FunFact:
Also, I hope you know the myth of Noah's Flood was a plagarized Sumerian tale. Many cultures existing thousands of years before Christainity already had a story of a worldwide flood. The Israelites stole the story from the Mesopotamians; we’ve found their version of the tale that predates the Bible’s account. The Mesopotamians did live in a land that depended on flooding for the fertility of the land; they were highly dependent on this destructive force and it played a large part in their folklore.And the Babylonian version.

The great flood Babylonian version:https://www.livius.org/articles/misc/great-flood/flood3/

https://earth.usc.edu/~stott/Catalina/Mediterranean.html/Mediterranean.html

There’s no scientific evidence for a global flood ever happening.
There is no geological proof & no biological proof whatsoever to support this, instead there are evidence against this ever happening.

1.other ancient civilizations around at the time didn’t notice

2.nowhere for the water to come from or go to after

3. animals somehow traveled from Australia and the Americas to the Middle East

animals somehow traveled back without leaving any record

4.no evidence of human cities being destroyed

5. no evidence of a massive plant or animal die off
6.no evidence of modern sea creatures left on land
7.no massive and universal silt deposit or erosion events in rock strata
8.no evidence of human and animal genetic bottlenecks, especially not any occurring simultaneously across all species
9.insufficient room to house animals on the ark
logistics for feeding animals impossible, especially carnivorous animals

10.With maths;The most rainfall recorded was 12 inches for an hour in Holt, Missouri.
12 (inches of rain per hour) X 24 (hours in a day) X 40 (days) = 11,520 inches divided by 12 gives you 960 feet.
there are plenty of places located above 960 feet above sea level. There was no need for an ark as all the animals and humans who lived in, or could evacuate to, a small hill would have survived this flooding. And that's assuming there was no evaporation, water leveling or water run-off during the whole ordeal.

There was no water added to this planet to create that flood (we have the exact same amount of land mass today that we had before the "flood", and the water used would have to take away from water sources in the ground. So bodies of water would have given up a lot of their levels in order to create the clouds which would cause such drastic rainfall on a global scale.
Plus, such rainstorms would have been more of a hazard to anyone on ships or arks out at sea as opposed to people who are just getting very wet on these hills.

Noah's Flood is a Myth as how Then you say the story waa stolen and it predates Christianity, lol , was Noah a Christian or a Judaismic Jew, was there anything like Christianity in the world then..... ? I can already pick many holes in your theory. Try to research more but with an open mind, not a mind that already has some preset prejudices or bias. But for a start, marine archeologists have already discovered evidence that supports the occurrence of a great flood that happened in the world. But due to the nature of science, they just don't or can't specifically say it was Noah's flood. But the timing matches Noah's era, so whether or not they fully acknowledge it as Noah's flood doesn't matter, the flood happened.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2000/sep/14/internationalnews.archaeology
Then as for your theory of global flooding, your idea is fundamentally flawed and that is why you missed it and mixed things up. Let me explain to you. Human beings did not originally appear in all the different zones or continents in this world from the beginning of our existence. Even science knows this. Human beings originated from a fixed position or point on Earth, then we migrated to other parts of the world gradually as our population began to expand. At a point in our existence, we had not populated all the regions in this world. And such was the situation in the time of Noah. At this period, humans were not "global" yet. We were yet to span the entire Earth. So when the Bible talks about the world being flooded, it was not the entire geographical world in actual sense. It was the world of humanity. The flood covered the geographical location that the human population had expanded to, and so it was actually some part of the world that experienced the flooding, not the entire world. Then your idea about the rain measurements for rising water levels is also flawed. You see, science tells us that about 2/3 of the planet is made of water. So basically, you don't really need an ocean of rain to cause a catastrophic flood. You just need some steady and consistent heavy rainfall and it will trigger the flooding. Because the flooding isn't going to come from the rain water. NO! The flooding will come from the rising ocean/ sea water levels. The ocean / sea water levels in this planet has a tipping point where if reached, then the world is in serious trouble and capable to be sank underneath. Science tells us this and that's one of the major reasons they keep shouting and raising alarm about global warming. Because the hotter the planet gets, the more the polar ice caps of the world melts and the more they melt, the more the ocean / sea water level rises that if left unchecked can cause a catastrophic global flooding that can destroy the world. Hence, science is pushing us towards green energy to reduce the ozone depletion and other man-made pollution that increases global warming. And speaking of polar ice caps, the planet has a huge concentration of ice at the poles, hence called caps, these ice caps are directly connected to the ocean / sea water levels. If they melt indiscriminately, they can cause rising water levels that can cause catastrophic flooding. And this was what happened in Noah's world, or the world of man during Noah era, or the part of the world that humans had migrated to and had covered. The constant rain wasn't the source of the flooding, the constant rain TRIGGERED the flooding. Do you know that there's a part of the ice glaciers in the world called DOOMSDAY Glaciers? Because if it melts, then you can expect that there's going to be a catastrophic global flooding that will sink many places under the ocean, places like Lagos will be buried under the ocean forever, islands like Indonesia, and many other countries will be gone forever.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eF1edSg5VP4

ggirl4real:


Oga, abeg na which verse of the Bible support your point?

"It's a sin to add to or subtract from the Bible"

Genesis 1:1-2.
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

Verse 1 was the beginning of creation. Verse 2 says that the earth was without form and void and darkness was on the face of the deep.

God couldn't have created a voidless earth that was full of darkness. Something happened that made the earth empty and dark.

If the earth was already in existence in voidless form, then it means God was not the original creator. It means he made use of existing earth which contradicts the Scripture.

The Bible says that God created all things from things that were never in existence - Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear. (Hebrews 11:3).

If the empty earth was already in existence before God started creating, Hebrews 11:3 will be meaningless.

So there was an original earth that became voidless through circumstances that are not made available to us. But we are the first man on earth created in the image of God. If there were men in the previous earth, they were certainly not created in the image of God.

TruthinAction:


Genesis 1:1-2.
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

Verse 1 was the beginning of creation. Verse 2 says that the earth was without form and void and darkness was on the face of the deep.

God couldn't have created a voidless earth that was full of darkness. Something happened that made the earth empty and dark.

If the earth was already in existence in voidless form, then it means God was not the original creator. It means he made use of existing earth which contradicts the Scripture.

The Bible says that God created all things from things that were never in existence - Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear. (Hebrews 11:3).

If the empty earth was already in existence before God started creating, Hebrews 11:3 will be meaningless.

So there was an original earth that became voidless through circumstances that are not made available to us. But we are the first man on earth created in the image of God. If there were men in the previous earth, they were certainly not created in the image of God.

It's still your interpretation Sir, not the direct words from your Bible

I'm sure there are fellow Christians like you that will disagree with you and will still quote Bible verses.

kingxsamz:


Cognitive dissonance.
How does it feel lying to yourself just so you can believe in science and religion?
They don't go hand in hand, and millions of Christians would disagree with that statement you made up there.

The wisdom of God far exceeds that of scientists. Who put the millions of stars in the sky? Who made the sun that no one can approach. The universe is not a product of chance but by an intelligent mind. The earth revolves around the sun in definite orbits year after year. The rivers knows their boundaries.

Genesis 1:1 was the beginning of creation.
Genesis 1:2 is the account of an earth that became void. God couldn't have created an empty earth in verse 1.
Genesis 1:3 is the beginning of re creation.

TruthinAction:


The wisdom of God far exceeds that of scientists. Who put the millions of stars in the sky? Who made the sun that no one can approach. The universe is not a product of chance but by an intelligent mind. The earth revolves around the sun in definite orbits year after year. The rivers knows their boundaries.
.

You're right.
The Flying Spaghetti Monster did all that.
And you can't prove me wrong.

ggirl4real:
Our religious folks should come and say they are lieing as usual

According to them - anything that makes the Bible looks untrue is a lie

Story books...

TruthinAction:


The Bible supports pre Adamic race but didn't give details of the creatures that existed before Adam was created. The account of Genesis 1 was a re creation and not the beginning of creation. It doesn't include how angels were created proving there were living beings before man was created.

Is it not better to just shut up?

WinLABSstores:

Story books...

Don't talk against the "word of God" ooo

"The Bible was written through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit" and can never be faulted

I'm not against their beliefs ooo but I'm sometimes marvelled by their level of confidence in a book whose events they never witnessed

ggirl4real:
Our religious folks should come and say they are lieing as usual

According to them - anything that makes the Bible looks untrue is a lie

This post clearly hasn't said anything contrary to the bible.
The bible stated clearly that man should be fruitful,multiply & subdue the earth.

FunFact:


You mean the same bible that states the earth is flat?
The sun revolves around the earth?
The moon produces it’s own light?
Stop being a clown, your fairy tale book was written by ignorant ancient herders who didn’t know any better.

Bloody liar..job 26:7 shows that the earth was hung on nothing(meaning space)
Isaiah 40:22 shows that earth was round...you mock the Bible when you don’t even know shyt in it, when scientists still believed the earth was flat and that it was being carried on the back of a giant turtle the Bible knew the truth..funny enough many Christians like me(who actually studied and are getting their livelihoods from science and engineering) know more about science than you pseudo scientists...

ggirl4real:


Don't talk against the "word of God" ooo

"The Bible was written through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit" and can never be faulted

I'm not against their beliefs ooo but I'm sometimes marvelled by their level of confidence in a book whose events they never witnessed

And you witnessed the Bible abi?
You were there?
Itk

WinLABSstores:

And you witnessed the Bible abi?
You were there?
Itk

...but that's how those Christian folks talk now

They defend the Bible as if the book witnessed everything that is written there

walessssss:
I wonder why it is very difficult for people to see these are nothing but lies , afterall science itself support critical thinking. MRI is a SCIENTIFIC solution employed by fifa in determining footballers age , still yet age falsification still rocks the game.
If MRI is not accurate in discovering the age of a living person ? Then how did you want me to believe that crap called carbon dating is accurate? Does it means if it's scientific then it's 100 percent reliable ?

I'm not disputing that the earth has been here for a long while probably billions of years but I will never believe one bone was duged out of the earth even if it exist for just a hundred thousand years . Kindly google carbon dating flaws .

Lol, I get you very well. Carbon dating is not accurate beyond 50K years. They don't use carbon dating to predict the age of the earth, they use radioactive (or radiometric) dating. The thing is those figures are estimates, not pinpoint 100%. But they are reasonable estimates within the exact time frame, so they are actually accurate. Radioactive dating of meteorite rocks to predict the age of the Earth is just one aspect. But the main physics that verifies it beyond reasonable doubt is the sun, through the physics of understanding that the sun is like a burning nuclear reactor and it will eventually burn out. Then by radioactive measurements, the sun is estimated to have a lifespan of about 10 billion years. Another thing we learn from science is that without the sun, this planet Earth cannot support life. So life cannot exist here without the sun; if the sun burns out, then life on Earth will come to an end. From the radioactive investigation of the sun, it is estimated that the sun has reached about half of it its lifespan. And this further proves that the radioactive dating figures for the estimated age of the planet Earth being about 4.6 billion years old is accurate. But the confusion for some people is that they think the age of the earth and the age of humanity is the same. No it's not. This world has been existing long before we came to existence. And personally, (can't prove it beyond reasonable doubt, and some people might think I am crazy ), but my view is our humanity is not the only humanity that ever existed. I think there was another humanity that existed before ours. That is to say, our kind of mankind is not the only man that ever existed. I think there was another man that existed long before us but later became extinct. But we are the first man or the first humanity or first mankind to exist in God's image. There will be another mankind in God's image when this world ends. The new mankind in the new Earth, but with a celestial body, not the type of flesh body and weak body we have. A new man with a "superman" kind of body that cannot die or feel pain or be injured etc.

125 million years

ggirl4real:


You mean the only reason you believe that dragons existed before is because it's written in the Bible?

If the Bible didn't mention them, you won't believe?

I would believe dragons/dinosaurs/great reptiles existed because many ancient cultures talked about them..from Far East Asia to Europe..is it a coincidence that cultures worlds apart had tales of great reptiles ages before the internet? The shield of Georgia and many other countries depict dragons on their emblems...the Jewish historian Josephus wrote about flying serpents that he saw in India..the romans under Marcus atillus regulus during the campaign in North Africa killed a great reptile after battling against it for an extended time....it’s skin was 120 feet when measured...I believe dragons(or dinosaurs as they’re called today) lived on this earth but I don’t believe the years being attached to them.

Grandmeister:

I would believe dragons/dinosaurs/great reptiles existed because many ancient cultures talked about them..from Far East Asia to Europe..is it a coincidence that cultures worlds apart had tales of great reptiles ages before the internet? The shield of Georgia and many other countries depict dragons on their emblems...the Jewish histology Josephus wrote about flying serpents that he saw in India..the romans under Marcus atillus regulus during the campaign in North Africa killed a great reptile after battling against it for a man extended time....it’s skin was 120 feet when measured...I believe dragons(or dinosaurs as they’re called today) lived on this earth but I don’t believe the years being attached to them.

OK Sir

At least your belief about dragons is not 100% deep-rooted in the Bible

..

..

G

ggirl4real:


OK Sir

At least your belief about dragons is not 100% deep-rooted in the Bible

Nope but here’s a shocker..in the book of job (purportedly one of the oldest books in the Bible)chapter 40:15-24..an animal called behemoth was mentioned
1. It was so big that it could wade into the rushing Jordan river to drink without fear
2. It’s tail was as big as a cedar tree
3. It ate grass
4. It’s limbs and bones were as strong as brass....

Then in chapter 41 it mentioned a great beast called leviathan in those days
1. It had tightly knitted scales that air couldn’t pass through
2. Spears and javelins thrown at it by men didn’t do anything to it
3. Beasts and men cowered in fear when it raised itself up
4. It’s teeth were like daggers
5. It’s breath could kindle coal....the descriptions of these animals looks like the dinosaurs/dragons of ancient tales..but how it was written in the book of job suggests that job actually had knowledge or may have even seen these animals..if it’s so then man lived alongside great beasts that are now extinct..this is another reason I don’t believe that they existed millions of years ago..but that they existed with man.

codenameSTYNO:


Quite funny... Where in the Bible was it stated that the Earth is flat or that the moon produces it's own light

The Bible talks about God making two great lights;
The Greater Light to rule by day and the lesser light to rule by night
Ref: Genesis 1:16

This does not in anyway imply that the moon produces its light

When you look up at the sky in the night and you see the moon, what do you see? Do you not see a light?

This Bible you say was written by Ancient Herders who knew no better, this same Bible has accurately showed man his past, present and future.

Just a little example, the Bible talks about the flood of Noah, archeologists had found this to be true, and the exact spot where the Bible says the Ark rested, they found it there. And there are so many more proofs!

Are you talking about the Noah's ark that they keep finding every year in different locations?

RoSeMaRyA:
125 million years indeed,who are thy deciving.

If you like reading books, I'd like you to read "The Secret History of the World" by Mark Booth, you'll understand that the world has existed for that long. Its not enough to just read the bible, you've got to read other things too.

kingxsamz:


You're right.
The Flying Spaghetti Monster did all that.
And you can't prove me wrong.

Even FSM doesn't make such claims, where did you get the new idea?

nairarhymer:
the eternal sleeper actually existed 131 million years ago, not 125 million AD. They migrated to earth from planet max699ymmmcc-astro. The migration of the eternal sleeper was as a result of space wars for astral territory in max699ymmmcc-astro. Archeological evidence shows that the eternal sleeper were actually lucky to migrate to earth when they did, as planet max699ymmmcc-astro exploded 0.127 light years after their migration during the big bang.
However, the eternal sleeper was not totally fortunate, as it met stiff resistance from the Arachnidomollusca crocodiles when it arrived planet Earth. The Arachnidomollusca crocodiles which existed exactly 865 billion years ago, and which later evolved into the salt water dinosaur devoured the eternal sleeper in the Pacifics, 125 million years ago.
The vestiges of the armoured space ship which the eternal sleeper used in migrating to earth can be found in shrine of Baba Osas Edokpolo in Edo state.

Too much Quantum Physics. You have my respect though for being an avid reader

WinLABSstores:

Is it not better to just shut up?

Nah your fellow christian now, he claims to have the same holy spirit as you

Image123:



Even FSM doesn't make such claims , where did you get the new idea?

What claims does FSM make then?

This people should stop pls.saying 100 digit of millions like minutes and seconds.them no dey shame!?

Really

ggirl4real:


I didn't say "untrue", I said " look untrue". I'm sure they mean different things.

Secondly, I think your fellow Christians need your second paragraph because they are always fast to reject these kinds of discoveries. Some of them even argue that the earth is about 7000 years because that's the calculation from the time of creation. Anything outside that is unacceptable to them.

biko wich christians? u might be talking about nigerian christians
everybody christian or not knows the earth is more than frigging 7000 years.and how did they do their calculation in the bible?
abeg naija christians are funnyset of ppl.they will misquote bible upandan