Sinizia's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Sinizia's Profile › Sinizia's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 (of 340 pages)
Now i know why they call them Barkabots. Not all of them are brain-dead, Dmcdåd is an example of a Barca with sane reasoning, but for majority of them, their reasonings are nothing to write home about. Too many idiöts on this thread lately. |
phaamsaam:We'd do your bidding because your opinions counts? You're on a United thread with your other Barca minions discussing about Pep, EPL, Man City and United, something you hypocrite ignore when the Neymar troll, Dayo and Eruditör etc does as well, and you think your opinion counts coz your papa created us? Get the fùck outta here!! |
sebod:Last season, Chelsea fans were in more joyous mood than they're currently. Things went well for them and it reflected in their comments. Last season, Barca fans wailed more than they did this season. So it's no rocket science that if United were in City's position, it'd have been a jamboree. Which fans won't be happy that their club are doing fine? What are you trying to achieve with this? I don't know how and why fielding 6 players on the bench has become an offence really, when we have seen coaches not even utilising the 3 max subs in some occasions.Though I stand with Pep on this issue, it's not about a coach utilising his max subs or not, it's about following the standard long-existing practice of bringing the maximum subs. Gone are the days when Barca fans were criticised of being obsessed with Madrid by always discussing them on their thread. But today, one can hardly read a line here without seeing City this, Pep that. Not even chelsea that used to be the closest rivals anymore.You're just talking off point, or simply being mischievous. Even on your thread, you guys talk about Madrid and "Oponunaldo" even while doing well this season. Last season, you guys talked about Madrid. Both here and on Chelsea thread, Pep and City has been talked about before Pep came to EPL sef. Why won't we talk about City, are they untouchable or what? Are they not a football club in EPL? Stop talking like a toddler. Are you not on a United thread talking about another club? Why didn't you say this to that troll Neymar1095 that jumps upandan talking about Pep on every thread? Where were you when Eruditør was discussing anything about Pep from last season till now on other threads? Nigga, you're a hypocrite, and sad as it is for me to say this, I think this is a general disease amongst Barca fans. |
raumdeuter:Dayo, clubs do have other reserve teams like U21, U18, U19 etc. Remember Rashford wasn't even our 4th choice but lack of options forced us to use him. So, if Pep really wanted to add another player to that substitute bench, he'd have done if he's serious about it. Fashi all this talk. But I stand with Pep on this based on the ASSUMPTION that he's not broken any FA rules for going with 6 substitutes. Until it's been established that he broke FA rules, Pep is innocent. |
Roland17:OK, I understand your main POV as regards this issue with embolden. I did a little Google search, I didn't dig too deep, and I didn't find anywhere where Pep has been found guilty of this substitute matter in the past years. Based on my tiny search, I'm assuming it's his first time. So, if it is, then Pep should be cut some slack. He probably didn't see any big problem with it, or maybe his defence of going with 6 subs instead of 7 coz of the reserve team playing on Friday, was strong enough (I still believe if he's he'll-bent on adding the last player, he'd have added other young City reserve players easily as clubs do have other reserve teams based on age groups). I insist he shouldn't have received that kind of criticism for a first-time mistake. But what I'd want anybody that has time to do is to find out if Pep's using of just 6 substitutes broke any rule. If it didn't, then he deserve no criticism, and whatever criticism he'd face should come from City fans and employers; however, if he broke FA rules by going with 6 instead of 7, he'd be reminded about it and warned not to break such rules again. |
KevinDein:That's why y'all are okay with mediocrity. That's the difference between you and me. While I accept my club have fallen from its top position and are working hard to climb back up; y'all on the other hand will still tolerate mediocrity and unlike United, have fallen off top position since Mourinho arrived in England. Count the years. When Mourinho came to decimate the heagomony of power between our clubs, United rose up to the challenge to fight with Chelsea. When Man City had oil money and brought top players to further decimate the heagomony between United and Chelshit, United reinvented itself to still compete at the highest level. Fergie left and we're knocked off our perch, but unlike y'all, we are battling to not be mediocre like y'all. We've sacked some coaches to try to get back with the best out there, but y'all have remained stagnant for more than 13 years now. The gulf of determination to regain glory between us, is wider than the Pacific Ocean. |
kokaneprodigy:Cocain addict, shebi your eyes are suddenly paining you? Your Internet services doesn't allow say the truth abi? I'm sure your eyes were plucked away when Aubameyang scored an illegitimate goal yesterday, yes? Mctominay was nearly decapitated yesterday, the Huddersfield henchman got away with no card and United were denied a clear Pk. But you hid in your cave and pretended like none of these things happened. If it was United it favoured you'd have been here with your horde of ungrateful haters to scream "United PDP", the only English words you're fluent in typing. *in Diggz's voice* Thunder wee faya yhu well well any day you come here to recite that your dumb nursery rhymes. ![]()
|
Roland17, while I totally agree with you that if Mourinho had wore the yellow ribbon showing support to a state's independence, he MAY have been banned instead of escaping a fine like Guardiola did, I disagree with you on the number of substitutes controversy. Yesterday when I read about Gary's outburst concerning Pep's number of substitutes, what immediately came to my mind was, "what's he on about? Why is he making a mountain outta a molehill? Is it his business? How many times have Pep done such?" I don't see why there's so much noise made about this matter. Just coz of ONE substitute he didn't bring along? If he had brought him along he still wouldn't play him. To my best of knowledge, clubs are allowed just 3 substitutes in a match; so, Pep had enough substitute to see out that match. Pep drawing that match was not because of that move by him. So, what's the fuss about? Am I missing something here? If Pep usually does this, then Gary is right, but if he doesn't, then Gary should calm down and sip some tea. You're a pundit you attach meanings to everything. |
Oasis007:I've stopped replying him. My post this morning was a reply to the post of my United brethren. |
Lana1: joeace2020:
|
patrickmuf:I'll not reply him, trust me. |
neezar:Brother, this kind of numbing stupidity leaves me weak. I've never seen anything like it. The hypocrisy in watts will give every state, village and hamlet in Nigeria steady power for ever. This kind of foolishness will reduce the IQ of Einstein. So horrible is the stench of this hypocrisy that soakway pit workers refused to go near anywhere near it out of disgust. A Pep and Barca apologist going all sanctimonious on us? Who does he think he's debating here? Kids? Folks without Internet? What the actual fùck!? In 2013, Neymar passed a medical in Brazil with Madrid and even signed an agreement. Following Barcelona's involvement, Florentino Perez sent a member of the club's legal team, Javier Lopez Farre, who said that the deal was closed.http://www.marca.com/en/football/real-madrid/2018/01/12/5a588581e5fdea5b198b45b6.html But he could well have been lining up alongside Cristiano Ronaldo instead, only for Real Madrid to pull the plug on the transfer right at the end.http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/neymar-transfer-news-completed-real-madrid-medical-barcelona-move-florentino-perez-a7798881.html After Barca went behind to offer more incentives to Neymar, including mind-boggling fraud money, conniving with Neymar to dupe Santos in a deal that shocked the ENTIRE WORLD, that nigga had the temerity to come on this thread to utter bollocks? Like we're born today? Nigga, fùck you and fùck your opinions. Stay butthurt forever while your idol, Pep moves on with his life knowing this shît is regular football occurance. Now I know why Ibîme refused giving him audience anymore. I'll do same henceforth. I'll have to reach out to English scholars and Oxford dictionary editors to strike off the word HYPOCRISY and replace it with his name. My God!! |
patrickmuf:I've never seen a slave to another human like that guy. I never knew supporting or liking another human will lead to hypocrisy on a whole new inexplicable level, till I read the posts of that guy. It's shocking. How can one drop common sense about football knowledge coz of a fellow human? I pray Pep is paying him for this kind of disgraceful thinking and defense, If not, then it's a damn shame. Maybe, I'd become a total idiot just to win a dumb argument by insinuating it's because Roma wanted to sign Mahrez that made Man City willing to shell out 60m which they deemed is his true worth, to buy him. Maybe because Madrid, Arsenal and PSG were interested in Mbappe that's why Man City would have spent over 100m to bring Mbappe if he had chosen City. The same dumb analogy can be said about City who knew about Barca and Madrid interest in Jesus and still went for him. The same dumb analogy can be said about City who knew about Bayern and PSG interest in Sanchez and yet were ready to move mountains to get him. Same as Robinho, Berbatov (City tried to hijack a deal that Fergie had been been fighting all summer to seal) and the rest. It shows how backward, worshipping a human can lead to that once a club is interested in any player, every other clubs should back off because his idol, Pep is the alpha & omega of football. Every knee must bow down in obeisance whenever he indicates interest in any player. Pep can go for players other clubs are interested in, but if Pep is interested in a player, any club that gets him is fighting a god and very desperate. If there's one thing I've learned in this whole IQ-reducing debate from him, it's that hypocrisy leads to incurable amnesia. If not tell me why a Barca fan whose club's desperation and hijacking of deal led to one of the most disgusting and shocking football malpractice of all time. He won't remember of the Neymar deal because of his hypocrisy. Neymar deal was hijacked by Barca, who knew Neymar had already had medical with Madrid as a 14-year-old. Neymar even PASSED a Madrid medical prior to signing for Barca, but Barca went behind to pump more money to Neymar and his father to hijack a deal Madrid was interested in from the beginning. The greatest desperation and hijacking of all time. A deal so shady, nobody truly knows how much Neymar was paid except for the dumb figures they churned out to deceive the gullibles. A deal so shrouded in betrayal, secrecy with every element of fraud oozing from it, that Barcelona were taken to court, their president then shamefully dismissed/resigned and Santos wailed bitterly at how despicable Barca went about the whole deal to deny them of their fair cut in the transfer. Yet, a Barcelona fan with a full grown iroko tree in his eyes will try to remove a branch from mine. Sanchez earns 500k a week, a figure nobody is sure of, a figure that other sites have reported as 350k a week, a figure that includes both image rights and other clauses, but ask him to bring out that of KDB's, he'll give you the basic 290k a week KDB earns while hypocritically leaving out the rest for his devilish reasons. Ask him how the sites were right in their assessment of Sanchez's salary to 600k a week, he'll start telling you about "dindinrin reasoning" and calculating mathematics nobody sent him to do, while still not being able to tell you how much KDB earns as image right, his signing-on fees, that of his agent, and other juicy bonuses/clauses in his contract. This is a butthurt Pep stan who can't stomach the painment of losing Sanchez that he's clearly ignored the fact that Messi earned an unbelievable £80m just to sign a contract which is not included in basic salary or image rights or other bonuses. A deal if the total value over the duration of his contract is calculated well, will bring down Seun's servers. Yet he'll have the gall to come on here and spew his usual hypocritical claptrap. A Barca fan lecturing us on desperation after committing the worst crime in football during Neymar deal? I've seen it all.
|
patrickmuf:Gbam!! If Pogba can just forget about pushing forward to attack all the time in a 4231 formation, and allow Martial, Lingard, Sanchez and Ukaku to chase down opposition players while him and Matic pick up the pieces snuff out impending danger, 4231 will serve us best. Like a football columnist pointed out, against Tottenham he's stuck on deciding if he's to attack or defend thereby leaving us exposed. He needs to apply the brakes on his attacking zeal against top teams when we're being dominated. Mctominay did today exactly what Pogba needs to be doing. Against small teams, he can dominate and join in attack but against top teams, he needs to help out his partner Matic. This way we won't be spending big on another midfielder to partner Matic coz if Pogba is moved to the AM position, it means Martial would be benched and I hate that. But we still need one or two midfielders to replace Carrick and Fellaini, though. |
Leyqute:Blame the ref. He was never quick to flash the card at Huddersfield players who were out to hack us down. If na Pep na, he'd have been complaining about referees protecting players, I think he's right sha. |
patrickmuf:Well, the best tactic is to find the right balance. Push attack but run back like Sanchez or Lingard to win balls back. But if keep cultivating the attitude of just defending against top teams, we've no chance of winning most of the time. |
patrickmuf:Mourinho should try the 442 Funlörd suggested. Martial or Rashford on LW, Lingard or Mata on RW, Pogba pushed forward while Matic mops up from DM. If we can press as hard as City, we don't have to lose possession and get caught on the counter. Pogba needs to work hard like KDB as well for this formation to work. But if Mourinho wants to continue like this, then Martial has to be benched or learn the RW role coz Sanchez is best from the LW from where he roves. |
afrodoc2:This was why Guardiola went all out to buy Mendy and Walker at all cost coz in this modern times, full-backs attack relentlessly to pin oppositions back and help create outlets for the CF to score |
ctuagent007:Apart from few players like Carzola and Azplicueta who can cross with both legs, few players who are right-footed can cross with their left leg. That's why it's good to have a left-footed LB to play behind Sanchez for the crosses while he tries to stretch opponents and cause havoc for us. This was why I complained bitterly about us playing a right footed Young or Darmian as our LB coz they can't cross one-time football when they are given a through ball. So Sanchez not crossing immediately wouldn't have been out of order. Mata wouldn't have crossed that ball immediately he's on the right wing. No surprises there. Sanchez is giving us exactly what he's supposed to give us, though there's room for improvement. Sanchez is a terrific player. His work rate and energy are off the charts. |
ChristineC:The guy's hypocrisy numbs me. This was the same fella dishing facts against us out of his hurt over Sanchez's deal, and when asked to back it up, he said it's based "on deductive reasoning". I'm going to try to stop quoting his posts because I'm tired of his hypocrisy. |
Eruditor:The main reason I hate engaging in debates with you is that when it comes to Pep, your hypocrisy is so nauseating - not even because of your long epistles. You're ever ready to defend anything about Pep that you don't even know even know when you are shooting yourself on the foot. In the first paragraph you're mocking United for not being like City and other clubs and walking away from deals deemed too expensive, in the second paragraph, your amnesia kicked in because within few seconds you also listed a case of Perisic where we walked away. This is what hypocrisy causes. Other clubs walks away, you say? After Chelsea had almost signed Robinho, which club swooped in at the last minute, offer Robinho more riches and snatched him from Chelsea? I guess that club is Shooting Stars of Ibadan. Your hypocrisy stinks!! After United had already signed Mikel, didn't Chelshit swooped in and snatched him right under our nose with more money? Why didn't they walk away? Did you see us United fans still wailing about it? But due to Pep is involved, suddenly other clubs save United walks away from a deal. Your hypocrisy stinks!! From the beginning of time, clubs have always been hijacking deal by offering more incentives to a player. It's not a bad thing. Even your beloved Barca have done it in the past, but because United are involved, suddenly OTHER clubs walks away not us. Did Chelsea walk away even after it's clear that Tottenham had already agreed deal with Willian? You're here trying to make a normal occurance that's been happening since time immemorial to look bad because we got Sanchez. Your hypocrisy stinks!! Your post is just a skyscraper of hypocrisy. Man City have been chasing Messi for years, with rumors even saying they offered him a blank cheque. Even when it's clear that Barca have made it clear that they're not selling their prized possession, but yet your saintly City didn't walked away. It boils down to who wants it more and who's ready to pay to get a player which is not a bad thing as most clubs do it depending on their financial strength. When PSG snatched Dani Alves from City even though he'd already agreed to join City, I didn't see your wailing calling them out for being desperate enough to offer Dani Alvez more money to take him from City. Even Loserfool had to hasten up to sign Van Dijk and flew their medical personnels down to Bournemouth Airport to conduct medicals on VVD before Man City snatched him from them. I repeat, your hypocrisy stinks!! Last season, Bayern Munich and PSG were not "desperate" enough to land Sanchez because Bayern didn't have the money for the wages he's asking of, while PSG refused chasing the deal because they already had Neymar and was on the brink of getting Mbappe. Sanchez was no longer a priority target. Look bro, the difference between City and United in this Sanchez's saga was that in the summer City were fùcking desperate to get him and United weren't, this time around United were now the desperate ones and City weren't. What changed? Last season City finished trophyless. Pep was in a "desperate" mood to overhaul his squad, so he's willing to meet the huge amount clubs were asking for his targets, even when many people were complaining he didn't care. City were so desperate that they're ready to pay a whooping £70m for the services of Sanchez but Mourinho no send Sanchez then. We used to complain back then that Mourinho should be rivaling Pep for Sanchez's signature and that United were dulling in letting City being the only competitor for his signature. . Note that this hypocrisy you're projecting now is seriously irritating because City would've spent more than United in the total cost of signing Sanchez if they had landed him last year because: 1. Man City would've forked out £70m Assanal valuation of him. 2. City would've paid agent fees. 3. City would've paid Sanchez's signing-on fees. 4. City would've paid Sanchez a weekly fee of 300-350k, especially with how desperate other clubs wanted him after a fantastic season. 5. City would've also negotiated and paid Sanchez other bonuses that comes with contract signing including the image rights. When you add the above expenses to the fact that it'd be paid over a 4 years contract, if United are spending the purported £170m through out his contract, City would've paid within or even above the range of £200-300m for 4 years contract. Facts!! None of us have the real figures in his contract, but if consider we're getting him for free via a swap, and the fact that we just increased signing-on and agent fees and offered a bit more image right fees, then City would have still out-spent us if they had landed Sanchez on 4 years deal. That £70m alone for a player with a year contract remaining shows the zenith of desperation. Don't come here yapping about United being the only desperate club. Now as I was typing, when City couldn't land him, they went ahead without him and started having an absolutely fantastic season. Not even Pep had seen it coming. Now, they no longer needed Sanchez that much. Sane is on fire. City are obliterating oppositions like it's nothing. The rumors were that City will come back at the end of the season to take him away, but then Jesus got injured, and City wanted to bolster their squad so they went back in January and heard that United had offered Sanchez more money in signing-on fees, agent fees and image rights. City knowing they don't need Sanchez that much, backed away. This is just the fùcking truth. If City was in United's position, they would've done all it took to get him. This excuse of Pep is balderdash if City could afford to spend more than 200m on Sanchez over a 4 years contract last season. It's balderdash if City have been chasing Messi for years who would cost up to 300m (before his new contract) with shocking wages. It's balderdash coz City were in the race of Mbappe who would've cost them not less than 120m not even including the agent fees, weekly wages et al. So, yes, United were the ones in desperate need of him now so they offered more. Last season City were in desperate need of him and offered more than Bayern and PSG. City wanted Laporte, even though he broke Pep's heart by going back on his agreement with him to sign a new contract, Pep who the dumb columnists reported never forgives or goes back to his targets that betrays him, still went back out of his desperation to solve his defensive issues and broke the club's record to sign him. If City were as desperate as they were last season when they had a bad season, they'd pay the same amount for Sanchez!! |
Ibime:80 Whaaaaaaaat?!! 80m on top the 500k+ contract and other juicy bonus? Are you serious? And these people are hyperventilating over 10m signing-on bonus of Sanchez? ![]() |
Eruditor:No offence intended, but the emboldened is an avalanche of bullshît. Better still, it's aptly described as apples and oranges. Makes no goddamn sense. 1. Watford have never spent the kind of huge money the likes of Shitty, United, Chelshit, Barcelona and other top clubs have spent in this modern transfer window in their entire history. Apples and oranges. 2. Watford are ambitious, but there own ambitions is survival in the EPL and having a good run generally in cup competitions or league. Any other achievements like winning the FA Cup, Caraboa Cup or qualifying for European competition is a bonus and a lucky achievement for them, so sacking managers is means of survival not to win major trophies. But when top clubs sack mangers, it's usually for them not making the UCL or winning trophies. Apples and oranges. 3. When Man Shitty sacked Pellegrini, they got Pep. Who did Watford get? When Man Shitty hired Pep, they did with the future dream of winning UCL, league titles and having the success Pep brought to Bayern, Barca. Which success or targets will Watford demand from the average coach that replaced Silva? Apples and oranges. 4. Watford after sacking the coach before Silva was appointed, how much did they spend, and what are the quality of players they bought? When Man City appointed Mancini, below is what a website had to write about their ambitions, and onslaught in the transfer window. Check out the players they got and how much they spent. From the beginning, they identified that to have a winning team, capable of competing with United and the best clubs in Europe, given Uefa and the Premier League's squad limit of 25, they wanted two world-class players in each position.Man City's spending and the players they bought showed the higher ambitions of that club; Man City sack managers to aim higher, Watford sack theirs to escape relegation. Once again, apples and oranges. 5. Finally, the most funny one - You've the chutzpah to list Tevez, Mascherano and Lavezzi in your argument. First of all, the Chinese league just like the American league snap up mostly expired or waning TOP players who's past their prime (the young ones are usually average players or poor low tier ones) because theirs are still a growing league and need the influx of popular players to put their league on the map. They're not yet established. When LA Galaxy signed Beckham, they knew he's finished, or at least they signed him coz of his A-list status. He was signed to bring American league to the limelight. Beckham spent his prime at United and Madrid. It's same for Xavi and his Qatar quest. So if I find it funny that you're mentioning mercenaries and expired products like Mascherano, Lavezzi and Tevez who have their best years behind them. Who next will you mention? The Oscars, Anichebes and Ighalos of this world? Chinese clubs owners are showing ambition like their American counterparts by bringing in this popular stars to help grow their league, while these expired stars are going their for the money. So yes, The Chinese club owners are showing ambitions, that's why they criticised Tevez for scamming them when they were dreaming of having a determined Tevez of yesteryears. Neymar moved from Barca to PSG but his dream of competing at the highest stage, playing in Europe's top competition and at the highest level were never in doubt. If he'd done the same with the Chinese league, everybody would've concluded it is for the money because Chinese league is a lowly rated league which top players in demand doesn't give a fùck about. If Lavezzi, Tevez and co moves to City, their ambitions are not questioned coz City is a top club in England and Europe top 5 league, but when they move to China, everybody knows the truth that's its about the money. The difference is clear. |
Eruditor:It's not a must and there's no rule that state all club must follow a certain pattern of payment. You don't know how clubs decides to negotiate their contracts. Some can do it on weekly basis, some might not. The loyalty bonus of Neymar is different from other clauses/bonuses in his contract. Neymar's image right, match bonus were different from his loyalty bonus for signing a new contract. Don't lump them together to win this argument. |
Football365 exposing the bias reporting of Sanchez's wages. http://www.football365.com/news/mediawatch-man-united-why-is-mourinho-not-grinning-like-an-idiot
|
hardeycute:If? But it hasn't been triggered. Please let Dayo hear this sermon from you coz he's the one that quoted a figure that United haven't paid yet. |
raumdeuter:Your dream website TheSun reporting Sanchez about to earn 350k a week. Read continously till you get tired: https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/5350541/alexis-sanchez-man-utd-transfer-henrikh-mkhitaryan-arsenal/ |
eph12:It shows the hypocrisy and glaring bias against us. KDB signed a new contract only his basic salary was reported. But Sanchez signs for United, his dogs' upkeeping wages are included. |
raumdeuter:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3671558/Zlatan-Ibrahimovic-breaks-Manchester-United-power-records-medical-completion-free-transfer-PSG.html 200k a week |
raumdeuter:
|
Dayo, according to you the link below was written in November 2017 and shows that its the current earning of Zlatan. So why are you asking me for another link? See wetin excess shekpe dey cause. You no dey see well again. Elrony, please help Raumdeuter with a serious deliverance session. He seems lost. http://sportsmaza.com/football/manchester-united-players-salary/ ![]() |
raumdeuter:Story for the Amalanomics. Refute my dailymail link of Zlatan earning 200k. I'm sure you must scavenged through the pages and not finding any wrong English or date, started bringing up this irrelevant yarn. Swallow your L, don't be shy.
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 (of 340 pages)

