Sinizia's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Sinizia's Profile › Sinizia's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 (of 340 pages)
Gayners fans are the most deluded rétards of all time. Living in self-denial thinking they are worth shít. Always claiming titles before matches are played. Imagine the title of their thread, Gayners REBORN. True, they are REBORN every season for more RÅPING by their superiors!! ![]() |
I love that Spy360 guy. His stupidity always gives you a chance to mock him after Gayners loses as always. ![]() |
Spy360:https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CXLuQKIW8AEZsnu.jpg |
*in Elfenomino1's froggy voice* Mayhem on the Gayners thread!! ![]() |
Gayners disgracing EPL since 12BC. Useless rétarded dumb club. 2-0 Messi. |
Why is that vulture called Wenger protesting with his wrinkled face? Useless Gayners!! |
Gayners, Barca's bytch!! ![]() |
Gayners have started playing rubbish in this second-half. Smh. |
0 - Barcelona failed to register a single shot on target in a
first half of #UCL game for the first time with Luis Enrique
as manager. Blur. |
FBS:We are banned from scoring against them. |
Emaprince:You are right, Welbeck or even Walcot would have stretched Barca defences than the lazy Giroud. |
FBS:Not Barca, Hull City. |
Chamberlin na bastàrd!! How did he miss that shít? |
raumdeuter:Yes, I agree with this. |
raumdeuter:Yes, to an extent or better still, in some cases. In the case of Mascherano, the biodata doesn't tell the real position he plays for Barca. But not in the case of Okazaki. Okazaki PLAYS as striker for Leceister. |
raumdeuter:Yes I see it and I'm not going to blame Barca for still calling him a midfielder even he though plays as a CB for Barca. It's so coz a player's natural position or the position he's played the most in his career is usually used to describe him. Eto'o is a striker and I'm sure he was still called a striker at Inter even though he was playing a winger's position. It's coz you can't use the short time spent at Inter as a winger to judge the long ass time he's spent in his career as a striker. Same goes for other players. Thierry was a striker, listed as a striker for Barca even though he played as winger for them. 2 or 3 seasons is never enough to dwarf the main position of Henry as a striker for over 6 seasons. It's same logic for Mascherano. We're talking about a player that has played the DM for River Plate, Corinthians, West Ham, Liverfools and was the position they bought him for, for Barca but couldn't displace Busquets and so therefore had to be accomodated at the CB due to Barca's defensive woes for the past few seasons. Even at that, he plays the DM for Argentina. So it's only right that Barca lists him as a midfielder but a knowledgeable football fan knows he plays as a CB for Barca even though he's a midfielder. Nihílist:Even in this post from Nihílist confirms he plays as a CB for Barca that's why he said the embolden meaning, he's a CB but when Barca PRESSES (as they always do), he's on practically the same line with Busi. Still on that same quote by Nihi, he's called a "Make-shift center-back" coz he's a MIDFIELDER (main and natural position) playing a CB for Barca ONLY. So Javier is midfielder who plays as CB for Barca. And Barca are right to list him as a midfielder. Same thing was done to Eto'o (at Inter) and Thierry (at Barca). |
raumdeuter:If you disagree with me, you might as well disagree with every other sites and football pundits in the world coz even Leceister City club and the screenshot you posted still regards Okazaki as a striker despite where he spent most of his time in a match. Same thing applies to Henry. While at Barca, he was a winger, it doesn't matter if he advanced to striking positions at any point in his time there, he'll forever be known that he played in the wing position while at Barca. Same thing for CR7. He's a winger, recognized all over the world as winger DESPITE the fact that he spends his time in the most advanced role of a CF. Where he ADAVANCES TO FROM HIS MAIN WING IN THE FORMATION doesn't matter. His position in the formation is what matters. If not why was Zidane praised for removing CR7 from the striking role Benitez used him sometimes this season to the wing role he's known for even though everyone knows that CR7 drifts into the striker position for majority of the game? If CR7 doesn't drift into the striking position, he won't score those huge amount of goals. And if he starts as striker, he is easily nullified and his threat quenched. So he's better off as a WINGER who advances in the opponent's 18-yard box to score tons of goals. It works perfectly for him that way. |
raumdeuter:Yes I agree with the first embolden words. But while Kanu is not playing the SS role anymore for such a match (or the mins the team were on the back-foot) maybe due to stronger opposition, it still doesn't change his position generally as a SS, which is where my stance is. And which I think is the stance of the writer behind your screenshot. Basically, the writer is trying to a say while the SS can drop in the midfield position for such matches, it still doesn't change his striking position. Which is why I think a place one starts in a formation MOST of the time is his main position irrespective of where he switches or drops due to certain conditions. |
airmark:LOL. Jokes apart, is there more to this football bants between y'all? Coz the kind of rough tackle una dey give unaselves dey fear me. It looks kinda personal to me. ![]() |
raumdeuter:But Okazaki does that job (occupying the 10 position especially when Leciester are defending) week in, week out, and yet he's recognized as striker. What seem to be the cause for that, then? Or don't you feel it's a testament to the fact that he's a discplined SS in a 4-4-2 formation who can help out in the midfield in one minute and on the next minute he's in box of his opponent to help out with a striking job. What I'll say is, in that 4-4-2 formation, even if he occupies the 10 position in the field, it still makes him a SS. |
raumdeuter:Okay, but don't you think even though "drop" is a variation of move, pictorial evidences dropped by others and even by you, showed that the football sites and analysts in that SAME match still saw Okazaki as a striker, meaning his position as a striker didn't change in that SAME match? It's different from SWITCHING to midfield and becoming a midfield in that SAME MATCH. Plus your argument which Airmark posted now showed you saying "Okazaki is not A striker for Leceister." Not even in that match. |
Dadehmola: airmark:https://33.media.tumblr.com/64e74ce53c8469e0d8897aebc5d9c088/tumblr_inline_o214ioUroj1rakibw_500.gif Busted!! ![]() |
raumdeuter:Ehen. So if Ozil ADVANCED to a striker position during some point in a match, does that mean his position is a STRIKING? Does it change the fact that he's NOT a striker despite ADVANCING to a STRIKER's position? You see why I said you can't wriggle your way out of this argument? |
raumdeuter:Egbami!! My God!! Raumdeuter, you must be Amalinze The Cat, that Achebe talked about. How can a left winger DROP (move backward) to a ANOTHER WING? Is the wing BEHIND him (where the word DROP would have been effectively used) or BESIDE him ( where the word SWITCH (as you even said) would be effectively be used? Haba, Dayokanu, you don pass all these diversionary moves abeg. Stop this argument. Players SWITCH to flanks (wing) not DROP into them. Haba!! ![]() |
raumdeuter:Well, in a 4-4-2 formation, they are two strikers. Vardy is the main striker, while Okazaki is the supporting striker. The tag of "striker" still hangs on him irrespective of him not being "the striker" in your argument. If the whole argument was whether Okazaki drops into the midfield, I don't even think anyone would argue it. From what I read (I didn't start from the root of the whole argument), it's Okazaki's POSITION that's the bone of contention not whether he drops into the midfield which I think everyone had agree to. If you say Eto'o didn't play as "the striker" in Inter Milan, to be frank with you, I will say Eto'o is naturally a striker but I'll add that he PLAYED PREDOMINANTLY in the wings at Inter Milan." It's like Mascherano, he PLAYS predominantly as a CB for Barca, but as a DM for his country and his past clubs. So while he PLAYS as a CB for Barca, his past will always make him to be GENERALLY recognized as a DM. |
raumdeuter:MOVES in this aspect is different from DROPPING into another position. And any good site will give an analysis like; "He started from the left wing before MOVING (not dropping) to the right wing". And it still wouldn't change the fact that he's a WINGER. |
raumdeuter:I'll just concentrate my rebuttal on the enumerated points in your post as they'll cover the rest of your post that I cut out. Now, I think what's confusing you, or better still, what you are using to hang on to that faint hope that you are right are the words - PLAYED and DROPS. The clues you are missing are right there in your posts. Number 1 and 2, you used the word "played" for Eto'o and Carrick examples. See, when a striker (or even a goalie or any other player) plays a particular position other than his normal position in any match, the player assumes that particular position for that match (or number of matches he played there). E.g Eto'o played predominantly as a winger at Inter but he's generally known as a striker. The number of matches or seasons he played as a winger didn't change his GENERAL natural position as a STRIKER. Same thing can be said for Carrick. Carrick is a midfielder, but on any match he played as a CB, you'll hear words like "the Manchester United MIDFIELDER played as a CB for United in so, so and so match." Now on Number 3, what you are missing is the meaning of the word DROP as you used it. Like you and every site plus other commenters had said, Okazaki DROPS into the midfield to support in defensive duties not Okazaki PLAYED in the midfield. When a players DROPS into another position in any time in a match, it doesn't change his position for that match, e.g Rooney constantly droping into the midfield while as being a striker. So Okazaki DROPPING into the midfield when they are being pressed or defending, doesn't change his position as a striker. As matter of fact, it's one of his duties as a SS in a 4-4-2 formation like Pataki and Airmark had shown you with numerous screenshots. Okazaki is preforming his duty as a SS by DROPPING into the midfield!! Very easy argument. If Carrick DROPS into the CB position if any of our CB surges forward in order to prevent a counter-attack, he's not a CB, he only DROPPED into the CB position not PLAYED there. What's confusing you is played and dropped. If you say you are right, that means the link you posted (which recognized Okazaki's dropping into the MF but still called him a FORWARD), every football link plus everyone is wrong and ONLY you is right. Na wa o. |
The 1-2 that led to the freekick dey scatter my dada. ![]() |
Mata man of the match. The nigga dey ball well tonight. Wow!! What a goal. |
Fúck you Schneiderlin!! If only you feigned pain, that rugby player would have been sent off!! |
Smalling scores. This goal is very weird. LOL. |
This Borthwick-jackson no sabi roll on the floor and get this rugby players sent off. Olodo oshi. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 (of 340 pages)


