₦airaland Forum

NgeneUkwenu:
Massive Crowd!

NgeneUkwenu:
The whole thing has turned out to be a walk out exercise!

legendte:
But he was happy when they called him hero and Legend.

There's a thin line between success and failure. .....persistence.

Who send am make him start am before?

Why do you think that Jesus remains a king till date? He wasn't forced to come and save us. He took it upon himself and even rebuked Peter for trying to stop him.

People dared military government and you want people to hail a coward for his last minute bleep up.

Giyerte:
coward. A brave man ought not to complain of cold after entering water which nobody forces him to enter and perhaps, an antelope who dares the tiger should be ready to bath with blood.

vedaxcool:
lol a thief is tweeting and foolish yoots are salivating over his tweets is not the same fool who used arms fund for himself? Yet it is PMB that is to blame.

989900:
'Charly man' just spoke my mind.

famosh:
Omo aye, mi o gbe sori! Mo kan fe troll die ni! Have a nice day, bro!

famosh:
Baba mi, no mind me jo! Koni da fun oyinbo! Oyinbo o powo!

famosh:
Se o ti so di epe ni? Oda, ma binu! We're just having fun, man! Chill!

famosh:
And the Numbskull still can't punctuate properly. Show me just ONE of your posts here where you used your punctuation marks properly. What an illiterate!

famosh:
But you ignorant goat can come here to tell us "had had" is not correct, right? Brainless animal!

famosh:
But this statement of yours makes no sense without proper punctuation.

famosh:
Is hyphen your problem now? I thought you said it doesn't exist? You're trying so hard to find unnecessary flaws. I'm only trying to correct your poor grammar, but if I were to go your route, then I would correct every post of yours a hundred times because you're very poor at basic stuffs like punctuation. You punctuate like the illiterate that you are!

famosh:
Is hyphen your problem now? I thought you said it doesn't exist? You're trying so hard to find unnecessary flaws. I'm only trying to correct your poor grammar, but if I were to go your route, then I would correct every post of yours a hundred times because you're very poor at basic stuffs like punctuation. You punctuate like the illiterate that you are!

famosh:
Dunce, I'm yet to see a link where non-word is wrong!

famosh:
So where did they tell you "had had" is wrong? Mumu!
Now, let me show you very correct sentences where you can have more than one word appearing consecutively.

http://canyouactually.com/these-9-bizarre-sentences-might-look-wrong-but-theyre-actually-100-accurate/

famosh:
Numbskull, since you're good at screenshots, I dare you to take a picture of where "conversate" is in your personal dictionary at home & post it here! What a dunce!

famosh:
Why are you this dull? So you want me to lecture your Numbskull on tautology again? You're just a goat. The fact that you see similar words close to each other doesn't mean it is tautology. You have sentences where "had had" can appear close to each other, and it is very correct. So if I say "let's allow it slide," is it tautology too? Where are you from, you this illiterate?

famosh:
Why are you this dull? So you want me to lecture your Numbskull on tautology again? You're just a goat. The fact that you see similar words close to each other doesn't mean it is tautology. You have sentences where "had had" can appear close to each other, and it is very correct. So if I say "let's allow it slide," is it tautology too? Where are you from, you this illiterate?

famosh:
You this animal! You still can't deduce that "conversate" is wrong even after showing you what was written in YOUR OWN link about the non word? You're truly a goat!

So what's wrong with "let's let"? You see why I say you're a dunce! You should actually be happy you're learning by CONVERSING (not conversating, as you, dunce, have said) with me!

famosh:
At least, you already know you were silly for running to Google to prove that you typed crap in "conversate." Now let's let that slide.
"Does the word conversate not SERVED IT purpose..." Seriously, what school did you attend? Who types this?

famosh:
Goat! Can't you see it reads "NON STANDARD" in YOUR OWN screenshot? Or you don't know the meaning of non standard again? Are you this stupid? Didn't you read a part in the same link where it is called a non word? What school did you attend?
Olodo!

famosh:
Olodo! I knew the animal was going to come up with the Google it can't even use. Now let me educate you: The fact that words or slangs are defined by some website on the internet doesn't mean it is correct; it, many times, means aknowlegement of its usage, whether rightly or wrongly. Now, dullard, this is the full text of one of the links which you deliberately refused to fully screenshot.




"con-ver- sate
[kon -ver-seyt]
verb (used without object), conversated,
conversating. Nonstandard except in some
dialects.
1.
to have a conversation; converse; talk.
Origin of conversate Expand
1970-75; back formation from conversation
Word story Expand
The use of conversate has soared since 2000,
mostly in speech and in written records of
speech. The term is a back formation from
conversation, created by dropping the suffix -ion,
and adding -e, to produce a verb form.
Since it has essentially the same meaning as the
more common and frequently used verb converse,
the term conversate has been condemned in
some circles as an unnecessary nonword. And,
because the term occurs mostly among Blacks
and Latinos, some discussions have become
heated and impassioned, turning the word into a
badge (both positive and negative) of a person’s
class and education.
Conversate reminds us that discussions about
modern English must take into account the
different types of English spoken in our diverse
culture, rather than fixating on “correct” formal
usage. When all is said and done, however, the
term broadly remains nonstandard English."


www.dictionary.com/browse/conversating

famosh:
Block head, it is "conversing," and not "conversating." I'm sure you'll blame forbidden words on Nairaland for that again. If you don't know this, even with Google, then how will you comprehend more complex stuffs? You're just too dull!

funmyade:
Is that a yardstick now?

omoalajah:
The TECNO brand is now a global brand

famosh:
Are people actually seeing how stupid & dumb this guy is? You just jump from one issue to the other & I understand! It's simply because you are plain stupid & mentally deranged! Everyone knows many English words have origins from different languages & they are already accepted as STANDARD WRITTEN ENGLISH. NOBODY has put gonna or wanna as standard written English. Only dullards like you use them in written English when even the the screenshot you stupidly rushed to post clearly states that they, just like "fadalud," "issorait" & "issokay" which are obviously gotten from English words, are reductions while SPEAKING, & are not to be used when writing. But it's okay, because you're obviously too stupid to comprehend that.

famosh:
And there he goes again, copying & pasting what the animal doesn't understand!
You're just an imbe! Who said that to you? Are you blind? Even though you're really stupid, can't you comprehend even simplest sentences again? I told you they are nonexisting words, not they are coined from nonexisting words. You're just so dumb. They are coined the same way "adonbilivit," "fadalud," "issorait" and "issokay" are coined; they are called reductions. They are common in natural speech. Written reduced forms in advertisements, songs, personal writing, reflect natural spoken language. They are NOT standard written English. The screenshot you ignorantly posted even says "reductions when SPEAKING..." and not when writing! Dunce!

famosh:
Block head, so because it is called informal writing, then I can just coin any nonexistent English word & use, right? So I can even use Yoruba and English words in a sentence because it is called informal writing, right? Seriously, You're brain dead, my brother!

famosh:
My brother, you foolish no be small! You keep dishing out crap after crap! Does this make sense to you? You're just complicating things for your dull self. You don't even have sense!
To make it easier: During WAEC, when you want to write informal letter, you'll use slangs/"text" speech like "gonna," "wanna," or "cos," right? Stupid somebody!

famosh:
My brother, you're a waste of sperm! What is the difference between gonna, issorait & adonbilivit? Are they not derived in the same way? So you don't know how gonna & wanna were derived? Gonna is an ATTEMPT to represent the casual pronunciation of "going to." You don't use it in any form of writing. It's not a real word. Even the second screenshot you posted & couldn't comprehend because of your block head says "reductions when SPEAKING...," not writing. Since you're a dunce, just tell someone close to you there to help you use Google to find out if "gonna" is a real word & if you can use it in any form of writing. Goat!