₦airaland Forum

TAO11:
Question: Hey ₦airaland, who is ScotMisile ??

AnswerS: He is one of the many jokes we have on here.

TAO11:
You failed for the sixth consecutive time to even attempt to answer my questions.

Hmm! You seem to have reverted to your penultimate excuse. Lol!

In your very first reply to me, you described my comment and questions as "rubbish" obviously for no sound reason (and I don't even care), but suddenly now you've become the persecuted one --- the one who is being terrorized and bullied just for being asked to answer questions. Lol!

It is obvious that what is left of your replies is as the case of the proverbial drowning man clutching at straws.

It has become clear that you are bereft of ideas at this point, and you're simply keeping up appearances just to be seen, by some, as not giving up.

You should do better than this.

TAO11:
For the fifth consecutive time, you failed miserably to answer my questions.

First, you failed to answer me on why Christianity made reference to the scriptures of Judaism (i.e. the Torah, et al.)?? even though Judaism itself rejects Jesus as a fraudulent impostor who is cursed by God.

Second, you failed to answer me on whether Christianity knows itself to be fake and thus needs some validation from the scriptures of another religion before it?? --- a religion which rejects Christianity as a fraud (i.e. Judaism)

You failed to answer these two foregoing questions despite your original remark that Ifa and Islam often make reference to the scriptures and figures of Christianity because they know themselves to be fake and thus need some validation.


Third, you failed to answer me on why you flamed up when the same exact finger you pointed at others was pointed at you.


Furthermore, anyone (with even with the slightest grain of discernment) who has followed this specific exchange would have noticed how you've been running helter-skelter from one face-saving excuse to another.

You've been running from pillar to post all in a bid to muster whatever desperate excuse you could make for why you will not answer my questions which you are obviously too embarassed to address.

You started out with the excuse of not noticing that I already asked you the questions; then you moved to the excuse of a so-called "manufactured history"; and after that to the excuse of an imagined "subjectivity"; and even after that to the excuse that I am directing "bad words" at you; and then now to the excuse that I am terrorizing and bullying you.

REALLY??!!

Who knows if this will be your last excuse or you still have more coming??

You obviously are a distasteful joke!

TAO11:
For the fourth consecutive time, you failed miserably to answer my questions (including why you flamed up when the same exact finger you pointed at others was pointed at you.)

In other words, you maintain your position that it is okay if you "criticize" others, but it's wrong if the same "criticism" is directed at you.



However, if you really can't stand the so-called "bad words", then simply desist from earning and deserving the use of the so-called "bad words".

TAO11:
For the third consecutive time, you failed miserably to answer my questions (including why you flamed up when the same exact finger you pointed at others was pointed at you.)

In other words, you maintain your position that it is okay if you "criticize" others, but is wrong if the same "criticism" is directed at you

Regarding your insanely idiotic false accusation of subjectivity, please point it out first, and then I will bring you down on that also.

May God have mercy on your soul!

TAO11:
For the third consecutive time, you failed miserably to answer my questions (including why you flamed up when the same exact finger you pointed at others was pointed at you.)

In other words, you maintain your position that it is okay if you "criticize" others, but is wrong if the same "criticism" is directed at you

Regarding your insanely idiotic false accusation of subjectivity, please point it out first, and then I will bring you down on that also.

May God have mercy on your soul


For the upteenth time,nobody has Monopoly of bad words...desist from it or do not ever quote me again

TAO11:
Instead of you to answer my question of why you flamed up when the exact same finger you pointed at others was pointed at you; you rather went on an almost endless irrelevant and unsubstantiated rant.

My original and initial questions from which you've fled for the second consecutive time remains:


"Why did Christianity make reference to the Jewish Scriptures (i.e. Torah et al.)?? 

Yet Judaism rejects Jesus as a fraudulent impostor who is cursed by God.

Could it be that Christianity knows itself to be fake and thus needs some validation from the scriptures of another religion that rejects Christianity as a fraud??"


Instead of answering these questions (which are precisely a reflection of the remarks you had made in your original comment), you flamed up while pretending that you couldn't see the questions been asked. Lol!


Even in your second reply, you continued to flee while claiming but not proving what you consider to be "manufactured history".

You even went on to make assumptions about me ("You are the type that ... You will even claim that ..." ) and then attacked your assumptions thinking you've attacked me. Lol!

Hello young man, that's a fallacy known in argumentation as a straw man fallacy.

In fact, you committed more than a straw man fallacy as you also committed a red herring fallacy by attempting to derail my exchange with you into a separate topic of what you imagine my personal beliefs to be.

However, I insist on drawing your attention to your double standards which is obvious from your evident inflaming when the same exact finger you pointed at others was pointed at you.

[May be you should re-check what you'd written originally and then compare it concept-for-concept with my reply to it.]

I also like to tell you that if you must deserve my reply going forward, then you must be willing to provide specific reasonable answers to my questions.

But if you can not (and obviously you can not), then are you willing to be "Christian" enough to tender an unreserved apology here to others which you attempted to demonize with your initial comment??

Danhumprey:
And zombies and Christians are of the same spelling? whoa! glad to know.

Danhumprey:
And your Christian masters told you that whoever is an atheist is an Antichrist, isn't it?

Danhumprey:
@ bolded, I can't help but laugh when I read supposed believers using that line in bold when in arguments about their beliefs. Very funny and weak arguments. You were "once" an atheist? Then you switched back to being a believer and a zombie? The indoctrination never truly left you, never was your eyes fully opened.

TAO11:
I just asked questions tho. Two of them actually. Lol!

It's obvious you're intolerant as a typical Christian.

You flamed up just because the exact same finger you pointed at others was pointed at you. Lol!

More like, let me criticize others but no one should criticize me, otherwise I will flame� up.

Very typical!

Rubicon67:
I don't see the involvement of Yorubas in this statement but since you mentioned it, the Yorubas are universally known to be very accommodating, even to those they shouldn't.

TAO11:
Why did Christianity make reference to the Jewish Scriptures (i.e. Torah et al.)??

Yet Judaism rejects Jesus as a fraudulent impostor who is cursed by God.

Could it be that Christianity knows itself to be fake and thus needs some validation from the scriptures of another religion that rejects Christianity as a fraud??

Amujale:
And then after the fall of the Roman Empire, the Early Crusaders got their hands on it.

They continued in the same way as the Romans, and then took it to another new level.

Similar to the Roman's, getting people to accept their gospels from behind the tip of their swords, they would later replicate these tactics behind the barrell of a gun.

These barbaric actions persisted into the 20th century.

Amujale:
I can honestly say that the Romans wrote the bible in a way so as to seem that it was written in the past.

They made numerous mistakes, the main mistake was their lack of knowledge of facts, dates, timeline and chronology.

Because they spent all their time copying, stealing and desecrating other peoples sacred sites, they misinterpreted numerous facts and figures.

Infact, much of the Abrahamic text was written on the move.

After they overwhelmed their enemies, they would sack a city of its riches and later move to steal all their sacred text and monuments.

Then, they would later force the local priest and or devotees to interprete their text. These text and concepts would later be incoporated into their biblography.

There are countless nations that the Roman armies actually wiped off the face of the Earth, purposefully meaning to leave no trace of their existence.

As each military campaign passed, the stories grew larger and lager. The Emperor became adicted to these story collecting that he launch wars based on the monetary and spiritual spoils of his foes.

Before long, the Emperor had himself the bible.

Most of these stories are copied from ancient philosophies and concepts from around the globe, with the authors creating their own characters and storylines, in some instances, the Romans didnt bother to change the names of the main chatacters of the stolen stories.
Some are simply fabricated or made up.

The Emperor later used these same compilation of text to firdt subdue rebellious factions and later to subdue his peasants so that they continued to pay their taxes.

Amujale:
There is no story from Abrahamic text that can claim to being original, if it wasn't stolen, plagerized then it was often fabricated.

Name one out of any of the famous stories peddled by the christian bible, and let me proof to you that they lack originality.

Amujale:
Nonsense, it's the bible that stole its stories from various African religious concepts. That's where it got the name bible from bibliography.



Precisely, the Christian bible and Quaran stole their text from older religious concepts from all accross the globe. The book of revelation is a direct copy from a more older African religious concept.

Amujale:
NO, it's the bible that copy, edit paste from various African religious concepts. That's where it got the name bible from bibliography.

Both the Christian bible and Quaran copied their text from older religious concepts from all accross the globe.

sammhi:
Not true
Some Christians joined voluntarily...some were enticef by money , jobs , position , power etc and is both ways

kheny12:
Hindus holy book vedas speaks about the coming of prophet Muhammad SAW.We worship God in different ways.

Kokoebapluse:
. I have no problem with you and your book. Am well guide by Allah. And am very happy to why belong to stray way.


Masallam

Kokoebapluse:
Sukesuke. I knew many Christians that have converted to Islam, I knew many Christians that have turn to athies, I red Bible but don't let me lie. Bible is not a book of God but book of man made.