Queed's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Queed's Profile › Queed's Posts
RobinHez:johnydon22 !!!!!!!! Teempakguy !!! This small boy has said it all ![]() |
kodeya:yeah Edison was more of a business man, though some people believe they were enemies, many others think they were more of friends than enemies, I am one of such .At the time that power grids which lined major cities were first built, there was no convenient way to change the voltage of DC power, whereas using a transformer made that relatively easy for AC power. That is why AC power won the “war of the currents” The only significant advantage AC has over DC is that it can be step up or down easily and efficiently DC has It's own advantage too ![]() » Every current that oscillate, radiate some amount of energy, this is prevented using DC » There are no losses due to skin effect and there are many more bro.... HVDC (high voltage DC) has evolved a lot, and is now the best way to transmit large amounts of power great distances. There are many Countries in world switch from AC to DC ;the West, Chinese etc.. ain't beefing tesla, he is one of my favourite ![]() HVDC has come to stay!! |
Teempakguy:yes I do ![]() so what's your idea, perhaps, I could see reasons why it just might work |
Teempakguy:my presence ![]() |
johnydon22:Too many?? or just too technical? ![]() ok,,, let me make things easier, answer just 5 |
Teempakguy:Never knew u know about this (the bolded) ![]() so you belong? ![]() when I was little, I don't wait for equipments to break down,,,,, I facilitate their doom , so that, when they break down I always know the problem, so I fix them. Not being a bad child, atleast, I get to know whats inside ![]() I heard you are built some atomic batteries?? hook me up , I love stuffs as such ![]() |
cc johnydon22 ![]() |
menesheh:POOR answer ![]() |
![]() Saw these questions online, and thought i could get great responses and answeres from atheist here [center] [color=#000000] [b] 1. Are you absolutely sure there is no God? If not, then is it not possible that there is a God? And if it is possible that God exists, then can you think of any reason that would keep you from wanting to look at the evidence? 2. Would you agree that intelligently designed things call for an intelligent designer of them? If so, then would you agree that evidence for intelligent design in the universe would be evidence for a designer of the universe? 3. Would you agree that nothing cannot produce something? If so, then if the universe did not exist but then came to exist, wouldn’t this be evidence of a cause beyond the universe? 4. Would you agree with me that just because we cannot see something with our eyes—such as our mind, gravity, magnetism, the wind—that does not mean it doesn’t exist? 5. Would you also agree that just because we cannot see God with our eyes does not necessarily mean He doesn’t exist? 6. In the light of the big bang evidence for the origin of the universe, is it more reasonable to believe that no one created something out of nothing or someone created something out of nothing? 7. Would you agree that something presently exists? If something presently exists, and something cannot come from nothing, then would you also agree that something must have always existed? 8. If it takes an intelligent being to produce an encyclopedia, then would it not also take an intelligent being to produce the equivalent of 1000 sets of an encyclopedia full of information in the first one-celled animal? (Even atheists such as Richard Dawkins acknowledges that “amoebas have as much information in their DNA as 1000 Encyclopaedia Britannicas.” Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker (New York: WW. Norton and Co., 1996), 116.) 9. If an effect cannot be greater than its cause (since you can’t give what you do not have to give), then does it not make more sense that mind produced matter than that matter produced mind, as atheists say? 10. Is there anything wrong anywhere? If so, how can we know unless there is a moral law? 11. If every law needs a lawgiver, does it not make sense to say a moral law needs a Moral Lawgiver? 12. Would you agree that if it took intelligence to make a model universe in a science lab, then it took super-intelligence to make the real universe? 13. Would you agree that it takes a cause to make a small glass ball found in the woods? And would you agree that making the ball larger does not eliminate the need for a cause? If so, then doesn’t the biggest ball of all (the whole universe) need a cause? 14. If there is a cause beyond the whole finite (limited) universe, would not this cause have to be beyond the finite, namely, non-finite or infinite? 15. In the light of the anthropic principle (that the universe was fine-tuned for the emergence of life from its very inception), wouldn’t it make sense to say there was an intelligent being who preplanned human life? [/b][/color][/center] GOOD answers, POOR answers, NOISE etc.. are all welcomed ![]() |
RobinHez:WICKED ![]() |
LWTMB ![]() |
so sad ![]() |
[quote author=orogodoganyin post=35327857][/quote]sorry man, can't snap ![]() Question is incorrect ![]() This is how I think it should be Sin 85 - Cos 55 - Sin 25 = 0 Then; [Sin 85 = (60+25)] - [Cos 55 = (30+25)] - sin 25 =0 [Sin 60*Cos 25 + Sin 25*Cos 60] - [Cos 30*Cos 25 - Sin 30*Sin 25] - sin 25 =0 Do the rest yourself (remember, the minus sign affects everything in the bracket) ![]() YOU DON'T HAVE TO KILL YOURSELF BECAUSE YOU WANT TO SOLVE MATHEMATICS ![]() |
Teempakguy:wow Did I heard someone say magnetism well, we would always know where to find the spoons, knives, watches, pots ![]() It's a great idea though ![]() |
He needs more time ![]() Give baba a break nah, It's only a month ![]() |
Teempakguy:We shouldn't kill ourselves becos we want to solve mathematics ![]() g = 5 b = 4 total = 9 If we have to choose a girl then p(G) = 5/9 since the condition attached to it is 'choosing a girl' we have one less person to shoose from from the sample space (9-1 = , also the number of girls has been reduced by one (5-1=4)Now e can pick a boy, or pick a girl. so we would have a girl or a boy 4/8 + 4/8 = 1 possible outcome (1 ) decide by the total outcome( =1/85/9 * 1/8 5/72 |
1. My favourite book is Google. by google. I don't care whether its a book or not , it is one of the best out there ![]() 2. 1. Nikola Tesla 2. John Goodenough 3. Max Planck 4. William Shockley 5. Perhaps, all German physicist 3. 1. Victor Frankenstein 2. Sherlock Holmes 4. 1. The wings ![]() 2. The transistor 3. Internet ![]() 4. The electric generator 5. Computers 5. That would be when I invent a machine that's over 100% efficient 6. When I found out that wearing glasses even for years wouldn't correct the fu.ckin eye defect ![]() 7. 1. Nobel prize 2. Scientific god 8. 1. Gravity battery ![]() 2. The sun (well I guess nature has already taken care of that) |
Would love to invent/discover or see an invention/discovery of a device/ mechine/ compound/ mixture or an element that can reverse the effect of radioactivity ![]() would like to set foot on Hiroshima without any protective suit ![]() |
Teempakguy:It doesn't just react and produce electricity . The heat has to be converted to electricity using turbine , and this process consumes quite a number of cubic meters Heat - steam - motion - electricity - your house ![]() ![]() |
Teempakguy:sure ![]() |
Teempakguy:Well said bro, I get your points and I also feel your pain becose I have got this deep part of me in science/tech too. But we still need government backup, scientists from those countries mentioned had and are still having full support from their government. Our government care less about science/tech. they still see it as 'oyinbo magic/juju', they believe ours is to dance around in rags (fu.ckin called masquerade). Until they change this prospective, am afraid we might not get there too soo btw,,, Op, why is germany not on the list ![]() |
Teempakguy:lol, we could share ideas here Am also an aspirant too ![]() [quote author=FrancisTony post=351877 18]Who said i'm good @Integration? ![]() And i'm an aspirant like you. [/quote] |
Following |
johnydon22:This is 'purely' correct, and its the fact too. I always try to have an open mind about everything, and when scientific facts contradict believe or the other way round, I always put to use the the law postulated by some QUALIFIED African Teacher/Lecturers know as 'Gba bee's ' (youruba language meaning take it like that ) theory. like u asked in your other post; 'why does rain fall' , I would accept the scientific facts and also accept the 'Belief' hope you don't start seeing me as a nuisance because I believe ![]() |
johnydon22:johnnydon22 l be wan follow you because of ur interest in astronomy, bt this1 wey u no believe in God ![]() |
fp at last how did this happened?? am sure this can never be done by lalasticlala or ishilove , since this doesn't have to do with UKWU ![]() well, am science inclined too, though I care less or non about the biological part . My area of interests are: Astrophysics, Quantum physics, and Electronic/computers, am kind of an AUTODIDACT too (learned that today from teempakguy, poor me )For the programmers/engineers (or anyone who knows), help me with this question How does mere codes alter the a micro controller function(s) ![]() I understand that they are solid stated devices which comprises different logic units, and these gates have different functions. Each login unit/gate are made up of simpler semiconductors like transistors, diode, resistor caps, etc.. These semiconductors are made by doping silicon/germanium with a pent/ trivalent element. ok, let's assume that a micro controller has been programmed to allows current to pass through on direction five seconds then switches off for 10seconds. After reprogramming, it starts allowing current to go back and front for 3seconds, then makes it flow in only one direction for 5sec, after which it switches off for 15sec, then the cycle continues. how is this possible ![]() is the micro cotrl. changing it circulatory after reprogramming ![]() or is it building new components inside itself ![]() or is converting a transistor to a diode, diode to cap, resistor to inductor ![]() or is it changing the chemistry of what's inside ![]() Your little/huge help will be gladly appreciated ![]() Thanks in advance. cc Pakingzzz , acorntree , jarus , seun etc.. |
ELYMAXiimus:fp for where you go beg die ![]() Its not their fault though, its all about interest. ~80% of Nigerian don't care about science, imagine this topic between topics like: *tonton dike new make up *PDP needs change Most Nigerian will hardly click on this topic ![]() And the rule for the mods is more click + more view + more stup.d arguments = more fuc.kin money! ![]() *Modified* fp at last how did this happened?? am sure this can never be done by lalasticlala or ishilove , since this doesn't have to do with UKWU ![]() well, am science inclined too, though I care less or non about the biological part . My area of interests are: Astrophysics, Quantum physics, and Electronic/computers, am kind of an AUTODIDACT too (learned that today from teempakguy, poor me )For the programmers/engineers (or anyone who knows), help me with this question How does mere codes alter the a micro controller function(s) ![]() I understand that they are solid stated devices which comprises different logic units, and these gates have different functions. Each login unit/gate are made up of simpler semiconductors like transistors, diode, resistor caps, etc.. These semiconductors are made by doping silicon/germanium with a pent/ trivalent element. ok, let's assume that a micro controller has been programmed to allows current to pass through on direction five seconds then switches off for 10seconds. After reprogramming, it starts allowing current to go back and front for 3seconds, then makes it flow in only one direction for 5sec, after which it switches off for 15sec, then the cycle continues. how is this possible ![]() is the micro cotrl. changing it circulatory after reprogramming ![]() or is it building new components inside itself ![]() or is converting a transistor to a diode, diode to cap, resistor to inductor ![]() or is it changing the chemistry of what's inside ![]() Your little/huge help will be gladly appreciated ![]() Thanks in advance. |
. |
Op thanks for the tips, it would really help on my next trip to Mars ![]() |
isn't that Origin101 ? |
Teempakguy:you have a point there ![]() |

e.g, after kowalski's numerous attempt at a project, Private suggested he add sugar (cuz the mixture wasnt sweet...lol) but he was right as kowalski shouted EUREKA, he then explained the action of glucose on the something he was doing he den called Private a genius, dat made the little guy chuckle... (from penguins of madagascar. . .yeah i watch cartoons alot
)





.