and sell unleavened bread in the name of enlightenment.

Sanchez01:

It is not a dvck measuring contest. And I took you on from the angle of referring to those who don't buy the 250 million charade as Illiterates.

There is:

1. Samarium–neodymium dating method.
2. Potassium–argon dating method.
3. Rubidium–strontium dating method.
4. Uranium–thorium dating method.
5. And there is the lead (something...)

The Uranium–thorium dating method is more accurate for dating fossils of over 500,000 as against the carbon dating method you sold and branded people Illiterates over. Although the latter is considered more accurate generally, the Uranium-thorium is still much more accurate.

I believe approximation/estimation pattern is at play here. And if it is, it still makes a mockery of science in the end as to the true age of the earth. You can't tell me a fossil of 250 million years ago was recently discovered when science only discovered that sperm cells don't in fact swim but wriggle.

That science is very notorious for gross exaggeration is an open secret. Science interests me a whole lot and it has led me on a heuristic method of learning for about a decade but don't come and sell unleavened bread in the name of enlightenment.

Sanchez01:

The emboldened are contradictory. New age scientists are not too different from the old. The difference is the old had limited knowledge and exhibited some societal dogmas. The new age is cursed with exaggeration, data manipulation (for profit), and lies to suit narratives.

That they said they found a creature's fossil of 250 million years ago and put up pictures does not validate the claim in any way.

ArisingStorm:
Lies!!!
Scam!!!

Mercury, Venus, Saturn, Jupiter etc : they are all names of gods o and yet NASA is still giving us top quality entertainment scam, a well financially sponsored scam. And Hollywood and media too are perfectly brainwashing the masses. They quickly brainwash us with western education at a tender age so our mind remains sealed and closed to real truth. They will go to any length to make us not believe the existence of The Creator of all things.

Abeg, people that don't like scam, research this, knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave :
The Hidden origin of science
The Satanist Scientist
The Foundations of the earth is firm and immovable
The Firmament

See another scam below. (Image)

Sososo:
240 million for this Earth abi na another planet

SegFault:

But how do you know they are lies if you have never carried out a research yourself. Nigerians!

GeneralPula:

Who created the earth?

ParpahSeventy:

Funny enough your mind is not an exception, the religious minds believe what they are told with their "evidence", you also believe what you are told with your own "evidence".
It's same African minds, nothing different, nothing new, those of you talking about scientific processes etc.
Apart from what you are told and what was presented to you with it's principles, do you know anything of your own?
Stop claiming all these audio "civilisation".
Mind all religions practiced in Nigeria (except traditional) comes from the Arabs.

Judybash93:


Exactly

SegFault:

But how do you know they are lies if you have never carried out a research yourself. Nigerians!

ossaisly:
the only thing i want to learn here is how is a million year known or determined?

ParpahSeventy:

Funny enough your mind is not an exception, the religious minds believe what they are told with their "evidence", you also believe what you are told with your own "evidence".
It's same African minds, nothing different, nothing new, those of you talking about scientific processes etc.
Apart from what you are told and what was presented to you with it's principles, do you know anything of your own?
Stop claiming all these audio "civilisation".
Mind all religions practiced in Nigeria (except traditional) comes from the Arabs.

Sanchez01:

Let's start from here... How old is the earth?

samsard:
Basically your point is that since some reseachers said that sperm cells don't swim therefore scientific results aren't reliable? That's just ridiculous. There's always a margin of error allowed in scientific research
The sperm cell not swimming stuff you're mentioning is tricky because you're talking of microscopic organisms. If you read the report well you'll understand what the researchers are saying is not so profound.
I still insist it's illiteracy that makes people think the Earth is 6000 years old.
Every self-respecting science enthusiast knows carbon dating isn't perfect, but it's what we've got and reseachers know where to draw the line.
If the title of the thread was to be more accurate it'll read as estimated 250 million year-old fossil or something, it's not a definite figure

samsard:
Basically your point is that since some reseachers said that sperm cells don't swim therefore scientific results aren't reliable? That's just ridiculous. There's always a margin of error allowed in scientific research
The sperm cell not swimming stuff you're mentioning is tricky because you're talking of microscopic organisms. If you read the report well you'll understand what the researchers are saying is not so profound.
I still insist it's illiteracy that makes people think the Earth is 6000 years old.
Every self-respecting science enthusiast knows carbon dating isn't perfect, but it's what we've got and reseachers know where to draw the line.
If the title of the thread was to be more accurate it'll read as estimated 250 million year-old fossil or something, it's not a definite figure

realstars:
How Am I Sure Of This, The W6rld Is Not Upto 10 Million Years Yet.

SegFault:

I don't know. Simple.

Legalcriminal:
Wontunde.
250million haaa please does anyone have the idea how this year figure is calculated.

Sanchez01:

Good. It would have been fair to rely on your science but you didn't, meaning you don't even trust their claims.

It is hilarious you had to put up an appeal to accomplishment fallacy even when you are ignorant and have no clue of what is real and what isn't. Funny.

isthatso:


My friend there is fact and there is opinion/faith/belief. Fact is not subjective. The Bible says the world is flat, science has proved otherwise. This is not about what one is told, fact is demonstrable. Faith by definition is asking you to believe what hasnt been proven.

Macsjebs:
Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8647513/A-15-foot-ichthyosaur-lived-240-million-years-ago-died-eating-12-foot-long-reptile.html

ParpahSeventy:

Question I have for you is this, apart from what you read on Google, watched on TV, and probably read in books do you have any other facts to prove these millions of years?
Am sure your biggest answer is NO.
You read, they read, you were told, they were told, you are all acting on faith, so labelling them illiterates because they don't share your faith is what am trying to point out to you, you went ahead to say African minds, all African minds flow with same wave, that is why even with your so called "intelligence" you still displaying the "African mind".
Those of you ranting about radio carbon dating, I can bet my life savings that you can't do Jack out of it.

SegFault:

Such foolishness exhibited by you too. The earth's age has been a source of argument between those who believe that the big Bang Theory happened and the people who believe the universe is has been the way it is. You are calling someone ignorant you of all people who rubbished a research yet does not have a single dime to even conduct one. Shame on you. As someone who believes in reason, I believe that there are some things that we will never really understand or know. For example, understanding what nothingness means or understanding time.

Humanoid01:

You don't have to be an expert to give a simplified explanation.

If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough -- Albert Einstein.

SegFault:

The difference is clear for shit's sakes. Religious people have what is called faith and let me define it according to the Catholics "Faith is a supernatural gift from God to believe beyond reasonable doubt that God exists...." now look at the bolded that should simply tell you the difference, science demands that you use your rational senses to find proof and use reason while religion doesn't.