₦airaland Forum

JUBSAM:
It depends on how free I am to write. On the average say $70 per week. But I've made $120 in a week in the past.

Okay. Approximately how many articles do you write within this timeframe?

JUBSAM:
They are genuine. I write for them.
Use this code 26189

On the average, how much do you earn per day/week on the site?

blueAgent:
Story for the gods.

You used to be bright. What happened?

blueAgent:
Story for the gods.

You used to be bright. What happened?

felixomor:
I never came here for fun. U miss road

Whatever. Get a grip.

felixomor:
Receive Sense!

You had to spoil the fun.

felixomor:
Receive Sense!

You had to spoil the fun.

Oloruntobi4382:
So na me like dangerous thing. Ask Baba Ijebu how they were driven from Illorin.

Lol.
Na servitor dem use?

Oloruntobi4382:
Why?

It's dangerous. So says the authority on esoteric matters.

Oloruntobi4382:
lol try and create it yourself. I will guide you.

No way.

Oloruntobi4382:
Should i?

Hi. I remember you from your servitor thread. Did it work? Can you create a 1000-odd servitor or something like that?

felixomor:
Cheer Up brah
The Lord will Show Himself strong in You soon.

Your life is not a competition against others

2 Corinthians 10:12 For we dare not make ourselves of the number, or compare ourselves with some that commend themselves: but they measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise.


When God is done building your foundation, the building itself will be glorious.
The more rugged the foundation, the more glorious the building

Shalom. Amen

The first sensible thing you have ever said on this forum.

butterflylion:
Was there soft tissue found in this 65 million year old fossil yes or no?

Yes there was. The question now becomes; why is it there?
Then you start to take rational steps towards finding out.
You don't jump into conclusions because you hold a belief.

Mary Schweitzer is also a Christian. She did it the right way and there was no furore.

The idiocy on this thread is just too much.

CAPSLOCKED:

LOL
HOW POSSIBLE?

IF 100,000 ADULTS RESIDE THERE CURRENTLY , FOR EXAMPLE...

AFTER 100,000 DAYS THERE WON'T BE ANY ONE LEFT SINCE ONE GETS KILLED PER DAY.

100,000 days is around 300 years.

Badgers14:
You are absolutely correct. I don't live in Chicago per se but I live in the Midwest and drive frequently to Chicago. Every city, state, country have both the good side and the bad side.

South side Chicago is generally regarded as a no go area. All those gang violence and all mostly happens in south side.

I read Baltimore is worse.
Approximately one murder daily.

MrMontella:
Utter foolishness on their part, they were already masturbating on the thread, without understanding the story, even the poster sef,

The thing just tire me.

felixomor:
Some one quoted research, you said it was from apologetics page
And you say i have grammar problems?

And then you used "postulate" to conclude that soft tissue can be preserved for 65 million years...
And used it as basis to call out the scientist who just won a case....

You are an utter Joke

You no get shame this guy?
I know you love to have the last word.
Take your best shot now because our discussion has ended on this thread.

butterflylion:
Oga I am sure you saw where the website clearly stated it was a report from The University College London research team.

That was no theory but evidence of actual scientific research.

Read it again and be healed of ignorance. I say be healed! Be healed! Be healed! Ni oruko Jeeesu!

How hard can it be to provide a link to the site?
You are just determined to win an argument. In science, nothing is etched in stone. As long as research is still going on, there is always the possibility that what we know might be wrong.
My argument has never been whether iron could preserve tissues for that long or not. No one on earth knows that for sure.
My argument has been that this guy's victory is merely a legal one and not a validation of any discovery. If you want to argue against that, then I can't help you.

felixomor:
we are still waiting for your demonstration of 65 million years embalmment science secret.

Besides, you just said the scientist got fired
You just reemphasised the essence of the whole cover up and settling.

I beg you. Stop quoting me.

LordOfNaira:
Stop embarrassing yourself. The guy never said iron preserves soft tissues. It was said by a paleontologist. And it was a postulation that should serve as a basis for argument. Science is not as straightforward as you people think. You cannot just feel you have discovered something and start passing it around as a theory or the truth.

Guy thank you. That guy cannot be helped.

felixomor:
"Nothing is acceptable as fool proof" you say

Yet you just told us soft tissue can be preserved by Iron for 65 million years.

Wow,
Abeg demonstrate that for us and u get a Nobel

You are the real pseudoscientist.

Apart from being a certified m0ron you are also deficient in grammar.
Please get a dictionary and look up the meaning of "postulate". Then come back and correct this nonsense you have written.

You are too dull to be real.

butterflylion:
Oga read small you hear?




When you finish reading and understanding you can then say something you hear?

This is exactly my point. In science, you continue to build theories, break them down if they don't stand to scrutiny. You continue the process until you get something that is foolproof. You quoted article gave about five examples of that. This is how the scientific method works.
Your guy failed to do that and he got fired.

I also noticed that your quoted article did not come with a link. I'm betting that it came from an apologist website.

butterflylion:
I was about to say 9mobile fall on you but when I saw that they already fell on you since yesterday I had to stop.

See guy, desperation to sell a lie no dey make the lie to be truth you hear?

A truly scientific mind with ask a simple question. If iron can preserve tissues for so long why then isn't iron used for embalming corpses? If iron can preserve tissues for so long was iron part of the composition of the soil where this particular fossil was found?

You think say the Christian scientist no consider these things before speaking out? They knew they had no case and could not defend anything so they had to cut the guy loose using religious discrimination. At least that's a lesser evil than shooting evolution in the head by exposing this discovery.

They chose to save evolution with $400k

Scientific thieves.

Please read the thread.
This was already published in 2005 by NOTABLE PALEONTOLOGIST Mary Schweitzer.
His discovery was not new.
In science when something is discovered, the next thing is to begin to make postulates which Mary Schweitzer did.
Nothing is accepted as absolute truth in science until it is foolproof.
You guy did not. He went and began to tell everyone that his discovery validates his beliefs. Very unscientific and he got fired.
The University settled because it will be cheaper in the long run than a drawn out legal battle.
Anyone who knows the American legal system will see that it was a prudent move.
Do a Google search.
Mark Armitage is a renowned pseudoscientist.

felixomor:
You dont know what read properly means?

I knew I was about to waste my time.
Sorry for disturbing you.

felixomor:
Sharrap. And read the story properly.

The school was sued for religious discrimination because of his discovery, and they lost the bid to stop the case before they agreed to settle.

You don't know what verbatim means?

CAPSLOCKED:

AND HIS SUPPORTERS, YOU KNOW.

JUST RUN IN TO HAIL HIM FOR HIS "STRAIGHT TO THE HEAD" SHOTS WITHOUT CHECKING FOR AUTHENTICITY.

You can imagine the foolishness.

In America with a good lawyer you'd win any case. A court does not rule on scientific matters. His victory was a legal and not a scientific one.

felixomor:
He actually wants to pretend as if he didn't read that part of the story.
Besides even if he is correct, why did the university choose to settle and why did they loose the bid to stop the scientists case?

Hehehehe.

Stop being silly.
Which part of the story?
Quote it verbatim

butterflylion:
Wrongful termination was used as an excuse to cover up the non acceptance of his religious views which made him unable to be quiet about his soft tissue discovery in the 65milli year old fossil. You did not understand the story.

He uncovered and spoke up about something they wanted to cover. When he did he was sacked sharp sharp and their excuse was his religion.

Wetin religion get to do with soft tissue discovery in a 65milli year old dinosaur fossil which should not have been there?

They knew the guy na akoba adaba. Period!

For dia mind the guy dey like spy. James Bond lomo joor!

This is why I try not to waste time with your kind.
If you had bothered to read the thread, you would have seen the part where it was written that notable molecular paleontologist Mary Schweitzer in 2005 postulated that soft tissue in dinosaurs were preserved by Iron.
This was almost a decade before this Armitage guy came up with his claims.
A renowned scientist sees something and begins to brainstorm on how it could have happened. Another person sees that same thing a decade later and says that the earth is 6,000 years old.
If you have a truly scientific mind, which of these two people will you take seriously?


Etisalat abi na 9mobile refused me internet access since yesterday.

The settlement was for wrongful termination and not a validation of his claims. You don't even understand your thread.
Evolution spoiler indeed.

Jhaytee4all:
That's a good idea. Pls, give me some hints. . .

All you need to know and more.

https://www.nairaland.com/1499182/making-regular-income-publishing-amazon

Jhaytee4all:
I'm highly frustrated on my 'ultimate search' of employers who'll give me the chance to write articles for them, especially on the Christian faith.

If you need a freelance article writer to appoint, hit me up on joshuaadesunloye2567@yahoo.com

You'd be glad you found someone

Why not write for yourself and publish on Amazon.