₦airaland Forum

diggz

Eden Hazard believes Chelsea's problems this season are partly due to the team having to spread their energies over several competitions, with the Champions League particularly taking its toll on the Blues

Hazard citing extra games as a reason for Conte's side finding life harder this term. "I think the Premier League is difficult," the player told ESPN FC. "It's hard to win every year. Last year we didn't have the Champions League. This year we have less time to be ready for the games. Every week there are three game

https://en.as.com/en/2018/02/08/football/1518129812_678329.html

This adodi gogo dancer don come again

How old was Mbappe when he was giving it to Man City defence last season

Oh I remember you were still in jail and didn't watch the match

My wish for this season Aguero to Chelsea

LordReed:
You are funny. You think that any reason they give justifies the deaths? LoL

Attacking America on 9-11 justifies anything that happens to those harboring the terrorists like Afghanistan

Are you saying Clinton had no justification for intervention in Bosnia and Obama had no justification for Syria? Basicallythe last 2 democratic presidents had no justifications

LordReed:
I have and will continue to fault American interventionist policies whether it be under Obama or Bush or Trump or Democrat or Republican. America and the rest of the West including Russia have constantly created a World were war is inevitable. If this world is ever going to survive self inflicted nuclear annihilation things need to change.

Bush had a reason. America was attacked under him, which was what pushed him into war. Before 9-11 Bush was not involved with any intervention. Key question is What did Libyans and Syrians do to Obama?

Let me ask when Milosevic was killing ethnic Albanians or when Iraq invaded Kuwait should America have ignored? When all these crimes are going on and people call on America what should they do? Ignore and let these dictators kill as many as they want of their people

lalaboi:
For those who would like to put their money where their mouth is. . . Season 3 of the Ultimate Stake Premier is here

Top 4 shared a pot of N190,000 last season. (19 participants).

Bigger things this year and we are targeting 40-50 entries.

So if you are interested, kindly drop your email address to be added to the thread for more information.


Tag: Nihilist, raumdeuter, Sleekdot, An0nimous, MaziOmenuko, Sleekdot, Griffon, A40,

Ina njo ogiri o sa. Fire dey burn wall no run

wraumdeuer@gmail.com

LordReed:
If you can point one post where I personally briefed about George W. Bush's foreign policy, I'll be glad to apologize. But you won't because I am not unaware of American history, you can't find me making such statements. I hold myself responsible for my opinions and statements but I will not take responsibility for those of others. When discussing with me please focus on my statements and not on what others have said.

For the purpose of equality and to avoid the typical liberal hypocrisy We will await you to chastise and criticize in clear words the policies of Obama in Syria and Libya.

America was attacked under Bush, What was Obamas excuse

oyb:
maybe because obama did not go running in like a go it alone cowboy.
and please spare us the batshit crazy republican idiocy.
obama avoided syria like the plague [after the libya fallout], and of course you republicans gave him hell for it

This is hilarious. Obama armed the rebels in Syria, He did the same in Libya. How come you are not counting the number of dead people as a result

WHat has happened to the economy and lives of people in Syria and Libya now?

Mr Obama is arguing that he reluctantly went along with those who said it was the way to combat the Islamic State, but that he never wanted to do it and has now has been vindicated in his original judgment.”

This bizarre “I was peer pressured into sending more weapons into the Middle East” argument by the president is possibly the most blatant example of blame shifting in recent memory, since he had every opportunity to speak out against it, or veto the bill. Instead, this is what Obama said at the time: “I am pleased that Congress...have now voted to support a key element of our strategy: our plan to train and equip the opposition in Syria.”

But besides the fact that he clearly did support the policy at the time, it’s ridiculous for another reason: years before Congress approved the $500m program to arm the Syrian rebels, the CIA had been running its own separate Syrian rebel-arming program since at least 2012. It was reported prominently by the New York Times at the time and approved by the president.

Mr Obama: I was peer pressured into doing it, LMAO. Liberals and blame shifting


America was attacked under Bush, that was his excuse for going to Iraq and Afghanista, What was Obamas excuse to intervene in Libya, Egypt and Syria?? Oh I get the excuse was Republicans made me do it. LMAO

LordReed:
I am sure you one of these conspiracy theorists who believe Obama and the Clintons belong to some World dominating order that's why they can't be persecuted. For the record I think that position is totally bogus, an attempt to transfer the burden of proving true wrong to some shadowy figures, a more sophisticated version of "it's the devil's hand work!". If Obama did something that was worth persecuting a Republican majority Congress would have leapt to action without an iota hesitation same way Clinton was impeached. So I think that argument should be laid to rest, it has no merit whatsoever.

The relevance of bringing up US foreign policy under Obama is also another bogus position because then you'll have to take all of US history into cognisance. So while you want to hang Obama for those policies I think you should also hang every other President before and after him because as far as I can see nothing has changed. Drones have increased, an ineffective missile strike was authorized, etc. This US policy, it almost has nothing to do with the President but everything to do with US interests and maintaining their hegemony. Don't kid yourself into thinking this presidency is any different.

It points to the hypocrisy of the Democrats. Read this thread and point out those yammering about Bush policy against Afghanistan and Iraq. You will see that they were democrats when we now bring Syria, Libya Egypt what did we hear crickets and excuses like the one you are giving now that its over 100yrs of American policy.

Quick question: Why didnt you proffer this excuse of 100yrs when it was George W Bush? But suddenly remembered that 100yrs excuse when it came to Obama?

Bush had the excuse that America was attacked that was why he attacked Afghanistan and Iraq. Please tell us what was Obamas excuse for the war in Libya, Syria etc?

All the liberal warriors like oyb and midfulness that were so offended by the Arab lives lost during Bush era, suddenly lost their voice when we reminded them of the Syria and Libya.

Is it because Syrian and Libyan lives hold less value than Afghan and Iraqi lives?

Tvegas:
This is why EPL teams may not win UCL in a long time. The unproductive competition is sickening. Dortmund freely sells players to Bayern, Madrid just bought Ceballos from Real Betis. But EPL teams will rather starve English top clubs who can win UCL of their best players . No wonder Mou complained about a difficult transfer market.

Everton sold lukaku to you, Spurs just sold Walker to City

omotayos01:
Of course I expect James and robben to start ahead of ribery and Coman. However this depend on the team we are playing. Base on today information, Carlo can as well play robben, ribery/coman while tolisso and Muller sit on the bench to accommodate Vidal and James.

What your opinion about tolliso performance today? The guy does not impress me today. I hope he comes around in subsequent match.

Coman lack balance sometime. I thought the counter will result in a goal since it since it 3 to 1. Instead of making the pass, the nigga opted to dribble thereby killing the counter. The nigga still need alot to learn, everything is not about dribbling and running

Comans main strenght is his speed, he doesnt look up enough and a lot of his crosses are poor quality ones, I think he would be behind Robben James, Muller, Ribery in that order having him as a 5th choice wonger wont hurt us

Tolliso seems like a Vidal lite. Seems like a guy who wants to run and play all action football. I am waiting to see how Carlo want to fit him into his formation, Rudy will always be an option too

airmark:
Your statement : ''before guardiola came, how was xavi doing?'' Was answered with xavi being the best player of euros 2008. A bad player wouldnt win that. Thats why ibime asked you to stop lying about pep being responsible for xavi's quality. Apari receive sense from above.

WHats anyones business with how he was doing in SPain or Euro 2008?How was he doing in Barcelona when the coach complained about him and wanted to sell him

You are too retardeed anyway

airmark:
You are displaying sheer stvpidity. That a coach deemed him not good for his tactics didn't take away his quality. The point here is, Xavi had been a good player before fraudiola came. He was the best player in euros 2008. Let that sink in to your bald head. That he thrived more in pep's system took nothing away from xavi. A good player becomes better with time in a good, suiting system, so dont tell us nonsense here.

You are extremely daft anyway so its not a surprise. Below is my first post. Anything you have to contradict on this

sleekdot:
Before Guardiola came to Barcelona how was Xavi doing? Xavi was actually on his way out because the previous coach told him he was too small to play football

Xavi has told us the previous coach didnt want him and he was on his way out but a school dropout like you will take 3hrs to understand what primary 2 pupils understand in 1min

airmark:
So if ake in future says that '' i was deemed not fit for chelsea in 2017''. Are you saying ake agrees with that notion? Your head is not scraped internally, you can still use it. You are losing it apari.

What kind of foolishness is this? Does the player need to agree? Mourinho deemed Mata not good enough, Does Mata need to agree with that notion or which brand of foolishness has fallen upon you in the past 10yrs?

Barca coach considered Xavi not good enough and wanted to sell him. Until Pep signed and made him the corner of the team

airmark:
Dayo stop disgracing yourself. I dont need to go to corona to call a college boy to explain that statement for you. A brilliant feyingbole grammar school will do that for you.

Your school dropout mind cant understand what deemed means. What are you looking for on the internet instead of buying form for NECO GCE

omotayos01:
I hope so

I saw that but they might struggle against big team with the formation and hoffeinheim did not come to the party today at all

Coman is just and average winger with the mentality of run,dribble and pass. Sometime he does not even look up before making a pass. This is not the type of winger Bayern should be parading as well. We need a winger with eyes for goal.

Looking forward to how Carlo is going to play James in the second match.

In a big game barring injuries I will expect Robben to start in place of Coman and James in places of Ribery. Muller, Tolliso or Thiago will have to drop for Vidal depending on whether we are attacking, defending or playing possesion

There was one move towards the end where Coman broke away on a counter, I expected a one time pass towards Lewy but he stopped and pulled back,

omotayos01:
Who is following the Telekom cup match here?

This tolisso guy look shaky o. Perhaps it first match fever.

Interesting game so far. Waiting for the final and please the mgt should find a way to dispose ribery next season. The guy don pass am. He is not the type Bayern should be parading when competing for the UCL

I saw part of the match. This should e Ribery last season and I think its just a courtesy to him. He should stay more on the wings

Muller and Lewy playing upfront with Lewy drifting wide atimes

A lot of players are not available, Coman has been burning up the wings

Pre season friendly just concluded, Bayern 1 Hoffenheim 0

airmark:
Your apari head would not see the red flag there.

deemed means regarded or considered

So if deemed is the word confusing you

It meant

Four or five years ago, I was regarded/considered terrible and useless. I was Barca's cancer! A player 1,70m tall was simply impossible."

airmark:
This is the problem :

You must have many problems if that is your problem

Xavi said this himself

"Four or five years ago, I was [deemed] terrible and useless. I was Barca's cancer! A player 1,70m tall was simply impossible."

Meaning before Barcelona he was deemed terrible and useless because he wasnt big enough. If you still have further problems then take it up with Xavi

Ibime:
I have no problem except your attempt to paint Guardiola as the making of Xavi.

Barcelona can never attempt to sell Euro 2008 Player of the Tournament even if mugu Rijkaard had wanted to sell him before.

The lies you are spinning here are akin to a new manager joining Man City, using Aguero to win league and then claiming he made Aguero just because Guardiola wanted to get rid of him last season. Some dickryder will then come and tell us that manager made Aguero and point to Guardiola trying to get rid of him as proof.

This is similar to your lies that Spain used Guardiolas tikitaka format to become successful when Aragones had already implemented tikitaka to win Euro 2008 before Guardiola became manager.

Stop telling lies and riding Pep dïck.

How do you know Barcelona cant sell him, when the player involved said they were and he was already in talks with other teams

So who should we believe the player in question or just another hater speaking through the mouth of ibime