₦airaland Forum

mariovito:
https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2025/17-january/news/world/churches-destroyed-in-california-wildfires

Botragelad:
What evidence? 🤷🏼

Botragelad:
I'm not! 🤷🏼

Botragelad:
Why are you cherry-picking data to fit your narrative?. Just because the church survived the fire doesn't mean it's a miracle. It's likely due to its construction materials/design.

If we apply Occam's Razor, the simplest explanation is that the church was built with fire-resistant materials, whereas the surrounding homes were not. That's not a divine intervention, is it? Just basic physics and architecture.

Again, if god were indeed responsible for sparing the church, why did he not prevent the fire from occurring in the first place? Or, at the very least, why did he not protect the surrounding homes and businesses?

Can you provide any evidence to support the claim that the church's survival was a divine miracle, rather than a result of its physical properties?

Botragelad:
Likewise, I'm not physical. What's your point?

Now can you disprove the "fact" that I stopped the fire from affecting the church?

Righteousness2:
Save yourself the stress!
I only reply Post that i think are relevant to reply.

Botragelad:
Weak and illogical argument.
Are you suggesting that god, in all his omnipotence, decided to spare this church from the wildfires, while allowing everything around it to burn to ashes? And this, somehow, is evidence of an existence? 🤷🏼

Look closely, the church was likely built with fire-resistant materials, possibly cement or brick, whereas the surrounding homes were probably made of wood. It's basic physics, really. United States of friggin America,buddy!

Now, if god is all-powerful, why didn't he simply prevent the wildfires from occurring in the first place? Why allow innocent people to lose their homes and livelihoods? Is that really the kind of "divine message" you think humanity needs?

By the way, Psalm 14:1 is a very weak attempt to shame atheists. It's called "appeal to faith" fallacy. Lol
Now, if you do not mind me asking: do you really believe that god's decision to spare a single church building, while allowing widespread destruction elsewhere, is evidence of his existence? Or is this just a convenient example of "God's providence" that you're using to prop up your faith?

Botragelad:
Did god put it on the news? 🤷🏼

Botragelad:
Can you disprove the "fact" that I stopped the fire from affecting the church?

Righteousness2:
Oga rest in the Name of JESUS CHRIST OF NAZERETH!
There is no maybe or may whatever.

That is simply your CREATOR and my CREATOR, THE ALMIGHTY GOD passing a clear Message.

Botragelad:
Believe what? 🤷🏼

Botragelad:
Weak and illogical argument.
Are you suggesting that god, in all his omnipotence, decided to spare this church from the wildfires, while allowing everything around it to burn to ashes? And this, somehow, is evidence of an existence? 🤷🏼

Look closely, the church was likely built with fire-resistant materials, possibly cement or brick, whereas the surrounding homes were probably made of wood. It's basic physics, really. United States of friggin America,buddy!

Now, if god is all-powerful, why didn't he simply prevent the wildfires from occurring in the first place? Why allow innocent people to lose their homes and livelihoods? Is that really the kind of "divine message" you think humanity needs?

By the way, Psalm 14:1 is a very weak attempt to shame atheists. It's called "appeal to faith" fallacy. Lol
Now, if you do not mind me asking: do you really believe that god's decision to spare a single church building, while allowing widespread destruction elsewhere, is evidence of his existence? Or is this just a convenient example of "God's providence" that you're using to prop up your faith?

Mynd44:
Or maybe just maybe it is the only building that was built with concrete blocks instead of cardboards like the rest

Angelfrost:
Yep... Soon, there will more single people cohabiting than legally married people.

Angelfrost:
Divorce is a normal thing everywhere, even your hypocritically religious country, Nigeria.

dominique:
I'm totally against name calling of an elderly person but 100 days of fasting Ke? Are the members the ones responsible for Nigeria's collective problems?

Softmirror:
Exactly the point I am making. The bolded is called different strokes for different folks lol. All nah concept. 😂

There are a good number of pastors today who tell stories about how they use to be criminals.