Kobojunkie: 1. There is no "Lost tribe of Israel". They are mixed well into various populations at this point. Companies like Ancestry investigate ancient remains to collect DNA for tests. A DNA test of individuals from all over the world should be able to identify them as being related to the Jews or not. That has been happening all over the world. 🤔
If you are interested in learning how DNA issues are resolved, you should visit Ancestry.com to learn more about how people's DNA is compared.🤔
But that amounts to "lost". They disappeared as a distinct group.
About chattel slavery, I had the same argument with Secretbloodline about Nigeria as a whole and I easily won by adding the words "American style". Also, he should have emphasized he meant his part of Igbo land! Diarisgodoo
Secretbloodline: Nonsense. Toussaint was Creole and he was very light skinned. Dark skinned Creoles exist and we don't have no concept of colorism that is primarily African Americans because Mulattos like Prince Hall was put over them. A Creole male is a,son of Southern European, we are Middle Eastern Mediterranean people.
The only difference between Creoles and the Dominicans and Puerto Ricans who are also Southern Europeans paternally is they mixed with the Taino Indigenous women whilst our mixture was primarily with West Africans. That's because our paternal ancestors owned West African slaves. It's not a big deal because Africans owned African slaves too, much more than anyone else to be exact. Except my forefathers needed to grow their population so they freed many of them. But there is no way you can free a woman and her family still remained enslaved so we freed them too whenever we could afford it. Not all the French were white people. Two types of Europeans came to the New World the pale skinned and the tanned skinned. Not all the tan skinned people were friendly towards their slaves or indigenous.
I can show you the pictures of the tan skinned Southern Europeans. There are a lot of pictures of them who had tan skin and dark hair. Alot of Cajuns or Accadians/Gauls were tan skinned. Alot of the Spanish, Italians, Portuguese, etc were tan skinned. The Franks, Greeks, Romans, Iberians, Turks, Moors, Arabs and other Mediterranean Middle Eastern people were not pale skin or white. You need to educate yourself and stop seeing the world through the narrow lens of Igbo. I'm not West African, I'm Middle Eastern and North East African by genetics and genealogy. I have a picture of my mother and she's very Ethiopian looking. Black is just a classification that Whites put everyone inside that was mixed with Sub Saharan African. It helps their theft of Middle Eastern Mediterranean heritage by extending white prestige into classical antiquity.
Mr LIAR is still lying. Produce one photo of Toussaint Louverture where he is "very light skinned". As for Dominican Republic, see below. Jacob the LIAR!
ogolemati: meaning if a wife gets pregnant for someone not her husband,she should go and be with the man that got her pregnant na .abi the two can be loving two parents to their child na.abi people working in zenith Bank receives salary from Access bank. Why should a wife get pregnant outside in the first place is what you should tell me
Understand, it'd be different if DNA tests are free and can be done without the wife and child knowing or if there were 50% chance the child is not his, or if the child were still a baby. But none of that is true. There's only 1-4% chance the child is not his and DNA is very expensive, and it could destroy the family even if the husband is the father becsuse of the established lack of trust for both his wife and child!
Secretbloodline: AI. Your religion isn't Vodou its Aro. The Haitian slaves went into the forrest to summon Ogun God of War which is a Vodoun and Ifa deity.
I have friends who are ordained Vodou priests and I am connected with Bokor which are generational Vodou bloodline priests.
This guy, u sure u all there? He's shown records in black and white directly from ships' manifests and he’s still talking gibberish that's entirely from his head!
My religion? How do you know my religion? Voodoo is combination of NIGERIAN religions and Catholicism! As far as I know, Igbos had a Supreme Being - exactly ike in the Old Testament!
Secretbloodline: 19th century is the 18th century and the 1900s is the 20th century.
Photography was invented in 1826 when Nicéphore Niépce created the first permanent photograph, followed by the 1839 public introduction of the commercial daguerreotype process.
Exactly. And you were showing photos from "17th through 18th century"!😂 LIAR as usual! Egg on your face as usual!
And below, see where Africans trafficked to Saint-Domingue (Haiti) were from:
DiarisGodoo: It actually could. Everybody will answer his father's name, so to speak. Everybody will now know where they stand.
And the stable family would be gone and all of a sudden you have a wife who knows her husband does not trust her and a teenager who knows his father didn't trust his mother and was doubtful he was his child!
Secretbloodline: If you had a slave revolt in Africa there would be no need for it anywhere else but its all lies.
Several powerful African kings and rulers actively protested and resisted the banning of the transatlantic slave trade by European powers in the 19th century. Because many coastal kingdoms had built their wealth and military power around the slave trade, they viewed British and European abolition as a direct threat to their economic survival and sovereign authority.
Prominent Rulers Who Protested AbolitionKing Ghezo of Dahomey (Modern-day Benin): Ghezo famously stated in the 1840s that the slave trade was the ruling principle of his people, noting that it was the source of their glory and wealth. He argued that he could not abruptly end a trade deeply rooted in his kingdom's institutions without risking a rebellion from his own subjects and military.
King Obi Osai of Aboh (Modern-day Nigeria): When British commissioners approached King Obi in 1841 to sign an anti-slavery treaty, he expressed profound confusion and resistance. He argued that if white men stopped buying slaves, it would ruin his kingdom’s trade, as selling captives was their primary means of acquiring European goods.
King Kosoko of Lagos: Kosoko aggressively refused British demands to stop trading enslaved people. His defiance led the British Royal Navy to intervene militarily during the 1851 Reduction of Lagos, where they deposed Kosoko and installed a puppet ruler willing to sign an anti-slavery treaty.
The Rulers of Bonny and Calabar: These major trading states in the Niger Delta heavily resisted British suppression efforts. They pointed out that local law, religious customs, and deep economic dependency made a sudden shift to alternative commodities like palm oil highly disruptive.
Why They Opposed the BanEconomic Devastation: Enslaved people were the primary export used to buy firearms, textiles, and manufactured goods. European abolition threatened to instantly bankrupt these states.
There were multiple revolts in Africa that were carefully erased from the books - same way you'd never find the women's war in any European narrative. Who wrote these stories that make perfect sense to you? Is it the kings that wrote them or the slavers?? How about the extremes European traders went to to continue slave trade?? Just as, if Haitian revolution had happened in Africa the story in history books and textbooks would be about the Christian kindness and morality of the French who simply refused to kill the enslaved African revolutionaries despite their far superior firepower! A story that'd make perfect sense to anybody reading it!
Secretbloodline: My bloodline is royalty. I am a de France and my mother's bloodline came from Ethiopian royalty. There isn't too many royals in Africa that came from two ancient royal lineages. It's called 1st class royalty. Equal born. Even my father couldn't make that claim.
You know nothing about me except what your Freemasonic gossip lying network tells you to spread.
And your father is a peasant, you said so yourself .
Can you imagine, say, Elon Musk, or Dangote being obsessed with bloodline? It is like wearing shoes - the only reason you'd be preoccupied with your shoes is if there's something wrong with them. Something in your blood is really odious that's why it won't let you forget it. Probably horrific crimes committed and you're carrying the DNA of the culprit and can't run away from it because it is inside you, it is you! So you spend all your waking hours fighting outside with lies becsuse there's no way you can fight it inside you. What a fate indeed!
DiarisGodoo: Yes, Mr. Secret how about that? Secretbloodline - can you regale us exactly how that seemingly obsession moniker came about?
That's the word for it: obsession! Because his bloodline is totally mixed up and messed up, what with rapists and all mixed in. Last thing on a normal person's mind is bloodline!
Secretbloodline: I love eggs. Chicken eggs. But you love snake eggs. There is no African Toussaint. He was a Creole. There's no African in history whose ever lead a slave revolt, not in Africa and not in Diaspora. Creoles and Mulattos lead all slave revolts, lead all Civil Rights movements, Black Panthers formed by a Creole. You don't have it in you to form such ideas. Not that you're not intelligent enough it's not in your spirit to do such. That's just the truth. Freedom of religion.
You ought love eggs because you have too much on your face!😂 The ONLY successful slave revolt that established a country in the history of man was by mostly enslaved and also some formerly enslaved Africans! Do a LITTLE research before posting your usual LIES!
Secretbloodline: Toussaint was a Creole, he was educated and refined. Toussaint was light skinned not dark skinned but his complexion isn't never an issue.
The African slaves were the great Dahomey warriors captured in battle. These people were not Igbos. Their religion was not Aro it was Vodoun the religion of Dahomey.
The notion of an African didn't exist in the 17th century for every African saw himself through the lens of tribal clan loyalty. An Igbo can not claim the track record of a Dahomey any more than a Saxon can claim to be a Scott. The notion of a white race didn't exist in the 17th century. The concept of race was put forward by the British in the 18th century. It was thoroughly documented and complied by the British to catalogue people around the world where they colonized and Race was used to justify Slavery and Colonialism.
Haiti is a failed state because the people there betrayed the Creoles and accepted violence and turmoil over peace and stability. Haiti shares the same exact island with the Dominican Republic and they're like night and day. Haiti is chaotic and violence and Dominican Republic is stable and peaceful. It doesn't matter what the people look like and that one is darker and looks more Sub Saharan African and the other is lighter skinned looking more Southern European. This does not matter. What matters is the spiritual qualities of these two nations. Haiti is 95 percent Catholic but 100 percent Vodou. The Dominican Republic is 100 percent Catholic with traces of Native Indigenous religion and some African religion.
You're supposed to do the work of inner transformation. Comparing the outside of your self to others is idolatry.
Take a look:
Why not do some research before posting pure nomsense. Almost all, if not ALL, participants in the revolution were enslaved Africans and Toussaint Louverture was born of two African parents. Despite the Europeans' power of the press they haven't succeeded in changing the story because too many people were alive who witnessed it live!
DiarisGodoo: You keep posting this. It simply proves that there is a whole lot we don't know. One thing is irrefutable - there is an indisputable connection between ancient Israel and Igbos. The reason we never had kings was because we left before Israel started having kings.
Why not ask him if all humans originated from Africa as is the consensus, where did all these Y chromosomes come from??
ogolemati: you are very funny. So if I marry you,you will go about fucking other men to get pregnant and say am the father of the child. like what kind of heart is in your chest. DNA test was introduced because some homosapiens promised never to be faithful even in sacred things
But this is not about me. It is totally about making sure the teenager is brought up to maturity in a loving two-parent home where unnecessary, unwanted DNA fishing expediton hasn't suddenly spoilt everything. There is only a 1-4% chance that the husband is not the father!
LordReed: I have told you, it is fine for a man to say I love the kid no need for a test. It NOT fine to have the GOVERNMENT tell a man he cannot do a DNA test because he has been playing the role of a father.
He is not a simp if he chooses it.
You actually did say that. I totally forgot. So we kind of agree on this. I say it doesn't necessarily make him a simp. I also say it doesn't necessarily make him a man's man either!
So you're no longer an atheist. Are you now an evangelist for Christ?
Secretbloodline: I love eggs. Chicken eggs. But you love snake eggs. There is no African Toussaint. He was a Creole. There's no African in history whose ever lead a slave revolt, not in Africa and not in Diaspora. Creoles and Mulattos lead all slave revolts, lead all Civil Rights movements, Black Panthers formed by a Creole. You don't have it in you to form such ideas. Not that you're not intelligent enough it's not in your spirit to do such. That's just the truth. Freedom of religion.
Poor guy is becoming really senile - he has totally forgotten that initial definition of Creole is no longer what Creole means today. Durring Toussaint Louverture time Creole simply meant "Born in the Colonies" as opposed to people who moved there or were brought there. Thus Toussaint Louverture was a Creole simply because he was born in Haiti. His two African parents were NOT Creole because they were brought from Africa. Same also applied to Whites - those born in the Colonies were Creoles. But all that ended long ago and today Creole basically means a person originally from Louisiana of basically Mixed African and European, ancestry!
Secretbloodline: My mother's family fled Ethiopian Civil War in 1855 to Egypt then to the United States. Ethiopians have been Christians since around the 4th century and a few groups before in Ethiopia. On my forefathers side the de France have been Christians since the time of Bishop Arias. My bloodline has never been pagan, never Anglos, never African and my story is 100 percent true.
Let's look scientifically at the claims.
1. Mediterranean Middle Eastern people are haplagroups J1, J2 and G2a, they are not Anglos or Africans. Mediterranean Middle Eastern people are a brown to yellow but not pale.
2. Creole men are mostly J1, J2 and G2a haplagroup..
3. African Americans who came from West African slaves sold to Anglos E1b1ba Sub Saharan African and many are now R1B haplagroup the bloodline of Anglo male slave owners.
4. Creole women are mostly L1, L2 and L3 maternal haplagroup with some having Native American maternal ancestry.
Creoles are men are not the descent of Africans or Igbos. We are not the descendants of the British.
Ignoring these scientific facts are deliberately done out of spiritual and moral envy. I came to this conclusion after thoroughly observing Igbos and African Americans parade to the world that they're the true Israelites. Look at the science, that's all I present.
Kobojunkie, he is LYING!!! He lies constantly. I don't know how someone can be simply incapable of telling a single word that is true. Someone that lives among his Louisiana Creole people already told him all he does is lie, yet he keeps LYING!!!
Here are Louisiana Creoles telling the simple truth about Louisiana Creoles:
Secretbloodline: No. You're welcome. Because truly you don't know. The Haitian people are from Dahomey not Igbos.
**The Myth of Toussaint’s Darkening: How Former Slaves Reinvented His Identity**
### **1. The Transformation of Toussaint in Folklore:** - Post-revolution, *African-born rebels* recast him as a **"pure African"**—a symbol of their liberation, erasing his Creole origins to claim him as one of them: > - This was a conscious rewriting… >> Turning the strategic, light-skinned leader into an ancestral hero! *(Source: Haitian Oral History)*
### ***2**. Why It Happened*** Two reasons: > - To unify the newly freed masses under his legacy (*"He fought for us!"*)… >> And to distance themselves from elite Creoles they resented.
Poor guy. He doesn't know that these things happened a relatively short time ago. Please show a photo of Toussaint Louverture looking tan. Egg on your face again!
Secretbloodline: I just showed the actual portrait in Haiti of Toussaint and colonial records describing him and you're now dodging the bullet after it blasted your brains out.
You're a destiny theif like most Freemasons trying to steal another's star. It doesn't matter to me at all what Toussaint looked like because his heroic deeds are what matters. But Toussaint is a testament of Creole legacy. You're suffering spiritual and moral envy and you need exorcism immediately.
Poor guy. Old age is really dealing with you. You don't know the difference between Pierre Toussaint, a hairdresser, and the Haitian revolutionary leader, Toussaint Louverture. See it below. EGG ON YOUR FACE AGAIN!😂🤣
Secretbloodline: **Toussaint Louverture’s Creole Complexion: A Matter of Historical Accuracy**
### **1. His Light Skin as a Creole:** - Toussaint was *accurately* described by the French because he **was light-skinned**, reflecting his mixed ancestry—typical of Haitian/Caribbean Creoles: > - His complexion wasn’t "dark" like enslaved Africans from the continent… >> But rather a lighter brown, common among free people of color! *(Source: Haitian Colonial Records)*
### ***2**. Why This Matters*** It’s not racist to acknowledge: > - That Toussaint’s appearance reflected Haiti’s diversity… >> And that being light-skinned didn’t diminish his revolutionary leadership!
In your 90s or so, aren't you too old to be doing this? Jacob the LIAR! Lies, lies, and more lies everywhere. He has turned a very dark-skinned man tan!😅 See below, ask any AI platform if there is any dispute about Louverture being 100% African and come post it here. EGG on your face as usual!😂
Secretbloodline: Wash, wash but sometimes no amount of soap or water can do any good.
Prince Hall.
But your Haitian revolutionary hero, Toussaint Louverture (who you did not realize was a 100% full-blooded African) was also a FREEMASON! What does that make you??!
CanadaOrBust: I'd say him not wanting to know is simpish behavior. There is something not manly about it. Different if he knew for sure but decides to raise the child anyway
You have a point but I believe love trumps all. Love now turns what would normally be considered simpish behaviour into something NOT so simpish!
DiarisGodoo: For him to refuse DNA test means he already strongly suspects the child is not his. I will say he is a simp only because he is burying his head in sand instead of being man enough to want to know for sure no matter what.
But let's look at it another way: what does he really gain by knowing - except possible disruption of his solid family?
ariesbull: That's a lie....I can't live a lie! If the child isn't mine biologically that child isn't yours biologically ..if you want to adopt ..adopt and make it clear
Really, WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?? You love the child, he knows you as his only father. Can you tell us exactly the difference?
Family › Re: Why Government Should Ban DNA Testing Of Minors by QuinQQ(op): 11:15am On Jul 31
