₦airaland Forum

When did Multiple Scorgasm reach the top 100!? lol

About 50 points total after they add bonus points/auto-subs, can't shout!

A-40:
When we say Torres has been shyte this doesn't mean he was never good to start with. You really do need some Adderall to help with your chronic attention deficit

What do we have here? Another epic failure to grasp simple points. In the same breath, A-40 says:

A. Under-performance over a long period of time = loss of ability.
B. Torres has under-performed for a long period of time.
C. Torres still has "undeniable ability".

Lololol

A-40:
I don't think even Torres's biggest critic would deny his ability! You don't play so many games for the Spanish National Team without being above average his goalscoring record pre-Chelsea shows the ability is there. Actually he is the poster-child of the underperformance we are talking about! When you under-perform for a long period of time its easy to deduce that a player has or might have lost it. Its simple logic bruh keep up

A-40: His goalscoring record pre-Chelsea[aka three years ago] shows the ability is there.
A-40: When you under-perform for a long period of time its easy to deduce that a player has or might have lost it.
A-40: I don't think even Torres's biggest critic would deny his ability!

Hehehehe. Well i no get time to dey type long thing, when everybody with the most basic grasp of European football already knows City have the best players in the EPL, which is why they're comfortably the bookies'/said peoples' favorites to win the league. . . I'm better off debating whether or not "A Good Day to Die Hard" was a terrible movie or not with a screw-driver.

A-40:
Lol apparently someone that cannot separate ability from underperformance is busy talking about clues. How rich! (Pun intended)

Oh, so Chelsea's strikers have 'ability' but are 'under-performing'? The same ninjas that have been telling us Torres[Chelsea's best/most-used striker] has lost it for three years are now trying to convince us he is simply 'under-performing'. Maybe if Maradona comes out of retirement and scores 2 league goals in a calendar year you will say 'he's just under-performing', what a joke.

Of course when one coach is a disciple of negative/park the bus football while his rivals run a more expansive ship odds are strikers from the latter team are bound to score more!

Nonsense. Chelsea are the fourth highest scorers in the league, yet basically every other team in the league can boast a striker with a better goal ratio than all Chelsea's strikers, COMBINED. Ba + Eto'o + Torres = 5 goals in over 1,620 minutes of football. . . It's not even funny.

Looking at Brendan Rodgers and the average players (bar Suarez) at Liverpool and tell me why Mourinho with all that attacking talent isn't getting more out of his team

Mourinho's team is currently above Rodger's team. If one manager punches above his weight it doesn't mean every other manager has to do the same or face a tribunal. Why aren't Pellegrini, Moyes and co also on trial for not emulating Rodgers? Is JM the only manager in the league?

Come to think of it, other than United who have clearly under-performed, can we even say Liverpool are currently above any team that have better players than them? I think not.

4llerbuntu: in other words we should give the chelsea team a pass then seeing that their league position is not indicative of their quality. they are over performing eh?


lmao. go and sleep dude. do u have any idea what the 2nd team costs at chelsea?

Ritchboy: Chelsea have the third best team in the league.
Chelsea: Currently third in the league.
4llerbuntu: So you're saying they're overperforming?

It's too early to be drunk.

dayokanu: Ibime you mean Giroud and Bendtner on paper are better than Torres, Etoo and Ba?

Bendtner has only started one game(and still managed to score, something apparently illegal for Chelsea strikers). Giroud despite his dip in form has still comfortably outperformed all Chelsea's strikers. Podolski and Walcott also just returned from long-term injuries and are already banging in goals for fun. The CF role is not alien to either of them.

Anyone who thinks Chelsea have the best squad needs to get a clue.

azpekuliar: That honor belongs to me this GW..

Are you within 100 points of me yet?

59 points, can't shout!

Finally mustered the courage to take the armband away from Suarez at the last minute, so far so good!

Mic check, 1, 2-0

Luis just saved my week!

Moral of the story - Always captain the form player irrespective of fixtures.

Let's list their players man for man and see which would get into which squad?

The first thing you have to realize is performance(especially at this stage of the season) is not just about squad depth but more importantly how good your XI is(unless injuries hit hard). Liverpool are sitting pretty in second with little squad depth but a starting XI that can blow most teams in the league away.

Having good players on your bench means nothing if they won't play. The Premier League aren't going to say "oh look, they have Willian and Mata on the bench, let's give them 3 points"

Using Man City as an example is laughable because Aguero,Yaya and Kompany are probably the only players that would make Chelsea's starting XI

What a joke. Any manager with half a brain would also pick Zabaleta, Fernandinho and David Silva in addition to those 3. That's six guaranteed starters already. Not to mention the ones dat will boil down to personal preference: Azpilicueta/Clichy/Cashley/Kolarov at LB, Nasri/Schurlle/Navas etc on the wing and Nastasic/Terry/Cahill/Lescott @ CB. We're looking at as many as nine City players out of eleven.

Arsenal? Please don't make me laugh. Prior to Ozil's signing and Ramsey's recent form which Arsenal fan could boast and compare their squad to Chelsea

Prior to Ozil's signing? Ho ho ho, why not prior to Essien signing or prior to Roman buying the club or prior to the 21st century.

As we speak Hazard is the only Chelsea player that would break into Arsenal XI, and maybe one or two others MAX depending on preference.


I don't even know what niggas are chatting here when Mourinho himself has already admitted City clearly have the best squad and all his strikers are pants.

mukina2: Ibime predicted that by December i will fall, he ended up running away

OAM predicted that i will drop, i cant see him from where i am.

Stealth mode

I'm proud of you honey

2legit2qwt: Lol what's your name on there?

How many teams do you see at the top?

The ninjas saying JM 'clearly' has the best squad don't know what they're talking about. Just because you see Mata on the bench cos JM doesn't fancy him is no evidence of anything.

You can't possibly have the best squad when all your strikers are pants. All City's strikers will stroll into Chelsea XI, even Guidetti will fancy his chances.

You also can't have the best squad when your midfield is also pants. Yaya and co. will cartwheel into that Chelsea team, let's not even get started with Arsenal's.

The much hyped AMs Mazacar/Willian/KDB/Schurlle aren't any better than City's/Arsenal's AMs/SSs so what are we talking about here?

Even the defenders/goalie are mostly past their prime[Cashley/Cech/Terry] or were never that good to begin with [Luiz/Cahill].

As much as I'd like to label JM incompetent, i think he's doing OK with the players he has to work with. At least his team aren't ninth on the log

It's getting lonely at the top

chamotex: Tell me what Moyes' football philosophy is and how his team plays football?

Under Fergie, we were known for our outstanding wingplay and devastating counter attacks
Brendan Rodgers, Laudrup, Mourinho, Wenger, Pep, Martinez, even Sam Allardyce can be said to play a certain brand of football respectively.
Moyes just picks 11 players and tells them to go and play.

That's his philosophy

odutope: lets just try to avoid relegation

Suarez 4 goals and counting. . . Good luck to those who didn't captain him

Fat Frank, get in!

dipo+:
Giroud's judgment of himself being offside was unforgivable. Now no one will remember the quality from Ozil that would have been

In his defense he was a good three yards offside. On the other hand you should always play to the whistle but then again if diving is considered cheating then trying to score when you know you're offside should be as well

Too bad the linesman didn't see Ozil's touch/doesn't know his job.

Ibime: Aluta continue. . . na you get your own time. . .

Of course Ibime always has time initially, but never has time when he gets taken to the cleaners. That's the same way he pussied out of FPL this season

Ibime: the idea of Dembele-Sandro-Paulinho giving Bale complete freedom like the Porto three gave Hulk. That does not mean I consider Sandro or Alvaro Perreira in particular to be genuine midfielders, it's just a recognition of how they fit into the system.

So in summary, the quality of the player doesn't matter, just stick any "wastepipe" in the right system and your team will "beast". What insightful analysis. I wonder why Havant & Waterlooville aren't champions of Europe.

Buncha blokes who reduce complex arguments into simple black and white so they can score cheap points.. If a team lose a game they come here to reduce argument to midfield just to clown Ibime.

What follows this statement is truly amazing...

Spurs midfield had the best defensive record in the league, they never made a peep, then wait till a poor day at the office to make noise just because of Ibime.

So your absurd claim of Spurs' MIDFIELD having the best defensive record in the league doesn't constitute "reducing complex arguments into simple black and white to score cheap points"? Farting from both sides of ur ar[color=#000000]s[/color]e I see.

Considering the fact you are also the same mofo that told us Chelsea lost to Basel simply because they "have no steel in midfield" then you should be shot between the eyes.

Make I just sit back and enjoy Man City "beasting". Please don't disturb me next time Man City lose a game or try and claim it's the midfields fault.

After saying:

Funny enough Spurs actually lost because of foolish highline AVB was playing and several individual mistakes, not that they were even played off the park in midfield.

So City's midfield beasted Spurs, except Spurs midfield weren't actually beasted but lost because of "individual mistakes" and "highline"?

See how you tie yourself in tortuous knots trying to justify all the nonsense you type?

Whenever City win, its down to their midfield, nothing to do with Aguero and co. But when they lose it's a "Joe Hart brainfart" and no one should disturb you because their midfielders are incapable of having a bad day.

The stupidity on show here is purer than Walter White's meth.

Ibime: Either way, at least now Man City is 'beasting', traducers wanna switch argument to Spurs. No blame me jor. Blame AVB!!!

Man City beasting at home and getting rimmed by everyone from Cardiff to basement boys Sunderland away. True Championship form!

I didn't know your statement had a 'home' clause attached.

Ibime: Are you sure about that? Get me the quotes and the date. I've never rated Sandro, he's just another Ramires but without attacking output.

You are a disgrace. . .

Ibime: And that same combination had the best defensive record in the league so STFU.

I'm just chilling jejely and some bytch I no get business with coming to tell me wetin Spurs play today when Capoue my summer recommendation and Dembele my favourite no even dey pitch. You must feel like a fool.

Shut up Ibime. . . Capoue had not even signed when you told us Spuds would beast. The "beasts" you listed were Paulinho-Sandro-Dembele, now all of a sudden you turn around to say "Capoue didn't play" and "Sandro is a wastepipe", the same Sandro that was supposed to beast the league a few months ago. The Paulinho they signed that prompted your misguided misyarns no dey pitch too abi?

Maybe they don't have enough "steel"

Breaking free...

azpekuliar: Good bro. I'm not about to pull an Ipukulu and also gift Ritchy the title...

You are not in the title race, son!!!

Don't blame Ibime, even the most seasoned fantasy manager would do something drastic after dropping to PAGE 2! #next #deleted

debosky: We're top of the league now and there are 27 games to go - what a deeply insightful and perceptively revealing comment.

Careful now, if you follow that up with saying football games last for 90 minutes or that 11 players feature for each side you might just explode the universe with your unplumbed depths of sagacious perspicacity.

Ibime: Twasnt a penalty but wasn't a dive either. Ramires is a weak skinny fella and he falls like that even in midfield at slight contact so no, it wasn't a dive.

You can't honestly believe this crap you just wrote... This is the most blatant dive I've seen this year.

Look at the gif DK posted, Ramires literally throws his body into the defender.

https://i.imgur.com/Lpbr5XO.gif

In fact it should be a red card for Ramires. Yellow for diving and another yellow for preventing the defender from winning the ball back and launching a counter attack!