Rolams's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Rolams's Profile › Rolams's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 (of 265 pages)
magicbrain007:That your magicbrain is malfunctioning. You need the real natural brain. |
This is one of the news righteousness89 do not like to hear or see. It gives him headache! |
Oya TRUMP supporters come and see ooo! |
ImadeUReadThis:You mean the judges throwing out Trump cases are not senseless like you? |
budaatum:Don't mind him jhor. He's just blindly accepting Trump false claim. |
imhotep:Straight! |
ImadeUReadThis:False claim. Are you telling me this statement is not convincing enough to win all the series of litigations by Trump and his fellow Republicans even where Trump has one of his relatives as judge? Infact, this should clear your mind that this allegations are baseless. Is it a must for all votes to be counted in a day? Won't there be ballots separation? Must all the counts finished on the election day? Must all ballots arrive at same time? Is mail in ballot legal? Must the person leading a race at the beginning be the eventual winner? Most you rely solely on open campaign to win election? Who told you Biden did not campaign and has no platforms? Fact! Trump failed to manage Corona virus properly and that increases the death rate to over 250k people. Many republicans who have been attacked by Trump worked against him. Many Democrats worked tirelessly to ensure more voters are registered. A black woman single handedly registered over 800k voters for Democrats just because she was denied Governorship ticket for being black. Many blacks voted for Biden just because of black lives matter You can't tell me Biden with at least 8 years experience is not experienced enough to know how he can win election. If Trump can have his votes increased by 10 million, why can't Biden who has been the vice president for years get 80 million votes. I can give you more reasons behind his failure. He knows he lost the election but he can't still believe his attitude caused it. Are you aware the guy who sponsored his legal cases is now requesting for a refund? These people knows better. Stop believing Trump false allegations. |
A Donald Trump supporter who donated $2.5m to help expose and prosecute claims of fraud in the presidential election wants his money back after what he says are “disappointing results”. Fredric Eshelman, a businessman from North Carolina, said he gave the money to True the Vote, a pro-Trump “election ethics” group in Texas that promised to file lawsuits in seven swing states as part of its push to “investigate, litigate, and expose suspected illegal balloting and fraud in the 2020 general election”. But according to a lawsuit Eshelman filed this week in Houston, first reported by Bloomberg, True the Vote dropped its legal actions and discontinued its Validate the Vote 2020 campaign, then refused to return his calls when he demanded an explanation. The founder of Eshelman Ventures llc, a venture capital company, said he asked “regularly and repeatedly” for updates, the lawsuit asserts, but that his “requests were consistently met with vague responses, platitudes, and empty promises”. The lack of success of True the Vote’s efforts to challenge the outcome appears to mirror that of the president himself, whose team has lost 38 court actions since the 3 November election, most recently in Pennsylvania where a federal appeals court panel blasted Trump’s legal team for filing a case with no merit. True the Vote did not immediately return an email from the Guardian seeking comment. True the Vote did not respond to Bloomberg’s request for comment, but posted a statement on its website, attributed to the group’s founder and president, Catherine Engelbrecht, seeking to blame outside forces for the failure of its efforts. “While we stand by the voters’ testimony that was brought forth, barriers to advancing our arguments, coupled with constraints on time, made it necessary for us to pursue a different path,” the group said, announcing that it had withdrawn legal filings in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. All four states were won by Joe Biden, the Democratic president-elect. “Our mission is much bigger than just one election. It is about repairing the system for all future elections,” it continued. Like the Trump campaign’s own legal filings, which have been based on scant evidence, however, the True the Vote statement did not detail any of the proof it claimed it had to support the allegations of election fraud. Eshelman, the former chief executive of a pharmaceutical company, claims in his lawsuit that the nonprofit offered to refund him $1m if he would drop his plan to sue the group. He is seeking the return of the full $2.5m that he says he wired on Engelbrecht’s instructions in chunks of $2m and $500,000 on 5 and 13 November. Source:https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/28/trump-donor-election-fraud-sues-money-back |
Up goners! Pls don't correct me ooo!! |
orisa37:Can't understand this. Explain pls |
ImadeUReadThis:Only Trump news is right? Keep deceiving yourself! |
ImadeUReadThis:Keep deceiving yourself! |
How did you started? |
HOVER206:Haven't you read that such did not happen. |
Efforts continue by President Donald Trump and his team to challenge the outcome of the election. What evidence is there for the main allegations they are making of fraud and irregularities? Claim 1: More votes than registered voters President Trump has repeated unproven claims that battleground states have recorded more votes than registered voters - it's a rumour that has been circulating in various forms since the election. The latest allegations focus on Michigan, where the Trump campaign says voter turnout in some areas was higher than 100%, an outcome known as an "overvote". The source for this claim appears to be a document posted by former Republican congressional candidate Russ Ramsland. It lists 19 areas which appear to have a voter turnout high than 100%. Precincts which are claimed to be in Michigan - but are in fact in Minnesota image captionPrecincts which are claimed to be in Michigan - but are in fact in Minnesota However, these precincts are all in the state of Minnesota - not Michigan. Do they even stack up as precincts where impossibly high levels of voting took place? Top of the list is Benville Township with an alleged 350% turnout. It's a small place, and according to electoral records, 63 voted out of a total of 71 registered. That's a turnout of 89%. We checked the other precincts on the list, and all have them had turnouts below 100%. So the list is wrong on all counts: it's the wrong state, and the turnout figures (for these 19 Minnesota precincts) are all wrong as well. President Trump has also claimed there were "far more votes than people" in Michigan's largest city Detroit. However, a quick check of the election results for Detroit shows that turnout in the city was just under 50%. There have been other claims on social media that more people voted than were registered in Wisconsin - but that's because they were sharing an out-of-date figure for voter registrations in the state. [b]Claim 2: [/b]Unexplained surges in Democrat votes There've been a number of allegations from President Trump and others about votes for his rival, Joe Biden, suddenly appearing in large numbers during the counting process. In his news conference on 19 November, Mr Giuliani repeated a claim suggesting that thousands of extra ballots had arrived very early in the morning at a Detroit counting centre. image captionCounting at an election centre in Detroit, Michigan Mr Giuliani's remarks were based on a claim made by an election worker, alleging she saw two vans which were meant to bring food, but she says she "never saw any food coming out of the vans, coincidentally it was announced on the news that Michigan had found over 100,000 more ballots — not even two hours after the last van left." However, this claim - and other allegations - were rejected in a ruling on 13 November, with the judge deciding they weren't credible. There've been other claims from the Republicans about sudden spikes in votes favouring the Democrats in key battleground states - such as Michigan and Wisconsin - implying fraud could be involved. These spikes can be easily accounted for in the timing of the release of large batches of results for big cities like Milwaukee and Detroit, which are always skewed heavily Democratic. In some cases, there have been clerical errors or software glitches, which have been corrected after being discovered. It's also worth noting that the record numbers of postal ballots in this election have overwhelmingly favoured the Democratic party, particularly in urban areas. In some states (including Michigan and Wisconsin) counting of these postal votes only started once the polls had closed on 3 November. They take longer to count, so you would have expected to see a bump in the Biden vote each time batches of these results were released. [b]Claim 3: [/b]Votes flipped from Trump to Biden President Trump's legal team also repeated a claim made by him that there had been an issue with the voting system used in some battleground states which supposedly allowed millions of votes to be flipped from him to his rival, Mr Biden. There is no evidence for this, and none has been provided by the president's legal team. The president is echoing accusations made on the conservative news outlet One America News Network (OANN) about Dominion voting machines, which have been widely used across the US in this election. An OANN report refers to an "unaudited analysis of data" obtained from an election monitoring group, Edison Research, which allegedly showed millions of votes were flipped. However, the company's president, Larry Rosin, said: "Edison Research has produced no such report and we have no evidence of any voter fraud." Edison Research provides many of the major US networks (as well as the BBC) with exit poll data and results. Dominion Voting Systems has released a statement saying: "Claims about Dominion switching or deleting votes are 100% false." Claim 4: The voting machines are owned by Democrats President Trump has said the "Radical Left owned Dominion Voting Systems" with his legal team pointing to ties with Bill and Hillary Clinton and other Democratic politicians. In a statement, Dominion Voting Systems said it is a non-partisan US company and has no ownership relationships with the Clintons or with top Democratic politician Nancy Pelosi. image captionDominion software has been widely used in voting and counting machines It is important to clarify the difference between direct ownership of Dominion as claimed by President Trump, and donations made by the company either for philanthropic or lobbying purposes. Dominion has made donations to both Republicans and Democrats, but it's not uncommon for a company such as this to lobby for government contracts in this way. Dominion donated to the Clinton Foundation in 2014, but the company has also donated to Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. The rumours about Speaker Pelosi stem from her former chief of staff, Nadeam Elshami, being hired by Dominion - but it has also hired staff previously associated with the Republican party. [b]Claim 5: [/b]Thousands of dead people voted President Trump and his supporters have said ballots were cast for dead people on a massive scale in the election - with thousands voting in key states. We looked into a list of 10,000 people in the battleground state of Michigan who it was claimed were dead but voted - and found it was fundamentally flawed. image captionRoberto Garcia was on the Michigan 'dead voter' list but told us: "I'm definitely alive and I definitely voted for Biden!" Investigations into other "dead voter" lists have come to similar conclusions - with no evidence emerging that there's been widespread fraud through ballots being cast for dead people. Fox News host Tucker Carlson apologised after he had repeated claims from the Trump campaign and singled out a 'dead voter' in Georgia who subsequently turned out to be alive. There have been occasions in US elections of dead people having apparently voted, but evidence suggests this is not a widespread problem. It is often down to clerical errors when legitimate votes are received or perhaps other family members with similar names voting with their ballots. Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55016029 |
Tamel:Do you know the goal was a penalty, check the movement of the ball before getting to that spot. Brighton always start their play from their left close to the middle. |
Tamel:I have played football and I have managed and still managing teams. I know what I am saying. |
Remove your brain from the container it was kept and reposition it in its normal spot. Your cheating girlfriend can kill or reck your career. I don't need to read your full story after seeing the heading. |
Tamel:Don't worry. Did you play football? |
Tamel:If you watch closely you will see defect in the right side that opened the game for them. That start their play from their. Henderson that just got back and play 90 mins. Playing Jones in the midfield will be ok. He is creative. Henderson can play from the right back like milner. He has tried it before. It works. No threat up front on the other side. Reason with me. Minamino was just running around the midfield. Remember, Firmino can play from here too. |
HIGHESTPOPORI:We are on the same chapter Boss! |
Tamel:You are not getting my point. Read all over again! Jones is creative in the midfield while Henderson can play from the right back. The whole right flank was empty because Jones can't overlap. He only won single tackle at the back. Williams was covering the spot and that leaves our center open. |
Theboss100:I don't just like some of his decisions. |
Artwasdcase:Henderson can play from the right. He put himself in this situation. Why not select the better side against Atlanta in the midweek. I am not against him for taking off Williams but playing Jones there is a very wrong choice. Jones won only one successful tackle. They hijacked our midfield because there was no threat for them around their box. Remember every game counts and matters too. |
I am getting tired of watching play these days. If the manager no Bleep up, some go just happen. No creative midfielder in the team. We don't keep possession like we normally do before. Things has really changed negatively. Bored for 90 mins! |
Klopp deliberately crippled our midfield with stupid selection. Why Jones at the right back when you have tested Henderson in that position and played well before? No player playing in the right flank. Why was Salah substituteed when Firmino has not been playing well. You keep mane on bench while minamino has been playing rubbish in the middle of the park and he played for a whole 90 min. Klopp is not getting it at all! |
Ojota great guy. Minamino and Firmino no dey play anything again |
Jashub:Nothing will change. This is not Nigeria, it's the will of people. Do you know that the 3 judges were appointed by Trump? Infact, one of them is related to Trump. All of them are republicans too. Again, Georgia governor is a republican, yet he certified the result. Bro. Nothing will change. |
Jashub:They won't grant Trump request. He has no evidence. |
helinues:I am telling you. He will be humbled by force! |
Jashub:Hahaha! Another fail mission. ![]() |
November 27, 2020 at 1:05 PM EST A federal appeals court on Friday rejected President Trump’s request for an emergency injunction to overturn the certification of Pennsylvania’s election results. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals said in a scathing 21-page opinion that the Trump campaign’s challenge of a U.S. District Court’s decision had “no merit.” “Voters, not lawyers, choose the President. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections,” the court said. Source: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal-appeals-court-rejects-trump-request-for-emergency-injunction-to-overturn-certification-of-pennsylvanias-election-results/2020/11/27/556540ba-30d7-11eb-bae0-50bb17126614_story.html%3foutputType=amp |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 (of 265 pages)

